Implantation of pericardial substitutes

Reoperation after pericardial closure with bovine pericardium

To reduce the risk of damage to the anterior surface of the right ventricle after resternotomy, it has been recommended that the pericardium be closed with a patch after open heart operations. We have examined 4 patients undergoing resternotomy for the third time 3 to 8 years after bovine pericardium valve replacement. On each occasion the pericardium was closed with a patch of bovine pericardium. In all cases, the patch was frozen to the inner aspect of the sternum, increasing the difficulty of resternotomy. Histological examinations of the patches confirmed dense fibrous connective tissue, patchy calcification, and foreign body giant cell reaction. Bovine pericardium appears to increase the difficulty of repeat cardiac operations. We recommend its use be discontinued.

Pericardial substitutes: a survey

Many thoracic surgeons have used pericardial substitutes to reduce the risk of reoperation, but there have been few reports of these procedures. Therefore, we used a questionnaire to gather information on experience with use of pericardial substitutes and to document the findings at reoperation. A six-question survey was sent to 2,344 members of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, requesting surgeons to list their experience with pericardial substitutes and at reoperation in patients with these substitutes in place. Of the 634 surgeons who responded to the survey, 120 reported the insertion of 3,828 pericardial substitutes. Two hundred thirty-six reoperations were reported by 89 surgeons. None of the pericardial substitutes was reported to be completely successful in facilitating reoperation. The experience with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) pericardial substitutes was reported to be significantly more satisfactory than that with all other substitutes (p = 0.0004 by chi-square analysis), but 14% of surgeons who used PTFE said they were dissatisfied at reoperation. Based on the results of this survey, we suggest caution, careful documentation, and long-term follow-up studies before widespread use of pericardial substitutes can be recommended.