Laparoscopic incisional and ventral herniorrhaphy in 100 patients

Comparative effectiveness of hybrid and laparoscopic techniques for repairing complex incisional ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The recently developed Hybrid Hernia Repair technique (HHR), an adaptation of the laparoscopic method, has been proposed as a potential alternative for the treatment of complex Incisional Ventral Hernias (IVH). While single-arm studies have reported promising outcomes, a comprehensive meta-analysis affirming these benefits is lacking. This meta-analysis aims to compare the clinical outcomes of HHR and Laparoscopic Hernia Repair (LHR) in the management of IVH.

METHODS

An exhaustive search of the literature was conducted, targeting publications in both English and Chinese that compare HHR and LHR up to March 31, 2023. The primary outcomes examined were operation time, blood loss, and intestinal injury. Secondary outcomes included rates of seroma, wound infection, post-operative acute/chronic pain, recurrence, and mesh bulging. The RevMan 5.0 software facilitated the statistical meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The final analysis incorporated data from 14 studies, encompassing a total of 1158 patients, with 555 undergoing HHR and 603 treated with LHR. Follow-up data, ranging from 12 to 88 months, were available in 12 out of the 14 identified studies. The HHR method was associated with a significantly lower risk of seroma (OR = 0.29, P = 0.0004), but a higher risk of wound infection (OR = 2.10, P = 0.04). No significant differences were observed between the two techniques regarding operation time, blood loss, intestinal injury, intestinal obstruction, post-operative pain, mesh bulging, and recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The HHR technique did not demonstrate a clear advantage over LHR in reducing surgical complications, apart from a lower incidence of postoperative seroma. Surgeons with substantial expertise may choose to avoid incidental conversion or intentional hybrid procedures. Further research is needed to clarify the optimal surgical approach for IVH.

Hybrid approach for ventral incisional hernias of the abdominal wall: A systematic review of the literature

With increasing complexity of ventral incisional hernias being operated on, the treatment strategy has also evolved to obtain optimal results. Hybrid ventral hernia repair is a promising technique in management of complex/difficult ventral incisional hernias. The aim of this article is to review the literature and analyse the results of hybrid technique in management of ventral incisional hernia and determine its clinical status and ascertain its role. We reviewed the literature on hybrid technique for incisional ventral hernia repair on PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar database published between 2002 and 2019 and out of 218 articles screened, 10 studies were included in the review. Selection of articles was in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. Variables analysed were seroma, wound infection, chronic pain and recurrence. Qualitative analysis of the variables was carried out. In this systematic review, the incidence of complications associated within this procedure were seroma formation (5.47%), wound infections (6.53%) and chronic pain (4.49%). Recurrence was seen in 3.29% of patients. Hybrid ventral hernia repair represents a natural evolution in advancement of hernia repair. The judicious use of hybrid repair in selected patients combines the safety of open surgery with several advantages of the laparoscopic approach with favourable surgical outcomes in terms of recurrence, seroma and incidence of chronic pain. However, larger multi-centric prospective studies with long term follow up is required to standardise the technique and to establish it as a procedure of choice for this complex disease entity.

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a composite mesh with polypropylene and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: a prospective, multicentre registry

BACKGROUND

Abdominal wall hernias are a common problem. Composite meshes placed intraperitoneally for abdominal wall hernia repair are widely used. This registry evaluated the safety and efficacy of one specific composite mesh with polypropylene and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Intramesh^® T1) in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

METHODS

A prospective multicentre registry with data from seven centres was collected between January 2013 and September 2014. Primary endpoint was recurrence rate at 12 months determined by clinical examination. Secondary outcome measures included intraoperative complications, complications during hospitalisation and at 1-month and 12-months follow-up.

RESULTS

The registry included 90 patients (30 female and 60 male). Fifty-five patients (61.1%) presented with primary ventral hernias and 35 patients (38.9%) with incisional ventral hernias. Median hernia size was 4 cm². Intraoperative complications were reported in two patients (2.2%). Complications during hospitalisation were reported in four (4.4%) patients. At 1-month follow-up, 17 (18.9%) patients had postoperative complications, of which 5 complications were major and 19 were minor. Late complications at 12-months were observed in 10 patients (11.1%), of which 2 were major and 8 minor complications.

CONCLUSION

Intramesh^® T1 is a safe and effective composite mesh with favourable short and midterm outcome and morbidity. (NCT01816867).

Massive Incisional Hernia Repair with Parietex: Monocentric Analysis on 500 Cases Treated with a Laparoscopic Approach

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study is to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of the laparoscopic technique for treatment of massive incisional hernias (MIHs) and to compare three different fixation devices.

METHODS

From January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2014, we collected retrospective data from patients with large incisional hernias (IHs). Laparoscopic IH repair is performed by applying a three-dimensional polyester knit structure mesh with a resorbable collagen barrier on peritoneal side (Parietex™ Composite Mesh; Covidien, New Haven, CT). Patients were divided into three groups according to the different fixation devices. The mean follow-up was 19 (12-156) months.

RESULTS

The mean defect size was 12.83 cm (10-26 cm) and the mean body mass index was 30.8 kg/m² (26-39 kg/m²). The EMS stapler™ was used on 260 patients, the Protack^® on 210 patients, and the AbsorbaTack™ on 30 patients. The mean operative time was 69.9 minutes (38-130 minutes). Intraoperative morbidity rate was 1.6% (8 cases). Early reoperation rate was 0.2% (1 case). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.3 days (range 2-7 days). Seromas were observed in 20 patients (4.0%) and neuralgia in 10 patients (2.0%). Recurrence was observed in 12 patients (2.4%) with the majority in the absorbable tack group (10%). There were no conversions (0%) to open technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic approach seems to be safe and appropriate for treatment of MIH. The Parietex composite mesh we used guarantees excellent intraabdominal laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall defects. Absorbatack system seems to give less postoperative neuralgia, but it is related to a high recurrence rate. Protack system seems to give more postoperative neuralgia than the Endopath EMS. In our experience, the best fixation system is the latter.

Force Comparison of Commercially Available Transfascial Suture Passers

BACKGROUND

Transfascial suture passers (TSPs) are a commonly used surgical tool available in a wide array of tip configurations. We assessed the insertion force of various TSPs in an ex vivo porcine model.

METHODS

Uniform sections of porcine abdominal wall were secured to a 3D-printed platform. Nine TSPs were passed through the abdominal wall both without and with prolene suture under the following scenarios: abdominal wall only and abdominal wall plus underlay ePTFE or composite ePTFE/polypropylene mesh. Insertion forces were recorded in Newton (N).

RESULTS

When passed without suture through the abdominal wall, smaller diameter TSPs required less insertional force (1.50 ± 0.17 N vs 9.68 ± 1.50 N [ P = 0.00072]). Through composite mesh, the solid tipped TSPs required less force than hollow tipped ones (3.87 ± 0.25 N vs 7.88 ± 0.20 N [ P = 0.00026]). Overall, smaller diameter TSPs required less force than the larger TSPs when passed through ePTFE empty (Gore 2.95 ± 0.83 N vs Carter-Thomason 16.07 ± 2.10 N [ P = .0005]) or with suture (Gore 8.37 ± 2.59 N vs Carter-Thomason 19.12 ± 1.10 N [ P = .003]).

CONCLUSIONS

Diameter plays the greatest role in the force required for TSP penetration. However, when passed through underlay mesh or while holding suture, distal tip shape, the mechanism of suture holding, and shaft diameter all contribute to the forces necessary for penetration. These factors should be considered when choosing a TSP for intraoperative use.

Current Status and Challenges of Laparoscopy in Ventral Hernia Repair

Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias gained strong popularity in the late nineties with some of the early enthusiasm lost later in time. We review the current status and challenges of laparoscopy in ventral hernia repair and best practices in this area. We specifically looked at patient and hernia defect factors, technical considerations that have contributed to the successes, and some of the failures of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR). Patients best suited for a laparoscopic repair are those who are obese and diabetic with a total defect size not to exceed 10 cm in width or a "Swiss cheese" defect. Overlap of mesh to healthy fascia of at least 5 cm in every direction, with closure of the defect, is essential to prevent recurrence or bulging over time. Complications specifically related to surgical site occurrence favor the laparoscopic approach. Recurrence rates, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life results are similar to open repairs, but long-term data are lacking. There is still conflicting data regarding ways of fixating the mesh. The science of prosthetic material appropriate for intraperitoneal placement continues to evolve. The field continues to be plagued by single author, single institution, and small nonrandomized observational studies with short-term follow-up. The recent development of large prospective databases might allow for pragmatic and point-of-care studies with long-term follow-up. We conclude that LVHR has evolved since its inception, has overcome many challenges, but still needs better long-term studies to evaluate evolving practices.

Current Trends in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair

Background and Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to analyze the surgical technique, postoperative complications, and possible recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) in comparison with open ventral hernia repair (OVHR), based on the international literature.

Database:

A Medline search of the current English literature was performed using the terms laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and incisional hernia repair.

Conclusions:

LVHR is a safe alternative to the open method, with the main advantages being minimal postoperative pain, shorter recovery, and decreased wound and mesh infections. Incidental enterotomy can be avoided by using a meticulous technique and sharp dissection to avoid thermal injury.

The usefulness of laparoscopic hernia repair in the management of incisional hernia following liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The reported incidence of incisional hernia following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) varies from 4% to 23%. Postoperative wound complications are less frequent after laparoscopic repair while maintaining low recurrence rates. We present our experience in managing this complication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively, collected data of all patients who underwent liver transplant and developed incisional hernias were analyzed. Patients' demographic data, anthropometric data, transplantation-related data, and repair-related operative and postoperative data were collected. Risk factors for post-transplant incisional hernia were appraised in our patients. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A included patients who had their incisional hernia repaired through the laparoscopic approach, and Group B included patients who had their incisional hernia repaired through open conventional approach.

RESULTS

A total of 488 liver transplantations were performed at our institution between May 2001 and end of December 2012. Thirty-three patients developed incisional hernias after primary direct closure of the abdominal wall with an overall incidence of 6.9%. Hernia repair was done in 25 patients. Follow-up ranged from 6.4 to 106.1 months with a mean of 48.3 ± 28.3 months. All patients were living at the end of the follow up except four patients (16%). Group A included 13 patients, and Group B included 12 patients. The size of defects and operative time did not differ significantly between both the groups. On the other hand, hospital stay was significantly shorter in laparoscopic group. Complication rate following laparoscopic repair was insignificantly different for open repair.

CONCLUSION

In experienced hands, laparoscopic incisional hernia repair in post-liver transplant setting proved to be a safe and feasible alternative to open approach and showed superior outcome expressed in shorter hospital stay, with low recurrence and complication rate.

Laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: evidence-based guidelines of the first Italian Consensus Conference

PURPOSE

The laparoscopic treatment of ventral incisional hernias is the object of constant attention and is becoming increasingly widespread in the international scientific-surgical community; however, there is ample debate on its technical details and indications. In order to establish a common approach on laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair, the first Italian Consensus Conference was organized in Naples (Italy) on 14-15 January 2010.

METHODS

The format of the Consensus Conference was freely adapted from the standards of the National Institute of Health and the Italian Health Institute. The parties involved included the followings: a Promotional Committee, a Scientific Committee, a group of Experts, the Jury Panel and a Scientific Secretariat.

RESULTS

Eleven statements, regarding three large chapters on the indications, the technical details and the management of complications were drafted on the basis of literature references collected by the Scientific Committee, documents developed by the Experts, reports presented and discussed during the Consensus Conference, and discussion among the members of the Jury.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic approach is safe and effective for defects larger than 3 cm in diameter; old age, obesity, previous abdominal operations, recurrence and strangulation are not absolute contraindications. Ensuring an adequate overlap, careful adhesiolysis and correct fixing of the prosthesis are among the technical details recommended. Complications and recurrences are comparable to, and in some cases, less numerous than with the open approach.

Staged laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair when faced with enterotomy or suspicion of an enterotomy

Enterotomy is a significant complication of laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair (LVHR) and can be devastating if missed. Enterotomy occurs in 2.6% of patients undergoing LVHR and is missed 21.8% of the time. Controversy exists regarding the management of known or potential enterotomies. Approaches for managing recognized enterotomies during hernia repair are usually employed immediately; in a nonstaged fashion; and include laparoscopic enterotomy repair with immediate LVHR, laparotomy for repair of enterotomy with concomitant LVHR, or conversion to laparotomy for both enterotomy and hernia repair. The staged approach for managing recognized or potential enterotomies is less commonly employed and involves laparoscopic repair of enterotomy, admission, and delayed but definitive laparoscopic hernia repair in the same hospitalization. The presence of known or potential enterotomies during LVHR presents a difficult problem and may be a contraindication for immediate placement of prosthetic because of increased risks posed for abdominal infection, reoperation, prosthetic removal, hernia recurrence, and death. The staged approach--with a 2- to 5-day delay--represents a safe solution to this challenging problem. We present 4 cases managed via staged approach due to an enterotomy, risk factors, and suspicion for missed or delayed enterotomies augmented by a review of the literature.

Procedimento de Rives/Stoppa modificado robô-assistido para correção de hernias ventrais da linha média

RACIONAL: Os defeitos da linha média podem ser congênitos ou adquiridos. Os procedimentos convencionais para correção desse defeito geralmente envolvem grandes incisões, com grandes descolamentos de pele e tecido celular subcutâneo. O uso da videocirurgia para a correção desses defeitos, ainda é controverso. OBJETIVOS: Realizar descrição inédita na literatura, mostrando a experiência inicial do uso da robótica nas reconstruções de linha média, associando a cirurgia minimamente invasiva à técnicas consagradas como Rives/Stoppa e separação de componentes. MÉTODOS: Foram operados cinco pacientes no mesmo hospital, pela mesma equipe, usando o sistema robótico da Vinci S. RESULTADOS: Foram três mulheres e dois homens, sem mortalidade na amostra. Duas pacientes foram reoperadas com hérnia pelo tunel entre os músculos retos do abdomen e aponeurose posterior, com fechamento dos mesmos na reoperação. CONCLUSÕES: O procedimento robótico para reconstrução da linha média mostrou-se factível e esteticamente aceitável. Tem a vantagem de seguir os princípios tradicionais aventados para a parede abdominal através de via minimamente invasiva.

Post-operative adhesions after digestive surgery: their incidence and prevention: review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Post-operative adhesions after gastrointestinal surgery are responsible for significant morbidity and constitute an important public health problem. The aim of this study was to review the surgical literature to determine the incidence, consequences and the variety of possible countermeasures to prevent adhesion formation.

METHODS

A systematic review of English and French language surgical literature published between 1995 and 2009 was performed using the keywords "adhesion" and "surgery".

RESULTS

Peritoneal adhesions are reported as the cause of 32% of acute intestinal obstruction and 65-75% of all small bowel obstructions. It is estimated that peritoneal adhesions develop after 93-100% of upper abdominal laparotomies and after 67-93% of lower abdominal laparotomies. Nevertheless, only 15-18% of these adhesions require surgical re-intervention. The need for re-intervention for adhesion-related complications varies depending on the initial type of surgery, the postoperative course and the type of incision. The laparoscopic approach appears to decrease the risk of adhesion formation by 45% and the need for adhesion-related re-intervention to 0.8% after appendectomy and to 2.5% after colorectal surgery. At the present time, only one product consisting of hyaluronic acid applied to a layer of carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm(®)) has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative adhesion formation; but this product is also associated with a significant increase in the incidence of anastomotic leakage when the membrane is applied in direct contact with the anastomosis. The use of this product has not been shown to decrease the risk of re-intervention for bowel obstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevention of postoperative adhesions is an important public health goal, particularly in light of the frequency of this complication. The routine use of anti-adhesion products is not recommended given the lack of studies with a high level of evidence concerning their efficacy and safety of use.

Feasibility and effectiveness of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia is a frequent problem after liver transplantation. It is related to immunosuppression, use of steroids, obesity, as well as the type of incision. Laparoscopic repair shows a lower rate of complications in terms of infection and recurrence, as well as reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery.

METHODS

We reviewed our experience with laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (LIHR) in patients after liver transplantation, using the BARD Composix mesh which is composed of two layers of polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and fixed with metal ProTack.

RESULTS

Between March 2002 and April 2010, we performed 20 LIHR in 17 male and three female subjects of overall mean age of 58.3 years, and body mass Index of 31.05 kg/m(2). The mean size of the defects was 215.25 cm(2). All patients had undergone bilateral subcostal incisions with a midline extension, and seven had additional operations after the transplantation for various reasons. There were no differences in immunosuppression. Three patients had needed steroid boluses for acute graft rejection episodes. There was no conversion of therapy. The size of mesh was 18 × 23 cm in seven cases and 20 × 25 in 12 cases. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.1 days. Oral feeding was initiated a few hours after surgery, and routine immunosuppression was not discontinued. There were no major early complications. During follow-up, we identified one patient with a mesh infection (5%) and one with a recurrence (5%).

CONCLUSION

LIHR is safe and feasible even for major hernias after liver transplantation with few complications.

Is the outcome of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair affected by defect size? A prospective study

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to determine if defect size after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is predictive of recurrence during the long-term follow-up evaluation.

METHODS

We performed a prospective clinical study on 310 patients who underwent laparoscopic incisional hernia repair to identify predictable risk factors for hernia recurrence. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used. The defect size was analyzed with curve receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

The overall recurrence rate was 6% after an average follow-up period of 60 months. On univariate analysis of the defect size (categories: <10 cm, 10-12 cm, and >15 cm), obesity, previous repairs, hernia location, surgical time, hospital stay, morbidity, and recurrences were significantly different (P < .001). By multivariate analysis, only obesity and defect size were independent prognostic factors (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive value of defect size is shown. Patients with large defects have a higher risk of recurrence. Our study recommends reserving the laparoscopic technique for hernias not exceeding 10 cm in size, where it can be put to better use.

Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair

Background:

It has been more than a decade, since the introduction of laparoscopic management of ventral and incisional hernia. The purpose of this article was to systematically review the literature, analyze the results of Laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia and to ascertain its role.

Materials and Methods:

Pubmed was used for identifying the original articles. Both incisional and ventral hernia repair were included. Out of 145 articles extracted from Pubmed, 34 original studies were considered for review. More than three thousand patients were included in the review. Variables analyzed in the review were inpatient stay, defect size, mesh size, hematoma, seroma, wound infection, bowel perforation, obstruction, ileus, recurrence and pain. Qualitative analysis of the variables was carried out.

Results:

Seromas (5.45%) and post operative pain (2.75%) are the two common complications associated with this procedure. Recurrence rate was found to be 3.67%. Overall complication rate was 19.24%, with two deaths reported.

Conclusion:

The results suggest laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia as an effective procedure. Faster recovery and shorter in patient stay - makes it a feasible alternative to open repair.

Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair

BACKGROUND

There are many different techniques currently in use for ventral and incisional hernia repair. Laparoscopic techniques have become more common in recent years, although the evidence is sparse.

OBJECTIVES

We compared laparoscopic with open repair in patients with (primary) ventral or incisional hernia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, metaRegister of Controlled Trials. The last searches were conducted in July 2010. In addition, congress abstracts were searched by hand.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled studies (RCTs), which compared the two techniques in patients with ventral or incisional hernia. Studies were included irrespective of language, publication status, or sample size. We did not include quasi-randomised trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors assessed trial quality and extracted data independently. Meta-analytic results are expressed as relative risks (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 RCTs with a total number of 880 patients suffering primarily from primary ventral or incisional hernia. No trials were identified on umbilical or parastomal hernia. The recurrence rate was not different between laparoscopic and open surgery (RR 1.22; 95% CI 0.62 to 2.38; I(2) = 0%), but patients were followed up for less than two years in half of the trials. Results on operative time were too heterogeneous to be pooled. The risk of intraoperative enterotomy was slightly higher in laparoscopic hernia repair (Peto OR 2.33; 95% CI 0.53 to 10.35), but this result stems from only 7 cases with bowel lesion (5 vs. 2). The most clear and consistent result was that laparoscopic surgery reduced the risk of wound infection (RR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.46; I(2)= 0%). Laparoscopic surgery shortened hospital stay significantly in 6 out of 9 trials, but again data were heterogeneous. Based on a small number of trials, it was not possible to detect any difference in pain intensity, both in the short- and long-term evaluation. Laparoscopic repair apparently led to much higher in-hospital costs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The short-term results of laparoscopic repair in ventral hernia are promising. In spite of the risks of adhesiolysis, the technique is safe. Nevertheless, long-term follow-up is needed in order to elucidate whether laparoscopic repair of ventral/incisional hernia is efficacious.

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with fibrin glue in select patients

Hi-Tex dual-sided mesh fixed to the abdominal wall with fibrin glue was successful in the repair of incisional hernia in select patients.

Background and Objective:

Laparoscopic treatment of incisional hernias can be performed using different types of fixation devices and prosthesis. We present a case series of 19 patients with incisional hernias with a diameter of <6cm, who underwent laparoscopic repair using Hi-tex dual-side mesh, positioned intraperitoneally, fixed to the abdominal wall by fibrin glue (Tissucol).

Methods:

Nineteen patients with incisional hernias <6cm in diameter were enrolled in this study and treated laparoscopically with Hi-tex and Tissucol. Surgical complications and patient outcomes were assessed with a clinical follow-up.

Results:

Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias by using Hi-tex mesh affixed to the parietal wall with fibrin glue was feasible and easy in patients with parietal defects <6cm in diameter. Mean operating time was 30 minutes. Mean hospital stay was 1.5 days. Almost no postoperative pain, major surgical complications, seroma formation, relapses, or prosthesis infection occurred during a mean follow-up of 20 months.

Conclusions:

In select patients, Hi-tex mesh affixed using fibrin glue allows laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias with very good patient outcomes, especially in terms of postoperative pain and seroma formation.

[Historic analysis of complex incisional hernia: to an understanding of the double prosthetic repair technique]

The treatment of complex incisional hernias is, on occasions, a real social and professional, and still controversial, challenge. A multitude of techniques have been described over the years in an attempt to solve this problem. The social context and technological development of each period are essential to understand the continuous changes in the way of performing these techniques. This article caries out an historical review of the prosthetic treatment of incisional hernias, trying to understand and apply the basic principles of the treatment of all incisional hernias to the repair with a double mesh.

Pseudo-recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic mesh repair is an established alternative to the open repair of herniae of the antero-lateral abdominal wall. However, a definition in the literature of "recurrence" is lacking. This study reviews the phenomenon of pseudo-recurrence in patients who describe recurrent symptoms despite an apparently successful laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair (LVIHR).

METHODS

Cases of LVIHR from 1st January 2004 to 31st December 2007 were identified from the Lothian Surgical Audit database. Patients were contacted by telephone after a minimum of 11 months following operation. Pseudo-recurrences were identified by history and clinical examination, together with radiological investigation if the diagnosis remained in doubt.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-three repairs were performed in the study period. One hundred and twenty-one patients were contacted (63 incisional and 58 other ventral herniae). Twenty possible recurrences were reported (16.5%). Four were true recurrences and two more were new incisional herniae. There were 14 pseudo-recurrences, arising after 12 incisional and two other ventral hernia repairs. These were due to mesh bulge (10), seroma (3) and retained hernia contents (1).

CONCLUSION

True recurrences after LVIHR do occur but should be preventable with good surgical technique. Pseudo-recurrences are more common and may mimic true recurrence. We recommend computed tomography (CT) to clarify the diagnosis and determine the indication for revisional surgery.

Long-term results of laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias using an intraperitoneal composite mesh

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to evaluate the long-term complications and recurrences of laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias. Very few studies evaluate objectively the long-term results of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.

METHODS

Data for 200 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (LIHR) in a university teaching hospital using a standardized procedure between January 1994 and December 2006 were collected prospectively. The median follow-up was 6 (range, 1-12) years.

RESULTS

The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open approach was 2.5% (205 initial patients). Mean operative time was 51 minutes; 63% of these patients were discharged the day of surgery. Mean hospital stay was 2.6 days. There was an overall postoperative complication rate of 15%. We had four small bowel injuries repaired laparoscopically, and one patient died as a result of a sepsis. Postoperative pain was limited, with a mean analgesics requirement of 6.8 (range, 0-30) days. During a mean follow-up of 60 (range, 12-144) months, the recurrence rate was 6.2%, which developed within 1 year of the operation and associated with body mass index >37, defect size >10 cm, and multiple Swiss-cheese defects (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

1) Intra-abdominal composite mesh is good tolerance. 2) The recurrence rate is low and within 1 year of the operation. 3) The long-term morbidity with LIHR is moderate. 4) The risk of intestinal injury is not predictable. 5) Reoperations can be performed with sufficient guarantee using laparoscopy.

Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this article is to analyze laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia (IVH).

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to analyze clinical trials on IVH.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials involving a total of 366 patients were analyzed. There were 183 patients in each group. Open repair of IVH was associated with significantly higher complication rates and longer hospital stays than laparoscopic repair. There was also some evidence that surgical times may be longer for open repair of IVH. However, statistically there was no difference in wound pain or recurrence rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic repair of IVH is safe, with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays, and possibly a shorter surgical time. However, postoperative pain and recurrence rates are similar for both techniques. Hence, the laparoscopic approach may be considered for IVH repair if technically feasible, but more trials with longer follow-up evaluations are required to strengthen the evidence.

Laparoscopic repair of incarcerated ventral abdominal wall hernias

BACKGROUND

The role of laparoscopy in the management of incarcerated (irreducible) ventral hernia remains to be elucidated. We present our experience of the laparoscopic repair of incarcerated primary ventral and incisional hernias over an 8-year period.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the records of 112 patients undergoing laparoscopic repair for incarcerated primary ventral and incisional hernias from January 1998 to February 2006 was performed. The patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were assessed.

RESULTS

The procedure was completed entirely laparoscopically in 103 patients (91.9%) with the placement of intraperitoneal mesh. A sutured tissue repair (without mesh) was performed in seven patients and hernia repair was abandoned after laparoscopy in two patients. Five patients required limited conversion by a targeted skin incision for the resection of nonviable bowel (three patients) and to complete adhesiolysis within multiloculated hernial sacs (two patients). The contents of the hernial sacs were incarcerated omentum (42 patients), small bowel (28 patients), large bowel (six patients), and omentum and small bowel (34 patients). Of these, seven patients presented with signs of acute small-bowel obstruction. The mean size of the largest defect through which incarceration occurred was 3.5 +/- 1.6 cm (range 1.5-7.5 cm) and the mean size of the mesh used was 379 +/- 210 cm2 (range 225-780 cm2). The mean operative time was 96 +/- 40.8 min (range 50-170 min). Inadvertent enterotomy occurred in four patients during bowel reduction and adhesiolysis. In two patients, the enterotomy was repaired by total laparoscopy followed by mesh placement, and two patients required conversion to formal laparotomy due to long-segment tears and peritoneal contamination. The average postoperative hospital stay was 2.8 +/- 1.5 days (range 1-6.5 days). Postoperative complications occurred in 20.5% patients. There was no mortality. Hernia recurred in three patients at a mean follow-up of 48 +/- 28.3 months (range 1-84 months).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic ventral abdominal wall hernia repair can be safely performed with a low complication rate, even in incarcerated hernias. Careful bowel reduction with adhesiolysis and mesh repair in an uncontaminated abdomen with a 5-cm mesh overlap remain key factors for a successful outcome.

Parastomal hernia: short-term outcome after laparoscopic and conventional repairs

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes after laparoscopic and conventional parastomal hernia repairs. A retrospective review of parastomal hernia repairs was performed. Conventional repairs included primary suture repair, stoma relocation, and mesh repair. Laparoscopic repairs included the Sugarbaker and keyhole techniques. Forty-nine patients underwent repair of symptomatic parastomal hernias: 19 ileostomies, 13 colostomies, and 17 urostomies. Thirty patients underwent 39 conventional repairs. Nineteen patients underwent laparoscopic surgical repairs. Operative times were longer for laparoscopic repair (208 +/- 58 vs 162 +/- 114 minutes, P = .06). The mean length of stay was 6 days for both groups (P = .74). The mean follow-up was shorter in the laparoscopic group (20 vs 65 months, P < or = .001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of surgical site infections (11% laparoscopic vs 5% conventional, P = .60) or complication rates (63% laparoscopic vs 36% conventional, P = .67). Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair is a feasible operation with similar short-term outcomes to conventional repairs.

Full laparoscopic incisional hernia repair using a 2-port route technique

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The incidence of incisional hernia repair is increasing each year throughout the world. We created a full laparoscopic herniorrhaphy by means of an easy, reliable, and minimally invasive (two trocars) intraperitoneal onlay technique, using different sizes of a DualMesh (W. L. Gore & Associates; Flagstaff, AZ) with the soft side against the adherence material.

METHODS

A group of patients with an incisional hernia and other ventral hernias underwent a laparoscopic herniorrhaphy using this technique. By combining simple extra- and endocorporeal manipulation, a mesh, prior to being inserted into peritoneal cavity through a trocar port was completed with four sutures between the corner of the mesh and the abdominal wall, so that when pulling the strands outside the abdomen, the furled intraperitoneal mesh being unfurled flat, was lifted from and overlapped the hernial defect at the top of the abdomen spontaneously and exactly. The mesh was anchored by nonabsorbable surtures and endo-Helical Fasteners. The sutures were either tied and the knots buried subcutaneously, or were eventually removed.

RESULTS

It is by employing only two trocars applying this technique to a complete full laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay of different sizes of a DualMesh incisional and ventral hernia repair. The mesh overlapped all hernial margins nicely and was anchored firmly. Postoperative courses were uneventful, without any complications. During the longest follow-up period of 2 years and 1 month, there was no recurrent evidence of the hernia in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique, which applies to almost every laparoscopic ventral hernia repair procedure for use against an adherence mesh, can help to carry out an ideal, easy, and quick orientation and intraperitoneal anchoring of the mesh.

Wound complications following kidney and liver transplantation

Advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppression (IS) have led to an appreciable reduction in postoperative complications following transplantation. However, wound complications as probably the most common type of post-transplantation surgical complication can still limit these improved outcomes and result in prolonged hospitalization, hospital readmission, and reoperation, consequently increasing overall transplant cost. Our aim was to review the literature to delineate the evidence-based risk factors for wound complications following kidney and liver transplantation (KTx, LTx), and to present the preventive and therapeutic modalities for this bothersome morbidity. Generally, wound complications are categorized as superficial and deep wound dehiscences, perigraft fluid collections and seroma, superficial and deep wound infections, cellulitis, lymphocele and wound drainage. The results of several studies showed that the most important risk factors for wound complications are IS and obesity. Additionally, there are surgical and/or technical factors, including type of incision, reoperation, and surgeon's expertise, as well as comorbidities such as advanced age, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, and uremia. Preventive management of wound complications necessitates defining their etiological factors so that their detrimental effects on healing processes can be addressed and reduced. IS modalities and agents, especially sirolimus (SRL), and steroids (ST) should be adjusted according to the patient's co-existing risk factors. SRL should be administered three months after transplantation and ST should be tapered as soon as possible. A body mass index (BMI) lower than 30 kg/m2 is advisable for inclusion in a transplantation program, but higher BMIs do not exclude recipients. Surgical risk factors can be prevented by applying precise surgical techniques. Therapeutic modalities must focus on the most efficient and cost-effective medications and/or interventions to facilitate and improve wound healing.

Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze the published perioperative results and outcomes of laparoscopic (LVHR) and open (OVHR) ventral hernia repair focusing on complications and hernia recurrences.

METHODS

Data were compiled from all English-language reports of LVHR published from 1996 through January 2006. Series with fewer than 20 cases of LVHR, insufficient details of complications, or those part of a larger series were excluded. Data were derived from 31 reports of LVHR alone (unpaired studies) and 14 that directly compared LVHR to OVHR (paired studies). Chi-squared analysis, Fisher's exact test, and two-tailed t-test analysis were used.

RESULTS

Forty-five published series were included, representing 5340 patients (4582 LVHR, 758 OVHR). In the pooled analysis (combined paired and unpaired studies), LVHR was associated with significantly fewer wound complications (3.8% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.0001), total complications (22.7% vs. 41.7%, p < 0.0001), hernia recurrences (4.3% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.0001), and a shorter length of stay (2.4 vs. 4.3 days, p = 0.0004). These outcomes maintained statistical significance when only the paired studies were analyzed. In the pooled analysis, LVHR was associated with fewer gastrointestinal (2.6% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.0001), pulmonary (0.6% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.0013), and miscellaneous (0.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.0011) complications, but a higher incidence of prolonged procedure site pain (1.96% vs. 0.92%, p = 0.0469); none of these outcomes was significant in the paired study analysis. No differences in cardiac, neurologic, septic, genitourinary, or thromboembolic complications were found. The mortality rate was 0.13% with LVHR and 0.26% with OVHR (p = NS). Trends toward larger hernia defects and larger mesh sizes were observed for LVHR.

CONCLUSIONS

The published literature indicates fewer wound-related and overall complications and a lower rate of hernia recurrence for LVHR compared to OVHR. Further controlled trials are necessary to substantiate these findings and to assess the health care economic impact of this approach.

Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia mesh repair: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

An incisional hernia develops in 3% to 13% of laparotomy incisions, with primary suture repair of ventral hernias yielding unsatisfactory results. The introduction of a prosthetic mesh to ensure abdominal wall strength without tension has decreased the recurrence rate, but open repair requires significant soft tissue dissection in tissues that are already of poor quality as well as flap creation, increasing complication rates and affecting the recurrence rate. A minimally invasive approach was applied to the repair pf ventral hernias, with the expectation of earlier recovery, fewer postoperative complications, and decreased recurrence rates. This prospective study was performed to objectively analyze and compare the outcomes after open and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

METHODS

The outcomes for 50 unselected patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were compared with those for 50 consecutive unselected patients who underwent open repair. The open surgical operations were performed by the Rives and Stoppa technique using prosthetic mesh, whereas the laparoscopic repairs were performed using the intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair technique in all cases.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 100 patients (82 women and 18 men) with a mean age of 55.25 years (range, 30-83 years). The patients in the two groups were comparable at baseline in terms of sex, presenting complaints, and comorbid conditions. The patients in laparoscopic group had larger defects (93.96 vs 55.88 cm2; p = 0.0023). The mean follow-up time was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.5640-23.0227 months). The mean surgery durations were 90.6 min for the laparoscopic repair and 93.3 min for the open repair (p = 0.769, nonsignificant difference). The mean postoperative stay was shorter for the laparoscopic group than for the open hernia group (2.7 vs 4.7 days; p = 0.044). The pain scores were similar in the two groups at 24 and 48 h, but significantly less at 72 h in the laparoscopic group (mean visual analog scale score, 2.9412 vs 4.1702; p = 0.001). There were fewer complications (24%) and recurrences (2%) among the patients who underwent laparoscopic repair than among those who had open repair (30% and 10%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate that laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in our experience was safe and resulted in shorter operative time, fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and less recurrence. Hence, it should be considered as the procedure of choice for ventral hernia repair.

Traitement cœlioscopique des éventrations. Étude prospective non randomisée de 51 éventrations

AIM OF THE STUDY

Insertion of a mesh in treatment of incisional hernias reduces the risk of recurrence. A single prospective randomized trial have compared laparoscopic and open approach: there were less postoperative complications and fewer recurrences in the laparoscopic group. Aim of this prospective trial was to control these results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2000 to May 2005, 51 consecutive incisional hernias were operated on by a laparoscopic approach. Incisional hernia was single in 41 and double in 5. It was median in 41 and lateral in 10. Previous hernia repair was noticed in 33.3%. Main criteria was recurrence. We have considered whether one of the following criteria was associated with the risk of recurrence: sex, obesity, previous repair, pre and preoperative sizes of the hernia, uni or multi orificial aspect of the hernia, median or lateral location, mesh size, ratio mesh surface/hernia surface. Others were postoperative mortality and morbidity, duration of hospitalisation and occurrence of late events.

RESULTS

At 2 years all patients were followed. Follow up achieved 3 years in 23 cases and 4 years in 9. Recurrence was observed in 7 (13.7%). None predictive factor was disclosed. No death occurred. Median postoperative pain score at D1, D2 and D3 was respectively 3.1+/-1.9, 2.9+/-2.3 and 2.3+/-2.1. Mean postoperative stay was 4.1+/-1.9 days. Seven postoperative complications occurred, al benign. During follow-up 18 events were noticed and of these 8 were chronic abdominal pain.

CONCLUSION

This technique could be employed for every type of incisional hernia but peristomial hernias (not assessed in this study) and every patient. Technical improvements ought to be find to reduce recurrence rate.

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a review of the literature

Incisional hernia is a common long-term complication of abdominal surgery. Historically the open repair with or without mesh was the mainstay of treatment. However, many recently published laparoscopic repair studies have challenged surgeons to re-evaluate which technique provides the best short and long-term outcomes. A Medline search of all English-language literature was performed using the keywords 'incisional', 'ventral', 'hernia', 'laparoscopic', and 'open'. Further references were obtained by cross-referencing the bibliography in each paper. Current evidence suggests that the laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is the optimal surgical treatment. A laparoscopic repair appears to shorten hospital stay, decrease perioperative complication rates, and decrease recurrence rates. However, there is no randomized trial utilizing a standardized complication grading system making it difficult to draw a definitive conclusion as to which repair is best.

Open Reconstruction of Sizeable Ventral Hernias in the Laparoscopic Era

The purpose of this study was to review our 15 years of experience in the repair of sizeable ventral hernias with a standardized open surgery technique, to evaluate the clinical outcome, and to assess the decreasing role of traditional surgical techniques in the laparoscopic era. A retrospective study has been conducted, including 200 patients operated for ventral hernia defects with a standardized underlay mesh implantation technique between 1990 and 2004. Their mean age was 62.6 (range 21–88) years and their mean BMI (body mass index) was 33.4 (range 22–69). Out of them, 56 per cent presented one to four major risk factors and 31.5 per cent had previously undergone ventral hernia repair surgery. The mean size of hernial defect was 135.2 (range 24–684) cm2. The mean follow-up was 43 (range 3–174) months. The overall major complication rate was 3.8 per cent and overall recurrence rate was 9.6 per cent. Our retrospective study confirms the safety and efficacy of open reconstruction in complex hernias. Prospective randomized homogenous trials with long-term follow-up are needed to provide us a better evidence-based approach. Minimal invasive surgery is favored but open reconstruction should still be considered as an alternative for sizeable ventral hernias management. A careful selection among patients for selecting the optimal technique is necessary.

Surgeon perspectives on options for ventral abdominal wall hernia repair: results of a postal questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Ventral abdominal wall hernias are a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Opinion varies as to appropriate management. A recent consensus meeting on incisional hernia identified the need to standardise repair. On this background, a survey of current practice was performed.

METHOD

A questionnaire was sent to 101 practicing general surgeons within the West of Scotland. Incisional, epigastric and para-umbilical defects were subdivided into defect size <2, 2-5 and >5 cm. The surgeons were asked to indicate the most appropriate repair (suture, mayo or mesh) for each. The influence of reducibility on the decision to repair was also assessed.

RESULTS

Sixty-one of 101 questionnaires were returned valid giving a response rate of 60%. Suture repair was significantly more likely to be used in all defects <2 cm (P<0.001). Mesh repair was significantly more likely to be recommended in all defects >5 cm (P<0.001). Of defects >5-cm, mesh was recommended for 90% of incisional hernia compared with 81% of epigastric and 76% of para-umbilical hernia (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in choice of repair for defect size 2-5 cm with opinion divided between suture and mesh. Irreducibility increased the likelihood of recommendation for repair.

CONCLUSION

This survey shows a lack of consensus on the appropriate repair of ventral abdominal wall hernia among practicing consultant general surgeons. This reflects the contrasting views within the current literature.

Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic techniques are being used increasingly in the repair of ventral hernias and offer the potential benefits of a shorter hospital stay, decreased wound complications, and possibly a lower recurrence rate. Despite good results from high-volume centers, significant complications may occur with this approach and the morbidity of incisional hernia repair may be underestimated. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) since its inception at our institution.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients who underwent LVHR at a single institution from May 2000 through December 2003 were reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative variables including complications were analyzed. Follow-up evaluation was by office visit and phone survey with assessment of patient satisfaction scores. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD.

RESULTS

A total of 121 LVHR were performed in 116 patients (52 men, 64 women; mean age, 57 +/- 13 y; mean body mass index, 35 +/- 8). Hernias were recurrent in 35 cases (28.9%), with a mean of 1.4 prior repairs (range, 1-7). The mean defect size was 109 +/- 126 cm2 and the average mesh size used was 256 +/- 192 cm2. Operating time was 147 +/- 45 minutes, and the hospital stay averaged 1.7 +/- 1 days. Twelve cases (9.9%) were converted to open operation, most commonly because of extensive adhesions. Extensive laparoscopic adhesiolysis was necessary in 29 cases (26.6%). Overall, perioperative complications occurred in 33 cases (27.3%), 13 of which (39.3%) were persistent seromas. Major complications were seen in 9 cases (7.4%). There were 4 enterotomies (3.3%): 3 occurred as a result of adhesiolysis and 1 resulted from a trocar injury; 2 were detected intraoperatively and were converted to open operation and 2 presented postoperatively. One of these patients developed sepsis and died. Follow-up evaluation was available for 83.6% of cases at a mean interval of 22 +/- 16 months after repair. The hernia recurrence rate was 9.3% (9 cases) and was detected at a median of 6 months postoperatively. The overall patient satisfaction score was high at 4.3 +/- 1.1 (scale, 1-5).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic repair is effective for the vast majority of patients with primary or recurrent ventral hernias and results in hernia recurrence rates of less than 10%, with high patient satisfaction scores. Although seroma is the most common complication, major morbidity occurred in 7.4% of the patients in our series. Enterotomy is the most common serious complication and may result in sepsis and death.

Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: complications-how to avoid and handle

Complications will occur with any operative procedure. The possibility of this must be considered for laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair (LIVH) as well. The most commonly reported of these include: intraoperative intestinal injury (1-3.5%), infection involving the prosthetic biomaterial (0.7-1.4%), (2.6-100%), postoperative ileus seromas (1-8%), and persistent postoperative pain (1-2%). The incidence of enterotomy can be reduced by careful dissection and judicious use of any energy source. Infection can be minimized by the use of perioperative antibiotics, an antimicrobially impregnated biomaterial, and careful manipulation of the prosthesis during the procedure. Seromas are so common that they should be expected but can be decreased by the use of a postoperative abdominal binder. Aspiration will be necessary in a few instances. Similarly, ileus is expected when there is significant bowel dissection and bleeding. Early ambulation and standard use of postoperative bowel care will aid in the treatment of this problem. Persistent pain will generally occur at the site of a transfascial suture. It cannot be predicted or prevented with certainty. When it occurs, local injection with bupivacaine, steroids, or non-steroidal agents will help, but occasionally, removal of the offending suture(s) will be required. The average recurrence rate for LIVH is approximately 5.6% in the literature. Rates as high as 15.7%, however, have been reported. Recurrence will be increased by inadequate prosthetic overlap of the fascial defect, infection that involves the biomaterial, which then requires its removal, and lack of the use of transfascial sutures. To prevent these risks, the surgeon must assure that there is at least a 3-cm overlap of all portions of the hernia defect and insist that sutures are used at 5-cm intervals to fix the biomaterial. Infection that requires explantation of the patch will generally result in recurrence, as this must be repaired primarily. Alternatively, the use of a collagen prosthesis may allow immediate repair, but this is associated with a high failure rate. A staged repair will be necessary in the future in most patients.

One hundred consecutive laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is becoming a promising alternative with many potential advantages, but this procedure is still under study. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the laparoscopic approach to ventral hernia repair.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs between April 2000 and February 2003 were prospectively entered into a database and reviewed.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven ventral hernia repairs were completed laparoscopically. The mean time in the operating room was 128 minutes (range 37 to 255). The average length of stay was 2 days (range 0 to 9). The mortality rate was 0%. A total of 23% of patients experienced postoperative complications. Over a mean follow-up period of 3 months (range 0 to 26), 6% (6 of 97) of patients experienced recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair can be safely performed with a low conversion rate and acceptable recurrence rate, operative time, length of stay, and morbidity. Securing the mesh with full-thickness abdominal wall sutures in at least 4 quadrants remains a key factor in preventing early recurrence.

Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair

Repair of parastomal represents a significant challenge for the hernia surgeon. Repair of these hernias is indicated because of an ill-fitting appliance, cosmetic deformity, inability to maintain proper hygiene and complications from the hernia itself such as incarceration or strangulation. Recent reports in the literature have shown that primary fascial repair can occur in 46% of patients and relocation of the stoma is associated with a 40% recurrence rate. For this reason, the use of polypropylene mesh has been applied to this repair. The recurrence rate with this open technique will still incur a failure rate of 20-29%. Additionally there are other complications such as obstruction, fistulization or mesh erosion with this biomaterial. The laparoscopic approach to this hernia may offer a new choice for this difficult problem. We have used ePTFE to repair 12 parastomal hernias with three different approaches. There have been eight colostomy, two ileostomy and two urostomy hernias. Follow-up ranges from 3-39 months (average 20 months). There has been one recurrence that required two repairs (8%). Other complications included enterotomy (one patient), ileus (one), seroma (one), and death from postoperative aspiration (one). The laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias appears to be a promising technique for this complex dilemma.

Immediate, early, and late morbidity with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and tolerance to composite mesh

The laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias is still a controversial therapeutic option, and little is known of its medium- and long-term morbidity. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and analyze the clinical factors that might be related to it. 86 consecutive patients who had ventral hernia and underwent endoscopic surgery in a Universitary teaching hospital. Epidemiological, clinical, postoperative complications, tolerance, aesthetic evaluation of the wall and recurrence rate are analyzed. The mean follow-up (100%) was 42 months (range: 1-5 years) and included clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 23.2%, with one case of mortality following a sepsis due to intestinal perforation; the rate of re-admissions and recurrences was 3.5%. Statistically significant relationships were shown between the complications and infra-umbilical location (P < 0.001), age over 60 years and female sex (P < 0.05). The dynamic ultrasound study showed 91% and 94% of the patients to be adhesion-free at 1 and 3 years respectively. Aesthetic assessment of the wall at 3 years showed persistent asymmetries in 5% of the patients and a 92% degree of personal satisfaction. The morbidity with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is not negligible. The surgeon must know these complications and be able to treat them appropriately.

Long-term complications of laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair

To date, there have been no long-term follow-up studies of the results of laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. We evaluated the long-term complications of these repairs over a mean follow-up period of 64 months. Between March 1993 and April 2000, we retrospectively evaluated 9 patients who underwent ventral or incisional hernia repair with prosthetic material and one patient who received laparoscopic primary closure of a hernia defect. The prosthetic material polypropylene was used in one patient and an expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene patch was used in the other 8. In one patient, the hernia was closed directly. In 7 patients, the prosthesis was fixed by stapling or tacking with no transfacial suture fixation and a 2-cm prosthesis overlap. In 2 later patients, we modified our technique by fixing the prosthesis by stapling or tacking with transfacial suture fixation and using prosthesis overlap of more than 3 cm. There were 2 episodes of hernia recurrence (20%), one of which required reoperation. Both occurred in patients in whom we used the unmodified repair technique. One of the patients in whom we used the unmodified technique developed a seroma which resolved spontaneously without antibiotic therapy. One patient in whom we used the modified technique developed infection (10%) requiring removal of the prosthetic material. The 2 episodes of hernia recurrence occurred 40 months after laparoscopic treatment, and the case of infection occurred 11 months after treatment. There were no episodes of recurrence in patients who received the unmodified surgery and had hernia defects less than 42 cm2. To perform safe and effective laparoscopic repair of ventral or incisional hernias, it is necessary to use a prosthetic overlap of more than 3 cm from the edge of the hernia gate and to use transfacial suture fixation with nonabsorbable sutures. In addition, patients who undergo laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair should be observed for more than 5 years.

Emergent laparoscopic repair of incarcerated incisional and ventral hernia

BACKGROUND

The role of laparoscopy in the repair of incarcerated incisional or ventral hernia is not yet established. This presentation reviews the authors' experience with patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery in presence of incarceration.

METHODS

Patients who had surgery during the years 1997 to 2001 were included in the study. All patients underwent surgery immediately after their admission. In all cases, Gore-Tex Dual Mesh was used.

RESULTS

The review included 25 patients (21 women and 4 men). Ten of these patients (40%) had undergone at least one earlier repair, and one patient (4%) underwent conversion to open repair because of small bowel injury. The mean operation time was 63 min (range, 15-20 min). The median postoperative hospital stay was 3.2 days (range, 2-7 days). There were no noteworthy postoperative complications. During the follow-up period, no patient experienced recurrent hernia.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' current has experience demonstrated that laparoscopic repair is feasible and can be attempted for patients presenting with incarcerated incisional or ventral hernia.