Evaluation of spinal ultrasound in spinal dysraphism

Role of ultrasonography in screening of spinal dysraphism in infants at risk

Background

Spinal dysraphism (SD) encompasses congenital spinal defects that result from inappropriate fusion of the different midline osseous, mesenchymal, and neural elements. The primary tools for diagnosis of SD are both spinal ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Spinal USG is growingly being used as an initial screening modality with sensitivities and accuracies equivalent to those of MRI. Anorectal malformations (ARM) have ultimate association with many other congenital abnormalities, of which spinal dysraphism is one of the most common. The main aim of study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of spinal USG as a screening modality in comparison with MRI in infants with closed spinal dysraphism. We also endeavored to highlight the associated spinal dysraphism radiological findings in patients with either ARM or back cutaneous stigmata.

Results

Our prospective diagnostic comparative study included 33 patients, all of whom underwent both MRI and USG. Both MRI and USG showed appreciable agreement in the assessment of spinal dysraphism. In comparison with the gold standard MRI, spinal USG revealed comparable diagnostic metrics: specificity (98.6–100%), sensitivity (66.6–91.6%), PPV (90–100%) and NPV (94.1–98.7%) in diagnosis of different types of spinal dysraphism. The main clinical presentation of nineteen patients was anorectal malformation (ARM), 11 of whom (57.9%) had evidence of associated spinal dysraphism. The most common types of ARM were cloacal malformation, recto-urethral fistula, and rectal atresia with no fistula. On the other hand, sixteen patients were mainly presented with back cutaneous stigmata, 11 of whom (68.8%) had associated spinal dysraphism. The most common presenting cutaneous stigmata were low back swelling and atypical dimples.

Conclusion

The front-line screening modality for infants with closed SD should be spinal USG, however, its main limitation is the restrained time window in the first 6 months of life. Infants with ARM should be screened for spinal anomalies, especially those with high and complex types. Infants with high-risk back cutaneous stigmata should be similarly screened, as well.

Determining the optimal timing of screening spinal cord ultrasonography to detect filum terminale lipoma in infants

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal timing for screening spinal cord ultrasonography (US) to detect filum terminale lipoma in infants.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed infants (<12 months old) who underwent repeated spinal cord US between April 2011 and January 2019. We excluded infants if they only had one US examination, or if they had lesions other than filum terminale lipoma. Infants with filum terminale lipoma on magnetic resonance imaging were included in the lipoma group and the others in the control group. A linear mixed model was used to assess differences in the growth pattern of filum terminale thickness by age and group. The cutoff thickness on US and its diagnostic performance were assessed according to age.

Results

Among 442 infants with 901 US examinations, 46 were included in the lipoma group and 58 in the control group. Sixty-seven infants had unmeasurable filum terminale thickness on initial US, including 55 neonates (82.1%) before 1 month of age. The lipoma group had significantly greater filum terminale thickness than the control group (P<0.001). Thickness increased with age in the lipoma group (P=0.027). The sensitivity of US was 87.5% and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.949 (95% confidence interval, 0.849 to 0.991) with a cutoff value of 1.1 mm in 4- to 6-month-old infants.

Conclusion

Screening spinal cord US could effectively diagnose filum terminale lipoma in 4- to 6-month-old infants with a cutoff thickness of 1.1 mm. Spinal cord US can be used to screen young infants with intraspinal abnormalities.

Diagnostic value of spinal ultrasound compared to MRI for diagnosis of spinal anomalies in pediatrics

Background

Spinal dysraphism (SD) is a spectrum of congenital disorders. MRI is the gold standard technique for diagnosis of SD. Spinal ultrasonography (USG) can be used as a screening tool for SD in infants. The purpose of our study is to assess the diagnostic value of spinal USG in the diagnosis of spinal dysraphism in pediatrics compared to MRI as a gold standard technique. Our prospective, cross-sectional study involved 45 infants and children with suspected spinal dysraphism. All patients were subjected to supervision of their medical history, full neurological examination, spinal ultrasonography and anatomical spine assessment by conventional MRI examination including sagittal and axial T1W & T2W, sagittal & coronal STIR imaging. Comparison of spinal USG with MRI findings was done.

Results

There is excellent overall agreement between MRI and ultrasound diagnosis in the evaluation of spinal cord morphology and bony elements in patients aged ≤ 2 years old (κ = 0.96 and 0.98) respectively, and fair overall agreement between MRI and ultrasound diagnosis (κ = 0.58) in patients aged > 2 years old. The accuracy of spinal USG in diagnosis of spinal dysraphism in patients aged ≤ 2 years old was as the following: specificity (94.5–100%), sensitivity (84.3100%), PPV (86.7–100%) and NPV (85.7–100%), as compared to MRI.

Conclusion

Spinal ultrasound can be used as a first-line screening investigation for SD; patients with USG abnormalities proceed to MRI. Spinal ultrasound is of no worthy value after the age of bone ossification, and MRI is the best modality of diagnosis in older pediatrics.

Unveiling the tale of the tail: an illustration of spinal dysraphisms

Spinal dysraphism is an umbrella term describing herniation of meninges or neural elements through defective neural arch. They can be broadly categorized into open and closed types. MRI is the investigation of choice to study neural abnormalities and to assess the severity of hydrocephalus and Chiari malformation. Knowledge of the embryology of these disorders is valuable in correctly identifying the type of dysraphism. The aim of surgery is untethering and dural reconstruction. Accurate depiction of the abnormal anatomy in cases of spinal dysraphism is of utmost importance for surgical management of these patients. MRI makes this possible due to its excellent soft tissue contrast resolution and multiplanar capability, allowing the radiologist to evaluate the intricate details in small pediatric spinal structures. Imaging enlightens the surgeons about the status of spinal cord and other associated abnormalities and helps detect re-tethering in operated cases. Besides, antenatal surgery to repair myelomeningoceles has made detection of open dysraphisms on fetal MRI and antenatal ultrasound critical. The purpose of this review is to describe the development of spine, illustrate the myriad imaging features of open and closed spinal dysraphisms, and enlist the reporting points the operating surgeon seeks from the radiologist.

Perioperative ultrasound imaging versus magnetic resonance imaging in management of lumbosacral spinal dysraphisms

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to correlate lumbosacral spinal ultrasound (LUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with lumbosacral spinal dysraphisms to evaluate the value of LUS in diagnosis, intraoperative use, and during follow-up of those patients.

Methods

A total of 24 patients aged up to 6 years old were operated for lumbosacral spinal dysraphisms at the Neurosurgery Department of Zagazig University hospitals during the period from January 2017 to August 2018. All patients were investigated preoperatively, intraoperatively, and on follow-up by LUS to compare the data with preoperative and follow-up MRI of the spine.

Results

The median age was 11 months at the time of surgery. The most common anatomical description from the LUS study was thickened filum (18 cases). Using MRI findings as the standard reference, the sensitivity of LUS in detecting a thickened filum was 77.8% preoperatively and 62.5% postoperatively, with a specificity of 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of detecting conus level, solid masses, and cystic masses were 100%.

Conclusions

Lumbosacral spinal dysraphisms can be evaluated well by ultrasound imaging in age group up to 6 years old with 100% specificity (true negative) in comparison with MRI.

Importance of Physical Examination and Imaging in the Detection of Tethered Cord Syndrome

Tethered cord syndrome (TCS) is a type of occult spinal dysraphism that may lead to permanent neurologic and orthopedic deficits. Infants with TCS may have lumbosacral cutaneous malformations (LsCMs). We studied 67 infants referred to a single pediatric urology practice for a urological concern unrelated to occult spinal dysraphism with no prior diagnosis of LsCM between March 1, 2015 and September 30, 2018. Each infant underwent a spinal ultrasound. If an abnormality was detected, they were referred to a pediatric neurosurgeon. The most common cutaneous manifestations were duplicated or bifurcated (46%) gluteal folds and gluteal asymmetry (16%). Fourteen (21%) of the 67 patients had an abnormal spinal ultrasound; 5 of the 14 infants underwent a lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. One infant had urodynamics studies and a tethered cord release. Pediatricians should be familiar with TCS and perform lumbar physical examinations for LsCMs suggestive of TCS to ensure prompt diagnosis and management and avoid potentially devastating complications.

Optimal Timing of Spinal Ultrasound Evaluations for Sacral Dimples in Neonates: Earlier May Not Be Better

OBJECTIVES

A spinal ultrasound (US) evaluation during the immediate postnatal period may have limited ability in evaluating filum thickness because of the spinal cord pulsation caused by a crowded subarachnoid space and the cerebrospinal fluid deficiency during this period. This study aimed to determine the optimal timing of spinal US to evaluate sacral dimples in neonates.

METHODS

This study included 585 neonates who had a clinically suspicious sacral dimple and underwent spinal US examinations between January 2015 and August 2017. Patients were classified into 1 of 2 groups based on whether measurements of all parameters were possible (group A) or not (group B). Neonatal and maternal clinical factors, including the antenatal history and US parameters, were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Group A included 443 patients, and group B included 82. Patients in group B were significantly younger (6.2 versus 31.0 days), had a younger corrective age (38.9 versus 42.5 weeks), and had a smaller body weight (3.1 versus 4.6 kg) than those in group A (all P < .005). However, no statistically significant differences were found in other patient or maternal factors (P > .05 for all). The pulsation of the conus medullaris and nerve roots of the cauda equina (14.6% versus 100%), thickening and echogenicity of the filum terminale (2.4% versus 100%), and the presence of a normal subarachnoid space (18.3% versus 100%) were significantly more difficult to detect in group B than in group A (all P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

For an accurate evaluation, which can reduce unnecessary confusion and costs, spinal US can be delayed until neonates grow beyond 31 days, with a corrected age of older than 42.5 weeks and body weight of greater than 4.6 kg.

Evaluation of Dorsal Midline Discolorations with Physical Examination and Ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between dorsal midline skin discolorations, tethering of the spinal cord, and the role of ultrasound screening of these stigmata, focusing specifically on vascular lesions.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective observational study of infants <6 months of age with suspicious dorsal midline skin stigmata. All were evaluated by physical examination and ultrasound scan. A subset also had a magnetic resonance imaging examination. We examined the association between small, red-shaded discolorations and their respective imaging findings.

RESULTS

Among 100 cases with discolorations of vascular types, either isolated or combined with low-risk simple dimples or deviated gluteal folds, none had clinically significant pathologic findings requiring surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Midline lumbar discolorations are more benign than previously thought. Despite the very low association of this group of stigmata with surgical implications, we still recommend the routine use of ultrasound scanning.

Evaluation and management of tethered cord syndrome in occult spinal dysraphism: Recommendations from the international children's continence society

AIMS

As awareness and frequency of tethered spinal cord (TSC) related to occult spinal dysraphism (OSD) has increased with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), variability exists in its evaluation and management. Due to no published level I data, we summarize the current International Children's Continence Society (ICCS) recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of OSD.

METHODS

Guidelines were formulated based on analysis of pertinent literature and consensus among authors. This document was vetted by the multidisciplinary members of the ICCS via its website before submission for peer review publication.

RESULTS

The more frequent diagnosis of OSD is associated with increased operative intervention. Spinal cord untethering (SCU) has a highly variable risk profile, largely dependent on the specific form of OSD. Progressive neurological deterioration attributed to "tethered cord" may occur, with or without surgery, in selected forms of OSD whereas other cohorts do well.

CONCLUSION

Infants with classic cutaneous markers of OSD, with progressive neurologic, skeletal, and/or urologic findings, present no diagnostic or therapeutic dilemma: they routinely undergo MRI and SCU. Conversely, in asymptomatic patients or those with fixed, minor abnormalities, the risk profile of these OSD cohorts should be carefully considered before SCU is performed. Irrespective of whether or not SCU is performed, patients at risk for progression should be followed carefully throughout childhood and adolescence by a multidisciplinary team.

Ultrasonographic features of the normal filum terminale

Purpose

The filum terminale (FT) is a fibrous band that connects the conus medullaris to the posterior body of the coccyx. Considering the advances of ultrasonography (US) technology and improvements in the resolution of US images, we aimed to re-establish the US features of the normal FT in infants younger than 6 months of age.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 30 spinal US scans, stored as video clips. The internal structure of the FT and the marginal echogenicity of the FT were assessed, and transverse and longitudinal US were compared.

Results

On US, a central echogenic line was defined in 18 (60%) normal FTs; however, there was no visible internal structure in 12 cases (40%). The marginal echogenicity of the FT was hyperechoic in eight cases (27%) in comparison with the cauda equina and was isoechoic in 22 cases (73%). In differentiating the normal FT from the surrounding nerve roots, transverse US was superior in 18 cases (60%), while longitudinal US was superior in two cases (7%).

Conclusion

On US, the central canal of the FT was defined in 60% of normal FTs. Hyperechoic marginal echogenicity and the use of transverse US were helpful in distinguishing the normal FT from the nerve roots of the cauda equina.

Pediatric Spinal Ultrasound: Neonatal and Intraoperative Applications

The purpose of this article is to review the use of ultrasound as a screening tool for spinal diseases in neonates and infants and its intraoperative value in selected pediatric neurosurgical disorders. A review of spinal embryology followed by a description of common spinal diseases in neonates assessed with ultrasound is presented. Indications for spinal ultrasound in neonates, commonly identified conditions, and the importance of magnetic resonance imaging in selected cases are emphasized. Additionally, the use of ultrasound in selected neurosurgical spinal diseases in pediatric patients is presented with magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative correlation. Technique, limitations, and pitfalls are discussed.

Use of magnetic resonance imaging to detect occult spinal dysraphism in infants

OBJECTIVE Cutaneous stigmata or congenital anomalies often prompt screening for occult spinal dysraphism (OSD) in asymptomatic infants. While a number of studies have examined the results of ultrasonography (US) screening, less is known about the findings when MRI is used as the primary imaging modality. The object of this study was to assess the results of MRI screening for OSD in infants. METHODS The authors undertook a retrospective review of all infants who had undergone MRI of the lumbar spine to screen for OSD over a 6-year period (September 2006-September 2012). All images had been obtained on modern MRI scanners using sequences optimized to detect OSD, which was defined as any fibrolipoma of the filum terminale (FFT), a conus medullaris ending at or below the L2-3 disc space, as well as more complex lesions such as lipomyelomeningocele (LMM). RESULTS Five hundred twenty-two patients with a mean age of 6.2 months at imaging were included in the study. Indications for imaging included isolated dimple in 235 patients (45%), asymmetrically deviated gluteal cleft in 43 (8%), symmetrically deviated (Y-shaped) gluteal cleft in 38 (7%), hemangioma in 28 (5%), other isolated cutaneous stigmata (subcutaneous lipoma, vestigial tail, hairy patch, and dysplastic skin) in 31 (6%), several of the above stigmata in 97 (18%), and congenital anomalies in 50 (10%). Twenty-three percent (122 patients) of the study population had OSD. Lesions in 19% of these 122 patients were complex OSD consisting of LMM, dermal sinus tract extending to the thecal sac, and lipomeningocele. The majority of OSD lesions (99 patients [81%]) were filar abnormalities, a group including FFT and low-lying conus. The rate of OSD ranged from 12% for patients with asymmetrically deviated gluteal crease to 55% for those with other isolated cutaneous stigmata. Isolated midline dimple was the most common indication for imaging. Among this group, 20% (46 of 235) had OSD. There was no difference in the rate of OSD based on dimple location. Those with OSD had a mean dimple position of 15 mm (SD 11.8) above the coccyx. Those without OSD had a mean dimple position of 12.2 mm (SD 19) above the coccyx (p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of OSD identified with modern high-resolution MRI screening is significantly higher than that reported with US screening, particularly in patients with dimples. The majority of OSD lesions identified are FFT and low conus. The clinical significance of such lesions remains unclear.

Intraspinal lesions associated with sacrococcygeal dimples

OBJECT.: Sacrococcygeal dimples in the gluteal fold, also known as coccygeal pits, are observed in 2%-4% of newborns. Sacrococcygeal dimples are not generally considered to be associated with a significant risk of intraspinal anomalies and therefore are not thought to require further radiographic evaluation. Accordingly, the precise incidence and nature of intraspinal lesions that may be associated with sacrococcygeal dimples is unclear. This study was conducted to determine the incidence of intraspinal lesions in patients with intergluteal dimples.

METHODS

In this study, the authors used MRI to evaluate 103 children who were seen at the Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital between 2006 and 2011 because of skin abnormalities in the lumbosacral region. Of these children, 14 were excluded as having a subcutaneous fatty mass, and 5 were excluded because the dimples were above the gluteal fold or did not end at the coccyx. The remaining 84 patients were classified according to whether the bottom of the dimple was visible (shallow) or not (deep). The authors also retrospectively examined other skin abnormalities and coexisting anomalies.

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of MRI evaluation was 11.7 months. Magnetic resonance imaging led to the identification of fibrolipoma of the terminal filum (FTF) in 14 cases (16.7%); 6 of these patients also had a low conus. Classified by depth, there were 58 cases with shallow and 26 with deep dimples. Fibrolipoma of the terminal filum was found in significantly more patients with deep dimples (9 [34.6%]) than in those with shallow dimples (5 [8.6%]). The frequency of other congenital anomalies was significantly higher in patients with FTF-associated dimples (6 [42.9%] of 14) than in those with dimples that were not associated with FTF (9 [12.9%] of 70).

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrolipoma of the terminal filum was identified by MRI in 16.7% of patients with sacrococcygeal dimples. The risk of FTF increased when the dimples were deeply excavated or were accompanied by congenital anomalies. Magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to identify intraspinal lesions when there are high risk factors for intraspinal abnormalities, or when an ultrasound screening suggests intraspinal abnormalities.

Ultrasound investigation of sacral dimples and other stigmata of spinal dysraphism

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether there was any relationship between the number of clinical markers for spinal dysraphism and its presence on ultrasound and whether there was any relationship between the presence of an isolated sacral dimple and the presence of spinal dysraphism. Outcomes and further imaging were also examined.

METHODS

All patients who underwent spinal ultrasound (SUS) in University Hospital Galway (UHG) over a 5-year period (2006-2011) were identified. Patients were excluded based on age (>14 years old excluded) and indication for imaging (only patients being investigated for suspected spinal dysraphism were included). Indications for imaging, ultrasound results and information on further imaging were accessed from the computerised radiology software in UHG. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS-18.

RESULTS

Data were analysed for 216 patients. A single clinical indication was recorded for 174 ultrasound requests, ≥2 indications for 42 requests. Nineteen of 216 (8.8%) ultrasound images were abnormal, 7 having spinal dysraphism. Multiple clinical indications were 6 times more likely to have dysraphism than those imaged on the basis of a single marker (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.289 to 27.922, p=0.022), and there was no significant correlation between the presence of a sacral dimple and the presence of dysraphism (95% CI 0.71 to 6.622, p=0.722).

CONCLUSIONS

SUS performed on the basis of multiple clinical indications is six times more likely to detect spinal dysraphism than imaging performed for isolated abnormalities or risk factors. Sacral dimple is a poor marker for occult spinal pathology.

Tethered cord syndrome in childhood: diagnostic features and relationship to congenital anomalies

Tethered Cord Syndrome (TCS) is a stretch-induced functional disorder of the spinal cord that often develops and presents in childhood in association with spinal dysraphism. While the subtlety with which TCS can present makes it challenging to diagnose, awareness of the common neurological, musculoskeletal and urologic symptoms are of great value to the clinician, and can aid timely referral for neurosurgical evaluation. This article reviews these symptoms, as well as the clinical and radiological findings of the most common dysraphic conditions associated with TCS.

The accuracy of abnormal lumbar sonography findings in detecting occult spinal dysraphism: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECT

The purpose of this study was to correlate lumbar ultrasound (LUS) and MRI findings in patients suspected of having occult spinal dysraphism (OSD).

METHODS

Over a 5-year period, 1273 consecutive infants underwent an LUS study at a major pediatric tertiary referral center. Of these, 106 patients had abnormal LUS findings suggestive of an OSD, and 103 underwent subsequent MRI studies. The anatomical descriptions of the 2 studies were compared for agreement.

RESULTS

The average age of the infants was 34 days at the time of the LUS study; OSD was suspected in these patients because of the presence of cutaneous stigmata and congenital defects. The most common anatomical descriptions from the LUS study included a thickened or fatty filum (32 cases), filum cyst (11 cases), and presence of a terminal ventricle or syrinx (9 cases). Using MRI findings as the standard reference, the sensitivity of LUS in detecting a thickened or fatty filum was 20%. The sensitivity of detecting an abnormal conus level at or below L-3 was 76.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

In the patient population chosen to undergo LUS studies, abnormal findings had poor sensitivity at detecting anatomical findings consistent with OSD.

Use of lumbar ultrasonography to detect occult spinal dysraphism

OBJECT

Various cutaneous stigmata and congenital anomalies are accepted as sufficient reasons to perform lumbar ultrasonography as a screening tool to rule out occult spinal dysraphism (OSD). The purpose of this study was to correlate presenting cutaneous findings with lumbar ultrasonography results based on a large number of lumbar ultrasonography tests obtained by regional primary care providers.

METHODS

Over the course of 5 years, 1273 infants underwent lumbar ultrasonography screening at a major pediatric tertiary referral center. Of these infants, 1116 had adequate documentation for retrospective chart review. Referral sources included urban academic, urban private practice, and surrounding rural private practitioners. Presence of cutaneous stigmata and/or congenital anomalies and lumbar ultrasonography results were reviewed for all patients. When present, surgical findings were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 943 infants were referred for presumed cutaneous stigmata, the most common of which was a sacral dimple (638 patients [68%]) followed by hairy patch (96 patients [10%]). Other reported cutaneous findings included hemangioma, deviated gluteal fold, skin tag, and skin discoloration. In comparison, 173 patients presented with congenital anomalies, such as imperforate anus (56 patients [32%]) and tracheoesophageal fistula/esophageal atresia (37 patients [21%]), most of which were detected prenatally by fetal ultrasonography. A total of 17 infants underwent surgical exploration. Occult spinal dysraphism was diagnosed in 7 infants in the cutaneous stigmata group and in 10 infants in the group with congenital abnormalities. None of the cutaneous stigmata as recorded were found to be indicative of the presence of OSD.

CONCLUSIONS

Cutaneous markers as currently defined by general practitioners are not useful markers for predicting OSD. The vast majority of findings on lumbar ultrasonography studies performed under these circumstances will be negative.

International survey on the management of skin stigmata and suspected tethered cord

OBJECTIVES

We designed a survey to investigate current international management trends of neonates with lumbar midline skin stigmata suspicious of tethered cord, among pediatric neurosurgeons, focusing on the lower risk stigmata, simple dimples, deviated gluteal folds, and discolorations. Our findings will enable physicians to assess their current diagnosis routine and aid in clarifying management controversies.

STUDY DESIGN

A questionnaire on the proposed diagnostic evaluation of seven case reports, each accompanied by relevant imaging, was distributed by e-mail to members of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, the European Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, and via the PEDS server list between March and August 2008.

RESULTS

Sixty-two questionnaires, completed by experienced professionals with a rather uniform distribution of experience levels, were analyzed. Forty-eight percent do not recommend any imaging of simple dimples, 30% recommend US screening and 22% recommend MR. Seventy-nine percent recommend imaging of deviated gluteal fold with 30% recommending MR. Ninety-two percent recommend imaging infants with hemangiomas with 74% recommending MR. MR for sinus tracts is recommended by 90% if sacral and by 98% if lumber. Eighty-four percent recommend MR for filar cyst.

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey demonstrates that management of low-risk skin stigmata, simple dimple, deviated gluteal fold, and discolorations lacks consensus. In addition, a significant sector of the professional community proposes a work-up of simple dimples, sacral tracts, and filar cysts that contradicts established recommendations. A simple classification system is needed to attain a better approach, enabling correct diagnosis of tethered cord without exposing neonates to unnecessary examinations.

Prevalence of tethered spinal cord in infants with VACTERL

OBJECT

The term VACTERL represents a nonrandom association of birth defects including vertebral malformations, anal atresia, cardiac anomalies, tracheoesophageal fistulas (TEFs), renal anomalies, and limb malformations. Clinical experience and a few published case series suggest that a tethered spinal cord (TSC) occurs commonly in children with VACTERL, but to date, no study has defined the prevalence of TSC in patients with VACTERL. Such information would guide decisions about the appropriateness of screening spinal imaging.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the charts of all patients discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit at Children's Hospital Pittsburgh in the past 14 years with the diagnosis of VACTERL, TEF, or anal atresia. During that period, the authors' protocol has been to use spinal ultrasound to screen this population for TSC. The charts were reviewed for the presence of a TSC requiring surgery and for the features of VACTERL.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with VACTERL and adequate spinal imaging studies were identified. In 13 (39%) of these, a TSC requiring surgery was identified. Among patients without VACTERL, the incidence of TSC was 7.9% in those with anal atresia and 2.4% in those with TEF. False-negative ultrasounds were identified in 21.4% of patients with TSC.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with VACTERL should undergo MR imaging screening for TSC. In infants with anal atresia without VACTERL, the incidence of TSC is much lower than in those with VACTERL.

Low-risk lumbar skin stigmata in infants: the role of ultrasound screening

OBJECTIVE

To reassess the utility and validity of ultrasound (US) screening in infants with lumbar midline skin stigmata (MSS) that may be associated with tethering of the spinal cord.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective observational study of 254 infants under age 6 months with suspicious dorsal MSS between 2005 and 2007. All infants were examined by US and neurosurgical clinical evaluation, and 50 infants also underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The US and MRI findings were analyzed for correlation. Associations between the imaging findings and the presence of the low-risk skin lesions simple dimple (113 cases) and deviated gluteal fold (DGF; 44 cases) also were evaluated.

RESULTS

Analysis of US and MRI results for the cohort of 50 neonates in whom both examinations were performed showed high concordance. The low-risk group of infants with simple dimple and DGF constituted 157 US procedures, 96% of which were of high quality, providing clear visualization of spinal components. None demonstrated any clinically significant pathological findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data reaffirm the reliability of US as a screening tool for tethered cord syndrome. Infants with low-risk lesions, such as simple dimple and DGF, may be absolved from US screening, because these findings alone do not indicate underlying pathological lesions. We propose a simplified diagnostic classification system for MSS.

A prospective study of cutaneous manifestations of spinal dysraphism from India

Recognition of cutaneous markers of spinal dysraphism is important to prevent the morbidity associated with underlying spinal anomalies. To investigate the frequency and type of cutaneous stigmata in different forms of spinal dysraphism and to assess the role of ultrasonography and/or magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing spinal dysraphism at two pediatric dermatology tertiary care centers. Over a 4-year period, all pediatric patients presenting to the dermatology clinic with dorsal midline cutaneous stigmata were evaluated clinically and with imaging studies (radiography, ultrasonographic examination and magnetic resonance imaging/Doppler). Surgical interventions were planned in conjunction with neurosurgery and orthopedic specialists. On examination, 245 (4.2%) had 285 cutaneous stigmata. Of the 180 patients evaluated with radiography, ultrasonographic examination and magnetic resonance imaging, 50 patients (28%) had spinal dysraphism (with 64 cutaneous stigmata). The most common stigmata associated with occult spinal dysraphism were lipoma (10) and dimples (12) and in open spinal dysraphism lipomeningomyelocoele (10) and meningomyelocoele (10). Statistically, lipomeningomyelocoele/myelomeningocoele, atypical dimples and port-wine stains were most associated with spinal dysraphism (p < 0.001). In 80 children less than 6 months of age, radiography with ultrasonographic examination revealed an SD in 16, while magnetic resonance imaging was diagnostic in four cases. Ultrasonographic examination performed fairly well in children less than 6 months and in cases of flat cutaneous stigmata it missed only 5% of cases, but in cases with bulky overlying masses (lipoma, hemangioma) it missed 15% of cases.

Lumps and bumps in neonates and infants

There are many developmental abnormalities that may appear in the neonate and in infants when critical steps in embryogenesis fail. These steps are often not fatal but can lead to significant morbidity for those patients affected. A logical approach is needed in addressing both the diagnostic and therapeutic issues that arise when caring for these patients, as various lesions will warrant an observational approach, and others may require imaging studies or definitive surgical intervention. Additionally, there are other "lumps and bumps" that are seen in the neonatal and infantile age groups that include malignancies and cutaneous neoplasms with associated systemic sequelae.

Recognizing neurosurgical conditions in the pediatrician's office

Clinical problems with potential neurosurgical ramifications, such as headache and abnormalities of head size and shape, arise often in general pediatric practice. Other neurosurgical issues may manifest themselves less frequently and more insidiously. In either case the pediatrician who is alert to spectrum of the presentations of neurosurgical conditions will direct investigations and referrals efficiently and inspire the confidence of the patient and the family.