Role of vessel size as a predictor for the occurrence of in-stent restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus

Fasting blood glucose predicts high risk of in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort study

Objectives. Studies have shown that fasting blood glucose (FBG) is closely associated with poor prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but its association with in-stent restenosis (ISR) is still unclear. Therefore, this study was to explore the association between FBG with ISR in patients with CHD after PCI. Design. In this cohort study, we included 531 patients with CHD who underwent PCI. Logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), subgroup analysis and restricted cubic spline (RCS) were used to assess the association between FBG with ISR. Results. A total of 124 (23.4%) patients had ISR. Patients with higher levels of FBG had higher incidence of ISR compared to those with lower levels of FBG (p = 0.002). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, higher levels of FBG remained strongly associated with higher risk of ISR (as a categorical variable, OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.21-2.94, p = 0.005; as a continuous variable, OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.23, p = 0.011). ROC analysis also showed that FBG might be associated with the occurrence of ISR (AUC = 0.577, 95% CI: 0.52-0.64, p = 0.013). Subgroup analyses showed the association of FBG with ISR was also stable in several subgroups (< 60 years or ≥ 60 years, male, with or without smoking, without diabetes and without hypertension). And RCS analysis showed that FBG was linearly and positively associated with the risk of ISR. Conclusions. Higher levels of FBG were closely associated with higher risk of ISR in patients with CHD after PCI.

Clinical implication of ticagrelor monotherapy in patients with small vessel coronary artery disease: results from the TICO randomized trial

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy in patients with small vessel disease compared with ticagrelor-based DAPT within the Ticagrelor Monotherapy after 3 Months in the Patients Treated with New Generation Sirolimus Eluting Stent for Acute Coronary Syndrome (TICO) trial population.

Methods

Reference vessel diameter ≤2.5 mm was considered as small vessel disease. We conducted a comparison of the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding. TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization.

Results

652 patients among 3,056 TICO population (21.3%) had small vessel disease. Patients with small vessel disease showed a higher rate of TLF compared to those without small vessel disease (2.9% vs. 1.0%, log-rank p < 0.001). The presence of small vessel disease emerged as an independent predictor for 1-year TLF (HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.54-5.25), while it did not show a significant association with bleeding complications. The 12-month TLF rate was 1.6% for ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT, and 4.2% for ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT (p = 0.059) in patients with small vessel disease (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.14-1.04, p for interaction = 0.261). The incidence of BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding rate 2.5% for ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT, and 5.6% for ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT (p = 0.052) in patients with small vessel disease (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.19-1.01, p for interaction = 0.322). In the 3-month landmark analysis, ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding in patients with small vessel disease (HR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.69, log-rank p = 0.005) while demonstrating a similar incidence of TLF compared to ticagrelor based 12-month DAPT during the 3-12 months period.

Conclusions

There are no significant interactions between the antiplatelet strategy regarding the 12-month incidence of ischemic and bleeding complications. Ticagrelor monotherapy demonstrated a reduction in bleeding complications after a 3-month period of DAPT without increasing the rate of TLF, when compared to ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT, specifically in patients with small vessel disease. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier, NCT02494895.

Diabetes and restenosis

Restenosis, defined as the re-narrowing of an arterial lumen after revascularization, represents an increasingly important issue in clinical practice. Indeed, as the number of stent placements has risen to an estimate that exceeds 3 million annually worldwide, revascularization procedures have become much more common. Several investigators have demonstrated that vessels in patients with diabetes mellitus have an increased risk restenosis. Here we present a systematic overview of the effects of diabetes on in-stent restenosis. Current classification and updated epidemiology of restenosis are discussed, alongside the main mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of this event. Then, we summarize the clinical presentation of restenosis, emphasizing the importance of glycemic control in diabetic patients. Indeed, in diabetic patients who underwent revascularization procedures a proper glycemic control remains imperative.

Impact of strut dimensions and vessel caliber on thrombosis risk of bioresorbable scaffolds using hemodynamic metrics

Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) promise to be the treatment of choice for stenosed coronary vessels. But higher thrombosis risk found in current clinical studies limits the expectations. Three hemodynamic metrics are introduced to evaluate the thrombosis risk of coronary stents/scaffolds using transient computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The principal phenomena are platelet activation and effective diffusion (platelet shear number, PSN), convective platelet transport (platelet convection number, PCN) and platelet aggregation (platelet aggregation number, PAN) were taken into consideration. In the present study, two different stent designs (thick-strut vs. thin-strut design) positioned in small- and medium-sized vessels (reference vessel diameter, RVD=2.25 mm vs. 2.70 mm) were analyzed. In both vessel models, the thick-strut design induced higher PSN, PCN and PAN values than the thin-strut design (thick-strut vs. thin-strut: PSN=2.92/2.19 and 0.54/0.30; PCN=3.14/1.15 and 2.08/0.43; PAN: 14.76/8.19 and 20.03/10.18 for RVD=2.25 mm and 2.70 mm). PSN and PCN are increased by the reduction of the vessel size (PSN: RVD=2.25 mm vs. 2.70 mm=5.41 and 7.30; PCN: RVD=2.25 mm vs. 2.70 mm=1.51 and 2.67 for thick-strut and thin-strut designs). The results suggest that bulky stents implanted in small caliber vessels may substantially increase the thrombosis risk. Moreover, sensitivity analyses imply that PSN is mostly influenced by vessel size (lesion-related factor), whereas PCN and PAN sensitively respond to strut-thickness (device-related factor).

One-year clinical outcomes of patients implanted with a Resolute Onyx™ zotarolimus-eluting stent

Objective

To evaluate the 1-year clinical outcomes of patients who received the Resolute Onyx™ stent.

Methods

This was a single-centre, retrospective registry analysis that reviewed the clinical data from all patients who were implanted with a Resolute Onyx™ stent between March 2015 and February 2016. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 year post-implantation.

Results

A total of 252 patients received a Resolute Onyx™ stent and two patients were lost to follow-up. The mean age of the cohort was 66.9 years and 113 (45.2%) had diabetes mellitus. Thirty-eight patients (15.2%) had left main disease and 73 (29.2%) had three-vessel disease. A total of 175 patients (70.0%) had small vessel disease (<2.75 mm) and 210 (84.0%) had long lesions (>20 mm). The 1-year target lesion failure was 4.4% (11 of 250), cardiovascular death occurred in eight patients (3.2%), ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization was undertaken in five patients (2.0%) and stent thrombosis occurred in one patient (0.4%).

Conclusion

The Resolute Onyx™ stent showed a favourable 1-year clinical performance in a real-world population.

One-year outcome of small-vessel disease treated with sirolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of the e-SELECT registry

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the characteristics and one-year outcomes following sirolimus-eluting CYPHER Select Plus stent (SES) implantation in small (SmVD) and non-small vessel disease (NSmVD) in the international e-SELECT registry.

BACKGROUND

Large-scale registry data are lacking on DES outcomes in SmVD treatment.

METHODS

There were 4,700 SmVD (at least one vessel with estimated reference vessel diameter [RVD] < 2.5 mm, excluding 283 patients with unknown RVD vessels) and 10,139 NSmVD only patients.

RESULTS

The SmVD population was older, with more women, diabetics, and vessels treated, higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score (CCI), shorter lesions, and less STEMI presentation. The 1-year stent thrombosis (ST) rate (primary end-point), was significantly higher (1.3% vs. 0.7%) in SmVD versus NSmVD, mainly driven by early events. One-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization (TLR) rates were significantly higher in SmVD although death and major bleeding rates were similar in both groups. Complication rates were similar between pure (3,188 patients; only RVD < 2.5 mm) and mixed (1,795 patients; some RVD < 2.5 mm or unknown RVD) SmVD. Multivariate predictors for 1-year MACE in SmVD included saphenous vein graft or bifurcation lesions, major bleeding, any antiplatelet therapy discontinuation within 1 month, age, number of stents implanted, CCI, acute coronary syndrome, and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

SES implantation for SmVD occurs more frequently in women, diabetics, and those with multivessel disease and comorbidities. One-year ST, MACE, MI, and clinically indicated TLR rates are higher, although low overall, in SmVD or mixed SmVD patients while death rates are similar to NSmVD.

Long-term efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stent for small vessel disease--subanalysis of Cypher Stent Japan Post-Marketing Surveillance Registry

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention for lesions with small vessel diameter may have high event rates. Although drug-eluting stents reduce the risk of restenosis, the long-term efficacy of drug-eluting stent implantation in small vessels is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed the data of Cypher Stent Japan Post-Marketing Surveillance Registry including 2356 lesions of 1959 patients, and retrospectively investigated the angiographic outcomes at 8 months, and the clinical outcomes at 1800 days after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in vessels with diameter less than 2.5mm (small vessel group) compared to that with diameter of 2.5mm or more (non-small vessel group). The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1800 days was slightly higher in the small vessel group than in the non-small vessel group, but not statistically significant (24.4% vs 21.0%, p=0.086). The rate of target lesion revascularization was higher in the small vessel group than in the non-small vessel group (10.2% vs 6.4%, p=0.004). The rate of stent thrombosis was almost the same in the two groups. Multivariate Cox hazard model analysis revealed that a vessel diameter less than 2.5mm was not an independent risk factor for MACE.

CONCLUSION

SES implantation for vessels with diameter less than 2.5mm is safe and provides good long-term outcomes.

Three-vessel coronary disease in diabetics: personalized versus evidence-based revascularization strategy

A steady increase in the number of diabetic patients undergoing coronary revascularization has been recorded in recent years. The causes for this rise are found predominantly in the general demographic development of western industrialized nations, the epidemic progress and wide-spread of diabetes mellitus and changes in assignment behavior. In this article, the specific risk profile of diabetic coronary patients with three-vessel disease in percutaneous or surgical revascularization and tried and tested treatment concepts for this particularly challenging group of patients, with reference to the most recent study results will be presented. Particularly, the peculiarities of coronary heart disease in diabetic patients, the choice of revascularization method, different operative strategies for diabetic patients with coronary heart disease, and challenges faced during follow-up are discussed.

Predictors of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention using bare-metal stents: a comparison between patients with and without dysglycemia

The objective of this study was to identify intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), angiographic and metabolic parameters related to restenosis in patients with dysglycemia. Seventy consecutive patients (77 lesions) selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria were evaluated by the oral glucose tolerance test and the determination of insulinemia after a successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a bare-metal stent. The degree of insulin resistance was calculated by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Six-month IVUS and angiogram follow-up were performed. Thirty-nine patients (55.7%) had dysglycemia. The restenosis rate in the dysglycemic group was 37.2 vs 23.5% in the euglycemic group (P = 0.299). The predictors of restenosis using bivariate analysis were reference vessel diameter (RVD): pound2.93 mm (RR = 0.54; 95%CI = 0.05-0.78; P = 0.048), stent area (SA): <8.91 mm(2) (RR = 0.66; 95%CI = 0.24-0.85; P = 0.006), stent volume (SV): <119.75 mm(3) (RR = 0.74; 95%CI = 0.38-0.89; P = 0.0005), HOMA-IR: >2.063 (RR = 0.44; 95%CI = 0.14-0.64; P = 0.027), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG): < or =108.8 mg/dL (RR = 0.53; 95%CI = 0.13-0.75; P = 0.046). SV was an independent predictor of restenosis by multivariable analysis. Dysglycemia is a common clinical condition in patients submitted to PCI. The degree of insulin resistance, FPG, RVD, SA, and SV were correlated with restenosis. SV was inversely correlated with an independent predictor of restenosis in patients treated with a bare-metal stent.

Can surgeons do complete revascularization in diabetic patients using the off-pump technique?

BACKGROUND

: The arguments are discussed as to whether or not to proceed with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention, with or without a drug-eluting stent, in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), including (1) surgeons unable to complete revascularization because of smaller native arteries; and (2) diabetic patients being sicker and having higher operative mortality rates than nondiabetic patients (non-DM), particularly with the conventional coronary artery bypass surgery (on-pump) technique. To support or dispute the claims, a retrospective review of 480 consecutive patients at a single institution (195 DM and 285 non-DM) was carried out. Observations were made to see whether diabetes is a predictor of poor outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

: The preoperative comorbidity, intraoperative measurement of the size of the artery at the site of anastomosis with different gauged probes, and the number of grafts per patient were recorded. Intraoperative and postoperative variables between two groups were compared. The observed number of grafts (O) after surgery was compared with the number of grafts predicted (P) before surgery. The O/P ratio or "completion index" of ≥1 signifies complete revascularization. Logistic regression analysis was used to test the possibility that diabetes is a predictor of poor outcomes.

RESULTS

: Diabetic patients were older, with more comorbidity (congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular diseases, dialysis-dependent). The number of grafts per patient was 4.2 ± 1.3 (DM) and 4.2 ± 1.3 (non-DM). The size of 742 DM and 949 non-DM arteries were gauged. There was no statistical difference in size between DM and non-DM (in millimeters) at each artery. All ratios ranged from 0.9 to 1.2, indicating similarity between DM and non-DM. The only significant risk factor for operative death was low left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

: Patients with DM were sicker but tolerated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting as well as non-DM patients. The number of grafts per patient and O/P ratio signify the ability to perform complete revascularization. We are able to bypass the small target vessels, as anticipated. Diabetes is not a predictor of the outcomes.

Eficacia de la implantación del stent recubierto de rapamicina en pacientes diabéticos con vasos muy pequeños (≤ 2,25 mm). Subanálisis del estudio DIABETES

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Diabetic patients frequently have small-diameter vessels, which increases their risk of restenosis. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in these high-risk patients following percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

Our study population comprised a subset of 85 diabetic patients from the DIABETES (DIABETes and sirolimus Eluting Stent) trial who had very small vessels, defined as those with a reference diameter < or =2.25 mm. In the 100 lesions treated, 49 sirolimus-eluting stents and 51 bare-metal stents were used. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used as recommended by the protocol and dual antiplatelet therapy was administered for 1 year.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable in the two groups. The patients' mean age was 66 (9) years, 42% were women, and 37% were insulin-dependent. On average, the lesion length was 15.0 (9.0) mm and the reference diameter was 1.9 (0.2) mm. At 9-month follow-up, both late lumen loss and the restenosis rate were significantly lower in the sirolimus-eluting stent group than in the bare-metal stent group, at -0.03 (0.3) mm vs 0.44 (0.5) mm (P< .001), and 9.1% vs 39.1% (P=.001), respectively. These differences were also observed in the subgroup of insulin-dependent patients. At 1-year follow-up, the stent thrombosis rate was 0% in the sirolimus-eluting stent group, whereas two patients in the bare-metal stent group presented with stent thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetics with very small vessels is safe and effective, even in insulin-dependent patients.

Sirolimus-eluting stents versus Paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus

This study was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) on the outcomes of diabetic patients. Recent data with drug-eluting stents have shown improved clinical outcomes in diabetic patients. This study compared outcomes between the 2 available drug-eluting stents, SESs and PESs. From the prospective drug-eluting stent registries at the investigators' institution, 1,320 consecutive diabetic patients treated with SESs (n=873, 1,293 lesions) and PESs (n=447, 733 lesions) were identified and their in-hospital and 1- and 6-month clinical outcomes compared. Baseline characteristics showed more men, more patients with previous coronary bypass surgery, and smaller ejection fractions in the PES group and more obese patients in the SES group. Procedural characteristics were similar except for more left anterior descending artery and proximal lesions and the greater use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the SES group and more type C lesions, direct stenting, and stents per patient in the PES group. In-hospital complications were similar. Clinical follow-up at 1 month was also similar between the 2 groups, including subacute stent thrombosis. At 6 months, the 2 groups had similar mortality (7% vs 7%), myocardial infarctions (18% vs 21%), target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, major adverse cardiac events (11% vs 12%), and late thrombosis (0.3% vs 0%). Subanalysis of insulin-treated diabetic patients showed no significant differences in outcomes in the 2 groups. No significant differences were found between SESs and PESs on Cox regression analysis for hazard ratios. In conclusion, SESs and PESs are associated with similar efficacy and safety with regard to repeat revascularization rates, major adverse cardiac events, and stent thrombosis up to 6 months for the treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus regardless of insulin therapy.

Impact of stent design on clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation

Coronary stents have considerably improved both immediate and late results after coronary angioplasty, by limiting elastic recoil and vascular remodeling, but their use does not eliminate restenosis, caused mainly by neointimal hyperplasia. Stents are now implanted in over 70% of percutaneous coronary interventions. More than 50 coronary stents have already been approved in Europe and over 20 stents are commercially available in the USA, raising the question: which device is best suitable for which lesion? Several in vitro experiments revealed significant differences in expansion characteristics of coronary stents, related to the strut design and metallic composition. Animal studies were performed to determine the influence of stent design on the patterns and extent of neointimal hyperplasia. However, the clinical results of randomized trials comparing stent types in humans have not always reflected laboratory findings. This article is a critical overview of experimental and clinical data concerning the impact of stent design on the early and late clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation.

Contribution of aldose reductase to diabetic hyperproliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells

The objective of this study was to determine whether the polyol pathway enzyme aldose reductase mediates diabetes abnormalities in vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC) growth. Aldose reductase inhibitors (tolrestat or sorbinil) or antisense aldose reductase mRNA prevented hyperproliferation of cultured rat aortic SMCs induced by high glucose. Cell cycle progression in the presence of high glucose was blocked by tolrestat, which induced a G0-G1 phase growth arrest. In situ, diabetes increased SMC growth and intimal hyperplasia in balloon-injured carotid arteries of streptozotocin-treated rats, when examined 7 or 14 days after injury. Treatment with tolrestat (15 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)) diminished intimal hyperplasia and decreased SMC content of the lesion by 25%. Although tolrestat treatment increased immunoreactivity of the lesion with antibodies raised against protein adducts of the lipid peroxidation product 4-hydroxy trans-2-nonenal, no compensatory increase in lesion fibrosis was observed. Collectively, these results suggest that inhibition of aldose reductase prevents glucose-induced stimulation of SMC growth in culture and in situ. Even though inhibition of aldose reductase increases vascular oxidative stress, this approach may be useful in preventing abnormal SMC growth in vessels of diabetic patients.

Predictors of long-term outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVES

Diabetes has a major impact on the long-term outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention, being a major risk factor for restenosis. We aimed at assessing the clinical, hemodynamic and angiographic factors that predict outcome in this high-risk group.

METHODS

Diabetic patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention during the period 1996-2000 were identified retrospectively, and their medical records, hemodynamic data and angiograms studied at the time of their procedure. Angiographic data were analyzed to determine procedural factors, quantitative angiographic results of their percutaneous coronary intervention and severity and extent scores of coronary artery disease. Clinical follow-up was obtained in 99.7% to a mean time of 782+/-153 days after percutaneous coronary intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 327 consecutive diabetic patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention on 389 lesions. The overall procedural success rate was 96.2%; however, during follow-up, 40.2% of patients had an adverse cardiac event. The strongest independent predictors of adverse outcome were presence of renal disease, need for medical diabetic treatment, and the extent of coronary artery disease as assessed by the extent score, but not the duration of diabetes or glycemic control. Other factors, which are often predictive of short-term outcome in a general population, such as vessel diameter, lesion length, and severity of coronary artery disease, were not predictive of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the extent of the coronary arteries involved with atheroma as well as systemic factors such as renal involvement are the best predictors of long-term outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention.

How to revascularize patients with diabetes mellitus: bypass or stents and drugs?

The diabetic patient is at high risk for coronary artery disease. Incidence as well as severity of the disease is highly increased in comparison to non-diabetic patients. The revascularization of the diabetic patient is a great challenge, since the longterm results are disappointing when compared to non-diabetic patients. The success of coronary artery bypass grafting is limited by increased perioperative mortality and a faster occlusion of especially venous bypass grafts. In percutaneous interventions the excessive high restenosis rates worsen longterm results. Several clinical trials investigated the outcome of the two revascularization strategies and could demonstrate at least a tendency towards better results when the operative approach was chosen. Particularly, the BARI trial showed reduced mortality for surgery when compared to percutaneous coronary interventions. However, in this trial, in 87% of patients undergoing bypass surgery all stenoses were successfully treated, whereas in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention only 76% of all stenoses were primarily successfully treated. In addition, no stents were used in this trial.Furthermore, the enrollment of the previous trials dates one decade ago. These trials do therefore not necessarily represent the current standard therapy, especially for percutaneous coronary interventions. The restenosis rate could be decreased in recent years by means of drug-eluting stents and an aggressive antiplatelet therapy from more than 50% to less than 10% leading to considerably improved long-term results. Therefore, percutaneous coronary interventions have developed to be a reasonable alternative to bypass surgery. Different clinical trials are currently underway (BARI 2D, CarDIA, FREEDOM) comparing the outcome of the two approaches.

Clinical and angiographic outcomes after multi-link PENTA stent implantation in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease

The flexibility of the Multi-Link (ML) PENTA stent with platform 0.09 to 0.12-mm-thick struts and 12% to 16% metal/artery coverage was improved to facilitate safe delivery in complex coronary lesions. The present study was designed to evaluate the clinical (9-month) and angiographic (6-month) results of the ML PENTA stent in complex coronary lesions (modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lesion type B2 or C) and to determine independent factors correlated with target lesion revascularization. The study population consisted of 86 consecutive patients who had undergone successful coronary ML PENTA stent implantation for coronary artery disease from May 2003 to July 2004 in our hospital. During the follow-up period, cardiac events were documented in 21 (24.4%) of the 86 patients. Target lesion revascularization was required in 16 (18.6%) of the 86 patients. Single logistic regression analysis showed that target lesion revascularization was significantly correlated with lesion length > 2.0 cm, residual percent diameter stenosis after the procedure > 20%, and multiple stents. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that residual percent diameter stenosis after procedure > 20% (P = 0.0125, odds ratio = 11.585) was the significant explanatory factor of target lesion revascularization. The results of the present study suggest that 9-month clinical and 6-month angiographic outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease treated using the ML PENTA stent were excellent and target lesion revascularization after coronary ML PENTA stent implantation was influenced by residual percent diameter stenosis after the procedure.

Impact of treatment of coronary artery disease with sirolimus-eluting stents on outcomes of diabetic and nondiabetic patients

Patients with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk for repeat interventions and mortality after coronary angioplasty and stenting. The efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) to improve the outcomes of these patients is a focus of interest. In the first 1,407 patients treated with SESs at our institution, 492 were diabetic (insulin dependent diabetes mellitus [IDDM], n = 160 and non-insulin-dependent DM [NIDDM], n = 332). The in-hospital and 1- and 6-month clinical outcomes were compared with those of 915 patients without DM (non-DM). The baseline characteristics were similar, except for more women, obesity, previous myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, and renal insufficiency in the DM group (p <0.001). Compared with non-DM patients, DM patients had higher in-hospital (p <0.05) and 1-month mortality (p = 0.02). IDDM patients had more in-hospital renal failure (p = 0.04) and Q-wave myocardial infarctions (1.6% vs 0%, p = 0.04) compared with NIDDM patients, and higher mortality (3.1% vs 0.8%, p = 0.04) and subacute stent thromboses (2.3% vs 0.5%, p = 0.07) than non-DM patients at 30 days. At 6 months, DM patients had a higher incidence of Q-wave myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization-major adverse cardiac events, and composite of death and Q-wave myocardial infarction than non-DM patients (6.0% vs 2.7%, p = 0.01). Late outcomes between the IDDM and NIDDM groups were similar. Multivariate analysis showed diabetes and acute renal failure as independent predictors of target lesion revascularization-major adverse cardiac events. In conclusion, our data showed that, despite a reduction in repeat revascularization, coronary intervention with SESs in diabetic patients is limited by higher mortality at 1 month and a higher incidence of Q-wave myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization-major adverse cardiac events at 6 months compared with non-DM patients. Careful surveillance is required in IDDM patients undergoing SES implantation.

Family history, diabetes and extension of coronary atherosclerosis are strong predictors of adverse events after PTCA: A one-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In this study we addressed some open questions in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). First, we analysed which of the traditional risk factors was associated with the spreading of coronary stenosis and second, we aimed to identify if any variable was predictive of post-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) clinical events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We collected a consecutive series of patients with CAD (n=301) and in the subgroup of patients undergoing PTCA (n=135) we performed a prospective one-year follow-up study recording cardiovascular morbidity and total mortality. According to the extension of coronary atherosclerosis, we found a significant relationship with the prevalence of diabetes in men and with plasma HDL-cholesterol concentrations in women. The follow-up was completed in 95% of patients; we did not document any death whereas clinical events were registered in 16% of patients. At univariate analysis, we found that patients with clinical events had a higher prevalence of family history of CAD (43% vs 14%, p<0.005), diabetes (52% vs 21%, p<0.005) and multivessel disease (52% vs 35%, p<0.05). Multivariate analysis (logistic regression) confirmed that family history of CAD (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.7-12.8, p<0.005), diabetes (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.5-10.6, p<0.01) and multivessel disease (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.4, p<0.05) were the only variables predictive of clinical events.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, factors associated with the spreading of coronary stenosis were different according to the gender. Moreover, the presence of diabetes and multivessel disease had a negative impact on the long-term prognosis of patients undergoing PTCA. In addition, the family history of CAD represented in our study a strong predictor of clinical events. We suggest that in the management of post-PTCA patients, the role of individual baseline clinical characteristics must be taken into account and that subjects with a family history of premature CAD, diabetes and a wide extension of coronary disease represent those with the highest risk.

Recovery of left ventricular systolic function after left anterior descending coronary artery stenting

Our objective was to determine the factors affecting recovery of left ventricular (LV) contractility and myocardial perfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We selected 60 consecutive patients who underwent successful left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) stenting. The mean stent diameter and length were 3.37+/-0.47 mm and 17.4+/-6 mm, respectively. Supporting a functional impact of successful PCI, myocardial perfusion and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) improved at 6+/-3 months after the procedure (48.8+/-11.6% vs 52.5+/-11.5%, P=0.05). Patient related factors such as diabetes mellitus, presentation with acute coronary syndrome, and age did not seem to affect LVEF change after the procedure. On univariate analysis, the change in LVEF after PCI was only related to the stent diameter. The increase in LVEF was higher in patients who received a stent>3 mm in diameter (P=0.041). There was a weak but statistically positive correlation between the stent diameter and the LVEF change after the procedure (R=0.267, P=0.049). Other procedure related factors such as multivessel PCI or stent length did not affect the percent ejection fraction change after stenting.

Predictive Factors of In-Stent Restenosis in Renal Artery Stenting: A Retrospective Analysis

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the role of clinical and procedural factors in predicting in-stent restenosis in patients with renovascular disease treated by renal artery stenting.

METHODS

From 1995 to 2002, 147 patients underwent renal artery stenting for the treatment of significant ostial atherosclerotic stenosis. Patients underwent strict clinical and color-coded duplex ultrasound follow-up. Ninety-nine patients (111 stents), with over 6 months of continuous follow-up (mean 22+/-12 months, range 6-60 months), were selected and classified according to the presence (group A, 30 patients, 32 lesions) or absence (group B, 69 patients, 79 lesions) of significant in-stent restenosis. A statistical analysis was performed to identify possible preprocedural and procedural predictors of restenosis considering the following data: sex, age, smoking habit, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, serum creatinine, cholesterol and triglyceride levels, renal artery stenosis grade, and stent type, length and diameter.

RESULTS

Comparing group A and B patients (chi(2) test), a statistically significant relation was demonstrated between stent diameter and length and restenosis: the risk of in-stent restenosis decreased when the stent was >/=6 mm in diameter and between 15 and 20 mm in length. This finding was confirmed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Stent diameter and length were proved to be significantly related to in-stent restenosis also when evaluating only patients treated by Palmaz stent (71 stents).

CONCLUSION

Although it is based on a retrospective analysis, the present study confirms the importance of correct stent selection in increasing long-term patency, using stents of at least 6 mm in diameter and with a length of approximately 15-20 mm.

[Does symptomatic stable coronary artery disease still exist in France?]

In spite of the continuous growth of myocardial revascularisation techniques, stable angina remains an important clinical burden. In France, and based upon estimates from the European Society of Cardiology and from diverse epidemiological sources, 2 million people are likely to have stable angina. Though primary and secondary prevention are improving, this figure is likely to increase further, in particular because of the constant aging of the population (20% of patients more than 80 years of age have angina), but also because of the epidemics proportions that diabetes mellitus and obesity take.

Meta-analysis of the effect of diabetes on restenosis rates among patients receiving coronary angioplasty stenting

OBJECTIVE

Coronary artery disease is a significant source of morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes. Angioplasty has been associated with higher rates of restenosis in patients with diabetes. Numerous studies have been performed to determine whether coronary artery stenting would be useful in decreasing rates of restenosis of coronary vessels in patients with diabetes. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effect of diabetes on angiographic restenosis in patients undergoing coronary stenting.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Six studies were included comprising 6,236 individuals-1,166 with diabetes and 5,070 without. The relationships between restenosis rates and age, the percentage of the study population that was male, and the percentage of the study population receiving insulin therapy were examined.

RESULTS

The average restenosis rates among patients with and without diabetes were 36.7 and 25.9%, respectively. Restenosis rates were higher among older populations and populations in which a greater percentage of patients with diabetes were treated with insulin, but they did not vary according to the percentage of men in the studies. The odds ratio of coronary artery restenosis associated with diabetes was 1.61 (95% CI 1.21-2.14, P = 0.004) in univariate logistic regression models, but decreased to 1.30 (0.99-1.70, P = 0.055) after controlling for age in multivariate models, suggesting that the higher restenosis rates found in patients with diabetes can in good part be explained by the older ages of patients with diabetes in these studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although diabetes is a risk factor for restenosis after coronary angioplasty stenting, the apparent effect of diabetes on restenosis rates in the published literature is overstated and was reduced in this meta-analysis by approximately half after adjusting for differences in age.

Drug-Eluting Stents

Advances in catheter and stent design have made stent implantation the standard coronary angioplasty procedure. Unfortunately, in-stent restenosis continues to plague this procedure, with the optimum binary restenosis rates reaching ~10% to 20%. In the past few years, it has become clear that in-stent restenosis is largely due to the migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells to form a neointima. To address this issue, stents coated with drug-delivery vehicles have been developed to deliver antiproliferative therapeutics. Two drugs, rapamycin and taxol, have been the lead compounds for testing the idea of a drug-eluting stent. These drugs have been successful largely because of the solid mechanistic understanding of their effects and extensive preclinical examination. The result of these years of work is that the rapamycin-coated stent entered the US market in April of 2003, and the taxol-coated stent appears poised to follow soon.

[Prognostic role of systemic hypertension and diabetes mellitus in patients with unstable angina undergoing coronary stenting]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The adverse effects of systemic hypertension and diabetes mellitus in coronary patients are well known, although their long-term prognostic influence on patients with unstable angina (UA) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary stenting is uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of these pathologies in this population at 3-year follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We studied 279 consecutive patients with UA who underwent coronary stenting. 129 (46.2%) of them had hypertension and 60 (24.7%) had diabetes. Clinical follow-up was obtained in 92.14% after 3 years.

RESULTS

Although the need for new PCI at the target lesion was higher for patients with hypertension and diabetes (12.1 vs 8.4%; p=0.31, and 14.5 vs 8.6%; p=0.16, respectively), the differences were not significant with respect to the control groups. Multivariate analysis showed hypertension (OR=4.71; CI 95%, 1.01-42.2; p=0.04) and ejection fraction (OR=0.95; CI 95%, 0.91-0.99; p=0.03) to be predictors of mortality, and diabetes to be a predictor of myocardial infarction and infarction resulting in death (OR=3.01; CI 95%, 1.13-8.02; p=0.02, and OR=2.68; CI 95%, 1.03-6.95; p=0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension was the only independent long-term predictor of mortality in our series of patients with UA who underwent coronary stenting. Diabetes was the only predictor of myocardial infarction or for the combined event of infarction and death. Risk of myocardial infarction was threefold as high in this diabetic patient population, and was the main cause of mortality.

Early and Late Angiographic and Clinical Outcome Following Helistent Stent Implantation

There is still a lack of data on the influence of different stent designs on long-term restenosis rates and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) with the use of new antithrombotic regimens. We evaluated the midterm (6 months) clinical and angiographic and lateterm (2 years) clinical outcome of Helistent stent implantation. The study population consisted of 150 patients with high risk factor rates who had single or multivessel disease and had undergone coronary Helistent stent implantation with new antiplatelet regimens. The control coronary angiographies were done at 6 months and they were followed clinically to the end of 2 years. In 150 patients, 236 Helistent stents were implanted for 224 lesions. Helistent stent implantation was associated with a very high success rate (99%). The angiographic re-stenosis rate was 11.3% at 6 months. Only 16% of the patients experienced target lesion revascularization, 20% of the patients experienced MACE and of them, only 3.3% died at the end of two year follow-up period. The results demonstrate that the Helistent stent can be implanted with a high success rate with encouraging 6 month angiographic and late clinical outcomes.

Predictors of angiographic restenosis after coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes mellitus are particularly prone to restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. An exploratory, nested, case-control study was undertaken to identify clinical, lesional, and procedural predictors of angiographic restenosis in these patients.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with diabetes mellitus with 86 coronary lesions were selected from a larger population of 217 patients who had undergone 6-month angiographic follow-up after a first, successful balloon angioplasty (PTCA) or stent implantation procedure. Data collection was by patient interview and review of hospital database and other medical records. All angiograms were analyzed with quantitative coronary angiography, and restenosis was defined as a >or=50% diameter reduction at the treated site. A multivariate analysis of 10 prespecified explanatory variables, derived from a literature review, was performed on a per-lesion basis.

RESULTS

There were 45 patients (53 lesions) with restenosis and 30 patients (33 lesions) without restenosis. Univariate predictors of binary restenosis were periprocedural glycosylated hemoglobin level, vessel reference diameter, PTCA, and larger final balloon size to reference artery diameter ratio. Multiple logistic regression identified poor glycemic control (odds ratio [OR] 3.03, 95% CI 1.06-8.65, P =.038), small vessel reference diameter (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.17-9.95, P =.025), and mode of intervention (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.08-9.00, P =.036) as independent risk factors. Vessel reference diameter appeared to be an important effect modifier of the association between type of intervention and angiographic outcome, with stenting no longer superior to PTCA in patients with diabetes mellitus who had vessels <2.87 mm in diameter (P =.054).

CONCLUSION

Poor glycemic control, vessel size, and PTCA were independent predictors of restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus. It is possible that improved periprocedural glycemic control, in addition to stenting, may reduce the restenosis rate in these patients.

Drug-eluting stents: potential applications for peripheral arterial occlusive disease

Many different approaches have been evaluated to prevent restenosis in stents after vascular implantation. Currently, drug-eluting stents are extremely promising in suppressing neointimal hyperplasia. Various animal studies and randomized trials in humans have shown excellent results in terms of safety and efficacy during intermediate-term follow-up. This article will give an overview of experimental and clinical data of the different agents in published and ongoing trials.

Angiographic findings of the multicenter Randomized Study With the Sirolimus-Eluting Bx Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent (RAVEL): sirolimus-eluting stents inhibit restenosis irrespective of the vessel size

BACKGROUND

Restenosis remains the major limitation of coronary catheter-based intervention. In small vessels, the amount of neointimal tissue is disproportionately greater than the vessel caliber, resulting in higher restenosis rates. In the Randomized Study With the Sirolimus-Eluting Bx Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent (RAVEL) trial, approximately 40% of the vessels were small (<2.5 mm). The present study evaluates the relationship between angiographic outcome and vessel diameter for sirolimus-eluting stents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients were randomized to receive either an 18-mm bare metal Bx VELOCITY (BS group, n=118), or a sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stent (SES group, n=120). Subgroups were stratified into tertiles according to their reference diameter (RD; stratum I, RD <2.36 mm; stratum II, RD 2.36 mm to 2.84 mm; stratum III, RD >2.84 mm). At 6-month follow-up, the restenosis rate in the SES group was 0% in all strata (versus 35%, 26%, and 20%, respectively, in the BS group). In-stent late loss was 0.01+/-0.25 versus 0.80+/-0.43 mm in stratum I, 0.01+/-0.38 versus 0.88+/-0.57 mm in stratum II, and -0.06+/-0.35 versus 0.74+/-0.57 mm in stratum III (SES versus BS). In SES, the minimal lumen diameter (MLD) remained unchanged (Delta -0.72 to 0.72 mm) in 97% of the lesions and increased (=late gain, DeltaMLD <-0.72 mm) in 3% of the lesions. Multivariate predictors for late loss were treatment allocation (P<0.001) and postprocedural MLD (P= 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Sirolimus-eluting stents prevent neointimal proliferation and late lumen loss irrespective of the vessel diameter. The classic inverse relationship between vessel diameter and restenosis rate was seen in the bare stent group but not in the sirolimus-eluting stent group.

Clinical and angiographic results after MULTI-LINK stent implantation and their relation to aggregation of risk factors: two-year follow-up

Results of trials using the ACS MULTI-LINK (ML) stent, one of the new generation stents, were similar to or slightly better than those of trials using the Palmaz-Shatz stent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate relatively long-term (2 years) clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease treated with the ML stent and to determine independent factors correlated with target lesion revascularization and cardiac events. The present study consisted of 82 consecutive patients who had undergone successful coronary ML stent implantation from January 1997 to December 1999. During the follow-up period, cardiac events occurred in 16 (19.5%) patients. All patients underwent follow-up angiography and 12 (14.6%) of the 82 patients underwent target lesion revascularization. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that aggregation of risk factors (> or = 3 risk factors) (p = 0.0274, odds ratio=5.14) and percent diameter stenosis >20% (p = 0.0395, OR = 4.586) were the significant explanatory factors of target lesion revascularization. In addition, aggregation of risk factors (> or = 3 risk factors) exhibited a tendency to correlate with cardiac events (p = 0.0528) on multiple logistic regression analysis. The results of the present study suggest that target lesion revascularization after coronary ML stent implantation was influenced by aggregation of major coronary risk factors and residual percent diameter stenosis and that long-term clinical outcome is influenced by the aggregation of risk factors.

Drug-coated stents

Drug-coated stents appear to be the most promising approach among all interventional strategies to prevent restenosis. These stents both suppress geometric remodeling and inhibit neointimal hyperplasia with a therapeutic agent. Animal studies and recent randomised clinical trials with sirolimus-eluting stents have achieved excellent results in the prevention of restenosis. These stents also have a good safety record and demonstrate a durable clinical benefit for patients at long-term follow-up. This article summarises experimental and clinical experiences with local drug delivery via a stent coating in the prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty, outlining the clinician's view of current trends.