Clamp control of the right ventricular angle to facilitate exposure and repair of cardiac wounds

Thoracic damage control surgery

The damage control surgery came up with the philosophy of applying essential maneuvers to control bleeding and abdominal contamination in trauma patients who are within the limits of their physiological reserves. This concept was extended to thoracic injuries, where relatively simple maneuvers can shorten operative time of in extremis patients. This article aims to revise the various damage control techniques in thoracic organs that must be known to the surgeon engaged in emergency care. RESUMO A cirurgia de controle de danos surgiu com a filosofia de se aplicar manobras essenciais para controle de sangramento e contaminação abdominal, em doentes traumatizados, nos limites de suas reservas fisiológicas. Este conceito se estendeu para as lesões torácicas, onde manobras relativamente simples, podem abreviar o tempo operatório de doentes in extremis. Este artigo tem como objetivo, revisar as diversas técnicas de controle de dano em órgãos torácicos, que devem ser de conhecimento do cirurgião que atua na emergência.

Damage control surgery for thoracic injuries

Damage control of thoracic injuries begins frequently with an emergency department thoracotomy via an anterolateral incision. Bleeding and air leaks are quickly temporised. As opposed to abdominal damage control where most injuries can be temporised, most thoracic injuries require initial definitive repair. Thus, the goal of thoracic damage control is to perform the least definitive repair using the fastest and easiest techniques to shorten the operative time as much as possible. There are some injuries that can be temporised and require re-operation once physiologic normality has been achieved.

Expanded use of suction and stabilization devices in cardiothoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Recent developments in beating heart instrumentation have allowed surgeons to perform multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery by overcoming the factors that impair surgical performance (limited visualization, continuous movement of the target area, and hemodynamic instability during exposure of the inferior and posterior parts of the heart). We have explored the possibility of further expanding apical and epicardial suction devices beyond their ordinary use in coronary artery surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our cardiac surgery database was undertaken to identify the incidences in which these devices have been used in a somewhat novel manner in the field of cardiac surgery.

RESULTS

During this time period we identified 20 instances in which either apical or epicardial suction devices were used alone or together. The nature of the procedures included dividing pericardial adhesions (pericardiectomy, n = 2; dividing adhesions in redo-coronary surgery, n = 4), securing epicardial hemostasis (penetrating cardiac trauma, n = 2; securing hemostasis during reexploration after cardiac surgery, n = 10), and facilitating epicardial microwave ablation (n = 2). On all 20 occasions the intended procedures were undertaken uneventfully. Furthermore, the use of apical and epicardial devices greatly facilitated the operative procedures and avoided the use of cardiopulmonary bypass on all occasions.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we would like to highlight the expanding role for apical and epicardial suction devices to an area beyond coronary artery surgery in which we have found their use invaluable.

Penetrating cardiac injuries

Penetrating cardiac injuries pose a tremendous challenge to any trauma surgeon. Time, sound judgment, aggressive intervention, and surgical technique are the most important factors contributing to positive outcomes. This article extensively reviews the history, surgical management, and techniques needed to deal with these critical injuries. This year commemorates the one hundredth anniversary of the first successful repair of a cardiac injury.