Structural models for the regulatory switch of Myosin

Invertebrate muscles: thin and thick filament structure; molecular basis of contraction and its regulation, catch and asynchronous muscle

This is the second in a series of canonical reviews on invertebrate muscle. We cover here thin and thick filament structure, the molecular basis of force generation and its regulation, and two special properties of some invertebrate muscle, catch and asynchronous muscle. Invertebrate thin filaments resemble vertebrate thin filaments, although helix structure and tropomyosin arrangement show small differences. Invertebrate thick filaments, alternatively, are very different from vertebrate striated thick filaments and show great variation within invertebrates. Part of this diversity stems from variation in paramyosin content, which is greatly increased in very large diameter invertebrate thick filaments. Other of it arises from relatively small changes in filament backbone structure, which results in filaments with grossly similar myosin head placements (rotating crowns of heads every 14.5 nm) but large changes in detail (distances between heads in azimuthal registration varying from three to thousands of crowns). The lever arm basis of force generation is common to both vertebrates and invertebrates, and in some invertebrates this process is understood on the near atomic level. Invertebrate actomyosin is both thin (tropomyosin:troponin) and thick (primarily via direct Ca(++) binding to myosin) filament regulated, and most invertebrate muscles are dually regulated. These mechanisms are well understood on the molecular level, but the behavioral utility of dual regulation is less so. The phosphorylation state of the thick filament associated giant protein, twitchin, has been recently shown to be the molecular basis of catch. The molecular basis of the stretch activation underlying asynchronous muscle activity, however, remains unresolved.

Photolabeling evidence for calcium-induced conformational changes at the ATP binding site of scallop myosin

A change in the conformation of the active site of scallop myosin under the influence of regulatory amounts of Ca2+ has been identified by use of the ADP photoaffinity analog 2-[(4-azido-2-nitrophenyl)amino]ethyl diphosphate (NANDP). NANDP, trapped at the active site with Mn2+ and vanadate, photolabeled preferentially Arg-128 of the heavy chain in the absence of added Mg2+ and Ca2+ [Kerwin, B. & Yount, R. (1992) Bioconjugate Chem. 3, 328-336]. However, addition of 2 mM Mg2+ and regulatory amounts of Ca2+ (0.01-1 microM) shifted the predominant labeling to Cys-198 of the heavy chain in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner. This Ca(2+)-dependent change in the photolabeling pattern was absent when the regulatory light chains were removed or when the unregulated head (subfragment 1) was examined under similar conditions. These results demonstrate that both Arg-128 and Cys-198 are part of the purine binding site which undergoes a conformational change in response to Ca2+ binding to the regulatory domain.

Mapping myosin light chains by immunoelectron microscopy. Use of anti-fluorescyl antibodies as structural probes

The two classes of light chains in vertebrate fast muscle myosin have been selectively labeled with the thiol specific reagent 5-(iodoacetamido) fluorescein to determine their location in the myosin head. The alkali light chains (A1 and A2) were labeled at a single cysteine residue near the COOH terminus, whereas the regulatory light chain (LC2) was reacted at either cysteine 125 or 154. The two cysteines of LC2 appear to be near each other in the tertiary structure as evidenced by the ease of formation of an intramolecular disulfide bond. Besides having favorable spectral properties, fluorescein is a potent haptenic immunogen for raising high affinity antibodies. When anti-fluorescyl antibodies were added to the fluorescein-labeled light chains, the fluorescence was quenched by greater than 90%, thereby providing a simple method for determining an association constant. The interaction with antibody was the same for light chains exchanged into myosin as for free light chains. Complexes of antibody bound to light chain could be visualized in the electron microscope by rotary shadowing with platinum. By this approach we have shown that the COOH-terminal regions of the two classes of light chains are widely separated in myosin: the cysteine residues of LC2 lie close to the head/rod junction, whereas the single cysteine of A1 or A2 is located approximately 90 A distal to the junction. These sites correspond to the positions of the NH2 termini of the light chains mapped in earlier studies (Winkelmann, D. A., and S. Lowey. 1986. J. Mol. Biol. 188:595-612; Tokunaga, M., M. Suzuki, K. Saeki, and T. Wakabayashi. 1987b. J. Mol. Biol. 194:245-255). We conclude that the two classes of light chains do not lie in a simple colinear arrangement, but instead have a more complex organization in distinct regions of the myosin head.

Active site trapping of nucleotide by smooth and non-muscle myosins

The folded 10 S monomer conformation of smooth muscle myosin traps the hydrolysis products ADP and Pi in its active sites. To test the significance of this, we have searched for equivalent trapping in other conformational and assembly states of avian gizzard and brush border myosins, using formycin triphosphate (FTP) as an ATP analogue. When myosin monomers were in the straight-tail 6 S conformation, the hydrolysis products were released at about 0.03 s-1. Adoption of the folded 10 S monomer conformation reduced this rate by more than 100-fold, effectively trapping the products FDP and Pi in the active sites. This profound inhibition of product release occurred only on formation of the looped tail monomer conformation. In vitro-assembled myosin filaments released products at a comparable rate to free straight-tail 6 S monomers, and smooth muscle heavy meromyosin, which lacks the C-terminal two-thirds of the myosin tail, also did not trap the products in this way. Phosphorylation of the myosin regulatory light chain had no effect on the rate of product release from straight-tail 6 S myosin monomers or from myosin filaments. Rather, it allowed actin to accelerate product release. Phosphorylation acted also to destabilize the folded monomer conformation, causing the recruitment of molecules from the pool of folded monomers into the myosin filaments. The two processes of contraction and filament assembly are thus both controlled in vitro by light-chain phosphorylation. A similar linked control in vivo would allow the organization of myosin in the cell to adapt itself continuously to the pattern of contractile activity.

Transient-kinetic studies of the adenosine triphosphatase activity of scallop heavy meromyosin

Fluorescence stopped-flow experiments were performed to elucidate the elementary steps of the ATPase mechanism of scallop heavy meromyosin in the presence and in the absence of Ca2+. ATP binding and hydrolysis, as monitored by the change in tryptophan fluorescence, appear to be Ca2+-insensitive, whereas both Pi release and ADP release are markedly suppressed in the absence of Ca2+. Rate constants for Pi release are 0.2 s-1 and 0.002 s-1 and for ADP release are 6 s-1 and 0.01 s-1 in the presence and in the absence of Ca2+ respectively. Ca2+ binding to the specific site of the regulatory domain is rapid and its release occurs at 25 s-1, consistent with the time scale of a twitch of the striated adductor muscle. Nucleotide binding is a multi-step process requiring a minimum of three states. In such a model Ca2+ controls the rate of conformational changes at the active site in both the forward and the reverse direction, leading to a large dependence of the rate of nucleotide release, but a lesser effect on the overall equilibrium position. The kinetic trapping of nucleotides and Pi at the active site, in the absence of Ca2+, appears to be a fundamental step in suppressing the interaction of the myosin head with the thin filaments in relaxed molluscan muscle.

Kinetic trapping of intermediates of the scallop heavy meromyosin adenosine triphosphatase reaction revealed by formycin nucleotides

The kinetics of interaction of formycin nucleotides with scallop myosin subfragments were investigated by exploiting the fluorescence signal of the ligand. Formycin triphosphate gives a 5-fold enhancement of the emission intensity on binding to heavy meromyosin, and the profile indicates that the kinetics of binding are Ca2+-insensitive. In contrast, the subsequent product-release steps show a marked degree of regulation by Ca2+. In the absence of Ca2+ formycin triphosphate turnover by the unregulated and the regulated heavy meromyosin fractions are clearly resolved, the latter showing a fluorescence decay rate of 0.002 s-1, corresponding to the Pi-release step. In the presence of Ca2+ this step is activated 50-fold. Formycin diphosphate release is also regulated by Ca2+, being activated from 0.008 s-1 to 5 s-1. In contrast with protein tryptophan fluorescence [Jackson & Bagshaw (1988) Biochem. J. 251, 515-526], formycin fluorescence is sensitive to conformational changes that occur subsequent to the binding step and demonstrate, directly, an effect of Ca2+ on both forward and reverse rate constants. Apart from a decrease in the apparent second-order association rate constants, formycin derivatives appear to mimic adenosine nucleotides closely in their interaction with scallop heavy meromyosin and provide a spectroscopic handle on steps that are optically silent with respect to protein fluorescence. A novel mechanism is discussed in which regulation of the formycin triphosphate activity by Ca2+ involves kinetic trapping of product complexes.

Myosin binding to actin. Structural analysis using myosin fragments

The actin-binding property of the myosin head 20 K (K = 10(3) Mr) fragment has been examined by a structural assay. A new fragment is produced by digestion of scallop myosin synthetic filaments with a lysine-specific protease. This fragment consists of the rod together with two "nubs" corresponding to the 20 K fragment, which retain both the regulatory and essential light chains. Myosin filaments, digested for different lengths of time, were mixed with F-actin and visualized by electron microscopy after negative staining. When the head is cleaved, but the head fragments remain associated, the filaments bind actin in an ATP-sensitive manner. Filaments made primarily of the nub-containing fragments, however, bind actin very poorly. In addition, electron microscopic characterization of actin-binding by the isolated tryptic 20 K fragment from chicken myosin indicates that binding of this fragment to actin is probably non-specific. These results suggest that interactions between the 20 K region and the other peptides in the head are essential for actin-binding.

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements of distances in actin and myosin. A critical evaluation

The contractile proteins actin and myosin are of considerable biological interest. They are essential for muscle contraction and in eukaryotic cells they play a crucial role in most contractile phenomena. Over the years since the first fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) paper appeared, an extensive body of literature has accumulated on this technique using actin, myosin and the actomyosin complex. These papers are reviewed with several aims in mind: we assess the reliability and consistency of intra- and inter-molecular distances measured between the fluorescent probes attached to specific sites on these proteins; we determine whether the measurements can be assembled into an internally consistent model which can be fitted to the known dimensions of the actomyosin complex; several of the FRET distances are consistent with the available structural data from crystallographic and electron microscopic dimensions; the modelled FRET distances suggest that the assumed value of the orientation factor (k2 = 2/3) is reasonable; we conclude that the model has a predictive value, i.e. it suggests that a small number of the published dimensions may be incorrect and predicts the magnitude of a larger number of measurements which have not yet been reported; and finally (vi) we discuss the contribution of FRET determinations to the current debate on the molecular mechanism of contraction.