Role of brain angiotensin II in renal nerve inhibition elicited by volume expansion in the conscious rabbit

The role of brain angiotensin II (type 2) receptors and nitric oxide in the renal sympathoinhibitory response to acute volume expansion in conscious rats

OBJECTIVE

The study was performed to investigate the role of angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptors and nitric oxide in the renal sympathoinhibitory response to volume expansion (VEP).

METHOD

Conscious rats were subjected to volume expansion (VEP) [0.25% body weight/min saline for 10 min intravenously (i.v.)] following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion of either saline or angiotensin II (Ang II), or a combination of Ang II with either losartan, PD123319, or N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME).

RESULTS

Intracerebroventricular losartan, PD123319, or L-NAME did not change baseline mean arterial pressure, heart rate, or renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA). However, i.c.v. Ang II increased mean arterial pressure and decreased heart rate and RSNA baselines (113 ± 2 vs. 107 ± 2 mmHg, 365 ± 7 vs. 379 ± 5 beats/min, 1.03 ± 0.13 vs. 1.29 ± 0.15 μV.s, respectively, all P < 0.05). During i.c.v. saline infusion, VEP decreased RSNA by 27 ± 2% (P < 0.05) after 10 min and the magnitude of this response was unchanged during i.c.v. infusion of Ang II, losartan, or PD123319 but was decreased by L-NAME compared with that obtained with i.c.v. saline (14 ± 3 vs. 30 ± 5%, P < 0.05). i.c.v. Ang II in combination with losartan enhanced (41 ± 3 vs. 29 ± 5%) but with PD123319 decreased (15 ± 2 vs. 28 ± 4%, P < 0.05) the renal sympathoinhibition compared with Ang II alone. The renal sympathoinhibitory response was enhanced (43 ± 5 vs. 29 ± 1%, P < 0.05) by i.c.v. infusion of an AT2 agonist, CGP42112 the magnitude of which was unchanged when combined with L-NAME. The sympathoinhibitory response to VEP following Ang II plus L-NAME was similar to Ang II alone.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that activation of central AT2 receptors enhances the renal sympathoinhibitory response to VEP but this effect is not dependent on nitric oxide.

Nitric oxide impacts on angiotensin AT2 receptor modulation of high-pressure baroreflex control of renal sympathetic nerve activity in anaesthetized rats

Aim

Nitric oxide (NO) interacts with the local brain renin-angiotensin system to modulate sympathetic outflow and cardiovascular homoeostasis. This study investigated whether NO influenced the ability of angiotensin AT2 receptor activation to modify the high-pressure baroreceptor regulation of renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) and heart rate (HR).

Methods

Anaesthetized (chloralose/urethane) rats were prepared to allow generation of baroreflex gain curves for RSNA or HR following intracerebroventricular (I.C.V.) CGP42112 (AT2 receptor agonist), PD123319 (AT2 receptor antagonist) or losartan (AT1 receptor antagonist), and then in combination with L-NAME (NO synthase inhibitor).

Results

I.C.V. PD123319, CGP42112, and Losartan did not change baseline mean arterial pressure, HR or RSNA. Baroreflex sensitivities for RSNA and HR were increased following AT2 receptor activation with CGP42112 by 112 and 157%, respectively, but were reduced following PD123319 by 20% (all P < 0.05). L-NAME alone increased baroreflex sensitivity for both RSNA and HR, by 62 and 158%, respectively, but when co-infused with either CGP42112 or PD123319, the baroreflex sensitivity fell to values comparable to those obtained during I.C.V. saline infusion. The baroreflex sensitivities for RSNA and HR were increased by losartan by 92% and 192%, respectively, but in the presence of L-NAME were no different from those obtained during I.C.V. saline infusion.

Conclusion

There is an important facilitatory role for AT2 receptors in the high-pressure baroreflex regulation of RSNA and HR which is dependent on a functional NO/NOS system. Conversely, AT1 receptors have an inhibitory effect on the baroreflex, an action that relies on a tonic inhibition of NO.

Role of angiotensin AT2 receptors and nitric oxide in the cardiopulmonary baroreflex control of renal sympathetic nerve activity in rats

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the hypothesis that angiotensin II (type 2) (AT2) receptor activation to modulate the renal sympatho-inhibition to saline volume expansion was dependent on nitric oxide production.

METHODS

Renal sympatho-inhibition to a saline volume expansion (VEP, 0.25% body weight/min i.v. for 30 min) was studied following intracerebroventricular (ICV) saline, CGP42112 (CGP, AT2 agonist), PD123319 (AT2 antagonist), and losartan (AT1 antagonist), and then in combination with N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (nitric oxide synthase inhibitor).

RESULTS

ICV saline, PD123319, CGP, and losartan did not change baseline mean arterial pressure, heart rate, or renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA). VEP decreased RSNA in all groups by 58-62% (P<0.05). CGP enhanced the decrease in RSNA compared to saline (74 vs. 60%; P<0.05), whereas PD123319 was without effect (58 vs. 57%). L-NAME only increased baseline RSNA when co-administered with PD123319 (P<0.05). VEP-induced reduction in RSNA following L-NAME was less than during ICV saline (46 vs. 62%; P<0.05). In the group where PD123319 preceded L-NAME, the fall in RSNA was smaller than when PD123319 was infused alone (40 vs. 63%; P<0.05), but not if PD123319 followed L-NAME (52 vs. 44%). L-NAME did not change the magnitude of VEP-induced sympatho-inhibition following CGP (67 vs. 60%). Losartan enhanced the renal sympatho-inhibition to VEP (70 vs. 62%; P<0.05), the magnitude of which was unchanged when L-NAME was present (70 vs. 65%).

CONCLUSION

AT2 receptor activation enhances the VEP-induced reduction in RSNA. Although nitric oxide is important in allowing the normal renal sympatho-inhibitory response to VEP, this is not dependent on AT2 receptors.