Comparative study of atrial vulnerability in patients with unexplained ischemic stroke or lone atrial paroxysmal fibrillation

A meta-analysis of the association of atrial septal abnormalities and atrial vulnerability

BACKGROUND

The mechanism of cryptogenic stroke (CS) in patients with atrial septal abnormalities remains unclear, and the increased incidence of atrial vulnerability may be one of the reasons. We performed this meta-analysis to clarify the association between atrial septal abnormalities and atrial vulnerability, and to provide evidence-based basis for the prevention and mechanism of CS.

METHODS

We systematically searched for studies on the association between atrial septal abnormalities and atrial vulnerability, and pooled available data on types of atrial septal abnormalities, types of atrial vulnerability, and methods of atrial vulnerability detection. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of atrial arrhythmias or P wave abnormalities. Random-effects models were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Twelve case-control studies were eligible. Compared with the control group, patients with atrial septal abnormalities had a higher risk of atrial vulnerability (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.13-3.30, P = .02). Data based on stroke patients showed that the group with atrial septal abnormalities had a higher risk of atrial vulnerability than the control group (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.13-3.53, P = .02). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of atrial vulnerability between the 2 groups of nonstroke patients. Subgroup analysis showed that although atrial septal abnormality increased the risk of atrial vulnerability in the subgroup of atrial septal aneurysm (OR: 1.68; 95% CI: 0.47-5.95, P = .42), the subgroup of atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial fluster (OR: 1.81; 95% CI: 0.94-3.46, P = .07) and the subgroup of subcutaneous recording system (OR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.68-2.61, P = .41), the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial septal abnormalities can increase the risk of atrial vulnerability, and atrial arrhythmia caused by atrial septal abnormalities may be one of the mechanisms of CS.

Unexpected low prevalence of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic ischemic stroke: a prospective study

Purpose

Ischemic stroke is a frequent pathology with high rate of recurrence and significant morbidity and mortality. There are several causes of stroke, affecting prognosis, outcomes, and management, but in many cases, the etiology remains undetermined. We hypothesized that atrial fibrillation was involved in this pathology but underdiagnosed by standard methods. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic ischemic stroke by using continuous monitoring of the heart rate over several months. The secondary objective was to test the value of atrial vulnerability assessment in predicting spontaneous atrial fibrillation.

Methods and results

We prospectively enrolled 24 patients under 75 years of age, 15 men and 9 women of mean age 49 years, who within the last 4 months had experienced cryptogenic stroke diagnosed by clinical presentation and brain imaging and presumed to be of cardioembolic mechanism. All causes of stroke were excluded by normal 12-lead ECG, 24-h Holter monitoring, echocardiography, cervical Doppler, hematological, and inflammatory tests. All patients underwent electrophysiological study. Of the patients, 37.5% had latent atrial vulnerability, and 33.3% had inducible sustained arrhythmia. Patients were secondarily implanted with an implantable loop recorder to look for spontaneous atrial fibrillation over a mean follow-up interval of 14.5 months. No sustained arrhythmia was found. Only one patient had non-significant episodes of atrial fibrillation.

Conclusion

In this study, symptomatic atrial fibrillation or AF with fast ventricular rate has not been demonstrated by the implantable loop recorder in patients under 75 years with unexplained cerebral ischemia. The use of this device should not be generalized in the systematic evaluation of these patients. In addition, this study attests that the assessment of atrial vulnerability is poor at predicting spontaneous arrhythmia in such patients.

Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation after Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale and Small Atrial Septal Defects in Patients Presenting with Cryptogenic Stroke

Objective

The occurrence of atrial fibrillation after percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale for cryptogenic stroke has been reported in a variable percentage of patients. However, its precise incidence and mechanism are presently unclear and remain to be elucidated.

Design

Prospective follow-up study.

Patients

Ninety-two patients undergoing a percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure procedure (closure group) for cryptogenic stroke were compared with a similar group of 51 patients, who were medically treated.

Methods

A systematic arrhythmia follow-up protocol to assess the incidence of AF was performed including a 7-day event-loop recording at day 1, after 6 and 12 months in patients of the closure group and compared with those of the medically treated group.

Results

The incidence of AF was similar in both study groups during a follow-up of 12 months, including 7·6% (95% CI: 3·1–15·0%) in the closure and 7·8% (95% CI: 2·18–18·9%) in the medically treated group ( P = 1·0). The presence of a large patent foramen ovale was the only significant risk factor for the occurrence of AF as demonstrated by a multivariate Cox regression analysis (95% CI, 1·275–20·018; P = 0·021).

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale have a rather high incidence of AF during a follow-up of 12 months. Atrial fibrillation occurred with a similar frequency whether the patent foramen ovale/atrial septal defect was successfully percutaneously closed or was medically managed. The presence of a large patent foramen ovale was the only significant predictor of AF occurrence during follow-up.

[Clinical relevance of patent foramen ovale and right-to-left shunt]

A frequent finding in healthy individuals, patent foramen ovale (PFO) with right-to-left shunt (RLSh), is an embrionary residue that has been linked with cryptogenic stroke and peripheral ischemia. Pulmonary hypertension and entities like decompression illness, migraine with aura or plathypnea-orthodeoxia have been found to have a higher prevalence of PFO with RLSh. Some dementias and unexplained syncopes could also have some relationship. Paradoxical embolism, thrombosis of the foramen channel or the atrial structures with subsequent embolism, transient arrhythmias, prothrombotic states and vasoactive substances passage have been proposed as physiopathologic mechanisms involved. Contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography is the standard reference diagnostic procedure but contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler is a good non-invasive alternative diagnostic tool that is highly sensitive and specific.

Does transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale really "shut the door?" A prospective study with transcranial Doppler

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is increasingly being performed and monitored with transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography, whereas contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (ce-TCD), which probably represents the most suitable tool to quantify right-to-left shunt (RLS) in the brain vessels, has been systematically overlooked. Our goal is to prospectively assess efficacy and safety of PFO transcatheter closure using ce-TCD.

METHODS

A total of 140 consecutive patients (mean age, 46+/-13 years; male/female ratio, 63/77) with PFO-related large RLS and no other recognized cause of focal cerebral ischemia underwent transcatheter closure. TCD was done preoperatively and 1 month after the procedure in all patients, after 3 months in 120, after 6 months in 112, and after 1 year in 104 patients.

RESULTS

Implantation was successful in all patients. During Valsalva strain, a large shunt was still detectable in 31 of 140 (22%), 15 of 120 (13%), 9 of 112 (8%), and 9 of 104 (9%) patients at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits, respectively. Periprocedural and postprocedural complications included atrial fibrillation in 8% and scintillating scotomata in 6% of patients. During the 1-year follow-up period, only 1 transient ischemic attack was recorded in a patient with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and complete PFO closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter PFO closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke and large RLS may be less successful than reported previously. TCD appears the ideal tool to follow up the closure process and to identify early, during follow-up, those patients who will be left with a significant shunt. Atrial fibrillation is more common than believed previously and may underlie the occurrence of further cerebrovascular events despite complete PFO closure. Irritative visual phenomena may occur as a consequence of nickel toxicity.