Effect of biphasic endocardial countershock on pacing thresholds in humans

The effect of biphasic defibrillation on the immediate pacing threshold of a dedicated bipolar, steroid-eluting lead

It is apparent that pacing threshold increases following an ICD shock, although the degree of change observed is dependent on the method used to assess pacing and the lead design used. We previously demonstrated a rise in postshock pacing threshold using a lead with integrated bipolar pacing in which the distal shocking coil also serves as the pacing anode. In this study, we sought to investigate whether the postshock pacing threshold increased significantly in an endocardial, steroid-eluting lead with dedicated bipolar pacing electrodes. Twenty patients (16 men, 4 women; median age 73, ejection fraction [EF] 0.17-0.58) were studied during pectoral ICD implantation (Medtronic active can model 7221Cx or 7223Cx with model 6932-65 lead). The diastolic pulse width pacing threshold at 1 or 2 V was determined. Pacing rate was set > or = 100/min at twice diastolic threshold output to assess pacing immediately following the first DFT test shock. For subsequent shocks, the output was adjusted to establish postshock thresholds as 1, 2, 3, or 4 times the diastolic threshold. The postshock threshold was defined as the output yielding 100% capture > or = 2.5 seconds following a shock. In 8 of 20 patients (ratio 0.40 +/- 0.11), a rise in the post-shock threshold was shown by failure of consistent capture when pacing at 2 times diastolic threshold > or = 2.5 seconds after a DFT test shock. Two of these patients failed at 3 times threshold, but none failed at 4 x threshold. Five of 12 patients with successful capture of 2 times threshold failed to capture at threshold. The postshock threshold increased by a mean factor of 2.83 +/- 0.83 in the group of patients with a threshold rise. Following ICD shock in an active can, steroid-eluting lead system with dedicated bipolar pacing, the post-shock threshold increases significantly. Our studies suggest a need for postshock pacing to be set at least 4 x threshold regardless of the lead design.

Prospective evaluation of the effect of biphasic waveform defibrillation on ventricular pacing thresholds

INTRODUCTION

Significant increases in ventricular pacing threshold have been observed following monophasic waveform ventricular defibrillation shocks. High-output pacing is recommended to ensure consistent capture, particularly in pacemaker-dependent patients who are likely to be defibrillated. Whether biphasic waveform defibrillation compounds this problem is not known. The purpose of this prospective study was to examine serial changes in ventricular pacing thresholds following single, multiple, low- and high-energy biphasic defibrillation shocks from an implanted defibrillator.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Bipolar pacing thresholds before and after defibrillation, and the adequacy of pacing capture at three times preshock threshold in the immediate aftermath of ventricular defibrillation, were prospectively evaluated in 67 consecutively tested recipients of a biphasic implanted cardioverter defibrillator. Overall, serial pacing thresholds following successful defibrillation were completely unchanged after 141 of 177 (80%) ventricular fibrillation inductions. In no case did the threshold pulse width increment > 0.06 msec from its baseline value after shock, nor did pacing at a pulse width of three times preshock threshold from dedicated bipolar pacing electrodes fail to result in successful ventricular capture. Changes in threshold were not related to when measured from the time of shock, defibrillation energy, number of shocks, electrode system, chronicity of leads, shock orientation, or to clinical factors.

CONCLUSIONS

No clinically important changes in pacing threshold were observed after biphasic waveform defibrillation. Bradycardia pacing at conventional pacemaker outputs of three times baseline pulse width threshold from bipolar electrodes dedicated exclusively to pacing or sensing (but not defibrillation) consistently allowed for an adequate safety margin following defibrillation.