Local staging of prostate cancer with 0.2 T body coil MRI

New developments in MRI for target volume delineation in radiotherapy

MRI is being increasingly used in oncology for staging, assessing tumour response and also for treatment planning in radiotherapy. Both conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy requires improved means of defining target volumes for treatment planning in order to achieve its intended benefits. MRI can add to the radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) process by providing excellent and improved characterization of soft tissues compared with CT. Together with its multiplanar capability and increased imaging functionality, these advantages for target volume delineation outweigh its drawbacks of lacking electron density information and potential image distortion. Efficient MR distortion assessment and correction algorithms together with image co-registration and fusion programs can overcome these limitations and permit its use for RTP. MRI developments using new contrast media, such as ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles for abnormal lymph node identification, techniques such as dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and diffusion MRI to better characterize tissue and tumour regions as well as ultrafast volumetric or cine MR sequences to define temporal patterns of target and organ at risk deformity and variations in spatial location have all increased the scope and utility of MRI for RTP. Information from these MR developments may permit treatment individualization, strategies of dose escalation and image-guided radiotherapy. These developments will be reviewed to assess their current and potential use for RTP and precision high dose radiotherapy.

Imaging clinically localized prostate cancer

At this time there is no highly sensitive and specific widespread radiographic test for local staging of prostate cancer. Future developments will likely require a combination of imaging modalities with utilization guided by risk-stratification models (Table 4). Staging data for all imaging tests discussed in this article are summarized in Tables 5 and 6. Clinically, conventional gray-scale TRUS remains the most frequently used tool because of its utility in guiding prostatic biopsies. Modifications of TRUS--including power and color Doppler, 3D imaging, and new ultrasound contrast agents and elastography--show promise in increasing the accuracy of ultrasound. Endorectal MRI may have some value for staging selected patients. The addition of prostatic MRS, which images the differential activity of metabolites, may increase the specificity of MRI. Newer techniques with finer voxel resolution may prove to be clinically useful. A large well-designed study evaluating the utility of MRI/MRS is currently being planned. Cross-sectional imaging of the pelvis with either MRI or CT should be used selectively as should radionuclide bone scans. Similarly, ProstaScint scans should be ordered selectively, either before or after primary therapy, rather than routinely in all patients.

Primary radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer

Prostate cancer in men is similar to breast cancer in women; both cancers rank first, respectively, in incidence and are normally responsive to radiation therapy. In addition, advances in mammography help detect earlier breast cancers, and the development and refinement of prostatic specific antigen (PSA) has resulted in early detection of low-stage localized prostate cancers. This has generated debate over the proper management of localized prostate cancer. While there have not been any controlled, prospective, randomized trials of sufficient power to compare the various local therapies, based on the current available data, the three commonly used local modalities, surgery, and external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy (radioactive seed implant), have similar efficacy controlling the disease up to 10 years in many patients. Technological advances in treatment delivery and planning have improved the treatment of prostate cancer with external-beam radiotherapy using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), ultrasound-guided transperineal implant, or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), as well as proton or neutron beam based therapies.

Open low-field magnetic resonance imaging in radiation therapy treatment planning

PURPOSE

To evaluate the possibilities of an open low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner in external beam radiotherapy treatment (RT) planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A custom-made flat tabletop was constructed for the open MR, which was compatible with standard therapy positioning devices. To assess and correct image distortion in low-field MRI, a custom-made phantom was constructed and a software algorithm was developed. A total of 243 patients (43 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, 155 patients with prostate cancer, and 45 patients with brain tumors) received low-field MR imaging in addition to computed tomographic (CT) planning imaging between January 1998 and September 2001 before the start of the irradiation.

RESULTS

Open low-field MRI provided adequate images for RT planning in nearly 95% of the examined patients. The mean and the maximal distortions 15 cm around the isocenter were reduced from 2.5 mm to 0.9 mm and from 6.1 mm to 2.1 mm respectively. The MRI-assisted planning led to better discrimination of tumor extent in two-thirds of the patients and to an optimization in lung cancer RT planning in one-third of the patients. In prostate cancer planning, low-field MRI resulted in significant reduction (40%) of organ volume and clinical target volume (CTV) compared with CT and to a reduction of the mean percentage of rectal dose of 15%. In brain tumors, low-field MR image quality was superior compared with CT in 39/45 patients for planning purposes.

CONCLUSIONS

The data presented here show that low-field MRI is feasible in RT treatment planning when image correction regarding system-induced distortions is performed and by selecting MR imaging protocol parameters with the emphasis on adequate images for RT planning.

Feasibility and acute toxicities of radioimmunoguided prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

We present a technique that fuses pelvic CT scans and ProstaScint images to localize areas of disease within the prostate gland to customize prostate implants. Additionally, the acute toxicity results from the first 43 patients treated with this technique are reviewed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 2/97 and 8/98, 43 patients with clinical stage II prostate adenocarcinoma received ultrasound-guided transperineal implantation of I-125 or Pd-103 seeds. The median patient age was 70 years (range 49-79). Prior to treatment, the median Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were 6 (range 3-8) and 7.5 (range 1.8-16.6 ng/mL), respectively. The median follow-up was 10 months (range 2.9-20.4 months).

RESULTS

The median PSA value at 10 months is 0.7 ng/mL. Significant acute complications within the first month following implantation included 13 Grade I urinary symptoms, 24 Grade II urinary symptoms, 6 Grade III symptoms, and no Grade IV complications. Beyond 4 months, complications included 12 Grade I urinary symptoms, 17 Grade II urinary symptoms, 1 Grade III, and 1 Grade IV complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The image fusion of the pelvic CT scan and ProstaScint scans helped identify regions within the prostate at high risk of local failure, which were targeted with additional seeds during implantation.

Imaging prostate cancer

In the detection of prostate cancer, the most important role of imaging is ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy. In the staging evaluation of prostate cancer, each presently used modality--transrectal US (TRUS), MR imaging, CT, nuclear medicine, and positron emission tomography--has advantages and disadvantages. Evidence-based guidelines on the use of CT and nuclear medicine bone scan, in assessing the risk of distant spread of prostate cancer, are available. There is no consensus and there are no guidelines, however, for the use of imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer local tumor extent. Results on the value of TRUS vary widely, and prospective multicenter studies suggest that TRUS is no better than digital rectal examination in predicting extracapsular extension. MR imaging offers the most promise for local staging of prostate cancer, but it must resolve problems of reproducible image quality and interobserver variability, and it should prove its efficacy in multicenter trials before it can be recommended for general clinical use. The introduction of MR spectroscopic imaging further expands the value of MR imaging, offering anatomic and metabolic evaluation of prostate cancer.