Diagnosis and management of biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

[The Critical View of Safety to Avoid Biliary Complications in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy]

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed procedures worldwide. Therefore, iatrogenic injury to the choledochal duct, although rare, remains a surgical risk that should not be underestimated. Over the years, various methods have been described to avoid this serious complication, with its high morbidity and even mortality. One of the safest methods to avoid bile duct lesions is to establish the so called "critical view of safety" before cutting any structures. This method shall be demonstrated in this instructional video.

Endoscopic management of bile leakage after cholecystectomy: a single-center experience for 12 years

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Bile leakage is an uncommon but serious complication of cholecystectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the endoscopic management of bile leakage after cholecystectomy.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), because of bile leakage after cholecystectomy, from January 2000 to December 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical parameters, types of management, and procedure-related complications were documented.

RESULTS

Most bile leakages presented as percutaneous bile drainage through a Hemovac (68.8%), followed by abdominal pain (18.8%). The sites of bile leaks were the cystic duct stump in 25 patients, intrahepatic ducts in four, liver beds in two, and the common bile duct in one. Biliary stenting with or without sphincterotomy was performed in 22 and eight patients, respectively. Of the four cases of bile leak combined with bile duct stricture, one patient had severe bile duct obstruction and the others had mild stricture. Concerning endoscopic modalities, endoscopic therapy for bile leak was successful in 30 patients (93.8%). Two patients developed transient post-ERCP pancreatitis, which was mild, and both recovered without clinical sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic approach of ERCP should be considered a primary modality for the diagnosis and treatment of bile leakage after cholecystectomy.

Endoscopic management of bile leakage after cholecystectomy: a single-center experience for 12 years

Background/Aims

Bile leakage is an uncommon but serious complication of cholecystectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the endoscopic management of bile leakage after cholecystectomy.

Methods

A total of 32 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), because of bile leakage after cholecystectomy, from January 2000 to December 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical parameters, types of management, and procedure-related complications were documented.

Results

Most bile leakages presented as percutaneous bile drainage through a Hemovac (68.8%), followed by abdominal pain (18.8%). The sites of bile leaks were the cystic duct stump in 25 patients, intrahepatic ducts in four, liver beds in two, and the common bile duct in one. Biliary stenting with or without sphincterotomy was performed in 22 and eight patients, respectively. Of the four cases of bile leak combined with bile duct stricture, one patient had severe bile duct obstruction and the others had mild stricture. Concerning endoscopic modalities, endoscopic therapy for bile leak was successful in 30 patients (93.8%). Two patients developed transient post-ERCP pancreatitis, which was mild, and both recovered without clinical sequelae.

Conclusions

The endoscopic approach of ERCP should be considered a primary modality for the diagnosis and treatment of bile leakage after cholecystectomy.

Hemoptysis as an early symptom of abdominal actinomycosis with thoracic extension ten years after cholecystectomy with retained gallstone

BACKGROUND

Thoracoabdominal actinomycosis is rare, especially in the context of readily available medical facilities.

METHODS

Case report and review of the literature.

CASE REPORT

A 54-year-old male patient was admitted because of hemoptysis and a pulmonary infiltrate in the left lower lobe. His history was unremarkable except for chronic gastritis and an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed 10 years earlier. Following persistent hemoptysis, elevated inflammatory markers, and a non-revealing bronchoscopy, a computed tomography scan of the thorax and upper abdomen revealed a tumor in the upper part of the left kidney spreading directly to the adjacent diaphragm and left lower lobe. Laparotomy revealed a granulomatous mass containing a gallstone, as well as orange granular content. The treatment involved surgical removal of the mass, splenectomy, excision of the infiltrated part of the left hemidiaphragm, and decortication of the left lower lobe. Because of a prolonged post-operative low-grade fever and radiologically confirmed encapsulation in the lingula, the patient was given ceftriaxone. Repeat bronchoscopy revealed Actinomyces meyeri. The initial antibiotic therapy was replaced with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, after which the patient's health improved.

CONCLUSION

Actinomycosis is still a highly intriguing disease, as initial symptoms often mislead clinicians. It is important to consider the disease whenever we are challenged diagnostically or when risk factors are present.

Multidisciplinary approaches for management of postcholecystectomy problems (surgery, endoscopy, and percutaneous approaches)

PURPOSE

A prospective study to evaluate the postcholecystectomy problem management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From March 2005 to April 2007, 210 patients were managed using surgery, endoscopy, and percutaneous approaches.

RESULTS

Endoscopy was therapeutic in 183 cases [stones (81), stricture (55), leakage (35)], and only diagnostic in 24 cases. Percutaneous approaches were carried out in 34 cases as diagnostic in 19 cases, stenting in 2 cases, and combined with endoscopy in 13 cases. Surgery was carried out in 40 cases either urgent in 10 cases (4.8%), or planned in 30 cases (14.3%), for peritoneal lavage in 7 cases, choledocholithotomy in 8 cases, undo ligation and T-tube drainage in 5 cases, common bile duct repair splinted by T tube in 3 cases, choledochoduodenostomy in 1 case, and Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy in 18 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopy is effective and safe not only for diagnostic but also for therapeutic approaches, especially when combined with percutaneous approaches that help in failure cases, but surgery remains as the gold standard treatment not only for the cases, which failed to be treated by less invasive approaches, but also in cases that are mandatory to be explored as peritonitis.

[A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of chronic cholelithiasis--a five-year experience]

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a method of choice in the treatment of symptomatic cholecystolithiasis because of less postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization and lower cost of treatment. The study was aimed at analysing the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients surgically treated for chronic calculous cholecystitis (symptomatic cholelithiasis).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The research was done in the period from December 2003 to December 2008. In the prospective study of 386 patients, we analyzed operative and postoperative complications, the reasons for conversion to open cholecystectomy, duration of hospitalization and mortality.

RESULTS

The average duration of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 31.9 +/- 14.5 min: dissection of adhesions 3.2 +/- 0.7 min., elements of Calot's triangle 9.8 +/- 3.2 min., gallbladder releasing from its bed 12.8 +/- 2.8 min., the abdominal cavity lavage and removal of gallbladder from the abdomen 6.8 +/- 0.9 min. Some operative difficulties emerged in 22 (5.7%) patients--4 (1%) during releasing of gallbladder adhesions from the surrounding structures, 9 (2.3%) during dissection of elements of the Calot's triangle, 6 (1.5%) during gallbladder releasing from its bed, 3 (0.7%) during gallbladder removal from the abdomen. Some post-operative complications, single or associated, occurred in 36 (9.3%) patients: perforation of gallbladder 21 (5.4%), bleeding from gallbladder bed 18 (4.6%)/ injury of extra hepatic bile ducts 1 (0.20%), 9 (2.3%) spillage of stones; 3 (0.7%) conversions were made. The average duration of preoperative and postoperative hospitalization was 1.1 +/- 0.3 and 1.4 +/- 0.5 days, respectively. The pathohistological examination revealed 2 (0.5%) adenocarcinoma of gallbladder. There were no lethal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure and rational choice in the treatment of biliary dyskinesia and symptomatic biliary calculosis with an acceptable rate of conversion.

The role of ERCP in the management of bile leakage: endoscopic sphincterotomy versus biliary stenting

INTRODUCTION

Bile leakage is a common complication of cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and biliary stenting (BS) in the treatment of bile leaks after cholecystectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with bile leakage following cholecystectomy underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP). Patients were randomized into two groups (EST and BS +/- EST), according to the initial therapeutic endoscopic intervention. The patients were allocated into subgroups once more, according to diameter of the common bile duct (CBD). Outcomes and efficacy of BS and EST on fistula closure and the time to fistula closure were investigated.

RESULTS

The median time between cholecystectomy and ERCP in the EST and BS groups was 6.45 +/- 3.41 and 4.50 +/- 1.99 days, respectively. The mean daily amount of biliary leakage in the EST and BS groups was 376.92 +/- 243.77 and 441.07 +/- 216.08 cc/day, respectively. The diameter of the distal part of CBD in the EST and BS groups was 9.07 +/- 3.84 and 8.28 +/- 4.04 mm, respectively. Mean fistula closure was achieved in 6.45 +/- 3.41 in 11 of 13 patients in the EST group and 4.50 +/- 1.99 days in the BS group in all patients. However, mean time of closure was significantly shorter in the BS 4.71 +/- 2.14 group, compared to EST (9.67 +/- 2.51), among patients with distal CBD diameter (< or =8 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

BS seems to be a more effective method than EST in the management of postcholecystectomy among patients with bile leakage and without CBD dilatation. BS might be the first-line treatment among such patients. However, further prospective, randomized, clinical trials regarding CBD dilatation are warranted.

Should laparoscopic cholecystectomy be practiced in the developing world?: the experience of the first training program in Afghanistan

OBJECTIVE

We address the controversial issue of whether or not it is wise to perform and train laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in a developing nation by reviewing the results of the first large series done in Afghanistan. Afghanistan has been devastated by 3 decades of war leaving it with deficiencies in training programs, medical technologies, and overall medical infrastructure that are among the worst in the developing world.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 137 consecutive cholecystectomies, 102 laparoscopic and 35 open, performed by 4 senior and 3 junior surgeons trained at our hospital in Kabul from July 2005 until February 2008. Deaths, complications, conversion rate, operative time, and hospital length of stay were compared.

RESULTS

Unrecognized major operative injuries occurred in 4 LC patients, 3 bile leaks, and 1 duodenal perforation, although there were no such injuries in the open cholecystectomy group. Complication rates were much higher for patients operated on for acute cholecystitis for both surgeon groups. Even though junior surgeons converted to open cholecystectomy more frequently than senior surgeons, they had a higher major complication rate. Hospital length of stay was 28% shorter for the laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSIONS

The high rate of major unrecognized intraoperative complications during LC in our series underscores the difficulties inherent in performing and training LC in developing nations. Practical changes are suggested to make LC more efficient and safer in a developing world hospital.

Long-term outcome of percutaneous transhepatic therapy for benign bilioenteric anastomotic strictures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of a percutaneous transhepatic approach in benign bilioenteric anastomoses with calibration of the stenosis to 15 F and extended internal/external drainage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2000 and May 2007, the efficacy of this percutaneous transhepatic procedure was retrospectively studied in 39 patients with benign postoperative bilioenteric anastomotic strictures. The main purpose of the protocol was to repair the anastomosis by calibration of the stenosis to 15 F with a silicone drain and perform internal/external drainage for at least 1 year. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 65 months (mean, 34.4 months), and outcomes were classified according to the patient's clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters and the need for further interventions.

RESULTS

The procedure was successful in 38 of 39 patients. Four patients were lost to follow-up during or after drainage. The duration of drainage (41 internal catheters in 34 patients) ranged from 126 days to 488 days (mean, 346 d). Twenty-seven patients had positive outcomes during the mean follow-up of 34 months, and six patients had negative outcomes. The bile duct patency probability according to the Kaplan-Meier method was and 70.6% at 34 months after drain removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous treatment of benign biliary strictures with calibrated stent implantation and extended drainage has good long-term results and may be an effective alternative to surgery. Advantages over surgery are its minimal invasiveness and reduced risk of complications.

[Treatment of biliary injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: retrospective study of 27 patients]

Biliary injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy are rare but serious. Their mortality rate can reach 9%.

AIM OF THE STUDY

Describe the management of biliary injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our center.

PATIENTS

Between January 1995 and June 2005, 27 patients (13 women, 14 men) were treated. The mean age was 53 years old (range, 18-92 years). The biliary injuries were common bile duct sections (n=16, 60%), common bile duct stenoses (n=5, 18.5%), biliary fistulas from the cystic duct (n=4, 15%), and biliary fistulas from an aberrant biliary duct (n=2, 7.5%).

RESULTS

Acute cholecystis was present in 40% of cases (n=11). An intraoperative cholangiography was done in 12 patients (44%). The mortality rate was 0%. Of the common bile duct sections, 43% were diagnosed during the cholecystectomy (n=7) or after the cholecystectomy within a mean of 11.2 days (n=9). Common bile duct injuries were treated in 16 cases with hepatojejunostomy and in five cases with an external biliary drain. Fistulas from the cystic duct were diagnosed within a mean 14.8 days. A fistula from an aberrant biliary duct was diagnosed during the cholecystectomy (n=1) or in the second postoperative day (n=1). Fistulas were treated with a clip on the cystic duct (n=2), an external biliary drain (n=1), a biliary endoprosthesis (n=1), and the biliary aberrant duct suture (n=2).

CONCLUSION

Common bile duct injuries are a serious complication because their treatment is a hepaticojejunostomy in 75% of cases.

Endoscopic sphincterotomy with or without cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis in high-risk surgical patients: a decision analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is recommended for patients with choledocholithiasis after ERCP with sphincterotomy (ES) and stone extraction.

AIM

We designed a decision model to address whether ES alone versus ES followed by LC (ES + LC) is the optimal treatment in high-risk patients with choledocholithiasis.

METHODS

Our cohort were patients with obstructive jaundice who have undergone an ES with biliary clearance. Recurrent biliary complications over a 2-year period stratified by gallbladder status (in/out) and age-stratified surgical complication rates were obtained from the literature. Failure of therapy was defined as either recurrent symptoms or death attributed to biliary complications.

RESULTS

For age 70-79 years, ES failed in 15% whereas ES + LC failed in 17% of cases. Mortality in the EC + LC group was 3.4 times that of the ES alone cohort. For age 80+ years, ES was dominant with an incremental success rate of 8%. Mortality in the ES + LC was 7.6 times that of ES. For age <70, ES + LC was the dominant strategy with an incremental success rate 5%. Sensitivity analysis in the groups confirmed our conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of choledocholithiasis by ES and stone clearance, but without cholecystectomy, should be considered for patients aged 70+. For low-risk patients, ES + LC should be performed to prevent recurrent biliary complications.

COMPARISON OF MAJOR BILE DUCT INJURIES FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY

BACKGROUND

The mechanism and extent of major bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy differ from those of open cholecystectomy.

METHODS

To identify differences in the demographic profile, timing of injury detection, management strategies and outcome, we undertook a retrospective review and analysis of our experience with 55 major bile duct injuries following both laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies over a period of 9 years.

RESULTS

Thirty-one major bile duct injuries resulted from laparoscopic cholecystectomy (56%) and 24 of them were sustained after open cholecystectomy (44%). The median time of presentation was 7 days after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 14 days following open cholecystectomy (P < 0.001). Twenty-eight (51%) patients had injuries recognized intraoperatively in both groups, of whom 18 patients underwent an attempt at primary repair before referral. All patients required subsequent surgical intervention. There were no differences in the clinical presentations between the two groups. However, serum alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were significantly higher following open cholecystectomy (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the level of injury between the two groups. All patients underwent surgical repair in the form of a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (including two revision hepaticojejunostomies in each group). Surgical outcome did not differ between the groups; however, better results were seen with Bismuth grades 1 and 2 strictures compared with Bismuth grades 3 and 4 strictures for both groups (P < 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Major bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy present earlier and with lower levels of serum alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase. There does not appear to be a significant difference between the Bismuth-Strasberg grading of the strictures and the type of surgery carried out.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy gained wide acceptance as treatment of choice for gallstone disease and cholecystitis. With this new technique, not only did the new era of minimal invasive surgery begin, but also the spectrum of complications changed. Laparoscopy-related complications such as access injuries and procedure-related problems are discussed in our article. Typical mishaps are reviewed according to the literature. Set-up of the pneumoperitoneum (morbidity up to 0.2%); bleeding-from trocar sites and vascular injury (mortality up to 0.2%); biliary leaks and bile duct injuries are the main topics in this article (still on a level of 0.2%-0.8%). Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment are discussed, and an overview of the most cited classifications of bile duct injuries is summarised graphically. Finally, bowel injuries as a specific complication in laparoscopy are discussed (incidence up to 0.87%).

CONCLUSION

Careful selection of patients, the knowledge of typical procedure-related complications, and their best treatment are the key points for a safe laparosopic cholecystectomy.

Does the Complication Rate Increase in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has replaced open cholecystectomy for the treatment of gallbladder disease. Despite the well-accepted success of LC in chronic cholecystitis, the efficacy of this technique has been subject to some debate in acute cholecystitis (AC). This study was designed to evaluate our institution's experience with LC for AC and chronic symptomatic calculous cholecystitis (CC), based on complication and conversion rates to open surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The records of 1158 patients with LC from September 1991 to December 2001 were analyzed. The parameters of age, gender, early and late complication rates, and conversion rates from LC to open cholecystectomy were compared in patients with AC and CC.

RESULTS

During the study period, LC was performed in 1158 patients. Of these, 162 patients had AC (group 1) and 996 patients had CC (group 2). The conversion rates were 4.3% (7/162) in group 1 and 2.4% (24/996) in group 2. The complication rates were not significantly different (5.6% in group 1, 5.1% in group 2, P > 0.05). Difficulty in dissection around Calot's triangle and obscure anatomy were the main reasons for conversion to conventional open surgery. The mortality rate was 1.2% in group 1 and 0.01% in group 2.

CONCLUSION

LC appears to be a reliable, safe, and effective treatment modality for AC and CC. The surgical approach should be performed carefully because of the spectrum of potential hazards of the laparoscopic procedure. Conversion and complication rates are similar in both AC and CC groups, and improve as surgeons gain experience.

Excluded-loop hepatojejunal anastomosis with use of laparoscopy in late management of iatrogenic ligature of the bile duct

Although the procedures adopted for bile duct surgery are routine, serious complications occasionally occur. This article reports the authors' experience in managing an iatrogenic ligature of the bile duct. The patient in this case had undergone open cholecystectomy and had significant jaundice in the early postoperative period. During the investigation, a complete ligature of the common hepatic duct was discovered. An anastomosis of the common hepatic duct with an excluded jejunum loop was performed with use of laparoscopy. Periodic follow-up continuing until 30 months after surgery showed the patient was asymptomatic, and ultrasonography, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, and cholangioresonance findings were normal. We consider the procedure feasible and technically advantageous when done with the assistance of laparoscopy.

Management of major bile duct injury associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Bile duct injury is a major complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our management strategy and outcomes for the treatment of such injuries.

METHODS

We studied 54 consecutive patients who had de novo bile duct injury (n = 20) or prior biliary injury repair (n = 34) associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All patients were managed using a multidisciplinary approach.

RESULTS

Definitive operation, almost always Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, was required in 85% of patients. We inserted external percutaneous biliary catheters in 98% of cases prior to surgery. There were no operative deaths, and the 30-day complication rate was 20%. Eight patients (15%) were managed nonoperatively. Overall, 96% of patients had no long-term, objectively definable biliary sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of bile duct injury associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is optimally done using a multidisciplinary approach. Surgical reconstruction is required in most cases and can be safely accomplished with minimal morbidity and excellent long-term outcomes.

Endoscopic therapy after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

The role of endoscopic therapy after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was assessed in 62 patients referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patients were referred because of persistent biliary pain, jaundice, abnormal liver function tests, elevated serum amylase, abnormal ultrasound of the biliary system, or abnormal laparoscopic cholangiogram. Diagnostic imaging of the biliary system was abnormal in 47 of 62 (76%) cases. Sonographic abnormalities were seen in 33 of 57 (58%) patients: common bile duct (CBD) stones were present in 10 of 58 (17%); CBD >7 mm, in 22 of 58 (38%); and subhepatic fluid collection, in 10 of 58 (17%). Laparoscopic cholangiogram was done in nine cases, and CBD calculi were detected in eight. Magnetic resonance cholangiogram was abnormal in six of seven patients: CBD stones were seen in two cases; subhepatic fluid collection, in two; and clip-on CBD, in two. Endoscopic therapy was carried out in 46 of 62 (74%) patients: 40 of 47 (85%) had abnormal imaging (p = 0.0003); 29 of 33 (88%), abnormal sonography (p = 0.002); 10 of 10 (100%), CBD stones on sonography (p = 0.03); and 31 of 46 (67%), abnormal liver function tests before ERCP (p = 0.04). Twenty-five patients had a CBD stone extracted at ERCP. Bile leaks were treated successfully with papillotomy alone in 12 of 13 cases; a stent was necessary in 1 case. Endoscopic papillotomy was done in two patients with biliary pancreatitis, in one patient with recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis, and in five with suspected biliary dyskinesia. Surgery was necessary in four patients with a CBD transection. We conclude that most patients referred for ERCP after LC need endoscopic intervention. Abnormal imaging correlates best with the need for endoscopic therapy.

Laparoscopic bile duct injuries: spectrum at a tertiary-care center

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is associated with a higher incidence of bile duct injury than is open cholecystectomy. We reviewed our experiences with the management of laparoscopic bile duct injuries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From October 1992 through August 1998, 34 patients with bile duct injuries (BDI) following LC were seen. The presentation, type of injury (Strasberg classification), management, and outcome were analyzed in these patients.

RESULTS

Of the 16 patients who sustained injury at our center (type A [N = 9], D [N = 5], and E1 [N = 2]), in 14, the injury was detected during LC, and two patients manifested with postoperative bile leak. All patients had an excellent outcome at a median follow-up of 5.5 (range 1.9-8.0) years. Of the 18 patients who sustained injury elsewhere (type C [N = 1], D [N = 2], E [N = 14; 6 with external biliary fistula (EBF) and 8 with benign biliary stricture (BBS)], and not known [1]), 9 had EBF, 1 had biliary peritonitis, and 8 had BBS at the time of presentation. Of these 18 patients, 4 underwent early repair of the BDI before referral (repair over a T-tube [N = 2] and Roux-Y hepaticojejunostomy [N = 2]). Three of them developed restricture. One patient was referred to us within 12 hours of injury and had a successful repair over a T-tube. Two patients with early repair for lateral injury had an excellent outcome. Eleven patients with BBS underwent repair with an excellent (N = 10) or fair (N = 1) outcome at a median follow-up of 5.0 (2.0-6.2) years. Three patients were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The spectrum of injuries sustained at LC at a tertiary-care center is different from that in the community hospitals. Missed injuries and attempts at repair in inexperienced hands result in serious sequelae of stricture formation and long-term morbidity.

Minimally invasive management of bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Bile leakage is an uncommon complication of cholecystectomy.The bile may originate from the gallbladder bed, the cystic duct or rarely from injury to a major bile duct.This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of minimal access endoscopic and percutaneous techniques in treating symptomatic bile leak.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with symptomatic bile leak following laparoscopic cholecystectomy underwent assessment of the extent of the bile leak via ultrasound/CT and ERCP. Following diagnosis, the patients were treated by sphincterotomy and biliary drainage and, if necessary, percutaneous drainage of the bile collection.

RESULTS

Only one patient required primary surgical treatment following diagnosis of a major duct injury.The other 20 were treated by a combination of sphincterotomy (including a stent in most) plus percutaneous drainage in six. In 19 of 20, this minimal access approach stopped the leak.

DISCUSSION

Most patients who present with bile leakage after cholecystectomy can be managed successfully by means of ERCP with percutaneous drainage of any large bile collection.

Bile duct injuries in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: nursing perspective

The advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy brought a new approach with many advantages to patients for the treatment of symptomatic gallstones. What was not anticipated was an increase in bile duct injuries as a major complication of this new technique. The advanced practice nurse (APN) must understand the technical aspects of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and routine perioperative care, because this knowledge provides a basis to recognize signs and symptoms of potential postoperative problems characteristic of a bile duct injury. The APN may be the initial healthcare provider who examines a patient or who is contacted by the patient with reports of symptoms that must be heeded and acted on. The APN responds to the patient by providing symptom management, initiating and coordinating care, and alerting the healthcare team. The APN at a specialty center may also be the consistent member of the healthcare team caring for a patient through nonoperative management and operative repair of the bile duct injury. Knowledge of the spectrum of bile duct injuries, their various manifestations, diagnostic tests, nonoperative management, and complex surgical repair is necessary for the APN to educate patients, coordinate care along the continuum, and support a patient with a bile duct injury. The medicolegal aspect of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is also a topic the APN may encounter that requires thoughtful consideration and response. The recognition of subtle postoperative symptoms of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy may mean the difference between early diagnosis of and intervention in a minor injury or a major complication.

Antiperistaltic Roux-en-Y Biliary-Enteric Bypass after Bile Duct Injury: A Technical Error in Reconstruction

Bilioenteric reconstruction using a Roux limb of jejunum is a well-established surgical option for the reconstruction of the proximal bile duct. Previous studies discussing short- and long-term complications of biliary-enteric anastomosis have focused on technical aspects, such as the use of anastomotic stenting or the level of the biliary tree used. We report two cases of previously unreported complications after hepaticojejunostomy that resulted from a technical error in constructing the Roux limb. Within a 3-month period, two patients were referred to our institution with recurrent cholangitis after biliary reconstruction for injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Reexploration disclosed major technical flaws in the construction of the Roux limb used for biliary drainage. Antiperistaltic limbs had been constructed in both patients: one from the distal ileum and one from the conventional location in the jejunum. In both cases, isoperistaltic reconstruction of the Roux limbs resolved the recurrent cholangitis. Cholangitis after biliary-enteric bypass can arise from a variety of etiologies and lead to anastomotic narrowing or ineffective drainage of the biliary tree. Review of the literature failed to disclose reports of technically flawed Roux limb construction as a cause of cholangitis. We present these cases to highlight the devastating consequences of antiperistaltic construction of the Roux limb. We hope that by publishing the role of this avoidable error in recurrent cholangitis after biliary-enteric bypass we may help prevent its future occurrence.

Trends in bile duct injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Bile duct injuries are a serious complication of cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) were originally associated with an increased incidence of injuries. Patients referred to a tertiary center were reviewed to assess the trends in the number, presentation, and management. Seventy-three patients were referred over a 6-year period with a maximum of 17 patients referred in 1992, but the number has not declined substantially over time. The persistent number of referrals is a consequence of ongoing injuries. One third of injuries were diagnosed at LC, and the use of cholangiography has not increased. The number of cystic duct leaks has not decreased and they represent 25% of all cases. The level of injury has remained unchanged with Bismuth types I and II in 37% and types III and IV in 38%. Excluding patients with cystic duct leaks, 58% were referred after a failed ductal repair. Definitive treatment with biliary stenting was successful in 37%, and 34 patients (47%) required a biliary-enteric anastomosis. Complications occurred in 18 patients (25%) including seven with postoperative stricture or cholangitis. No biliary reoperations have been performed at a mean follow-up of 36 months.

Benign post-operative bile duct strictures

The vast majority of post-operative bile duct strictures occur following cholecystectomy, these injuries having been seen at an increased frequency since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Bile duct injuries usually present early in the post-operative period, obstructive jaundice or evidence of a bile leak being the most common mode of presentation. In patients presenting with a post-operative bile duct stricture months to years after surgery, cholangitis is the most common symptom. The 'gold standard' for the diagnosis of bile duct strictures is cholangiography. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography is generally more valuable than endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in that it defines the anatomy of the proximal biliary tree that is to be used in surgical reconstruction. The most commonly employed surgical procedure with the best overall results for the treatment of bile duct stricture is a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. The results of the surgical repair of bile duct strictures are excellent, long-term success rates being in excess of 80% in most series. Recent data have suggested that, at intermediate follow-up of approximately 3 years, an excellent outcome can be obtained following repair of bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Percutaneous and endoscopic techniques for the dilatation of bile duct strictures can be useful adjuncts to the management of bile duct strictures if the anatomical situation and clinical scenario favour this approach. In selected patients, the results of both endoscopic and percutaneous dilatation are comparable to those of surgical reconstruction.

Major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Follow-up after combined surgical and radiologic management

OBJECTIVE

The authors provide the results of follow-up evaluation after combined surgical and radiologic management of 89 patients with major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The incidence and mechanism of injury of major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been clearly defined. Furthermore, a number of series have described the management of these injuries by surgical, endoscopic, and radiologic techniques with excellent short-term results. Long-term follow-up data, however, are lacking in the management of these injuries.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively on 89 patients treated at a single institution with major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy managed between July 1, 1990, and July 1, 1996. Patients referred with injuries underwent early percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage. Based on the cholangiographic appearance and clinical situation, patients were managed by either percutaneous balloon dilatation or surgical reconstruction with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy with transanastomotic stenting. Follow-up was obtained by personal interview during October 1996.

RESULTS

Two patients died without an attempt at definitive therapy. Both deaths were caused by sepsis and multisystem organ failure present at the time of transfer to the authors' institution. The remaining 87 patients were managed initially by either balloon dilatation (N = 28) or surgical reconstruction (N = 59). Ten patients have not completed treatment and still have biliary stents in place. Evaluation of 25 patients completing treatment after balloon dilatation (mean follow-up, 27.8 months) showed a success rate of 64%. Evaluation of 52 patients completing treatment after surgical reconstruction (mean follow-up, 33.4 months) showed a success rate of 92%. All failures were managed successfully by either surgical reconstruction or balloon dilatation.

CONCLUSIONS

Major bile duct injuries can be managed successfully by combined surgical and radiologic techniques. This series provides, for the first time, significant follow-up on a large number of patients with overall success rates of 64% after balloon dilatation and 92% after surgical reconstruction. The combination of surgery and balloon dilatation resulted in a successful outcome in 100% of patients treated.

Litigious consequences of open and laparoscopic biliary surgical mishaps

Three hundred six injuries or complications coincident to 296 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were analyzed for the nature and extent of injuries and litigious outcomes that followed. The data were drawn from 31 member companies of the Physician Insurers Association of America, a trade association that initiated the study. The outcomes were compared to 261 contemporaneous open cholecystectomy claims. Biliary tract injuries were the most common, accounting for almost two thirds of all injuries. The spectrum of cases, originally selected for indemnity potential, reflected relative incidences in the medical literature. Laparoscopic injuries were significantly more severe, more likely to result in indemnity, and more apt to involve higher mean +/- standard deviation dollar values (160 dollars +/- 154 x 10(3)) to surviving claimants than injuries resulting from open procedures (106 dollars +/- 122 x 10(3), P = 0.01). Injury recognition at the time of the original procedure had no discernible mitigating effect because 80% of recognized injuries required an additional operative procedure. Risk-aversive behavior should include paying particular attention to placement of the first port, more liberal use of the Hasson technique, placement of all other ports under direct vision, elimination of intraoperative anatomic uncertainty, programmed inspection of the abdomen before withdrawing the laparoscope, and acquiring sufficient knowledge of electrosurgical principles to ensure the safe use of this potentially dangerous modality.

Long-term follow-up after bilioenteric anastomosis for benign bile duct stricture

OBJECTIVE

The authors provide a prospective evaluation of long-term results after bilioenteric anastomoses for benign biliary stricture.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

With the advent of laparoscopic techniques, the frequency of bile duct injury after operation has increased. Reports on the operative management of these injuries have not provided long-term follow-up. Over a similar period, reports of both endoscopic and invasive radiographic methods as primary treatment for bile duct stricture have compared success rates to antiquated surgical reports.

METHODS

A protocol whereby preoperative radiographic (e.g., cholangiogram, computed tomographic scan, ultrasound), biochemical (e.g., alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin), and clinical evaluation was combined with ongoing postoperative evaluation and follow-up at approximately 6-month intervals. A total of 111 patients were evaluated from 1985 to 1995. Patients were categorized in three groups: 1) those with postoperative injuries during open and laparoscopic gallbladder surgery (31 patients), 2) those undergoing operation for pain associated with chronic pancreatitis who have distal common bile duct stenoses (64 patients), and 3) those with nonchronic pancreatitis-associated benign bile duct strictures (16 patients).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 60 months. Overall preoperative alkaline phosphatase was 640 units/L with a range of 280 to 1860 units/L. All patients had abnormally elevated alkaline phosphatase. Only 3 of 111 patients have had mild persistent elevation after operation. Clinical jaundice, present in 49 of 111 patients, was resolved uniformly by operative decompression. Total bilirubin was elevated abnormally in 56 of 111 patients and also was uniformly corrected by operation.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the careful combined use of endoscopy, invasive radiology, and surgery in the management of benign strictures of the biliary tree. These data further suggest a success rate for surgical management that, over long-term follow-up, appears to exceed that found using alternative measures. Alternative methods should measure their success rates against success rates currently achieved by operative management.

Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Video technology allows surgeons to offer patients operations through small incisions. While these minimally invasive techniques have been employed for a wide range of operations for many years, only recently has a laparoscopic cholecystectomy been possible. Compared to the same operation performed via laparotomy, it is deemed the "gold standard." Overall mortality after laparoscopic cholecystectomy ranges from 0-1%, and the rate of major complications is less than 5%. As a group, general surgeons are beyond their initial learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but the majority of iatrogenic injuries can be successfully avoided by appreciating the limitations and pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery, and by carefully dissecting the hepatocystic triangle before dividing any structure. Early identification and management of complications will minimize potentially devastating complications of small, unrecognized injuries. Physicians need to accurately advise patients of the proposed advantages and potential problems of laparoscopic cholecystectomy before referring them to a surgeon.

Exposure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy dissection adversely alters biliary ductal anatomy

BACKGROUND

Exposure for open cholecystectomy entails lateral, caudal traction on the gallbladder infundibulum, which results in opening the angle between the cystic and hepatic ducts. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), as initially described, is done with cephalad traction on the gallbladder. We hypothesized LC exposure technique narrows the angle between the cystic and hepatic ducts, placing them at increased risk of injury.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients had routine LC. Cystic duct cholangiography (IOC) was done with a flexible 5-Fr catheter via a percutaneous introducer placed anterior to the gallbladder. Exposure of Calot's triangle was maintained with cephalad traction on the gallbladder fundus. IOC was repeated after allowing the organ to assume the anatomic position. The cholangiograms were inspected for significant differences, and the angle of the cystic to the hepatic duct (CDHD) was measured by a blinded radiologist.

RESULTS

The mean angle of the cystic to hepatic duct was 30 degrees +/- 19 degrees in the IOCs taken with cephalad traction on the gallbladder fundus vs 59 degrees +/- 22 degrees, P < 0.001, in the cholangiograms taken without traction. A filling defect at the cystic-hepatic duct junction was present in 39% of IOC taken with traction vs none without traction. The intrahepatic ducts were seen in all films without traction, whereas the intrahepatic ducts were not visualized in 13% of IOCs taken with traction.

CONCLUSIONS

From these data we conclude (1) extra-hepatic biliary ducts may be at increased risk of injury during LC because of the exposure technique and (2) imaging bile ducts in the anatomic position may convey misleading information about the relative location of important structures. Optimal exposure for dissection of Calot's triangle should utilize a second clamp on the infundibulum with lateral, caudal traction.

Intraoperative trans-gallbladder cholangiography intended to delineate bile duct anatomy

Intraoperative cholangiography has been recommended to lower the incidence and severity of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However a literature review of common bile duct (CBD) injuries does not appear to support this concept. Most cystic duct cholangiographies disclose the injury after the fact. This study was designed to compare the technical difficulties and complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in three groups of patients: Group 1 underwent intraoperative cholangiography through the gallbladder (n = 288), group 2 underwent intraoperative cholangiography through the cystic duct (n = 162), and group 3 did not undergo cholangiography (n = 227). Cholecystectomies were defined as "difficult" if there was a need to convert to open procedure in the absence of an accidental complication, or if estimated blood loss was over 100 ml, and/or if operating time was over 2 h. Difficult cholecystectomies were encountered in 34% of patients in group 2 and 28.2% of patients in group 3, but in only 7.6% of patients in group 1. Technical complications (bleeding, bile leak, common bile duct injury, retained common bile duct stones, false positive choledocholithiasis, pancreatitis, and trocar injuries) occurred in 11.7% of cases in group 2, 4.4% in group 3, and in only 1.4% of group 1. Intraoperative cholangiography performed through the gallbladder before any dissection was initiated significantly facilitated the operation and helped decrease the incidence of technical complications.

Bile leakage following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is now the treatment of choice for gallstones, but there has been concern that bile leakage with LC is more frequent than after open cholecystectomy (OC). We have analyzed our experience of this complication with regard to both its incidence and management. From a consecutive series of 500 LC, in which both operative cholangiography and drainage of the gallbladder bed were routine, bile leakage was identified in ten patients (2%). There was no bile duct injury. Nine of the ten patients presented with bile in the drain within 24 h of operation and one patient presented 1 week after operation with a subphrenic collection. Of the ten patients, five settled spontaneously. Of the five remaining patients, two needed laparotomy--one for a subphrenic collection not responding to percutaneous drainage and one for biliary peritonitis. One patient was treated by relaparoscopy and suture of a duct of Luschka and one patient had successful percutaneous drainage of an infected collection; the fifth patient who presented with a late subphrenic collection of bile was shown at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to have a cystic duct stump leak and was treated with an endoscopic stent. Bile leakage is seen more frequently after LC than OC for reasons that are currently unclear. We believe that the use of routine gallbladder bed drainage is justified for this reason alone. The majority of bile leaks settle either spontaneously or with minimally invasive intervention.

Benign biliary strictures: repair and outcome with a contemporary approach

BACKGROUND

The Hepp-Couinaud technique is an innovative approach for repair of proximal biliary strictures. We have used this method selectively for bile duct reconstruction since 1982. Our aim was to analyze our experience with the surgical repair of benign biliary strictures in the decade since the Hepp-Couinaud technique has become an integral component of our surgical management strategy.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients undergoing surgical repair of benign biliary stricture between 1983 and 1992 were reviewed retrospectively. A grading system on clinical symptoms, results of liver function studies, and need for reintervention was used to assess outcome.

RESULTS

For the 27 patients with noniatrogenic strictures, followed up a mean of 3.9 years, excellent or good results (grade A or B) were obtained in 88.9%. For the 45 patients with iatrogenic strictures, followed up a mean of 4.6 years, 86.7% were categorized as grade A or B. The cumulative probability of anastomotic failure was significantly less for the 21 patients in whom the Hepp-Couinaud method was used when compared with the 24 patients in whom it was not (p = 0.032). Outcome was not influenced by age, time delay from injury to reconstruction, preoperative stenting, the number of previous repairs, or the duration of postoperative stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical reconstruction affords excellent or good results for the vast majority of patients with benign biliary strictures. For proximal iatrogenic strictures superior anastomotic durability is achieved with the Hepp-Couinaud technique.

Outcome of 49 repairs of bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Treatment of bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still under discussion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of end-to-end or biliodigestive anastomosis for various types of bile duct injury. Patient charts of 49 (0.81%) classified bile duct injuries from a national survey of 6076 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in The Netherlands were analyzed. The median follow-up after repair was 183 days (range 14-570 days). Statistical analysis showed that an end-to-end anastomosis was preferred by the surgeons for less severe bile duct injuries and a biliodigestive repair for more severe injuries. Three patients died owing to a delayed detected bile duct injury. Twelve bile duct strictures occurred after repair, leading to a stricture rate of 25%. The time elapsed between repair and occurrence of a stricture was 134 days (range 13-270 days). The type of repair or the severity of the bile duct injury did not determine the outcome of the repair. Histologically proved cholecystitis predisposed a stricture at the repair site. It was concluded that treatment of bile duct injuries is associated with a high stricture rate at the repair site of the anastomosis. End-to-end anastomosis is mostly successful for the less severe injury detected during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. For all other cases this repair can at least be considered a temporary internal drainage procedure. The biliodigestive anastomosis can best be considered a delayed repair after a drainage procedure has resolved the local inflammatory status.

Management of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

The success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been tarnished by the increased risk of bile duct damage associated with the operation. Many of these injuries can be managed by endoscopic techniques. Experience of such injuries between 1991 and 1994 was reviewed. Twenty-four patients were referred: 11 with injuries to the cystic duct alone, five with complete hepatic duct obstruction and eight with high bile duct leaks. All patients with leaks from the cystic duct were managed successfully endoscopically (sphincterotomy, four; stent, seven) without recourse to further surgery. Patients with complete obstruction were aided in their recovery by endoscopic and percutaneous techniques, either for postoperative problems (two patients) or in preparation for surgery (three). The eight patients with high bile duct leaks were managed endoscopically by stenting (seven patients) or sphincterotomy (one). Stenting appeared to encourage leaks to heal better than sphincterotomy alone; stents should probably be left in situ for 2 months before removal. There were no deaths and all but one patient had normal biliary function at follow-up. It is suggested that all suspected injuries after biliary surgery require management by a combination of interventional radiology and endoscopic interventional techniques. Surgery may be required only if there is complete obstruction of the biliary tree.

The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery

Under the mandate of the Educational Committee of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (E.A.E.S.), three consensus development conferences (CDCs) were performed in order to assess the current status of the endoscopic surgical approaches for the treatment of cholelithiasis, appendicitis, and inguinal hernia. Consensus panels for the different disease states (10-13 members each) selected by the education committee on the basis of members' clinical expertise, academic activity, community influence, and geographical location weighed the evidence on the basis of published results according to the criteria for technology assessment: feasibility, efficacy, effectiveness, economy. Draft statements were prepared, discussed by the panels, and presented at plenary sessions of the 2nd European Congress of the E.A.E.S. in Madrid September 15-17, 1994. Following discussions final consensus statements were formulated to provide specific answers for each topic to a minimum of the following questions: 1. What stage of technological development is the endoscopic surgical procedure at (in September 1994)? 2. Is endoscopic surgery safe and feasible? 3. Is it beneficial to the patients? 4. Who should undergo endoscopic surgery? 5. What are the training recommendations? Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the procedure of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Laparoscopic appendectomy is presently at the efficacy stage of development, because most of the data on feasibility and safety originate from centers with special interest in endoscopic surgery: it is not yet the gold standard for acute appendicitis. Endoscopic hernia repair is presently a feasible alternative for conventional hernia repair if performed by experienced endoscopic surgeons. It appears to be efficacious in the short-term. The full text of the consensus panel's statements is given in this publication.

Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after hospital discharge

In this community hospital medical center, all patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) who had a subsequent emergency room visit or hospital admission were reviewed to define the incidence and presentation of complications after hospital discharge. This unselected population, which is isolated geographically, provides a useful approximation of mortality and morbidity after hospital discharge. Of 1231 patients, 800 (65%) had no subsequent hospitalization or emergency room visit within a 6-32-month follow-up, whereas 431 (35%) did. Fifty-six (4.6%) patients had surgical complications related to their LC. The most serious complications were myocardial infarction (n = 1, the only death), common duct stricture (n = 2), retained common duct stone (n = 2), cystic duct leak (n = 2), subhepatic fluid collection or abscess (n = 3), pancreatitis (n = 3), and pulmonary (n = 5). Abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom (62%), and 72% (42/56) occurred within 14 days, whereas, only 4% (15/375) patients with nonsurgically related complications presented within 14 days. In this study, emergency room visits and hospitalizations after LC occurred more commonly (35%) than generally appreciated, were usually minor, and were not related to the operative procedure, but serious late surgical complications occasionally appeared weeks to months postoperatively.

Medicolegal analysis of bile duct injury during open cholecystectomy and abdominal surgery

To understand the medicolegal impact of bile duct injury, we analyzed 68 cases of biliary injury resulting from open cholecystectomy and abdominal surgery. Cases were litigated within the US civil justice system between 1970 and 1991. Operations resulting in bile duct complications included cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis in 49 patients (72%), common bile duct exploration in 5 patients (7%), and other abdominal operations in 7 patients (10%); 7 operations were of unknown type. The average delay in recognition of injury was 16 days (range 3 to 42). The mortality rate was 18% (12 of 68). Median jury verdict awards in successfully litigated cases were twice that of out-of-court settlements ($500,000 versus $250,000, P = 0.01). Bile duct injury after open cholecystectomy and abdominal surgery has a high mortality rate when diagnosed late, and is expensive to litigate. This review may be useful in defining the medicolegal outcome of similar injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomy.