Fluoroscopically-guided retrieval of ureteric stents

Clinical Utility of the Modified Snare Technique for Percutaneous Antegrade Removal of Double J Ureteral Stents

Although a snare is the commonly used device for antegrade double J (DJ) stent removal, there are some cases in which DJ stent removal using only a snare is particularly difficult. In the present study, an unfavorable positioning of the proximal DJ stent tip and tip embeddedness were significantly associated with a simple snare technique failure; thus, present the modified snare technique to overcome the simple snare technique failure. By applying these 2 techniques together, we can increase the overall technical success rate up to 97% (196/202). The modified snare technique is safe and effective in cases of simple snare technique failure.

Percutaneous antegrade ureteric stent removal using a rigid alligator forceps

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous antegrade ureteric stent removal using a rigid alligator forceps. Twenty patients were included in our study. Indications for ureteric stent insertion included stone disease (n = 7), malignancy (n = 8) and transplant anastomotic strictures (n = 5). Stent retrieval was carried out for proximal stent placement/migration in seven patients and encrustation in the remaining 13. Twenty-two stents were successfully retrieved in 20 patients. There was one technical failure (5%). There were no major complications. We had four minor complications, which included nephrostomy site pain (n = 2), periprocedural sepsis (n = 1) and a small urinoma (n = 1). All patients settled with conservative management. Percutaneous radiologically guided antegrade ureteric stent removal with an alligator forceps is safe and effective, particularly when initial surgical removal has failed.

Antegrade retrieval of ureteral stents through an 8-French percutaneous nephrostomy route

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the technique of antegrade retrieval of ureteral stents under fluoroscopic guidance through an 8-French nephrostomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During an 8-year period, we retrieved 26 ureteral stents from 24 patients who were not candidates for retrograde removal or had other conditions precluding use of a retrograde approach. A loop snare or grasping forceps was used to retrieve a ureteral stent in the renal pelvis or calyx or upper ureter through an 8-French vascular sheath with a safety wire in place. A snare catheter advanced into the bladder for retrieval of the bladder end was used in patients in whom retrieval with both a loop snare and a grasping forceps failed.

RESULTS

All 26 ureteral stents were successfully retrieved by the antegrade approach. Ten stents were retrieved with a snare alone and nine with a forceps alone. Five stents were retrieved successfully with a forceps after initial failures with snare catheters. Two stents were retrieved with snare catheters advanced into the bladder. The major complication of nephrostomy wound infection occurred in a patient with a urinary tract infection who underwent a one-stage procedure. All minor complications, including pelvic perforation in one patient and blood clot in the renal pelvis in four patients, resolved spontaneously without adverse sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Antegrade percutaneous retrieval of a ureteral stent through an 8-French nephrostomy is safe and effective and has a high degree of technical success. It can be used as a routine interventional practice in radiology.

Percutaneous antegrade removal of double J ureteral stents via a 9-F nephrostomy route

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of an antegrade approach in the removal of double J ureteral stents via preexisting nondilated nephrostomy routes under fluoroscopic guidance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Under fluoroscopic guidance and local anesthesia, antegrade removal of 39 ureteral stents in 27 patients was attempted by using a snare or basket. Indications for percutaneous stent removal included the presence of a preexisting nephrostomy route (n = 8), a surgical history resulting in an inaccessible retrograde route (n = 8), urethral stricture (n = 5), upward stent migration (n = 2), inability to obtain a lithotomy position (n = 1), fragmentation of the proximal stent (n = 1), and inability to find the ureteral orifice with a cystoscope (n = 2).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven of the 39 stents (95%) were successfully removed by using a snare or basket. Two stents (5.1%) could not be removed with a snare or basket because they were embedded against the renal calyx or pelvis. There were no major complications. Blood clot formation or laceration or tract leakage of the pelvicalyceal system occurred in six and two patients, respectively, all of which resolved spontaneously.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous antegrade removal of double J ureteral stents with a snare or basket via a nondilated nephrostomy route is effective without major complications in patients with an available nephrostomy route or an inaccessible retrograde option.

Outpatient ureteric procedures: a new method for retrograde ureteropyelography and ureteric stent placement

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a new method for retrograde ureteropyelography and retrograde ureteric stent placement.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Procedures were undertaken using a flexible cystoscope and digital C-arm fluoroscopy in outpatients under sedoanalgesia. The flexible cystoscope was used to identify the ureteric orifice and a straight 0.9 mm hydrophilic guidewire inserted and passed into the renal pelvis under fluoroscopic guidance. A 4 F general-purpose catheter was then passed over the wire and ureteropyelography performed. To place the stent the hydrophilic guidewire was exchanged for an ultra-stiff wire, over which the stent was passed directly.

RESULTS

Over a 47-month period, 723 procedures were carried out in 472 patients. The clinical indications were ureteric obstruction in 229 (32%), stone disease in 165 (23%), unexplained hydronephrosis in 150 (21%), haematuria in 94 (13%) and others in 85 (12%). Of the 723 procedures, 643 (89%) were technically successful. Failure was most commonly caused by failure to cannulate the ureteric orifice (51, 7%). Just over half the procedures (366, 51%) involved stent placement or replacement. Immediate complications occurred in 17 patients (3%). Of those who were questioned, 94% (282 of 300) reported the procedure to be acceptable.

CONCLUSION

Retrograde ureterography and ureteric stent placement may be satisfactorily undertaken with the patient under sedoanalgesia on an outpatient basis. This technique can reduce costs, hospital admissions, general anaesthetic use, demands on theatre time and complication rates.