Randomized trial of radiation for age-related macular degeneration

Radiotherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy has been proposed as a treatment for new vessel growth in people with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of radiotherapy on neovascular AMD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and three trials registers and checked references of included studies. We last searched the databases on 4 May 2020.  SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials in which radiotherapy was compared to another treatment, sham treatment, low dosage irradiation or no treatment in people with choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) secondary to AMD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard procedures expected by Cochrane. We graded the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We considered the following outcomes at 12 months: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (loss of 3 or more lines, change in visual acuity), contrast sensitivity, new vessel growth, quality of life and adverse effects at any time point.  MAIN RESULTS: We included 18 studies (n = 2430 people, 2432 eyes) of radiation therapy with dosages ranging from 7.5 to 24 Gy. These studies mainly took place in Europe and North America but two studies were from Japan and one multicentre study included sites in South America. Three of these studies investigated brachytherapy (plaque and epimacular), the rest were studies of external beam radiotherapy (EBM) including one trial of stereotactic radiotherapy. Four studies compared radiotherapy combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) with anti-VEGF alone. Eleven studies gave no radiotherapy treatment to the control group; five studies used sham irradiation; and one study used very low-dose irradiation (1 Gy). One study used a mixture of sham irradiation and no treatment. Fifteen studies were judged to be at high risk of bias in one or more domains. Radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy There may be little or no difference in loss of 3 lines of vision at 12 months in eyes treated with radiotherapy compared with no radiotherapy (risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 1.04, 811 eyes, 8 studies, I² = 66%, low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence suggests a small benefit in change in visual acuity (mean difference (MD) -0.10 logMAR, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.03; eyes = 883; studies = 10) and average contrast sensitivity at 12 months (MD 0.15 log units, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.25; eyes = 267; studies = 2). Growth of new vessels (largely change in CNV size) was variably reported and It was not possible to produce a summary estimate of this outcome. The studies were small with imprecise estimates and there was no consistent pattern to the study results (very low-certainty evidence). Quality of life was only reported in one study of 199 people; there was no clear difference between treatment and control groups (low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence was available on adverse effects from eight of 14 studies. Seven studies reported on radiation retinopathy and/or neuropathy. Five of these studies reported no radiation-associated adverse effects. One study of 88 eyes reported one case of possible radiation retinopathy. One study of 74 eyes graded retinal abnormalities in some detail and found that 72% of participants who had radiation compared with 71% of participants in the control group had retinal abnormalities resembling radiation retinopathy or choroidopathy. Four studies reported cataract surgery or progression: events were generally few with no consistent evidence of any increased occurrence in the radiation group. One study noted transient disturbance of the precorneal tear film but there was no evidence from the other two studies that reported dry eye of any increased risk with radiation therapy. None of the participants received anti-VEGF injections. Radiotherapy combined with anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF alone People receiving radiotherapy/anti-VEGF were probably more likely to lose 3 or more lines of BCVA at 12 months compared with anti-VEGF alone (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.17, 1050 eyes, 3 studies, moderate-certainty). Most of the data for this outcome come from two studies of epimacular brachytherapy (114 events) compared with 20 events from the one trial of EBM. Data on change in BCVA were heterogenous (I² = 82%). Individual study results ranged from a small difference of -0.03 logMAR in favour of radiotherapy/anti-VEGF to a difference of 0.13 logMAR in favour of anti-VEGF alone (low-certainty evidence). The effect differed depending on how the radiotherapy was delivered (test for interaction P = 0.0007). Epimacular brachytherapy was associated with worse visual outcomes (MD 0.10 logMAR, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.15, 820 eyes, 2 studies) compared with EBM (MD -0.03 logMAR, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.03, 252 eyes, 2 studies). None of the included studies reported contrast sensitivity or quality of life. Growth of new vessels (largely change in CNV size) was variably reported in three studies (803 eyes). It was not possible to produce a summary estimate and there was no consistent pattern to the study results (very low-certainty evidence). For adverse outcomes, variable results were reported in the four studies. In three studies reports of adverse events were low and no radiation-associated adverse events were reported. In one study of epimacular brachytherapy there was a higher proportion of ocular adverse events (54%) compared to the anti-VEGF alone (18%). The majority of these adverse events were cataract. Overall 5% of the treatment group had radiation device-related adverse events (17 cases); 10 of these cases were radiation retinopathy. There were differences in average number of injections given between the four studies (1072 eyes). In three of the four studies, the anti-VEGF alone group on average received more injections (moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence is uncertain regarding the use of radiotherapy for neovascular AMD. Most studies took place before the routine use of anti-VEGF, and before the development of modern radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic radiotherapy. Visual outcomes with epimacular brachytherapy are likely to be worse, with an increased risk of adverse events,  probably related to vitrectomy. The role of stereotactic radiotherapy combined with anti-VEGF is currently uncertain. Further research on radiotherapy for neovascular AMD may not be justified until current ongoing studies have reported their results.

Context for Protons as Adjunctive Therapy in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Review

In the last few years we have witnessed increasing availability of proton therapy in the United States and worldwide. As a result, proton therapy is considered as either a primary or adjunctive approach for numerous indications where conventional radiation therapy shows promise but is accompanied by toxicities. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) remains the leading cause of adult blindness in industrialized nations, and third worldwide, following cataract and glaucoma. Current standard therapy is intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. While this treatment shows improvement and stabilization in visual acuity for 40% of patients, 60% still experience disease progression. These injections are costly, necessitate repeated office visits, and carry the risk of endophthalmitis. The pathophysiology underlying neovascular AMD (nAMD) underscores the need to simultaneously target multiple pathways to retain useful vision. Radiation can be antiangiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antiproliferative. Early photon therapy clinical trials were heterogeneous, and a Cochrane review of data demonstrated usefulness in treatment of nAMD but recommended further studies. Advantages of proton therapy over photon therapy include the ability to deliver a focal dose to the target while minimizing dose to normal structures, which is enhanced by unique treatment planning software that uses fluorescein angiography to verify target location and allows conformation of dose to the irregular shape and thickness characteristic of choroidal neovascular membranes, the pathognomonic finding in nAMD. Preliminary data suggest a potential role for proton therapy in the treatment of nAMD. In this article we review previous treatments for AMD, including those with both photon and proton radiation, and recommend future directions for clinical investigations to evaluate the role of proton therapy as an adjunct to antiangiogenic therapy, the current standard of care in this challenging setting.

One-year results from clinical practice of epimacular strontium-90 brachytherapy for the treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of epiretinal strontium-90 brachytherapy in subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in eyes unresponsive to repeated anti-VEGF injections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective, single-center study on patients treated with strontium-90 brachytherapy for CNV secondary to neovascular AMD. Patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy with a single 24 Gy dose brachytherapy. They were re-treated with anti-VEGF injections on an as-needed basis if subretinal or intraretinal fluid was detected on optical coherence tomography imaging.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were treated, and 20 completed 12 months of follow-up. Ten patients maintained stable vision, eight gained vision, and two lost more than three Snellen lines. The mean best corrected visual acuity change from baseline was -8 ± 5.7 letters. A mean of 5.5 ± 4.4 anti-VEGF injections were administered throughout 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Epimacular brachytherapy is feasible in clinical practice. While some patients benefit from the treatment and need significantly fewer as-needed injections, others appear not to react to irradiation treatment after 1 year of follow-up. Larger numbers of patients are needed to evaluate therapeutic efficacy and to determine which patients can benefit from combined radiation and anti-VEGF therapy.

[Adjuvant stereotactic low energy radiation therapy of exudative age-dependent macular degeneration (Oraya system)]

With respect to the increasing number of patients and the risk and burden for patients caused by injections, a reduction in the number and frequency of injections with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in exudative age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is desirable. Stereotactic low-voltage x-ray irradiation seems to be a promising approach. For this purpose the Oraya system is available and has shown positive results in initial studies. Pending presentation of phase II and III study data this adjuvant irradiation should only be used in clinical trials.

Age-related macular degeneration revisited--piecing the puzzle: the LXIX Edward Jackson memorial lecture

PURPOSE

To present the current understanding of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) pathogenesis, based on clinical evidence, epidemiologic data, histopathologic examination, and genetic data; to provide an update on current and emerging therapies; and to propose an integrated model of the pathogenesis of AMD.

DESIGN

Review of published clinical and experimental studies.

METHODS

Analysis and synthesis of clinical and experimental data.

RESULTS

We are closer to a complete understanding of the pathogenesis of AMD, having progressed from clinical observations to epidemiologic observations and clinical pathologic correlation. More recently, modern genetic and genomic studies have facilitated the exploration of molecular pathways. It seems that AMD is a complex disease that results from the interaction of genetic susceptibility with aging and environmental factors. Disease progression also seems to be driven by a combination of genetic and environmental factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapies based on pathophysiologic features have changed the paradigm for treating neovascular AMD. With improved understanding of the underlying genetic susceptibility, we can identify targets to halt early disease and to prevent progression and vision loss.

Radiation therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

In the enormity of the public health burden imposed by age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), much effort has been directed toward identifying effective and efficient treatments. Currently, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections have demonstrated considerably efficacy in treating neovascular ARMD, but patients require frequent treatment to fully benefit. Here, we review the rationale and evidence for radiation therapy of ARMD. The results of early photon external beam radiation therapy are included to provide a framework for the sequential discussion of evidence for the usage of stereotactic radiation therapy, proton therapy, and brachytherapy. The evidence suggests that these 3 modern modalities can provide a dose-dependent benefit in the treatment of ARMD. Most importantly, preliminary data suggest that all 3 can be used in conjunction with anti-VEGF therapeutics, thereby reducing the frequency of anti-VEGF injections required to maintain visual acuity.

Macular epiretinal brachytherapy in treated age-related macular degeneration: MERITAGE study: twelve-month safety and efficacy results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of epimacular brachytherapy (EMB) for the treatment of chronic, active, neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, interventional, noncontrolled clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-three eyes of 53 participants with neovascular AMD requiring frequent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) retreatment.

METHODS

Participants underwent pars plana vitrectomy with a single 24-Gy dose of EMB delivered using an intraocular, handheld cannula containing a strontium 90/yttrium 90 source positioned over the active lesion. Participants were retreated with ranibizumab administered monthly as needed, using predefined retreatment criteria. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was undertaken monthly, with images assessed by an independent reading center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Coprimary outcomes at 12 months were proportion of participants with stable vision (losing <15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) and mean number of anti-VEGF retreatments.

RESULTS

Before enrollment, participants had received an average of 12.5 anti-VEGF injections. After a single treatment with EMB, 81% maintained stable vision, with a mean of 3.49 anti-VEGF retreatments in 12 months. Mean ± standard deviation change in visual acuity was -4.0±15.1 ETDRS letters. Mean ± standard deviation OCT central retinal thickness increased by 50±179 μm. Common adverse events included conjunctival hemorrhage (n = 38), cataract (n = 16), resolving vitreous hemorrhage (n = 6), and eye pain (n = 5).

CONCLUSIONS

Epimacular brachytherapy produces stable visual acuity in most participants with previously treated, active disease. Epimacular brachytherapy may reduce the need for frequent anti-VEGF retreatment.

Ten-year follow-up of eyes treated with stereotactic fractionated external beam radiation for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term effects of stereotactic fractionated external beam radiation on eyes treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all eyes treated with stereotactic fractionated external beam radiation (20-40 Gy, 2-Gy fractions) between 1997 and 2000 was performed to identify eyes with ≥ 2-year follow-up for analysis. A subset was imaged prospectively using a high-resolution Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

Among 94 eyes treated, 33 eyes (32 subjects) had ≥ 2-year follow-up information (mean follow-up, 6.2 years; range, 2-10 years). Final visual acuity ranged from 20/50 to no light perception. Final macular findings included central geographic atrophy (49%), disciform scar (30%), and active choroidal neovascular membrane (9%). Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography images of three eyes with geographic atrophy revealed photoreceptor layer loss within areas of geographic atrophy with intact retinal morphology in areas of radiation exposure outside geographic atrophy. Radiation retinopathy was suspected in 18% and confirmed by fluorescein angiography in 15%, ranging from mild to neovascular glaucoma/phthisis bulbi (2 eyes). Mean time from stereotactic fractionated external beam radiation to development of radiation retinopathy was 5.4 years (range, 1-10 years).

CONCLUSION

A moderate rate of delayed radiation retinopathy was noted in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with stereotactic fractionated external beam radiation. Geographic atrophy was a common finding.

Radiotherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy has been proposed as a treatment to prevent new vessel growth in people with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to examine the effects of radiotherapy on neovascular AMD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) in The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2010, MEDLINE (January 1950 to March 2010), EMBASE (January 1980 to March 2010), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (January 1982 to March 2010), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com) (March 2010) and ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov) (March 2010). There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 23 March 2010. We also wrote to investigators of trials included in the review to ask if they were aware of any other studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials in which radiotherapy was compared to another treatment, sham treatment, low dosage irradiation or no treatment in people with choroidal neovascularisation secondary to AMD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted the data. We combined relative risks using a random-effects model. We estimated the percentage of the variability in effect estimates that was due to heterogeneity, rather than sampling error, using I(2).

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen trials (n=1154) investigated external beam radiotherapy with dosages ranging from 7.5 to 24 Gy; one additional trial (n=88) used plaque brachytherapy (15Gy at 1.75mm for 54 minutes/12.6 Gy at 4mm for 11 minutes). Most studies found effects (not always significant) that favoured treatment. Overall there was a small statistically significant reduction in risk of visual acuity loss in the treatment group. There was considerable inconsistency between trials and the trials were considered to be at risk of bias, in particular because of the lack of masking of treatment group. Subgroup analyses did not reveal any significant interactions, however, there were small numbers of trials in each subgroup (range three to five). There was some indication that trials with no sham irradiation in the control group reported a greater effect of treatment. The incidence of adverse events was low in all trials; there were no reported cases of radiation retinopathy, optic neuropathy or malignancy. Three trials found non-significant higher rates of cataract progression in the treatment group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review currently does not provide convincing evidence that radiotherapy is an effective treatment for neovascular AMD. If further trials are to be considered to evaluate radiotherapy in AMD then adequate masking of the control group must be considered.

The Natural History and Prognosis of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

PURPOSE

To describe the natural history and progression of visual loss in eyes with untreated neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Four thousand three hundred sixty-two untreated neovascular AMD patients from published interventional studies.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature from 1980 to August 2005 was performed. Studies reporting disease progression outcomes for untreated patients with neovascular AMD were included. Outcome measures were summarized using simple counts and means. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted and tests of heterogeneity were performed where appropriate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in visual acuity (VA) loss, development of comorbidities, and fellow eye involvement.

RESULTS

Fifty-three primary studies were included. Nearly half of the studies (28) were randomized clinical trials. The quality of the studies was high, with over 80% providing level I or II evidence. Mean baseline VA among study patients was 0.64 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (approximately 20/87 Snellen). The mean VA change in logMAR progressed from 0.1 (1 line lost) at 3 months to 0.3 (2.7 lines lost) after 12 months and 0.4 (4 lines lost) after 24 months. The proportion of patients who developed severe vision loss (>6 lines) from baseline increased from 21.3% at 6 months to 41.9% by 3 years. The proportion of patients with VA worse than logMAR 1.0 (20/200 Snellen) increased from 19.7% at baseline to 75.7% by 3 years. Neovascular AMD developed in the fellow eye in 12.2% of patients by 12 months and in 26.8% by 4 years. Meta-analyses of vision outcome by subtype of neovascular AMD were not possible.

CONCLUSIONS

A doubling of the visual angle of presenting VA may be expected to occur in the year after initial presentation in eyes with untreated neovascular AMD. No conclusions can be drawn as to the differences in rates of disease progression by neovascular AMD subtype. The diversity of reporting formats, paucity of long-term natural history data, and heterogeneity among the reported clinical studies impose limits to the clear understanding of long-term prognosis for visual function in neovascular AMD.

Particle radiation therapy using proton and heavier ion beams

Particle beams like protons and heavier ions offer improved dose distributions compared with photon (also called x-ray) beams and thus enable dose escalation within the tumor while sparing normal tissues. Although protons have a biologic effectiveness comparable to photons, ions, because they are heavier than protons, provide a higher biologic effectiveness. Recent technologic developments in the fields of accelerator engineering, treatment planning, beam delivery, and tumor visualization have stimulated the process of transferring particle radiation therapy (RT) from physics laboratories to the clinic. This review describes the physical, biologic, and technologic aspects of particle beam therapy. Clinical trials investigating proton and carbon ion RT will be summarized and discussed in the context of their relevance to recent concepts of treatment with RT.

Progressive visual loss in subfoveal exudation in age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis using Lineweaver-Burke plots

PURPOSE

To analyze the randomized clinical trials in exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) to reveal apparent differences in the behavior of untreated control eyes among these trials. Herein we test the hypothesis that the behavior of untreated control eyes is actually the same in all studies, with apparent differences arising from differences in the time of entry of eyes into clinical trials.

DESIGN

Retrospective meta-analysis of prior clinical trials.

METHODS

Control eye data from six AMD studies (Macular Photocoagulation Study, Subfoveal Surgery Trial, Photodynamic Therapy [TAP] With Visudyne, pegaptanib trial for neovascular AMD, anecortave acetate trial, and 360 degree Macular Translocation Study) were plotted on a double reciprocal plot of 1/(Letters Lost) vs 1/(Months After Enrollment). To account for differences in time of entry into clinical trials, we introduced a horizontal translation factor to shift each data subset horizontally to maximize r(2) for the cumulative trend line.

RESULTS

Cumulative data for untreated control eyes fits a straight line on a double reciprocal plot (r(2) = .9521); an untreated eye would eventually deteriorate to a final vision of 20/640. The slope of the line predicts that patients would experience half of the maximum final vision within 10.88 months after exudation onset.

CONCLUSIONS

The pattern of vision loss experienced in AMD eyes with subfoveal neovascularization is uniform across a wide range of clinical trials, with apparent differences arising from differences in the time of entry of patients into clinical trials.

Proton Beam Irradiation for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate safety and visual outcomes after proton therapy for subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

DESIGN

Randomized dose-ranging clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred sixty-six patients with angiographic evidence of classic choroidal neovascularization resulting from AMD and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/320 or better.

METHODS

Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive 16-cobalt gray equivalent (CGE) or 24-CGE proton radiation in 2 equal fractions. Visual acuity was measured using standardized protocol refraction. Complete ophthalmological examinations, color fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography were performed before and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Proportion of eyes losing 3 or more lines of vision from baseline. Kaplan-Meier statistics were used to compare cumulative rates of vision loss between the 2 treatment groups.

RESULTS

At 12 months after treatment, 36 eyes (42%) and 27 eyes (35%) lost 3 or more lines of vision in the 16-CGE and 24-CGE groups, respectively. Rates increased to 62% in the 16-CGE group and 53% in the 24-CGE group by 24 months after treatment (P = 0.40). Radiation complications developed in 15.7% of patients receiving 16 CGE and 14.8% of patients receiving 24 CGE.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in rates of visual loss were found between the 2 dose groups. Proton radiation may be useful as an adjuvant therapy or as an alternative for patients who decline or are not appropriate for approved therapies.

Treatment of age-related macular degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the greatest cause of legal blindness in the western world. Established treatments include argon laser photocoagulation of extrafoveal choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) and photodynamic therapy of selected sub-foveal CNV. Newer approaches are targeting the angiogenic pathway in CNV development. Currently, other treatment modalities, such as radiotherapy and transpupillary thermotherapy do not have a clear role to play. Surgical options are experimental and only available in some centres for selected patients. Prevention of AMD remains elusive. Dietary supplements may have a role, while statins and prophylactic laser photocoagulation of drusen remain experimental. This paper explains the principles behind these approaches.

A phase I trial of stereotactic external beam radiation for subfoveal choroidal neovascular membranes in age-related macular degeneration

Effective treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is currently limited. Radiation therapy, a therapeutic approach with known antiangiogenic properties, has been investigated as a modality to prevent severe visual loss in AMD. Most of the studies using external beam radiation employed <25 Gy to the whole eye, which is below the dose of radiation that is toxic to the retina and optic nerve ( approximately 50 Gy and approximately 59 Gy, respectively). Stereotactic fractionated external beam radiation (St-EBR) is a method that allows radiation to be delivered to a small, defined area. We investigated the effects of St-EBR in incremental doses up to 40 Gy on neovascular AMD. Patients with clinical signs and fluorescein angiography demonstrating neovascular AMD, visual acuity (VA) better than 20/400 and ineligible for laser treatment (MPS criteria) or who refused to have laser photocoagulation were enrolled in the study. Each patient was treated with radiation at incremental dosages from 20 Gy to 40 Gy. After completion of the radiation course, all patients were followed-up at 3 and 7 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. Best-corrected VA (ETDRS), slit-lamp and fluorescein angiographic evaluations were performed at each visit. 94 eyes of 89 patients were treated from October 1997 to April 2000. The VA was 0.82+/-0.35 before treatment, 0.83+/-0.36 at 6 months, and 0.89+/-0.33 at 12 months. No patients suffered any significant acute side effects. No significant benefits in either VA or in membrane size were derived from increasing the doses of radiation. Our results are consistent with trends of a palliative benefit of radiotherapy in neovascular AMD and support further investigation of radiotherapy. Since there is no evidence that therapeutic effectiveness is dose dependent, our data provide no justification for potentially dangerous escalations in radiation dosage for treating neovascular AMD.

The age-related macular degeneration radiotherapy trial (AMDRT): one year results from a pilot study

PURPOSE

To assess the short-term safety and efficacy of treating subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) with external beam radiation delivered in 5 x 4 Gy fractions among patients having age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

DESIGN

A multicenter prospective randomized controlled pilot study.

METHODS

Eighty-eight patients were enrolled through 10 sites and were randomized to radiotherapy (20 Gy delivered in 5 daily fractions of 4 Gy each; 6 MV [N = 41]) or no radiotherapy (sham radiotherapy [N = 22] or observation [N = 25]). Eligibility criteria included visual acuity of at least 20/320 and subfoveal CNV not amenable to treatment. Randomization was stratified by lesion type (new or recurrent CNV) and blood (<50% or >/=50% of the lesion [N = 13]). The primary outcome measure was loss of >/=3 lines of visual acuity. Secondary outcome measures were angiographic response and side effects.

RESULTS

At baseline, patient and ocular characteristics were similar between treatment groups. At six months, 9 radiated eyes (26%) and 17 eyes not radiated (49%) lost >/=3 lines of visual acuity (P = .04; stratified chi(2) test). At 12 months, 13 radiated eyes (42%) and 9 observed eyes (49%) lost >/=3 visual acuity lines (P = .60). The radiated group demonstrated smaller lesions and less fibrosis than the nonradiated group (P = .05 and .004, respectively) at 12 months. Radiation-induced complications were not observed except for one radiated eye with numerous cotton wool spots and possible radiation retinopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

External beam radiation at 5 x 4 Gy may have a modest and short-lived (six month) benefit in preserving visual acuity.

Radiotherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy has been proposed as a treatment to prevent new vessel growth in people with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to examine the effects of radiotherapy on neovascular AMD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group trials register) on The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2004, MEDLINE (1966 to May 2004), EMBASE (1980 to June 2004) and LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database) (May 2004). We also wrote to investigators of trials included in the review to ask if they were aware of any other studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials in which radiotherapy was compared to another treatment, sham treatment, low dosage irradiation or no treatment in people with subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation secondary to AMD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted the data. Relative risks were combined using a random effects model. The percentage of the variability in effect estimates that was due to heterogeneity, rather than sampling error, was estimated using I2.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven trials randomising a total of 1078 people were included in this review. All trials used a similar method of delivering the radiotherapy treatment (external beam). Dosage ranged from 7.5 to 24 Gy. Most trials found effects (not always significant) that favoured treatment. However, there was considerable inconsistency in the results between trials (I2 > 50%). As only 11 trials were included in the review and only some of these trials provided data for each outcome our ability to determine the causes of the heterogeneity between trials was limited. Subgroup analyses did not reveal any statistically significant interactions although with small numbers of trials in each subgroup (range two to four) this was not surprising. There was some indication that trials with no sham irradiation reported a greater effect of treatment as did trials with a greater percentage of participants with classic choroidal neovascularisation.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

This review currently does not provide evidence that external beam radiotherapy is an effective treatment for neovascular AMD. If further trials are to be considered to evaluate radiotherapy in AMD then adequate masking of the control group must be considered. Given the recent evidence that most lesions are amenable to treatment with photodynamic therapy if identified at a small lesion size, trials evaluating radiotherapy against photodynamic therapy are warranted.

Radiotherapy for recurrent choroidal neovascularisation complicating age related macular degeneration

AIMS

To report the safety and visual outcome data of external beam irradiation for recurrent choroidal neovascularisation complicating age related macular degeneration.

METHODS

Eighteen consecutive eyes received external beam irradiation with seven fractions of 2 Gy (total dose 14 Gy). The next 16 consecutive eyes received external beam irradiation with five fractions of 3 Gy (total dose 15 Gy). Main outcome measure was change in visual acuity. Secondary outcome variables were contrast sensitivity and fundus photographic/fluorescein angiographic progression.

RESULTS

The 3 Gy fraction group lost fewer lines of distance visual acuity at the three and six month follow up. At one year follow up, this difference was not maintained with 2 Gy fraction and 3 Gy fraction eyes. At one year follow up a decrease in visual acuity of three or more lines (moderate visual loss) occurred in 58% of 2 Gy and 42% of 3 Gy fraction eyes (p<0.36). At one year follow up a decrease in visual acuity of six or more lines (severe visual loss) occurred in 41% of 2 Gy eyes and 17% of 3 Gy eyes (p<0.23). At three months follow up, 3 Gy eyes were less likely (0%) than 2 Gy eyes (47%) to show moderate visual loss (p<0.003). However, Kaplan Meier curves estimate a significantly lower rate of severe visual loss in the 3 Gy group (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in contrast sensitivity loss or fluorescein angiographic stabilisation rates. No evidence of radiation toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSION

Our results are consistent with trends for a palliative benefit with higher fraction sizes and doses. The radiobiologic differences between low and high fraction size groups in this study are modest and correlate with the modest and short term difference in visual outcomes. These trends support further investigation of radiotherapy using fraction sizes of 4 Gy or higher.

Palladium-103 plaque radiation therapy for macular degeneration: results of a 7 year study

AIM

To report 7 year results of ophthalmic plaque radiotherapy for exudative macular degeneration.

METHODS

In a phase I clinical trial, 30 patients (31 eyes) were treated with ophthalmic plaque irradiation for subfoveal exudative macular degeneration. Radiation was delivered to a mean 2 mm from the inner sclera (range 1.2-2.4) prescription point calculated along the central axis of the plaque. The mean prescription dose was 17.62 Gy (range 12.5-24) delivered over 34 hours (range 18-65). Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) type standardised visual acuity determinations, ophthalmic examinations, and angiography were performed before and after treatment. Clinical evaluations were performed in a non-randomised and unmasked fashion.

RESULTS

At 33.3 months (range 3-4), 17 of 31 (55%) eyes had lost 3 or more lines of vision on the ETDRS chart, five (16%) had improved 3 or more lines, and the remaining nine (29%) were within 2 lines of their pretreatment visual acuity measurement. Overall, 45% of patients were within or improved more than 2 lines of their initial visual acuity. Five eyes developed macular scars, eight developed subsequent neovascularisation or haemorrhage, and three progressed through therapy. Two patients were lost to follow up. The most common finding of patients followed for 6 or more months (n=18 of 29 (62%)) was regression or stabilisation of the exudative process. No radiation retinopathy, optic neuropathy, or cataracts could be attributed to irradiation.

CONCLUSION

Ophthalmic plaque radiation can be used to treat exudative macular degeneration. At the dose and dose rates employed, most patients experienced decreased exudation or stabilisation of their maculas. No sight limiting radiation complications were noted during 7 year follow up. Owing to the variable natural course of this disease, a prospective randomised clinical trial should be performed to evaluate the efficacy of plaque radiation therapy for exudative macular degeneration.

Current and Future Treatment Options for Nonexudative and Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible visual loss in the industrialised world. Although relatively simple to diagnose through direct visualisation augmented with rapid sequence fluorescein angiography, treatment has presented a far greater challenge because the true aetiology of AMD is largely unknown. Within the past decade, researchers have introduced many new, potentially promising treatment and prevention options in an attempt to minimise the damage imparted from AMD. They capitalise on many of the theoretical and known factors contributing to AMD progression. A high-dose of an orally administered combination of the antioxidants ascorbic acid (vitamin C), tocopherol (vitamin E) and beta-carotene, in addition to copper and zinc, is the only widely accepted preventive therapy. Thermal laser photocoagulation and verteporfin photodynamic therapy are the only standard treatment options available based on large scale, randomised, prospective, placebo-controlled trials; however, efficacy is limited and only a minority of patients who present with AMD are eligible for these treatments. Many other preventive and treatment options are in all phases of clinical studies and expected to change the entire approach to AMD management in the near future. For example, alternative antioxidants, drusen ablation, apheresis and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have shown promise in some studies by preventing or slowing the progression of certain forms of AMD. In addition, alternative photodynamic therapies, low-intensity laser, antiangiogenic medications, radiation treatment and surgery have demonstrated the ability, albeit to differing degrees, to inhibit or possibly even reverse the severe vision loss often associated with AMD characterised by choroidal neovascularisation.

Review Article. New treatments in age-related macular degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of legal blindness in individuals 50 years and older in the developed world. Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in exudative AMD is responsible for the majority of severe vision loss. Until recently, laser photocoagulation was the only well-established and widely accepted treatment for CNV. However, it is beneficial only for a small subset of patients, has a high rate of CNV persistence and recurrence and results in iatrogenic, collateral damage to the overlying retina. These issues make it difficult to recommend in the case of subfoveal lesions. Consequently, numerous experimental therapeutic interventions are under investigation with the common objective of destroying the CNV but leaving the foveal neurosensory retina intact. Treatment modalities can be grouped into five major categories: photodynamic therapy; radiotherapy; transpupillary thermotherapy; anti-angiogenic and angiostatic agents; and surgical intervention. The present review aims to explain the rationale behind these new treatments, analyse the evidence for their safety and efficacy, determine their stage of development and indicate in which patients they are potentially useful.

Age-related macular degeneration: etiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies

Age-related macular degeneration is the principal cause of registered legal blindness among those aged over 65 in the United States, western Europe, Australia, and Japan. Despite intensive research, the precise etiology of molecular events that underlie age-related macular degeneration is poorly understood. However, investigations on parallel fronts are addressing this prevalent public health problem. Sophisticated biochemical and biophysical techniques have refined our understanding of the pathobiology of drusen, geographic atrophy, and retinal pigment epithelial detachments. Epidemiological identification of risk factors has facilitated an intelligent search for underlying mechanisms and fueled clinical investigation of behavior modification. Gene searches have not only brought us to the cusp of identifying the culpable gene loci in age-related macular degeneration, but also localized genes responsible for other macular dystrophies. Recent and ongoing investigations, often cued by tumor biology, have revealed an important role for various growth factors, particularly in the neovascular form of the condition. Transgenic and knockout studies have provided important mechanistic insights into the development of choroidal neovascularization, the principal cause of vision loss in age-related macular degeneration. This in turn has culminated in preclinical and clinical trials of directed molecular interventions.

Clinicopathological correlation of choroidal neovascularization after external beam radiotherapy in age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To analyze the histopathology of choroidal neovascularization after external beam radiotherapy in age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

A retrospective non-case-matched comparative histopathologic study. The histoarchitecture of nine surgically removed subretinal specimens from nine patients that had undergone external beam radiotherapy for exudative age-related macular degeneration was studied. Seven patients had received 20 Gy in 10 fractions and two 15 Gy in 5 fractions with an average time interval between radiotherapy and surgical extraction of 14 months (range 3-28). A consecutive series of classic, mixed and occult choroidal neovascular membranes served as controls.

RESULTS

Clinical findings. Radiation-associated choroidal neovasculopathy was angiographically suspected in four patients: a coarse net of vessels on fluorescein angiography developing at the border of previously irradiated choroidal neovascularization was observed in three patients; blebs at the margin of a plaque on indocyanine green angiography were observed in two patients. Pathological findings. Diffuse drusen as well as intra-Bruch's fibrovascular tissue was found in all irradiated specimens. In four specimens an edematous vascularized layer was seen between diffuse drusen and normal-appearing intra-Bruch's fibrovascular tissue. This lesion was not found in the control specimens. A particular correlation for the bleb lesion was not recognized.

CONCLUSION

The appearance of an edematous subretinal pigment epithelial vascularized layer between diffuse drusen and normal-appearing fibrovascular tissue in four of nine irradiated membranes may be secondary to previous irradiation. It may correlate with the unusual exudative manifestations observed after external beam radiotherapy.

Beta irradiation: new uses for an old treatment: a review

Beta radiation has a long history as a treatment modality in ophthalmology. It is a convenient and practical method of applying radiation and has the advantage of minimal tissue penetration. There has been a recent resurgence in the use of beta radiation in other areas in medicine, such as the prevention of restenosis after coronary artery stenting. Beta radiation has been shown in vitro and in vivo to inhibit proliferation of human Tenon's fibroblasts, which enter a period of growth arrest but do not die. Effects on the cell cycle controller p53 have been shown to be important in this process. In ophthalmology, beta radiation has been used widely for the treatment of pterygium and is under evaluation for treatment of age-related macular degeneration and for controlling wound healing after glaucoma drainage surgery. In this latter role, beta radiation may be particularly appropriate for use in developing countries to improve the results of trabeculectomy while potentially avoiding some of the side effects of other antimetabolites.

Age-related macular degeneration: epidemiology and optimal treatment

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a common macular disease affecting elderly people in the Western world. It is characterised by the appearance of drusen in the macula, accompanied by choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) or geographic atrophy. The disease is more common in Caucasian individuals than in pigmented races. In predominantly Caucasian populations, the age-standardised prevalence of AMD in at least one eye is 7760 cases per million. The age-standardised cumulated 1-year incidence of AMD in at least one eye is 1051 cases per million individuals. AMD is the most important single cause of blindness among Caucasian individuals in developed countries. Blindness resulting from AMD rarely occurs before age 70, and most cases occur after age 80. The age-standardised 1-year incidence of legal blindness resulting from AMD is 212 cases per million. Two-thirds of AMD cases have CNV (exudative cases); the remainder has only geographic atrophy. In cross-sectional population-based studies about 45% of eyes with AMD have visual acuity reduced to 20/200 or worse. This is true both for exudative AMD and pure geographic atrophy. Age and genetic predisposition are known risk factors for AMD. Smoking is probably also a risk factor. Preventive strategies using macular laser photocoagulation are under investigation, but their efficacy in preventing visual loss is as yet unproven. There is no treatment with proven efficacy for geographic atrophy. Optimal treatment for exudative AMD requires a fluorescein angiographic study and a physician capable of interpreting it. For CNV not involving the foveal centre, the only evidence-based treatment is laser photocoagulation. For AMD cases with subfoveal CNV, good visual acuity, and predominantly classic fluorescence pattern on fluorescein angiography, photodynamic therapy with verteporfin is the treatment of choice. Photodynamic therapy is also effective in eyes with pure occult CNV and evidence of recent disease progression. For new subfoveal CNV with poor vision and recurrent CNV, laser photocoagulation can be considered.

Radiotherapy for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: a randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

To report results of 18-month follow up of external beam radiation therapy with photons for subfoveal classic or occult choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in age-related macular degeneration (ARMD).

DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

A total of 161 patients with subfoveal CNV in ARMD were recruited in a prospective double-masked study. The posterior pole of the afflicted eye was given 1 Gy (4 x 0.25 Gy) in the control group and 8 Gy (4 x 2 Gy) or 16 Gy (4 x 4 Gy) in the treatment groups. At the time of treatment, and 6, 12, and 18 months post treatment, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), reading ability, and CNV size were measured.

RESULTS

At the completion of the study 150 (93.2%), 139 (86.3%), and 137 (85.1%) patients were followed for 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. The mean number of lines lost in the BCVA was -1.69, -2.2, and -3.23 in the 1 Gy group; -0.94, -1.25, and -1.73 in the 8 Gy group; -0.51, -0.67, and -1.93 in the 16 Gy group. The difference was significant after 12 months (P =.016 for 8 Gy vs. 1 Gy; P =.006 for 16 Gy vs. 1 Gy), and 18 months (P =.011 for 8 Gy vs. 1 Gy; P =.05 for 16 Gy vs. 1 Gy). The patients with classic CNV, or with an initial distance visual acuity >or=20/100, benefited more from treatment. A significant difference was not found between control group and treatment groups in the reading ability and in the CNV size. No radiation-associated side effects were reported thus far.

CONCLUSION

The number of lines lost in the BCVA was less in the 8 Gy and 16 Gy treatment groups than in the control group during the complete follow up examination. Radiation therapy with 8 Gy and 16 Gy, without showing any difference in efficacy, resulted in a near stabilization of the BCVA in patients with subfoveal classic or occult CNV in ARMD. Further studies are necessary to determine the significance of repeated radiotherapy series with a dose of 8 Gy to improve the effect on the CNV size and thereby to prolong stabilization of distance visual acuity.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration: present and future treatment options

PURPOSE

To review treatment strategies in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD).

METHODS

Medline and Embase search.

RESULTS

Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is the commonest cause of blindness in the developed world in individuals over 50 years of age. ARMD may lead to loss of vision by atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium or by the development of choroidal neovascular membranes (CNVM) under the macula, which leak serous fluid and blood and ultimately cause a blinding disciform scar. Treatment options currently being investigated fall into three main approaches: elimination of the CNVM from the subfoveal area (by laser or surgery), modification of the CNVM (by laser, radiotherapy or chemotherapeutic agents) or lastly prevention of the formation of CNVM (by laser prophylaxis, diet or gene targeting). Whilst almost no therapy restores normal visual acuity, any significant visual improvement over the natural history may be regarded as beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the current and immediate future potential therapies for choroidal neovascularisation in ARMD require considerable advances to be made before they will make any impact on blindness caused by ARMD. Of the current treatments none are curative and the treatment benefits are small. There is an urgent need for new therapies.

Age-related macular degeneration: long-term results of radiotherapy for subfoveal neovascular membranes

PURPOSE

To study results of 2-year follow-up of radiotherapy for subfoveal choroidal neovascular membrane associated with age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

In a randomized prospective clinical study, 101 patients received a low-dose radiotherapy or no treatment. In the treatment group, subfoveal choroidal neovascular membranes were treated with 20 Gy of 6-MV photons to the macula of the affected eye.

RESULTS

The overall complete follow-up rate was 84.2% (85/101). No measurable treatment-related morbidity was seen during or after treatment. Mean changes in log of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) of visual acuity and area of choroidal neovascular membrane for 2-year follow-up were +0.226 +/- 0.373 and 143.5 +/- 53.1% in the treatment group, and +0.563 +/- 0.370 and 190. 3 +/- 81.4% in the control group; a significant difference was found (P <.0001; P =.0008). In patients with smaller choroidal neovascular membrane (</=1.5 mm(2)) or better visual acuity (>/=60/200) at baseline, the treatment group showed a significantly smaller increase in area of choroidal neovascular membrane and a significantly smaller decrease in LogMAR visual acuity for 2 years, whereas there was no significant difference in patients with larger choroidal neovascular membrane (>1.5 mm(2)) or poorer visual acuity (<60/200).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy appeared to have a favorable treatment effect in eyes with subfoveal neovascular membrane associated with AMD. Favorable factors for radiotherapy were a smaller area of choroidal neovascular membrane and better visual acuity.

Treatment of age-related macular degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), while rapidly becoming more prevalent due to an aging population, is still poorly understood and treatment modalities are limited. Fortunately, advances are being made in the treatment of AMD that may greatly alter the outcome of this debilitating disease. Treatments for both wet and dry AMD are reviewed.