Heparin-bonded circuits decrease myocardial ischemic damage: an experimental study

Investigation of Blood Compatibility and Determination of Clinical Performance of PMEA Coated and Flow Optimized Oxygenator

In this study, the blood compatibility of the tip-to-tip coated and flow-optimized extracorporeal circuits were investigated using poly(2-methoxyethylacrylate) PMEA-coated oxygenators and tubing sets. Total protein, human serum albumin, fibrinogen, erythrocyte, leukocyte and platelets loss quantities were analyzed on blood samples withdrawn five different times during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) such as: baseline (T1), during CPB (T2), end of CPB (T3), after protamine injection (T4) and intensive care (T5), no fibrinogen loss was observed for the tip-to-tip coated system. After an operation, protein desorption assays from fiber surfaces of the tip-to-tip coated and flow-optimized extracorporeal circuits showed very little desorption. Less protein desorption was found between sonicated fibers and fiber sample solutions at <0.2mg/dL and 0.58mg/dL, respectively. For tip-to-tip coated and flow-optimized extracorporeal system, no platelet aggregation and no erythrocyte, leukocyte losses were observed. Optimized flow path and eliminated straight turns due to integration of exchangers minimized turbulent flows. Larger surface areas of the fibers optimized blood flow speed and improved gentle flow conditions and lowered shear stress. Clinically, no excessive postoperative bleeding was observed by the patients with the tip-to-tip coated system after 24 hours (hemorrhage was 387mL). The average unit of red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma transfusions were 0.98 and 2.10 units, respectively. Differences in adsorbed HSA on the hollow fiber surfaces were examined by STM which indicated that less protein existed on the sample solution of the non-sonicated fiber surfaces.

Investigation of Blood Compatibility of PMEA Coated Extracorporeal Circuits

In this study, the blood compatibility of the PMEA-coated and uncoated hollow fibers was investigated using poly(2-methoxyethyl acrylate) PMEA-coated (X-coating, Terumo Corp., Japan) and uncoated (Capiox SX 18, Terumo Inc., Japan) oxygenators. Total protein, human serum albumin, fibrinogen, erythrocyte, leukocyte and platelets loss quantities were detected on blood samples taken in five different times during cardiopulmonarybypass (CPB) such as; baseline (T1), during CPB (T2), end of CPB (T3), after protamine injection (T4) and intensive care (T5). The average loss of fibrinogen for uncoated and PMEA-coated fiber surfaces was 1.34 and 0.25 g/L, respectively. After operation protein desorption assayfrom the PMEA-coated and uncoated fiber surfaces were examined, and significant protein desorption differences were found as 1.46 and 5.70 mg/dL, respectively. More platelet aggregation was observed for the uncoated fibers. Also for platelet loss quantities, significant differences were found as 116,000 and 36,000 cell/mm3,respectively,for uncoated and PMEA-coated fibers. Less bleeding was observed in the patients operated with oxygenator containing PMEA-coated fibers; more and longer postoperative haemorrhaging were observed when uncoated circuits have been used; fibrinogen losses caused longer blood clotting times. Differences in adsorbed protein quantities on hollow fiber surface and denaturation were examined by the aid of STM images, which showed that more proteins existed in the sample solution of uncoated fiber surfaces.

Effects of two differently heparin-coated extracorporeal circuits on markers for brain and myocardial dysfunction

Objective: The two most commonly used heparin-coated systems for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are the Carmeda Bio-Active Surface (CBAS) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and the Duraflo II coating (Baxter Healthcare, Irvine, CA, USA). The two surfaces are technically unequal and previous experimental studies have demonstrated disparities in effects on the immune system and blood cells. However, little is known concerning the influence of the two surfaces on markers for brain and myocardial dysfunction.

Methods: Forty patients undergoing elective, primary coronary bypass grafting with CPB were prospectively randomized to either the CBAS system or the Duraflo II circuit. During and after CPB, biological markers for brain dysfunction and myocardial injury were analysed.

Results: Both markers for brain dysfunction S-100B and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) increased significantly during CPB ( p =0.01). The elevation during bypass correlated significantly with the duration of CPB ( r = 0.39 and r= 0.38, respectively, both p< 0.02). NSE was somewhat more elevated in the Duraflo II group at the end of CPB ( p =0.01) and 5 h after CPB ( p= 0.02); for S-100B, there were no intergroup differences. Also, the markers related to myocardial injury, myoglobin and creatine kinase (CK-MB) mass increased during CPB ( p= 0.01), while elevation of troponin-I occurred 5 h after CPB ( p= 0.01). There were no statistically significant intergroup differences. No significant correlation was seen between the release of cardiac markers and the duration of CPB. The clinical course was similar in both groups.

Conclusions: Except for a slightly higher elevation of NSE at the end of CPB and 5 h after CPB in the Duraflo II group, there were no significant differences between the CBAS group and the Duraflo II group concerning markers for brain and myocardial dysfunction.

Aprotinin decreases ischemic damage during coronary revascularization

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This study sought to determine whether the favorable anti-inflammatory effects of aprotinin might limit ischemic damage during the revascularization of ischemic myocardium.

METHODS

Twenty pigs underwent 90 minutes of coronary occlusion followed by 45 minutes of blood cardioplegic arrest and 180 minutes of reperfusion. Ten animals received a loading dose of aprotinin (40,000 kallikrein inhibiting units/kg) during the start of coronary occlusion followed by an infusion of 20,000 kallikrein inhibiting units/kg/hour. Ten other animals received no aprotinin. Summary statistics are expressed as the mean +/- standard error.

RESULTS

The aprotinin-treated animals required less cardioversions for ventricular arrhythmias (1.0 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.6; p < 0.001), accumulated less lung water (1.0 +/- 0.2% change vs. 6.2 +/- 0.9% change; p = 0.038), had more complete coronary relaxation to bradykinin (34.1 +/- 5.9% change vs. 9.2 +/- 3.5% change; p = 0.01), and had reduced infarct size (area necrosis/area risk = 20 +/- 1.1% vs. 39 +/- 1.2%; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin limits ischemic injury during acute coronary revascularization by decreasing ventricular arrhythmias and lung edema, preserving endothelial function, and minimizing myocardial necrosis.

Soluble human complement receptor 1 limits ischemic damage in cardiac surgery patients at high risk requiring cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to determine whether soluble human complement receptor type 1 (TP10), a potent inhibitor of complement activation, would reduce morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

METHODS

This was a randomized multicenter, prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in which 564 high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery on CPB received an intravenous bolus of TP10 (1, 3, 5, 10 mg/kg) or placebo immediately before CPB. The primary endpoint was the composite events of death, myocardial infarction (MI), prolonged (> or =24 hours) intra-aortic balloon pump support (IABP), and prolonged intubation.

RESULTS

TP10 significantly inhibited complement activity after 10 to 15 minutes of CPB and this inhibition persisted for 3 days postoperatively. However, there was no difference in the primary endpoint between the 2 groups (33.7% placebo versus 31.4% TP10; P=0.31). The primary composite endpoint was, however, reduced in all male TP10 patients by 30% (P=0.025). TP10 reduced the incidence of death or MI in males by 36% (P=0.026), the incidence of death or MI in CABG males by 43% (P=0.043) and the need for prolonged IABP support in male CABG and valve patients by 100% (P=0.019). There was, however, no improvement seen in female TP10 patients. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TP10 effectively inhibits complement activation during CPB; however, this was not associated with an improvement in the primary endpoint of the study. Nevertheless, TP10 did significantly decrease the incidence of mortality and MI in male patients.

The systemic inflammatory response syndrome and cardiopulmonary bypass

Cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) provokes a systemic inflammatory response. This is mainly triggered by contact activation of blood by artificial surfaces of the extracorporeal circuit. Although often remaining sub-clinical and resolving promptly at the end of CPB, in its most extreme form this inflammatory response may be associated with the development of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) that can often lead to major organ dysfunction (MODs) and death. Here, we review the pathophysiology behind the development of this "whole body" inflammatory response and some of the methods currently used to minimise it.

Hemocompatibility of PMEA Coated Oxygenators Used for Extracorporeal Circulation Procedures

An inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) caused by bioincompatibility of extracorporeal circuits is one of the major clinical issues in cardiac surgery. Recently a new coating material, poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA), was developed to improve the biocompatibility of blood contacting surfaces. In a simulated cardiopulmonary bypass model, using fresh human whole blood, 15 membrane oxygenators (Capiox SX18, Terumo Corp., Tokyo, Japan) were compared. Five of them had the PMEA coating, five had a heparin-coated surface, and five had no surface treatment. Blood samples were taken at several time-points during a 90 minute circulation period. Changes in coagulation, complement, and blood cell alteration factors were measured by ELISA methods, plasma bradykinin levels were measured by radioimmunoassay, and expression of genes encoding cytokines TNF-alpha, interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8 was determined by semiquantitative real time RT-PCR. Platelet adhesion was significantly reduced in both the PMEA and the heparin coated circuits. Release of platelet activation marker beta-thromboglobulin was significantly higher in the uncoated control group (p < 0.01). After 5 minutes of blood circulation bradykinin levels significantly increased in all three groups (p < 0.01); however, the group with the PMEA coated oxygenators showed the lowest values. Expression of genes encoding proinflammatory cytokines in monocytes was increased in all groups, with the lowest being in the PMEA coated group. PMEA coated CPB surfaces in an in vitro experimental model showed an improved thrombogenicity, reduced bradykinin release, less platelet activation and less proinflammatory cytokines gene expression in comparison with a noncoated group. The authors assume that PMEA coating may ameliorate some of intra- and postperfusion syndromes, particularly hypotension, unspecific inflammation, hyperfibrinolysis, and blood loss.

A new poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit possesses superior platelet preservation and inflammatory suppression efficacy

BACKGROUND

Poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA) is a new coating material, and several studies have revealed that PMEA-coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits have good biocompatibility. This study sought to compare this biocompatibility with those of heparin-coated and noncoated circuits.

METHODS

Forty-five patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to PMEA-coated (group P, n = 15), heparin-coated (group H, n = 15), or noncoated (group N, n = 15) circuit groups. Clinical data and the following markers were analyzed: (1) platelet preservation by number of platelets; (2) complement (C) activation by C3a and C4a levels; (3) inflammatory response by interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels.

RESULTS

Platelet numbers were significantly preserved in group P compared with groups N and H. Postoperative blood loss did not differ among the groups. During CPB, C3a values were significantly lower in group H (536 +/- 145 ng/mL) than in group P (1,458 +/- 433 ng/mL, p < 0.01) and group N (1,815 +/- 845 ng/mL, p < 0.01). The C4a values did not differ 60 minutes after CPB initiation among the groups. The IL-6 and IL-8 levels were significantly lower in group P and group H than in group N.

CONCLUSIONS

The PMEA coating was superior to heparin coating and noncoating in preserving platelets, and was equivalent to heparin coating in terms of the perioperative clinical course and inhibition of inflammatory cytokines, but slightly inferior in reducing complement activation.

Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: current status

Heparin-coated circuits have been subjected to vigorous testing, both experimentally and clinically, for the past decade. When the functions of heparin are preserved on the surface, the heparinized surface plays multiple roles in attenuating the systemic inflammatory response. These include the ability to attenuate contact activation, coagulation activation, complement activation and, directly or indirectly, platelet and leukocyte activation. The heparinized surface also renders the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits hydrophilic and protein resistant and augments lipoprotein binding. The multifunctional nature of the heparinized surface contributes to the overall biocompatibility of the surface. Clinically, heparin-coated circuits become most effective in reducing systemic inflammatory response and in improving morbidity, mortality, and other patient outcome related parameters when material-independent blood activation is controlled or minimized through a global biocompatibility strategy. Techniques involved in the global biocompatibility strategy are readily available and are being effectively and safely practiced at several centers. With the global biocompatibility strategy, outstanding and reproducible results have been routinely achieved with conventional CPB techniques. Alternative revascularization procedures should equal or surpass conventional CPB, using best clinically proven strategies with respect to patient outcome and long-term graft patency.

Efficacy of a new coating material, PMEA, for cardiopulmonary bypass circuits in a porcine model

BACKGROUND

A new coating material, poly-2-methoxyethyl acrylate (PMEA), was developed to improve the biocompatibility of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits.

METHODS

To investigate the efficacy of the PMEA coating for CPB circuits, we compared PMEA-coated circuits (group P, n = 6) with uncoated circuits (group C, n = 6) and heparin (covalent-bonded heparin, Hepaface)-coated circuits (group H, n = 6) in a porcine CPB model.

RESULTS

Platelet counts were significantly preserved in groups P and H compared with those in group C (P versus C, p < 0.05). The plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin complex and bradykinin were significantly lower at 120 minutes in groups P and H than in group C (thrombin-antithrombin: P versus C, p < 0.05; bradykinin: P versus C, p < 0.05). The amount of fibrinogen adsorbed onto the hollow fibers was markedly less in group P than in groups C and H.

CONCLUSIONS

The PMEA coating was equal to heparin coating in preventing reactions induced by CPB circuits, and might be superior to heparin coating in suppressing the adsorption of plasma proteins such as fibrinogen. Thus, PMEA coating may be a suitable means for improving the biocompatibility of CPB circuits.

Cytokine mediated endothelial activation during and after normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass: heparin-bonded versus non heparin-bonded circuits

Studies evaluating cytokine production under normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are limited. We evaluated cytokine production, levels of thrombomodulin (TM), and soluble endothelium-derived adhesion molecules (ICAM-1) under normothermic CPB with and without heparin-bonded circuits. Nine patients treated with non heparin-bonded circuits (control group), and seven patients treated with heparin-bonded circuits (heparin group) were the subjects. Granulocyte elastase (G-E), and interleukin (IL) -6 and IL-8 were chosen as proinflammatory mediators, and TM and ICAM-1 served as indicators for endothelial damage. Blood samples were obtained before CPB, 30 minutes after initiation of CPB, at the termination of CPB, and 2 and 24 hours after CPB. G-E values in the heparin group were lower than those in the control group after 30 minutes of CPB. A G-E surge occurred at the end of CPB, and IL-6 and IL-8 surges were observed 2 hours after CPB in both groups. TM and ICAM-1 values, which were reduced at the initiation of CPB, returned to initial levels 2 hours after CPB, and exceeded them 24 hours after CPB compared with preCPB levels. Both groups showed similar changes. We conclude that there are no significant differences in serial G-E, IL-6, IL-8, TM, or ICAM-1 levels between the heparin and control groups during or after normothermic CPB for 2 to 3 hours.

Effects of new polymer-coated extracorporeal circuits on biocompatibility during cardiopulmonary bypass

An inflammatory response due to bioincompatibility of extracorporeal circuits is a major clinical issue during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). By using a swine model, we determined whether new polymer-coated circuits, the blood-contacting surfaces of which are coated with poly(2-methoxyethylacrylate) (PMEA), would reduce the inflammatory response during CPB. Plasma bradykinin levels and the percentages of CD35-positive monocytes in PMEA-coated circuits were significantly lower than those in uncoated circuits during CPB. The amount of proteins adsorbed on the PMEA-coated circuits was significantly lower than that on the uncoated circuits (0.30 microg/cm2 versus 3.42 microg/ cm2). Almost no IgG, IgM, or C3c/d was detected in proteins adsorbed on the PMEA-coated circuits although these proteins were clearly detected in proteins adsorbed on the uncoated circuits. We concluded that PMEA coating could reduce complement activation during CPB by suppressing the adsorption of IgG and IgM, which activate C3 via the classical pathway, on the surface of the circuits.

Heparin-coated circuits reduce occult myocardial damage during CPB: a randomized, single blind clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with a diffuse systemic inflammatory response that can cause considerable morbidity, including organ dysfunction and bleeding. Heparin-coated circuits have been shown to give a reduced inflammatory response with clinical benefits during open-heart surgery. However, the effects on lipid peroxidation, neutrophil activation and myocardial ischemic damage in the human have remained unknown.

METHODS

In a randomized single blind trial, complement activation, neutrophil counts, malondialdehyde, and cardiac enzymes were studied in 39 patients undergoing open-heart surgery. Two groups were perfused with cardiopulmonary bypass circuits with (n=20) or without heparin-coating (n=19).

RESULTS

The different complement factors (C3, C4, C3d, C3d/C3 and the C-function), neutrophil levels, MDA and the cardiac enzyme levels were comparable before CPB was started and significantly increased in both groups during bypass. There were significant intergroup differences in the neutrophil levels and MDA after reperfusion (P<0.0001). Furthermore, significant positive correlations between the lipid peroxidation, expressed as MDA levels, and the levels of neutrofils and the cardiac enzyme, CK-MB were seen within the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Heparin coated circuits did lead to a decreased neutrophil response and MDA level. The correlations between CK-MB and neutrophil and MDA levels suggest neutrophil activation leading to lipid peroxidation that may influence myocardial damage. Heparin coating improved biocompatibility and was associated with less occult myocardial ischemic damage in patients undergoing open heart surgery.

Heparin-coated circuits reduce myocardial injury in heart or heart-lung transplantation: a prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND

The effects of heparin-coated (HC) circuits have been primarily investigated in routine cardiac operations with limited duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and ischemia. Their benefits have not been conclusively proven but could be more significant when CPB and ischemic times are longer, such as during heart transplantation (HTx) or heart-lung transplantation (HLTx).

METHODS

In a 22-month period, 29 patients undergoing HTx and HLTx were randomly divided into two groups using HC (Duraflo II, n = 14, 10 HTx and 4 HLTx) or uncoated but identical circuits (NHC group, n = 15, 10 HTx and 5 HLTx). All patients received full systemic heparinization (3 mg/kg) during CPB. Plasma endotoxin, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, and cardiac troponin-I were measured before heparin administration, immediately after aortic cross-clamping, 5, 30, 60, 90, 120 minutes, and 12 and 24 hours after aortic declamping. The intensive care unit (ICU) staff and the laboratory technologists were blinded as to the use of HC circuits.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences between groups were found with respect to all baseline values, duration of CPB and aortic cross-clamping, graft ischemic time, doses of heparin, postoperative blood loss and transfusion, peak lactate and creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme values, duration of mechanical ventilation, or length of ICU stay. One patient in each group died during the hospital stay. Patients in the HC group needed more protamine sulfate after CPB. Although endotoxin levels were similar in the two groups, significantly lower IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 levels were observed 1 hour after aortic declamping in the HC group. The release of cardiac troponin-I was also significantly reduced in the HC group 12 and 24 hours after reperfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of HC circuit limits both pro- and anti-inflammatory responses to CPB. It may also reduce myocardial injury after prolonged duration of CPB and ischemia.

Total complement inhibition: an effective strategy to limit ischemic injury during coronary revascularization on cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

Activation of complement during revascularization of ischemic myocardium accentuates myocardial dysfunction. Soluble human complement receptor type 1 (sCR1) is a potent inhibitor of complement, as are heparin-bonded (HB) cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits. This study sought to determine whether total complement inhibition with the combination of sCR1 and HB-CPB limits damage during the revascularization of ischemic myocardium.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 40 pigs, the second and third diagonal coronary arteries were occluded for 90 minutes, followed by 45 minutes of cardioplegic arrest and 180 minutes of reperfusion. In 10 pigs, sCR1 (10 mg/kg) was infused 5 minutes after the onset of coronary occlusion (sCR1), 10 received HB-CPB only (HB-CPB), 10 received sCR1 and HB-CPB (sCR1+HB), and 10 received neither sCR1 or HB-CPB (unmodified). Addition of sCR1 to the HB group resulted in less myocardial tissue acidosis (DeltapH = -0.72+/-0.03 for unmodified; -0.46+/-0.05 for HB; -0.18+/-0.04 for sCR1; -0.13+/-0.01 for sCR1+HB), better recovery of wall motion scores (4 = normal to -1 = dyskinesia; 1.67+/-0.17 for unmodified; 2.80+/-0.08 for HB; 3.35+/-0.10 for sCR1; 3.59+/-0.08 for sCR1+HB), less lung water accumulation (5.46+/-0.28% for unmodified; 2.39+/-0.34% for HB; 1.22+/-0.07% for sCR1; 1.24+/-0.13% for sCR1+HB), and smaller infarct size (area necrosis/area risk = 44.6+/-0.7% for unmodified; 33.2+/-1.9% for HB; 19.0+/-2.4% for sCR1; 20+/-1.0% for sCR1+HB) (P<0.05 versus unmodified; P<0.05 versus unmodified and HB groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Total complement inhibition with sCR1 and sCR1+HB circuits optimizes recovery during the revascularization of ischemic myocardium.

Soluble complement receptor type I limits damage during revascularization of ischemic myocardium

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to determine whether suppression of complement activation with soluble human complement receptor type I reduces myocardial damage during the revascularization of ischemic myocardium.

METHODS

In 20 pigs, the second and third diagonal coronary arteries were occluded for 90 minutes, followed by 45 minutes of cardioplegic arrest and 180 minutes of reperfusion. In 10 pigs, soluble human complement receptor type I (10 mg/kg) was infused over 30 minutes before the period of coronary occlusion; 10 other pigs received no soluble human complement receptor type I. Complement activation was measured by total hemolytic complement activity (expressed as a percentage of preischemic values). Ischemic damage was assessed by changes in myocardial tissue pH, wall motion scores (range, 4=normal to -1=dyskinesia), and infarct size (area of necrosis versus area at risk).

RESULTS

After 180 minutes of reperfusion, hearts treated with soluble human complement receptor type I had significantly less complement activation than nontreated hearts (1.1%+/-0.09% versus 7.8%+/-0.04%, respectively; p < 0.002), less myocardial acidosis (-0.41+/-0.03 versus -0.72+/-0.03, respectively; p < 0.0001), higher wall motion scores (3.1+/-0.09 versus 1.67+/-0.16, respectively; p < 0.0001), and smaller infarct size (24.6%+/-2.0% versus 41%+/-1.3%, respectively; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Complement inhibition with soluble human complement receptor type I significantly limits ischemic damage during the revascularization of acutely ischemic myocardium.

Comparison of risk profile and outcomes in patients undergoing surgical and catheter-based revascularization

BACKGROUND

The effects of the randomized revascularization trials and improved strategies and techniques for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous transluminal catheter-based revascularization (PTCR) on current patient selection and clinical outcomes are unknown.

METHODS

We evaluated a concurrent, contemporary (1995 to 1997), and consecutive group of patients undergoing CABG (n = 982) or PTCR (n = 939) in a single institution that participated in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) trial. Results are presented as percent or mean +/- SD. Compared to PTCR, patients undergoing CABG were older (66.2+/-10.7 vs. 62.0+/-11.8 years, p<0.05) with a higher incidence of hypertension (73.3% vs. 52.4%, p<0.05), diabetes (32.5% vs. 23.1%, p<0.05), active smoking (67.8% vs. 27.2%, p<0.05), prior myocardial infarction (MI)(66.8% vs. 28.5%, p<0.05), peripheral vascular disease (19.8% vs. 7.7%, p<0.05), prior cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/transient ischemic attack (TIA) (6.4% vs. 2.8%, p<0.05), and a lower ejection fraction (48.7%+/-14.5% vs. 55.3%+/-11.7%, p<0.05). The presenting functional class and incidence of female gender were similar for both revascularization strategies.

RESULTS

Compared to patients undergoing CABG, those undergoing PTCR were more likely to have single or two vessel coronary artery disease (88.6% vs. 23.1%, p<0.001) and had fewer vessels revascularized per patient (1.08+/-0.30 vs. 3.5+/-0.98, p<0.001). Outcomes were comparable for CABG and PTCR with a similar incidence of death (1.0% vs. 0.9%, NS), renal insufficiency (0.7% vs. 0.6%, NS), and CVA/TIA (0.9% vs. 0.3%, NS). Patients undergoing CABG had a higher incidence of pulmonary complications (5.2% vs. 1.0%, p<0.05), a lower incidence of periprocedural MI (1.1% vs. 4.1%, p<0.05) and major complication (5.9% vs. 9.4%, p<0.05), but longer hospital stays (6.5+/-5.1 vs. 3.1+/-2.6 days, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite higher clinical and angiographic risk profiles in patients undergoing CABG, clinical results, morbidity, and mortality were comparable to those of PTCR. With evolving techniques, continued reevaluation of indications and outcomes are necessary.