Presence of unsedimented precipitate in visually non-turbid supernates in the heparin-manganese method for HDL-cholesterol quantitation

Lipid-altering efficacy of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg compared with doubling the statin dose in patients admitted to the hospital for a recent coronary event: the INFORCE study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin (Eze/Simva) 10/40 mg compared with doubling the statin dose upon discharge in patients taking a statin and admitted to the hospital for the investigation of a coronary event.

DESIGN

This phase IV, multi-centre, randomised, open-label, active-controlled, parallel group study enrolled 424 patients (aged >/= 18 years) hospitalised for an acute coronary event and taking a stable dose of a statin (>/= 6 weeks) that could be doubled per the product label. Upon discharge from the hospital, patients were stratified by their statin dose/potency (high, medium and low) and randomised 1 : 1 to doubling of the statin dose (n = 211) or Eze/Simva 10/40 mg (n = 213) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the absolute low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) value (mmol/l) at study end-point.

RESULTS

Mean baseline LDL-C for the two treatment groups were 2.48 and 2.31 mmol/l for the Eze/Simva and statin groups respectively. At study end-point, least squares mean LDL-C values were 1.74 mmol/l in the Eze/Simva group and 2.22 mmol/l in the statin group resulting in a significant between-group difference of -0.49 mmol/l (p </= 0.001). Eze/Simva 10/40 mg also produced significantly lower total cholesterol (-0.49 mmol/l), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [(non-HDL-C); -0.53 mmol/l] and apolipoprotein B (-0.14 mmol/l) values compared with doubling the statin dose (p </= 0.001 for all). Both treatments produced similar effects on triglycerides, C-reactive protein and HDL-C; the between treatment group differences were not significant (p >/= 0.160). Significantly more patients achieved LDL-C levels < 2.5 (< 100 mg/dl; 86% vs. 72%), < 2.0 (< 77 mg/dl; 70% vs. 42%) and < 1.8 mmol/l (< 70 mg/dl; 60% vs. 31%) with Eze/Simva than statin (all p </= 0.001). Eze/Simva was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to statin. There were no differences in the incidences of liver transaminases >/= 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or creatine kinase >/= 10 x ULN between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients taking a statin and admitted to the hospital for investigation of a coronary event, treatment with Eze/Simva 10/40 mg for 12 weeks produced greater improvements in lipids with a similar safety profile compared with doubling of the statin dose.

Effect of gemfibrozil and lovastatin on postprandial lipoprotein clearance in the hypoalphalipoproteinemia and hypertriglyceridemia syndrome

Eleven men with hypoalphalipoproteinemia (HPAL; fasting plasma high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level of < 0.9 mmol/l), mild hypertriglyceridemia (HTG; triglycerides (TG) level of 1.75-7.5 mmol/l) and a normal calculated LDL cholesterol level (< 3.7 mmol/l) participated in a randomized, double-blind, double-placebo, crossover trial to compare the effect of two drugs, lovastatin (40 mg once daily) and gemfibrozil (600 mg twice daily), on clearance of postprandial lipoproteins. A 2-week washout period separated drug treatment periods of 6 weeks each. Ten subjects completed each treatment period. After ingestion of a vitamin A fat load, plasma, chylomicron and non-chylomicron retinyl palmitate (RP) and TG responses (areas under curves) were reduced in all subjects on gemfibrozil therapy and in 7 on lovastatin therapy. There was close correlation between change in fasting TG (but not fasting HDL-cholesterol) and change in postprandial RP areas on gemfibrozil but not lovastatin therapy. Postheparin lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic lipase (HL) activities were increased by gemfibrozil therapy while only a mild elevation in LPL activity alone was seen on lovastatin therapy. These data indicate that improvement in HTG is the main feature associated with improvement in postprandial lipemia and this is likely due to LPL-mediated enhancement of lipolytic hydrolysis. Gemfibrozil is more effective than lovastatin in attenuating postprandial lipemia in the HPAL/HTG syndrome.