Colon interposition for benign esophageal disease: experience with 23 patients

Long-term quality of life and alimentary satisfaction after esophagectomy with colon interposition

BACKGROUND

The long-term outcome after colon interposition for esophageal reconstruction is not well documented. Our objective was to assess quality of life and alimentary satisfaction 10 or more years after colon interposition.

METHODS

Patients who had an esophagectomy that was reconstructed using a colon interposition before April 2003 were identified. Symptoms, alimentary satisfaction, and quality of life were assessed by telephone interview and questionnaires.

RESULTS

We identified 79 surviving patients, and follow-up was obtained in 63 (80%). The indication for esophagectomy was cancer in 45 patients and benign disease in 18. Vagal-sparing esophagectomy was performed in 48% of patients, en bloc in 44%, and transhiatal in 8%. Median follow-up was 13 years (range, 10 to 38 years). The median Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index score was 3 of 4 and results from the RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA) were at or above the published normal means in all categories. Most patients were free of dysphagia (89%), regurgitation (84%), and heartburn (84%). The most common postprandial symptom was early satiety (40%). The body mass index was within normal reference ranges in 90% of patients. Follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 30 patients at a median of 6 years showed no Barrett's metaplasia in the residual esophagus. Seven patients had a reoperation for colon redundancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term alimentary satisfaction and quality of life were excellent after colon interposition. Most patients were free of dysphagia and few needed revision for redundancy. These results should encourage the use of a colon interposition in patients expected to survive long-term after esophagectomy.

Esophageal conduit necrosis

A cumulative review of the prevalence of esophageal conduit necrosis is summarized in Table 4. The spectrum of conduit ischemia is broad and includes cases in which there is anastomotic leak or stricture as well as cases in which there is frank graft necrosis. Many of the studies that the authors reviewed do not specify the exact nature of postoperative ischemic complications or how they are defined. Therefore, postoperative conduit ischemia is reported globally. Based on the authors' review, average rates of ischemic complications for stomach, colon, and jejunum are 3.2%, 5.1%, and 4.2%, respectively. Results for colon and jejunum include results for both long- and short-segment grafting. Most reports that compare outcomes using different esophageal conduits demonstrate findings similar to the authors'. Davis and colleagues compared results with colon versus gastric conduit esophageal reconstruction. They found that operative mortality, anastomotic leaks, and conduit ischemia rates were all lower for the stomach than for the colon. Specifically, ischemia of the stomach conduit was 0.5%, compared with 2.4% for the colon conduit. Moorehead and Wong, in a large series of 760 esophagectomy patients in whom the stomach, colon, or jejunum was used for reconstruction, demonstrated that the stomach had the lowest incidence of conduit ischemia (1%), followed by jejunum (11.3%), then colon (13.3%). Some of the factors they identified as correlating with the risk of ischemia include length of conduit, technique of stomach graft preparation, whether anastomosis is in the neck or chest, and route of passage of the conduit. Mansour and colleagues compared their results using bowel interposition (either colon or jejunum) to reconstruct the resected esophagus. The authors report an overall mortality of 5.9%, and 3% conduit ischemia. All ischemia was noted in the colon conduits harvested from the left side. No ischemic complications were noted from jejunal segments. Briel and colleagues compared stomach versus colon conduit use after esophagectomy. They note an overall incidence of ischemia of 9.2%. In their series, the incidence of ischemia for stomach and colon was 10.4% and 7.4%, respectively. Anastomotic leak and stricture rates, both thought to be sequelae of ischemia, also were lower for colon conduit use than for stomach conduit. Multivariate analysis identified patient comorbidities as the only independent risk factor for conduit ischemia. The authors use their findings to support the preferential use of colon conduits rather than stomach conduits. The incidence of colon conduit ischemia (7.4%) is directly in line with all other published results, including the cumulative review by the authors of this article, whereas the rate of stomach conduit ischemia (10.4%) is considerable higher than in most other studies. Esophageal conduit necrosis is an uncommon but disastrous complication of esophageal surgery. Careful selection of patients for surgery, preoperative evaluation of the proposed conduit, and meticulous operative technique are the best defenses against conduit ischemia. Postoperatively, surgeons should have a high index of suspicion for this complication. Unexplained tachycardia, respiratory failure, leukocytosis, or any evidence for graft or anastomotic leak should prompt a search for conduit ischemia. The diagnosis is made by contrast esophagography, endoscopy, or direct operative inspection. There is no documented salvage technique once ischemia is identified. Treatment for mild cases may be supportive, with or without management of anastomotic leak. More severe cases of necrosis require débridement and conduit take-down with proximal esophageal diversion and placement of enteral feeding tubes. Reconstruction can be planned for later if possible. The majority of the data demonstrates that risk of ischemia is related to conduit type, length of conduit, comorbidities, and operative technique. The stomach has the lowest reported incidence of conduit ischemia, followed by the jejunum, and colon. In the future, methods to predict conduit ischemia more accurately at the time of surgery may further reduce the incidence of this disastrous complication.

Esophageal stricture with a pseudodiverticulum caused by the unrecognized ingestion of a small foreign body in a child: report of a case

A 2-year-old boy with a long history of vomiting, dysphagia, and weight loss was found to have a rigid stricture in the proximal esophagus. We performed esophageal repair using a Livaditis circular myotomy technique. The removed section of esophagus contained the inflammatory stricture with a pseudodiverticulum, caused by the unrecognized ingestion of a small, hard plastic sticker.

[Reinterventions for complication and defect of coloesophagoplasty]

AIM OF THE STUDY

To report a series of 17 patients operated for a complication oesophagocoloplasty, with evaluation of therapeutic modalities, and both early and distant results.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

From 1985 to 2003, 17 patients with a mean age of 50 years (range: 23-76) were reoperated after coloplasty pediculated on left superior colic vessels. Initial diseases were caustic ingestion (N=7), cancer (N=6), oesophageal perforation (N=2), gastric lymphoma (N=1) and oesotracheal fistula (N=1). Coloplasty has been performed as a first-intent procedure in 13 cases and as a second-intent procedure after failure of a previous operation in 4 cases. Nine patients were initially operated in another center and were subsequently referred in our unit. Complications needing reoperation were graft necrosis in 8 cases (47%) and stricture in 9 cases (53%). All patients with necrosis were reoperated within the 10 first postoperative days.

RESULTS

Necroses were treated by complete (N=5) or partial (N=3) resection of the coloplasty. Strictures were treated by resection-reanastomosis (N=3), right ileocoloplasty (N=2), colic stricturoplasty (N=2), a free antebrachial flap (N=1) and a tubulized latissimus dorsi myocutaneous pedicled flap (N=1). The 30-day mortality rate was 12% (N=2) and the overall morbidity rate was 66%. All deaths occurred after reoperation for necrosis. Eleven patients (65%) kept or recovered digestive continuity (including the 9 with stenosis) and 8 (73%) eat normally. Four patients with transplant necrosis died before reestablishment. Four patients operated for necrosis died before restoration of digestive continuity and 2 patients are still awaiting restoration.

CONCLUSION

Use of colon as an oesophageal substitute is risky. Reoperations for stenosis allows satisfactory oral feeding, while reoperation for necrosis is associated with both high early mortality and a low rate of restoration or digestive continuity. This later requires a range of complex surgical procedures.

Quality of life after colon interposition by necessity for esophageal cancer replacement

BACKGROUND

After esophagectomy for cancer, the first choice for reconstruction of the gastrointestinal continuity is by gastric tube. When this is not feasible, a reconstruction by colon interposition can be performed. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life in patients at least 6 months after esophageal cancer resection and colon interposition without signs of recurrent disease. The results were compared with previously published data of patients after esophageal cancer resection and gastric tube reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1993 and January 2002, 36 patients underwent esophageal cancer resection and gastrointestinal reconstruction by colon interposition. A one-time Quality of Life assessment was carried out in 14 patients who were still disease free after a median follow-up of 21 months (mean 35, range 7-97). The patients were visited at home and asked to fill in questionnaires which consisted of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey to assess general quality of life, an adapted Rotterdam Symptom Checklist to assess disease-specific quality of life, a visual analogue scale, and an additional questionnaire concerning other specific effects of the operation.

RESULTS

All 14 patients returned the completed set of questionnaires. Compared to the previously published results of patients after gastric tube reconstruction patients with a colon interposition scored significantly (P < or = 0.05) lower in five of the eight subscales of the SF-36 questionnaire (i.e. general health, physical role, vitality, social functioning, and mental health). The most frequent symptoms measured by the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist were early satiety after a meal, dysphagia, diarrhea, loss of sexual interest, and fatigue. Six patients could not independently run their housekeeping and four patients still needed artificial enteral nutrition.

CONCLUSION

Based on the SF-36 questionnaire, patients after colon interposition by necessity have a poor general quality of life. Even long after the operation they have a broad spectrum of persisting symptoms. Prior to surgery, patients should be informed about the disabling long-term functional outcome of a colon interposition.

Defiant dysphagia: small-caliber esophagus and refractory benign esophageal strictures

Among causes of defiant dysphagia, two pose a special challenge for the clinician: the small-caliber esophagus and refractory benign esophageal strictures. The small-caliber esophagus is a major cause of dysphagia for solids in young patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. A smooth, diffusely narrow esophageal lumen can be appreciated by barium esophagography or esophagoscopy. The term "small-caliber esophagus" is preferred over "stricture" because of the absence of cicatrization. A "subtle" small-caliber esophagus may defy detection by barium esophagogram and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The only evidence to its diagnosis is the endoscopic finding of unusually long rents in the body of the esophagus immediately after esophageal dilation. The ringed esophagus seems to be a variant of the small-caliber esophagus, with the additional endoscopic finding of a variable number of rings (few to numerous) throughout the narrowed esophagus. Classification, diagnosis, and management of small-caliber esophagus are discussed in this review. Refractory esophageal strictures have various causes, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, nasogastric tube placement, mediastinal irradiation, and corrosive ingestion. Treatments used to eliminate or reduce the need for frequent esophageal bougienage include acid-suppressive medical therapy, surgery, intralesional corticosteroid injection, and esophageal self-expandable metal stents.

Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: isoperistaltic or antiperistaltic? Experimental results

BACKGROUND

Isoperistaltic colon is preferred to antiperistaltic colon for esophageal replacement, but experimental data do not exist to support this practice.

METHODS

In 7 dogs a 20 cm long colon loop was interposed between the skin and the small bowel, isoperistaltically in 3 dogs and antiperistaltically in 4 dogs. Three months later five strain-gauges were implanted and evacuation was investigated by motility testing, barium studies, and scintigraphy.

RESULTS

Motility recording showed normal colon motility in the excluded loops. Quiescent states (duration 40.2 +/- 13.6 minutes) were followed by contractile states (duration 7.5 +/- 2.4 minutes, frequency 3.3 +/- 0.6 per minute). The main peristaltic direction of isoperistaltic loops was isoperistaltic, and the main peristaltic direction of antiperistaltic loops was antiperistaltic. Evacuation took place exclusively during the contractile status. Half time emptying was more rapid in isoperistaltic loops (35 +/- 11 vs 69 +/- 16 minutes). The content of antiperistaltic loops was held back by antiperistaltic activity. Application of oatmeal porridge into the loops shortened the quiescent status from 40.2 to 13.2 +/- 4.8 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

The colon graft for esophageal replacement is an active system. Food is stored during the quiescent states and evacuated during the contractile states. The original peristaltic direction is preserved so that retroperistalsis in antiperistaltic loops may lead to patient discomfort and pulmonary complications.

Revisional surgery after colon interposition for benign oesophageal disease

Although the short-term results of colon interposition for replacement of the oesophagus in part or as a whole are known to be satisfactory, there have been several reports of functional problems associated with total replacement in the long-term follow-up of patients. We have retrospectively studied patients who have required revisional surgery for anatomical and functional sequelae over a 7- to 38-year period. Although the short-segment colon interpositions have been relatively trouble free, several mechanical and functional problems requiring revisional surgery have been encountered in the long-term follow-up of patients who underwent long-segment colon interposition.

Comparative evaluation of acid- and bile-induced damage to pedicled jejunal or colonic segments in the rat

The choice of the esophageal substitute after surgical resection for peptic stricture lies between the colon and jejunum. The current study was designed to compare long-term resistance of the colonic and jejunal mucosa to gastric or mixed duodenogastric secretions. The following preparations were performed in Wistar rats: transposition of a colonic or jejunal patch (a) to the gastric body, with or without truncal vagotomy, or (b) to the gastric antrum and proximal duodenum, with or without truncal vagotomy. Jejunal and colonic patches were removed 4, 8, and 12 months after surgery. The only damage to the transposed mucosae was the alteration of microvilli. The alteration was more severe in colonic than in jejunal patches and was prevented by truncal vagotomy. Long-term resistance of the transposed mucosae to the environmental challenge may depend on their adaptation potentiality, involving both specific and nonspecific mechanisms. Nonspecific mechanisms include the increased production of mucus and the gastric-like transformation of the superficial epithelial layer. Specific mechanisms include the reduction of the mucosal surface size for jejunal segments and the shifting in mucin secretion patterns for colonic segments.

Replacement of the esophagus by a segment of colon provided with an antireflux valve

A method has been developed to prevent reflux of gastric contents into an interposed segment of colon substituting for the esophagus. The operative procedure includes construction of an intussusception valve at the cologastric junction. The method was used in 5 patients, who have been followed clinically for 17 to 30 months. Clinical observations including endoscopy as well as radiography and dynamic scintigraphy indicate that the addition of an antireflux valve at the distal end of the interposed segment of colon prevents gastrocolic reflux without jeopardizing the emptying of the colon transplant.

Colonic interposition for benign esophageal disease. Long-term clinical and endoscopic results

Replacement of the esophagus for benign disease requires familiarity with the long-term results of various esophageal substitutes. In the present study, 60 esophageal reconstructions for benign disease using colonic interposition have been presented. The operations were performed mainly without thoracotomy, using both antiperistaltic and isoperistaltic colonic segments. There were no differences in swallowing ability between patients with antiperistaltic and patients with isoperistaltic interpositions. Regurgitation symptoms, however, seemed to be somewhat more common and more difficult in patients with antiperistaltic colonic transpositions. Endoscopic signs of colitis were common, but they did not correlate with regurgitation symptoms. Bacterial cultures from the transplanted colon mainly revealed the usual mouth organisms. Candida albicans was frequently found in the fungal samples. There were no differences in the results between patients with follow-up periods of more and less than 2 years. The clinical results were good or fair in a great majority of the patients.

Esophageal mucocele: a complication of blind loop esophagus

Mucocele of the bypassed esophagus is an unusual complication of esophageal replacement and has been described only in isolated references. This report is based on our experience with 6 patients in whom a mucocele developed following esophageal replacement. Esophageal replacement was performed on 37 patients over a 10-year period at the Medical College of Georgia Hospital. A symptomatic mucocele requiring excision developed in 3 patients with achalasia, 1 with congenital tracheoesophageal fistula, 1 with esophageal atresia, and 1 with inflammatory stricture. Conduits used included stomach (4), reversed gastric tube (1), and colon (1). Our experience indicates that conversion of a closed-loop esophagus into a symptomatic mucocele is more likely in the presence of functioning, chronically irritated mucosa. The clinical features were referable to the mucocele itself or respiratory embarrassment therefrom. Thoracic roentgenograms and computed tomographic scans were diagnostic in verifying the presence of the esophageal mucocele. All five mucoceles arose from squamous epithelium. One of 3 patients with achalasia in whom a mucocele developed following esophageal replacement had premalignant changes in the mucosa. Based on this experience, our treatment of choice is early, complete excision of the mucocele.

Dietary habits of patients with regurgitation after colon interposition

The dietary habits after colon interposition following oesophagectomy in patients without symptoms (n = 8), with regurgitation (n = 22) and in sex- and age-matched healthy controls (n = 20) were studied by a 7-day diary method. The patients ate smaller meals (1080 +/- 90 kJ versus 1810 +/- 151 for the controls, P less than 0.01), more frequently during the day (eight versus five in the controls). Solid and sour foods were preferred, especially by those with regurgitation, compared with controls. The asymptomatic patients consumed more milk and coffee and less cheese, sour milk, meat, fish, eggs, tea and orange juice than the patients with regurgitation. Vegetable fats and medium chain triglycerides were consumed in negligible amounts. The patients with regurgitation had more fluids separately from meals than the asymptomatic patients. The results suggest that intake of vitamin supplements and replacement of animal fats by vegetable fats may be useful in these patients. Much of the dietary difficulties after colon interposition might be the result of the intra-abdominal colon graft loop anastomosed to the antrum; a short graft with a more proximal anastomosis to the lesser curvature merits study in this context.

Esophageal stricture in Crohn's disease--a case report

We treated a 46-year-old Japanese man with Crohn's disease of the esophagus and for whom medical therapy was adequate. Crohn's disease of the esophagus is a rare disease without specific clinical features and establishment of the diagnosis with guided biopsy is extremely difficult. Therefore, Crohn's disease of the esophagus should be considered in the differential diagnosis of biopsy-negative carcinoma of the esophagus in order to avoid major surgery. Treatment of Crohn's disease of the esophagus should primarily be medical and esophagectomy should only be considered in cases of complications, intractability or a suspicion of malignancy in the biopsied specimen.

Radiology of colonic interposition and its associated complications

A retrospective review of the medical records, pathology reports, and radiographic studies of 81 patients who had undergone colonic interposition was undertaken, with special attention to postoperative complications. Both early (within 30 days postoperatively, 81 patients) and late (later than 30 days postoperatively, 57 patients) complications were reviewed. Early findings included anastomotic narrowing (18 patients), anastomotic leak (13), aspiration (11), and ischemic necrosis of the colon (3). Late findings included aspiration (9 patients), anastomotic strictures (8), gastric stasis (6), redundancy and tortuosity of the colon (5), anastomotic ulcers (4), gastrocolic reflux (3), and gastroesophageal reflux into the residual esophagus (2).