Stress echocardiography and exercise electrocardiography for risk stratification after non-Q-wave uncomplicated myocardial infarction

Predischarge exercise electrocardiogram and stress echocardiography can predict long-term clinically driven revascularization following acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Predischarge stress testing provides suboptimal prediction of spontaneous hard events following uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

HYPOTHESIS

This study was aimed at assessing whether soft cardiac ischemic events requiring late revascularization could be predicted more accurately.

METHODS

In all, 428 patients undergoing exercise electrocardiography (ECG) and stress echocardiography (SE, 345 dobutamine and 83 dypiridamole) within 15 days of uncomplicated AMI were followed up for 425 (range 20-2220) days. Soft ischemic events (effort angina>class II [Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification] and unstable angina) driving late (>6 months) revascularization were regarded as endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 58 events (29 effort and 29 unstable angina with subsequent 47 coronary artery bypass grafts and 11 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties) occurred: 26 in patients with positive exercise ECG and 34 in patients with positive SE. Univariate predictors of revascularizations were positive exercise ECG (p = 0.0001), peak wall motion score index (WMSI) (p = 0.0009), low workload (p = 0.0018), rest WMSI (p = 0.02) and positive SE (p = 0.02). Cox multivariate analysis selected peak WMSI, positive exercise ECG, and low workload positive exercise ECG as independent predictors of late revascularizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Predischarge stress testing identifies the long-term occurrence of soft ischemic events driving late revascularization after uncomplicated AMI.

Pre-discharge stress echocardiography and exercise ECG for risk stratification after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: results of the COSTAMI-II (cost of strategies after myocardial infarction) trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare in a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial the relative merits of pre-discharge exercise ECG and early pharmacological stress echocardiography concerning risk stratification and costs of treating patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction.

DESIGN

262 patients from six participating centres with a recent uncomplicated myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to early (day 3-5) pharmacological stress echocardiography (n = 132) or conventional pre-discharge (day 7-9) maximum symptom limited exercise ECG (n = 130).

RESULTS

No complication occurred during either stress echocardiography or exercise ECG. At one year follow up there were 26 events (1 death, 5 non-fatal reinfarctions, 20 patients with unstable angina requiring hospitalisation) in patients randomly assigned to early stress echocardiography and 18 events (2 reinfarctions, 16 unstable angina requiring hospitalisation) in the group randomly assigned to exercise ECG (not significant). The negative predictive value was 92% for stress echocardiography and 88% for exercise ECG (not significant). Total costs of the two strategies were similar (not significant).

CONCLUSION

Early pharmacological stress echocardiography and conventional pre-discharge symptom limited exercise ECG have similar clinical outcome and costs after uncomplicated infarction. Early pharmacological stress echocardiography should be considered a valid alternative even for patients with interpretable baseline ECG who can exercise.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography and exercise electrocardiography for risk stratification in medically treated unstable angina

Previous reports have demonstrated the superiority of exercise echocardiography over exercise electro-cardiography (ex-ECG) for risk stratification in patients with medically stabilized unstable angina (UA). We sought to analyze the prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) compared with ex-ECG for risk stratification in patients with UA.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients with medically treated UA were studied (mean age 65 +/- 11 years, 24 women, 42% of patients had electrocardiographic abnormalities on admission). Dobutamine stress echocardiography and treadmill ex-ECG were performed on the third day after hospital admission. End points were recurrent UA, myocardial infarction (MI), or cardiac death.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 24 +/- 7 months. During follow-up, 22 patients had cardiac events (18 recurrent UA, 2 MI, 2 cardiac deaths). The event-free survival rate was 80% for patients with negative DSE results for ischemia and 52% for those with positive DSE results (log rank 9.57; P =.002), compared with an event-free survival rate of 79% for patients with negative ex-ECG results and 66% for those with positive ex-ECG results (log rank 2.06; P = not significant). Left ventricular dysfunction (P =.01) and a positive dobutamine stress echocardiogram (P =.03), but not a positive exercise electrocardiogram, were independent predictors of cardiac events during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Dobutamine stress echocardiography performed early in medically treated patients with UA predicts cardiac events during follow-up more accurately and with more specificity than ex-ECG does in this population.

Stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging versus stress echocardiography: prognostic comparisons

The use of noninvasive stress cardiac imaging for stratifying risk in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease is growing as a tool for identification of the subgroup most likely to benefit from the expense and risk of more invasive procedures, including cardiac catheterization and coronary revascularization. In this setting, it is especially important that a test be able to identify patients with sufficiently low risk that clinicians are comfortable in deferring such interventions, especially in those with other markers of increased risk. Previous data have shown that cardiac risk is most closely related to the presence and extent of jeopardized viable myocardium on noninvasive stress cardiac imaging. Although stress echocardiography may have comparable ability to detect coronary artery disease, current data suggest that stress echocardiography detects significantly less jeopardized viable myocardium than stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging and consequently fewer patients at risk for cardiac events. Stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging may therefore have important advantages for risk stratification and the direction of future care of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Noninvasive risk stratification in women with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction

The aim of our study was to compare the prognostic value of stress echocardiography and exercise electrocardiography after uncomplicated non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction in a series of 89 female patients. Our data show that stress echocardiography has independent predictive value in a female patient population recovering from uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction.