Nonobstructive dysphagia and recovery of motor disorder after antireflux surgery

The role of preoperative high resolution manometry in predicting dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic fundoplication is an accepted surgical management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). The use of high resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) in preoperative evaluation is often applied to determine the degree of fundoplication to optimize reflux control while minimizing adverse sequela of postoperative dysphagia.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the role of preoperative HRM in predicting surgical outcomes, specifically risk assessment of postoperative dysphagia and quality of life, among patients receiving laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for GERD with immediate postoperative (< 4 weeks clinic), short-term (3-month clinic), and long-term (34 ± 10.4 months of telephone) follow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 146 patients over the age of 18 who received laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication at University of Vermont Medical Center from July 1, 2011 through December 31, 2014 was completed, of which 52 patients with preoperative HRM met inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria included history of: (a) named esophageal motility disorder or aperistalsis; (b) esophageal cancer; (c) paraesophageal hernia noted intraoperatively.

RESULTS

Elevated basal integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), which is the mean of 4 s of maximal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation within 10 s of swallowing, was significantly correlated with worsened severity of post-fundoplication dysphagia (r = 0.572, p < 0.0001 with sensitivity and NPV of 100%) and poorer quality of life (r = 0.348, p = 0.018) at up to 3-years follow-up. The presence of preoperative dysphagia was independently related to post-fundoplication dysphagia at short-term (r = 0.403, p = 0.018) and long-term follow-up (r = 0.415, p = 0.005). Also, both elevated mean wave amplitude (r=-0.397, p = 0.006) and distal contractile integral (DCI) (r = - 0.294, p = 0.047) were significantly, inversely correlated to post-Nissen dysphagia. No significant association was demonstrated between other preoperative HRM parameters and surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Inadequacy of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation with swallowing as delineated by elevated IRP is significantly predictive of worse long-term postoperative outcomes including dysphagia and quality of life scores. Further assessment of tailoring anti-reflux surgical approach with partial vs. total fundoplication to functionally resistant LES is required.

Evaluation of esophageal motor function in clinical practice

Esophageal motor function is highly coordinated between central and enteric nervous systems and the esophageal musculature, which consists of proximal skeletal and distal smooth muscle in three functional regions, the upper and lower esophageal sphincters, and the esophageal body. While upper endoscopy is useful in evaluating for structural disorders of the esophagus, barium esophagography, radionuclide transit studies, and esophageal intraluminal impedance evaluate esophageal transit and partially assess motor function. However, esophageal manometry is the test of choice for the evaluation of esophageal motor function. In recent years, high-resolution manometry (HRM) has streamlined the process of acquisition and display of esophageal pressure data, while uncovering hitherto unrecognized esophageal physiologic mechanisms and pathophysiologic patterns. New algorithms have been devised for analysis and reporting of esophageal pressure topography from HRM. The clinical value of HRM extends to the pediatric population, and complements preoperative evaluation prior to foregut surgery. Provocative maneuvers during HRM may add to the assessment of esophageal motor function. The addition of impedance to HRM provides bolus transit data, but impact on clinical management remains unclear. Emerging techniques such as 3-D HRM and impedance planimetry show promise in the assessment of esophageal sphincter function and esophageal biomechanics.

Dysphagia postfundoplication: more commonly hiatal outflow resistance than poor esophageal body motility

BACKGROUND

Historically, risk assessment for postfundoplication dysphagia has been focused on esophageal body motility, which has proven to be an unreliable prediction tool. Our aim was to determine factors responsible for persistent postoperative dysphagia.

METHODS

Fourteen postfundoplication patients with primary dysphagia were selected for focused study. Twenty-five asymptomatic post-Nissen patients and 17 unoperated subjects served as controls. Pre- and postoperative clinical and high-resolution manometry parameters were compared.

RESULTS

Thirteen of the 14 symptomatic patients (92.9%) had normal postoperative esophageal body function, determined manometrically. In contrast, 13 of 14 (92.9%) had evidence of esophageal outflow obstruction, 9 of 14 (64.3%) manometrically, and 4 of 14 (28.6%) on endoscopy/esophagram. Median gastroesophageal junction integrated relaxation pressure was significantly greater (16.2 mm Hg) in symptomatic than in asymptomatic post-Nissen patients (11.1 mm Hg, P = .05) or unoperated subjects (10.6 mm Hg, P = .02). Sixty-four percent (9/14) of symptomatic patients had an increased mean relaxation pressure. Dysphagia was present in 9 of 14 (64.3%) preoperatively, and elevated postoperative relaxation pressure was independently associated with dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that postoperative alterations in hiatal functional anatomy are the primary factors responsible for post-Nissen dysphagia. Impaired relaxation of the neo-high pressure zone, recognizable as an abnormal relaxation pressure, best discriminates patients with dysphagia from those without symptoms postfundoplication.

Reflux and sex: what drives testing, what drives treatment?

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) affects ∼10-20% of American adults. Although symptoms are equally common in men and women, we hypothesized that sex influences diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in patients with GER. PubMed database between 1997 and October 2011 was searched for English language studies describing symptoms, consultative visits, endoscopic findings, use and results of ambulatory pH study, and surgical therapy for GER. Using data from Nationwide Inpatient Sample, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, we determined the sex distribution for admissions and reflux surgery between 1997 and 2008. Studies on symptoms or consultative visits did not show sex-specific differences. Even though women are less likely to have esophagitis or Barrett's esophagus, endoscopic studies enrolled as many women as men, and women were more likely to undergo ambulatory pH studies with a female predominance in studies from the US. Surgical GER treatment is more commonly performed in men. However, studies from the US showed an equal sex distribution, with Nationwide Inpatient Sample data demonstrating an increase in women who accounted for 63% of the annual fundoplications in 2008. Despite less common or severe mucosal disease, women are more likely to undergo invasive diagnostic testing. In the US, women are also more likely to undergo antireflux surgery. These results suggest that healthcare-seeking behavior and socioeconomic factors rather than the biology of disease influence the clinical approaches to reflux disease.

Influence of age on outcome of total laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease

AIM: To demonstrate that age does not influence the choice of treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We hypothesized that the outcome of total fundoplication in patients > 65 years is similar to that of patients aged ≤ 65 years.

METHODS: Four hundred and twenty consecutive patients underwent total laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD. Three hundred and fifty-five patients were younger than 65 years (group Y), and 65 patients were 65 years or older (group E). The following elements were considered: presence, duration, and severity of GERD symptoms; presence of a hiatal hernia; manometric evalu-ation, 24 h pH-monitoring data, duration of operation; incidence of complications; and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS: Elderly patients more often had atypical symptoms of GERD and at manometric evaluation had a higher rate of impaired esophageal peristalsis in compari-son with younger patients. A mild intensity of heartburn often leads physicians to underestimate the severity of erosive esophagitis. The duration of the operation was similar between the two groups. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications was low and the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups. An excellent outcome was observed in 92.9% young patients and 91.9% elderly patients.

CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is a safe and effective treatment for GERD even in elderly patients, warranting low morbidity and mortality rates and a significant improvement of symptoms comparable to younger patients.

Severely disordered esophageal peristalsis is not a contraindication to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is the preferred operation for the control of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The use of a full fundoplication for patients with esophageal dysmotility is controversial. Although LNF is known to be superior to a partial wrap for patients with weak peristalsis, its efficacy for patients with severe dysmotility is unknown. We hypothesized that LNF is also acceptable for patients with severe esophageal dysmotility.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective review of consecutive patients with severe esophageal dysmotility who underwent an LNF was performed. Severe dysmotility was defined by manometry showing an esophageal amplitude of 30 mmHg or less and/or 70% or more nonperistaltic esophageal body contractions.

RESULTS

In this study, 48 patients with severe esophageal dysmotility underwent LNF. All the patients presented with symptoms of GERD, and 19 (39%) had preoperative dysphagia. A total of 10 patients had impaired esophageal body contractions, whereas 32 patients had an abnormal esophageal amplitude, and 6 patients had both. The average abnormal esophageal amplitude was 24.9 +/- 5.2 mmHg (range, 6.0-30 mmHg). The mean percentage of nonperistaltic esophageal body contractions was 79.4% +/- 8.3% (range, 70-100%). There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions. Postoperatively, early dysphagia occurred in 35 patients (73%). Five patients were treated with esophageal dilation, which was successful in three cases. One patient required a reoperative fundoplication. Overall, persistent dysphagia was found in two patients (4.2%), including one patient with severe preoperative dysphagia, which improved postoperatively. Abnormal peristalsis and/or distal amplitude improved postoperatively in 12 (80%) of retested patients. There were no cases of Barrett's progression to dysplasia or carcinoma. During an average follow-up period of 25.4 months (range, 1-46 months), eight patients (16%) were receiving antireflux medications, with six of these showing normal esophageal pH study results.

CONCLUSION

The LNF procedure provides low rates of reflux recurrence with little long-term postoperative dysphagia experienced by patients with severely disordered esophageal peristalsis. Effective fundoplication improved esophageal motility for most of the patients. A 360 degrees fundoplication should not be contraindicated for patients with severe esophageal dysmotility.

Multichannel intraluminal impedance for the assessment of post-fundoplication dysphagia

Dysphagia often occurs after fundoplication, although its pathophysiology is not clear. We sought to better understand postfundoplication dysphagia by measuring esophageal clearance with multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) along with more traditional work-up (manometry, upper gastrointestinal imaging [UGI], endoscopy). We evaluated 80 consecutive patients after laparoscopic fundoplication between April 2002 and November 2004. Patients were evaluated clinically and underwent simultaneous manometry and MII, 24-hour pH monitoring, endoscopy, and UGI. For analysis, patients were divided into the following groups based on the presence of dysphagia and fundoplication anatomy (by UGI/endoscopy): (1) Dysphagia and normal anatomy; (2) Dysphagia and abnormal anatomy; (3) No dysphagia and abnormal anatomy; and (4) No dysphagia and normal anatomy. Patients with dysphagia (Groups 1 & 2) had similar peristalsis (manometry), but were more likely to have impaired clearance by MII (32 pts, 62%) than those without dysphagia (9 pts, 32%, P = 0.01). Patients with abnormal anatomy (Groups 2 & 3) were also more likely to have impaired esophageal clearance (66%vs. 38%, P = 0.01). Finally, of patients that had normal fundoplication anatomy, those with dysphagia were much more likely to have impaired clearance (12 pts, 52%) than those with dysphagia (4 pts, 21%, P = 0.03). MII after fundoplication provides objective evidence of esophageal clearance, and is commonly abnormal in patients with abnormal fundoplication anatomy and/or dysphagia. Esophageal clearance is impaired in the majority of patients with postoperative dysphagia, even with normal fundoplication anatomy and normal peristalsis. MII may detect disorders in esophageal motility not detected by manometry.

Esophagography predicts favorable outcomes after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for patients with esophageal dysmotility

BACKGROUND

We undertook this study to determine if clearance of a food bolus at preoperative esophagography predicts acceptable outcomes after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for patients with manometrically abnormal esophageal motility.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or symptomatic hiatal hernia with evidence of esophageal dysmotility by stationary manometry underwent videoesophagography to document the ability of their esophagus to clear food boluses of varying consistencies. Sixty-six patients were identified who had manometric dysmotility yet were able to clear a food bolus at esophagography, and subsequently underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. These patients were compared with 100 randomly selected patients with normal motility who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Symptom reduction and satisfaction were assessed through followup. Patients with normal motility were compared with those with manometrically moderate and severe dysmotility.

RESULTS

Preoperative patient demographic data, symptoms, and symptom scores were similar among patients with normal motility and moderate or severe dysmotility. After fundoplication, symptom reduction was notable for all patients regardless of preoperative motility (p < 0.01, paired Student's t-test). There was no notable difference in postoperative symptom scores (p = NS, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA) or in patient satisfaction (p = NS, chi-square analysis) among patients stratified by esophageal motility.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with esophageal dysmotility documented by manometry who are able to clear a food bolus at contrast esophagography, have functional results after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication similar to patients with normal motility. Preoperative esophagography predicts successful outcomes after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for patients with manometric esophageal dysmotility.

Effects of manometrically discovered nonspecific motility disorders of the esophagus on the outcomes of antireflux surgery

Nonspecific motility disorders (NMDs) of the esophagus are common manometric findings in patients evaluated for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, it is unclear how these disorders affect the outcomes of antireflux surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess symptomatic outcomes of patients with and without NMDs undergoing surgical treatment for GERD. A prospectively gathered database of all patients undergoing antireflux surgery was retrospectively reviewed for preoperative symptoms, symptom severity using the GERD-HRQL (best score 0, worst score 50), esophageal manometry measurements, presence of NMD, type of operation, any transient or permanent postoperative dysphagia, severity of postoperative dysphagia (best score 0, worst score 5), and postoperative symptom severity. A total of 239 patients were studied; 24% had a NMD identified by preoperative esophageal manometry, and 17% of this +NMD group had preoperative dysphagia or atypical chest/epigastric pain compared to 28% of those without a NMD (-NMD group) (P=NS). Preoperative symptom scores were +NMD 33 vs. -NMD 27 (P=0.01). Postoperative symptom scores were +NMD 5 vs. -NMD 3 (P=NS). There were no differences in preoperative or postoperative dysphagia scores. Transient postoperative dysphagia was 15.8% in the +NMD group vs. 16.4% in the -NMD group (P=NS). Postoperative dilation was 0% in the +NMD group vs. 2% in the -NMD group (P=NS). Manometrically discovered NMDs do not appear to affect preoperative symptoms or symptomatic outcomes of patients surgically treated for GERD. These findings my reflect the severity of GERD and may improve with antireflux surgery.

The laryngeal and esophageal manifestations of Sjögren’s syndrome

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is the syndrome caused by the backflow of gastric contents into the upper aerodigestive tract. Acid and pepsin in the pharynx, larynx, oral cavity, and trachea have been associated with dysphonia, chronic cough, reactive airway disease, middle ear effusion, throat pain, excessive throat mucus, postnasal drip, dental caries, and laryngeal cancer. The symptoms of LPR frequently occur in the absence of heartburn and esophagitis, and, thus, the diagnosis may be elusive. Individuals with Sjögren's syndrome are predisposed to reflux, and a high index of suspicion for LPR must be maintained in all individuals with the disease. This manuscript describes the laryngeal, pharyngeal, and esophageal manifestations of reflux in patients with Sjögren's syndrome and reviews state-of-the-art diagnostic and treatment strategies.