Propafenone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia

Pharmacokinetics of propafenone hydrochloride sustained-release capsules in male beagle dogs

This paper describes the development and validation of a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric assay for propafenone and its application to a pharmacokinetic study of propafenone administered as a new propafenone hydrochloride sustained-release capsule (SR-test), as an instant-release tablet (IR-reference) and as the market leader sustained-release capsule (Rythmol, SR-reference) in male beagle dogs (n=8). In Study A comparing SR-test with IR-reference in a crossover design T max and t 1/2 of propafenone for SR-test were significantly higher than those for IR-reference while C max and AUC were lower demonstrating the sustained release properties of the new formulation. In Study B comparing SR-test with SR-reference the observed C max and AUC of propafenone for SR-test (124.5±140.0 ng/mL and 612.0±699.2 ng·h/mL, respectively) were higher than for SR-reference (78.52±72.92 ng/mL and 423.6±431.6 ng·h/mL, respectively) although the differences were not significant. Overall, the new formulation has as good if not better sustained release characteristics to the market leader formulation.

Amiodarone versus propafenone for conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: results of a randomized, controlled study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of amiodarone and propafenone in the conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of amiodarone and propafenone in the treatment of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation has not been adequately studied.

METHODS

One hundred one patients (48 men, mean age 64 +/- 9 years) with atrial fibrillation lasting >3 weeks participated in the study. Thirty-four patients received amiodarone (300 mg intravenously over 1 h, followed by 20 mg/kg over the next 24 h plus 600 mg orally, in three doses, for 1 week, then 400 mg/day orally, for three weeks), 32 received propafenone (2 mg/kg intravenously over 15 min, followed by 10 mg/kg over 24 h and then 450 mg/day orally, for one month) and the remaining 35 served as control subjects. All patients received digoxin and anticoagulant treatment as indicated (International Normalized Ratio 2 to 3).

RESULTS

Conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved in 16 (47.05%) patients who received amiodarone, in 13 (40.62%) who received propafenone and in none of the control subjects (p < 0.001 for both groups vs. control subjects). Those who converted had smaller atria than those who did not and atrial fibrillation of shorter duration in both the amiodarone and propafenone groups. Treatment was discontinued in one patient of the propafenone group because of significant QRS widening.

CONCLUSIONS

Amiodarone and propafenone appear to be safe and equally effective in the termination of chronic atrial fibrillation. Left atrial diameter and arrhythmia duration are independent predictors of conversion.