Electrophysiologic characteristics and radiofrequency catheter ablation of fast-slow form atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Optimal method for ablation of atypical AVNRT

BACKGROUND

Considering that ablation of atypical AVNRT may be unsuccessful after ablation at the right posterior septum, in this study, we aimed to present an optimal method for ablation of atypical AVNRT. Also, we evaluated the efficacy of this technique for preventing recurrences.

METHODS

This is a prospective, double-center study. It was conducted on 62 patients with atypical AVNRT referred for radiofrequency ablation. The patients were randomly divided into two groups before ablation: 1-Group A (n = 30): treated with conventional ablation at the anatomic area of the slow pathway; 2-Group B (n = 32): ablation was done 2 mm higher in the septum during fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients in groups A and B were 54 ± 11.7 and 55 ± 12.2, respectively (P = 0.43). In group A, ablation was successful in 24 (80%) patients following right-sided slow pathway ablation, and the remaining patients required further treatment with either a left-side approach (N = 4, 13.3%) or ablation of additional regions (N = 2, 6.7%). In group B, ablation was successful in all patients. After a 48-month follow-up, recurrence of symptomatic atypical AVNRT was detected in 4 (13.3%) patients of group A and none of group B patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with atypical AVNRT, ablation 2 mm above the conventional area is more promising regarding success rate and recurrence of the arrhythmia.

Atypical Fast-Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Utilizing a Slow Pathway Extending to the Inferolateral Right Atrium

Background: The existence of atypical fast-slow (F/S) atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardias (NRT) using slow pathway (SP) variants connected to the right atrial (RA) inferolateral (inf) free wall (FW) along the tricuspid annulus (TA), has been neither confirmed nor precisely characterized.

Methods and Results: We studied 7 patients (mean age, 48±16 years; 5 men) with F/S-AVNRT with long RP intervals and an earliest atrial activation at the RA inf-FW along the TA (inf-F/S-AVNRT). AV reentrant tachycardia was excluded on observation of the transition zone criteria in all 7 patients. Atrial tachycardia was excluded on the observation of a V-A-V activation sequence after the induction or entrainment of the tachycardia from the right ventricle in all. During the tachycardia, low-frequency, fractionated potentials (LP) preceding the local atrial electrogram were recorded near the site of the earliest atrial activation in 6 patients. Observations of conduction delay and block of the LP during ventricular entrainment or ablation of the tachycardia indicated that LP reflect retrograde activation via the inf-SP. Retrograde SP conduction was interrupted at the site of earliest atrial activation in 3 patients, and in the right posterior septum in 4 patients.

Conclusions: inf-F/S-AVNRT are distinct supraventricular tachycardia incorporating an SP variant connected to the RA inf-FW along the TA in the retrograde direction, which were eliminated by ablation.

Catheter Ablation of Atypical Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Background:

Because of its low prevalence, data on atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) are scarce, and the optimal ablation method has not been established. Our study aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of conventional slow pathway ablation, as applied for typical cases, in atypical AVNRT.

Methods:

We studied 2079 patients with AVNRT subjected to slow pathway ablation. In 113 patients, mean age 48.5±18.1 years, 68 female, atypical AVNRT or coexistent atypical and typical AVNRT without other concomitant arrhythmia was diagnosed. Ablation data and outcomes were compared with a group of age- and sex-matched control patients with typical AVNRT.

Results:

Fluoroscopy and radiofrequency current delivery times were not different in the atypical and typical groups, 20.3±12.2 versus 20.8±12.9 minutes ( P =0.730) and 5.9±5.0 versus 5.5±4.5 minutes ( P =0.650), respectively. Slow pathway ablation was accomplished from the right septum in 110 patients, and from the left septum in 3 patients, in the atypical group. There was no need for additional ablation lesions at other anatomic sites, and no cases of atrioventricular block were encountered. Recurrence rates of the arrhythmia were 5.6% in the atypical (6/108 patients) and 1.8% in the typical (2/111 patients) groups in the next 3 months following ablation ( P =0.167).

Conclusions:

Conventional ablation at the anatomic area of the slow pathway is the therapy of choice for symptomatic AVNRT, regardless of whether the typical or atypical form is present.

Analysis of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with variable ventriculoatrial block: characteristics of the upper common pathway

BACKGROUND

The precise nature of the upper turnaround part of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is not entirely understood.

METHODS

In nine patients with AVNRT accompanied by variable ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction block, we examined the electrophysiologic characteristics of its upper common pathway.

RESULTS

Tachycardia was induced by atrial burst and/or extrastimulus followed by atrial-His jump, and the earliest atrial electrogram was observed at the His bundle site in all patients. Twelve incidents of VA block: Wenckebach VA block (n = 7), 2:1 VA block (n = 4), and intermittent (n = 1) were observed. In two of seven Wenckebach VA block, the retrograde earliest atrial activation site shifted from the His bundle site to coronary sinus ostium just before VA block. Prolongation of His-His interval occurred during VA block in 11 of 12 incidents. After isoproterenol administration, 1:1 VA conduction resumed in all patients. Catheter ablation at the right inferoparaseptum eliminated antegrade slow pathway conduction and rendered AVNRT noninducible in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Selective elimination of the slow pathway conduction at the inferoparaseptal right atrium may suggest that the subatrial tissue linking the retrograde fast and antegrade slow pathways forms the upper common pathway in AVNRT with VA block.

The electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia with eccentric retrograde activation

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of eccentric retrograde atrial activation has been demonstrated to be from 6 to 8% in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) by several previous reports. However, most of those reports were limited by the absence of coronary sinus venography to confirm if the retrograde activation was truly left sided. The purposes of this study were to 1) determine the incidence of left sided retrograde atrial activation in our center, 2) determine the specific electrophysiologic characteristics of eccentric and concentric atrial activation and 3) determine the outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation for AVNRT with eccentric retrograde atrial activation.

METHODS

From November 2001 to July 2004, 290 consecutive patients with AVNRT who underwent an electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency ablation were included. Group 1 consisted of AVNRT patients with eccentric retrograde atrial activation; group 2 consisted of AVNRT patients with concentric retrograde atrial activation. The electrophysiologic characteristics of the group 1 and group 2 patients were then compared.

RESULTS

The incidence of AVNRT with eccentric retrograde activation confirmed by CS venography was 6.5%. There were more females and atypical AVNRT in patients with retrograde eccentric conduction. There was more VA block after ablation and tachycardia induction by right ventricular pacing/extrastimuli in eccentric rather than concentric retrograde atrial activation. A shorter antegrade fast functional refractory period of the AV node was demonstrated in the atypical eccentric group as compared to the atypical concentric group.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the different electrophysiologic characteristics between the AVNRT patients with eccentric and concentric retrograde atrial activation. Successful ablation sites were similar to the standard RA ablation sites in patients with retrograde eccentric conduction.

Electrophysiologic delineation of the tachycardia circuit in the slow-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the exact boundaries of the reentrant circuit in the slow-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the tachycardia circuit in the slow-slow form of AVNRT.

METHODS

Single extrastimuli were delivered during the slow-slow form of AVNRT at 10 sites along the right interatrial septum: superior portion of the His-bundle (HB) site, the HB site, three equidistantly divided sites of the AV junction between HB site and coronary sinus ostium (CSOS; sites S, M, and I), and inferior, superior, posterior, posteroinferior, and internal portions of the CSOS in 13 patients. The longest coupling interval of a single extrastimulus that reset the tachycardia and the following return cycle were measured.

RESULTS

The tachycardia cycle length was 409 +/- 50 ms. The earliest atrial electrogram during tachycardia was observed at site I in all patients. The longest coupling intervals at superior-HB, HB site, sites S, M, and I, and inferior-CSOS, superior-CSOS, posterior-CSOS, posteroinferior-CSOS, and internal-CSOS were 340 +/- 52, 355 +/- 50, 367 +/- 50, 378 +/- 51, 398 +/- 49, 398 +/- 52, 355 +/- 60, 351 +/- 50, 371 +/- 48, and 363 +/- 54 ms, respectively. The following return cycles were 468 +/- 52, 453 +/- 52, 442 +/- 52, 431 +/- 50, 411 +/- 52, 410 +/- 49, 454 +/- 45, 457 +/- 57, 438 +/- 54, and 445 +/- 53 ms, respectively. The longest coupling intervals at site I and inferior-CSOS were significantly longer than those at the other sites (P <.0001). The return cycles at site I and inferior-CSOS did not differ from the tachycardia cycle length, whereas those at the other sites were significantly longer than the tachycardia cycle length (P <.0001).

CONCLUSION

Site I and inferior-CSOS are involved in the slow-slow form of AVNRT circuit, and the atrial tissue between those sites form an integral limb of the reentrant circuit.

The Specific Electrophysiologic Characteristics in Children with the Atypical Forms of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is well known to be one of the most common supraventricular tachycardias in childhood. However, information about the atypical forms of AVNRT in childhood is limited. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics in pediatric patients with the atypical forms of AVNRT.

METHODS

One hundred and three pediatric patients with AVNRT were included (aged 8-18 years; 44 male, 59 female). There were 10 (9.7%) children with the atypical forms (group 1), 86 (83.4%) with the slow-fast form (group 2) and 7 (6.9%) with the fast-slow form of AVNRT (group 3). The electrophysiologic characteristics and results of the radiofrequency catheter ablation were compared among these 3 groups.

RESULTS

Group 2 patients were associated with an older age when compared with the other two groups. A significantly higher incidence of retrograde dual atrioventricular nodal pathways and a higher percentage of ventricular pacing- and extrastimulation-induced AVNRT were demonstrated in the children with the fast-slow form of AVNRT. The children with the atypical forms of AVNRT had a greater difference in the antegrade 1:1 conduction (100 +/- 73 vs. 52 +/- 41 vs. 35 +/- 26 ms, p = 0.003). Furthermore, the children with the slow-fast form of AVNRT had a greater difference in the retrograde 1:1 conduction (125 +/- 97 vs. 42 +/- 35 vs. 65 +/- 79 ms, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the pediatric patients with the atypical forms of AVNRT had different electrophysiologic characteristics than those with the slow-fast or fast-slow forms of AVNRT. The results of radiofrequency catheter ablation were similar for all children with the slow-fast, fast-slow and atypical forms of AVNRT.

The Electrophysiological Characteristics in Patients with Ventricular Stimulation Inducible Fast-Slow Form Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can usually be induced by atrial stimulation. However, it seldom may be induced with only ventricular stimulation, especially the fast-slow form of AVNRT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the specific electrophysiological characteristics in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation.

METHODS

The total population consisted of 1,497 patients associated with AVNRT, and 106 (8.4%) of them had the fast-slow form of AVNRT and 1,373 (91.7%) the slow-fast form of AVNRT. In patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT, the AVNRT could be induced with only ventricular stimulation in 16 patients, Group 1; with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation in 90 patients, Group 2; and with only atrial stimulation in 13 patients, Group 3. We also divided these patients with slow-fast form AVNRT (n = 1,373) into two groups: those that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation (Group 4; n = 45, 3%) and those that could be induced by atrial stimulation only or by both atrial and ventricular stimulation (n = 1.328, 97%).

RESULTS

Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of an antegrade dual AVN physiology (0% vs 71.1% and 92%, P < 0.001), a lower incidence of multiple form AVNRT (31% vs 69% and 85%, P = 0.009), and a more significant retrograde functional refractory period (FRP) difference (99 +/- 102 vs 30 +/- 57 ms, P < 0.001) than those that could be induced with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The occurrence of tachycardia stimulated with only ventricular stimulation was more frequently demonstrated in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT than in those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT (15% vs 3%, P < 0.001). Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a higher incidence of retrograde dual AVN physiology (75% vs 4%, P < 0.001), a longer pacing cycle length of retrograde 1:1 fast and slow pathway conduction (475 +/- 63 ms vs 366 +/- 64 ms, P < 0.001; 449 +/- 138 ms vs 370 +/- 85 ms, P = 0.009), a longer retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (360 +/- 124 ms vs 285 +/- 62 ms, P = 0.003), and a longer retrograde FRP of the fast and slow pathway (428 +/- 85 ms vs 362 +/- 47 ms, P < 0.001 and 522 +/- 106 vs 456 +/- 97 ms, P = 0.026) than those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a different incidence of the antegrade and retrograde dual AVN physiology and the specific electrophysiological characteristics. The mechanism of the AVNRT stimulated only with ventricular stimulation was supposed to be different in patients with the slow-fast and fast-slow forms of AVNRT.

Coronary sinus morphology in different types of supraventricular tachycardias

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is based on the concept of dual AV node pathways that are functionally and anatomically distinct. The bigger coronary sinus ostium (CSO) in patients with AVNRT compared to other supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) may produce separation of atrial inputs into the AV node or create anisotropic conduction, thus giving rise to a different AV nodal physiology. Previous studies measuring the size of the CSO using CS angiography between patients with AVNRT and other SVTs showed conflicting results. Besides, no previous studies have compared the CS morphology of the different forms of AVNRT.

OBJECTIVES

This study compares the size and morphology of the CS among patients with typical AVNRT, atypical AVNRT and accessory pathways mediated reentrant tachycardia (AVRT).

METHODS

Ninety-six patients with clinically documented SVTs were divided into three groups. The diameter of the CS was measured in LAO projection during end ventricular systole (by choosing the last ventricular inward motion). The CSO as well as 5, 10 and 15 mm inside the CS were measured. CS morphology is defined as either wind-sock shape or tubular shape.

RESULTS

The size of the CS ostium was 13.58 +/- 3.98, 15.93 +/- 4.86 and 12.50 +/- 2.83 mm for the atypical AVNRT, typical AVNRT and AVRT, respectively (p = 0.03). There was significant difference in the size of the CS from the ostium until 15 mm into the CS between 1) typical AVNRT and AVRT, 2) typical AVNRT and atypical AVNRT. Typical and atypical AVNRT patients had more windsock morphology CS (13/32, 40.6% and 10/32, 31.2%) compared to AVRT which had only one (1/32, 3.1%) windsock morphology (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The easier CS cannulation in patients with typical AVNRT could be due to a bigger CS size and to a more windsock morphology. The CS size and morphology may be a very important substrate of tachycardia in patients with AVNRT.

Pacemaker-Like Syndrome Complicating Slow Pathway Ablation for AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

This case report describes pacemaker-like syndrome after successful slow pathway ablation for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia due to recurrence of single AV nodal echo beats during sinus rhythm. The resultant AV dyssynchrony was responsible for the symptom complex. Following ablation of retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction, the AV nodal echo beats were eliminated and the pacemaker-like syndrome resolved.

Anterograde slow pathway is not the same as retrograde slow pathway conducted in the reverse direction in patients with uncommon atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to examine the location of anterograde and retrograde slow pathways in 16 patients with uncommon atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), including the fast-slow form in 10, slow-slow form in 5, and both fast-slow and slow-slow forms in 1.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients were divided into two groups according to the approach used for slow pathway ablation in the initial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA): one approach used earliest atrial activation during tachycardia (ES group, n = 9), and the other used a slow potential during sinus rhythm (SP group, n = 7). When the initial RFCA failed to eliminate slow pathway conduction in the ES group, an additional RFCA guided by a slow potential was performed. The ratio of lengths from the His-bundle region to the RFCA site and coronary sinus ostium (Abl/His-CS ratio) and the ratio of amplitudes of atrial and ventricular potentials at the RFCA site (A/V ratio) were compared between the two groups. In the initial RFCA, retrograde slow pathway conduction was eliminated without impairment of anterograde slow pathway conduction in 8 (89%) patients from the ES group, and bidirectional slow pathway conduction was eliminated in 6 (86%) patients from the SP group. Residual anterograde slow pathway conduction that was preserved after the initial RFCA in 8 of 9 patients was eliminated by an additional slow potential-guided RFCA. Both the Abl/His-CS ratio (0.86 +/- 0.07 vs 0.73 +/- 0.11, P = 0.01) and A/V ratio (0.80 +/- 0.31 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.01, P < 0.001) were higher in the ES group than the SP group. The ratios for the residual anterograde slow pathway ablation in the ES group were similar to those in the SP group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the retrograde slow pathway runs more on the atrial side of the tricuspid valve annulus at the level of the coronary sinus ostium compared with the anterograde slow pathway, although both pathways run parallel or are fused in portions more proximal to the His bundle.

Demonstration of the exact anatomic tachycardia circuit in the fast-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The tachycardia circuit in the fast-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (FS-AVNRT) has not been convincingly defined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To define the tachycardia circuit, single extrastimuli were delivered during FS-AVNRT to 9 intra-atrial sites in 12 patients: the His bundle (HB) site; the superior portion of the HB site (S-HB); 3 arbitrarily divided sites on the AV junction extending from the HB site to the coronary sinus ostium (CSOS) (sites S, M, and I); the superior, posterior, and posteroinferior portions of the CSOS (S-CSOS, P-CSOS, and PI-CSOS, respectively); and the CSOS. The inferior portion of coronary sinus ostium (I-CSOS), at which the earliest retrograde activation was observed, was excluded. At each site, the longest coupling interval of the single extrastimulus that reset the tachycardia and the subsequent return cycle was measured. The mean tachycardia cycle length was 370+/-55 ms. The longest coupling intervals at sites S-HB, HB, S, M, I, CSOS, S-CSOS, P-CSOS, and PI-CSOS were 328+/-53, 360+/-55, 358+/-55, 358+/-54, 360+/-55, 338+/-56, 323+/-54, 331+/-56, and 321+/-58 ms, respectively, and the subsequent return cycles were 408+/-58, 371+/-55, 370+/-55, 372+/-56, 370+/-55, 396+/-56, 411+/-60, 405+/-58, and 412+/-59 ms, respectively. The longest coupling intervals at sites HB, S, M, and I were longer than those at S-HB, CSOS, S-CSOS, P-CSOS, and PI-CSOS (P<0.0001). The return cycles at sites HB, S, M, and I did not differ from the tachycardia cycle length, whereas those at CSOS, S-CSOS, P-CSOS, and PI-CSOS were longer than the tachycardia cycle length (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The perinodal atrium extending from the HB site to the I-CSOS is an integral limb of the reentry circuit in FS-AVNRT.

AV nodal reentrant tachycardia with unusual characteristics: lessons from radiofrequency catheter ablation

There are still some AV nodal reentrant tachycardias with unusual AV nodal properties that need further study to understand these complexities. Accordingly, the two-dimensional model with alpha and beta pathways in the AV nodal reentrant tachycardia circuit certainly is an oversimplification and does not explain adequately the anatomic and physiologic complexity of the AV junctional area. The modern concept suggests that this arrhythmia takes place in a highly complex three-dimensional model with nonuniform anisotropy and discontinuous conduction property in the AV junctional area. Application of radiofrequency energy within the AV junctional area should always be performed carefully to achieve a successful ablation procedure and to minimize possible injury of AV nodal conduction.