[External electrical cardioversion of atrial arrhythmia: predictive criteria of success]

Effects of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists on Atrial Fibrillation Occurrence: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression to Identify Modifying Factors

Background

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have emerged as potential atrial fibrillation (AF) preventive therapy, but inconsistent results have been reported. We aimed to examine the effects of MRAs on AF occurrence and explore factors that could influence the magnitude of the effect size.

Methods and Results

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were used to search for randomized clinical trials and observational studies addressing the effect of MRAs on AF occurrence from database inception through April 03, 2018. We performed a systematic review and random effects meta‐analyses to compute odds ratios with 95% CIs. Meta‐regression was then applied to explore the sources of between‐study heterogeneity. We included 24 studies, 11 randomized clinical trials and 13 observational cohorts, representing a total number of 7914 patients (median age: 64.2 years; median left ventricular ejection fraction: 49.7%; median follow‐up: 12.0 months), 2843 (35.9%) of whom received MRA therapy. Meta‐analyses showed a significant overall reduction in AF occurrence in the MRA‐treated patients versus the control groups (15.0% versus 32.2%; odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44–0.70 [P<0.00001]), with the greatest benefit regarding recurrent AF episodes (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.31–0.59 [P<0.00001]) and with significant heterogeneity among the included studies (I²=54%; P=0.0008). Meta‐regression analyses showed that effect size was significantly associated with older studies and higher AF occurrence rate in the control groups.

Conclusions

MRAs seem to be effective in AF prevention, especially regarding recurrent AF episodes.

Comparison of antero-lateral versus antero-posterior electrode position for biphasic external cardioversion of atrial flutter

External cardioversion is an established and very important tool to terminate symptomatic atrial flutter. The superiority of the biphasic waveform has been demonstrated for atrial flutter, but whether electrode position affects the efficacy of cardioversion in this population is not known. The aim of this trial was to evaluate whether anterior-lateral (A-L) compared with anterior-posterior (A-P) electrode position improves cardioversion results. Of 130 screened patients, 96 (72 men, mean age 62 +/- 12 years) were included and randomly assigned to a cardioversion protocol with either A-L or A-P electrode position. In each group, 48 patients received sequential biphasic waveform shocks using a step-up protocol consisting of 50, 75, 100, 150, or 200 J. The mean energy (65 +/- 13 J for A-L vs 77 +/- 13 J for A-P, p = 0.001) and mean number of shocks (1.48 +/- 1.01 for A-L vs 1.96 +/- 1.00 for A-P, p = 0.001) required for successful cardioversion were significantly lower in the A-L group. The efficacy of the first shock with 50 J in the A-L electrode position (35 of 48 patients [73%]) was also highly significantly greater than the first shock with 50 J in the A-P electrode position (18 of 48 patients [36%]) (p = 0.001). In conclusion, the A-L electrode position increases efficacy and requires fewer energy and shocks in external electrical cardioversion of common atrial flutter. Therefore, A-L electrode positioning should be recommended for the external cardioversion of common atrial flutter.