Teleradiology: another revolution in radiology?

Emerging Challenges and Opportunities in the Evolution of Teleradiology

OBJECTIVE. In recent decades, teleradiology has expanded considerably, and many radiology practices now engage in intraorganizational or extraorganizational teleradiology. In this era of patient primacy, optimizing patient care and care delivery is paramount. This article provides an update on recent changes, current challenges, and future opportunities centered around the ability of teleradiology to improve temporal and geographic imaging access. We review licensing and regulations and discuss teleradiology in providing services to rural areas and assisting with disaster response, including the response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. CONCLUSION. Teleradiology can help increase imaging efficiency and mitigate both geographic and temporal discrepancies in imaging care. Technologic limitations and regulatory hurdles hinder the optimal practice of teleradiology, and future attention to these issues may help ensure broader patient access to high-quality imaging across the United States.

From shared data to sharing workflow: merging PACS and teleradiology

Due to a host of technological, interface, operational and workflow limitations, teleradiology and PACS/RIS were historically developed as separate systems serving different purposes. PACS/RIS handled local radiology storage and workflow management while teleradiology addressed remote access to images. Today advanced PACS/RIS support complete site radiology workflow for attending physicians, whether on-site or remote. In parallel, teleradiology has emerged into a service of providing remote, off-hours, coverage for emergency radiology and to a lesser extent subspecialty reading to subscribing sites and radiology groups. When attending radiologists use teleradiology for remote access to a site, they may share all relevant patient data and participate in the site's workflow like their on-site peers. The operation gets cumbersome and time consuming when these radiologists serve multi-sites, each requiring a different remote access, or when the sites do not employ the same PACS/RIS/Reporting Systems and do not share the same ownership. The least efficient operation is of teleradiology companies engaged in reading for multiple facilities. As these services typically employ non-local radiologists, they are allowed to share some of the available patient data necessary to provide an emergency report but, by enlarge, they do not share the workflow of the sites they serve. Radiology stakeholders usually prefer to have their own radiologists perform all radiology tasks including interpretation of off-hour examinations. It is possible with current technology to create a system that combines the benefits of local radiology services to multiple sites with the advantages offered by adding subspecialty and off-hours emergency services through teleradiology. Such a system increases efficiency for the radiology groups by enabling all users, regardless of location, to work "local" and fully participate in the workflow of every site. We refer to such a system as SuperPACS.

The socio-economic impact of telehealth: a systematic review

We reviewed the socio-economic impact of telehealth, focusing on nine main areas: paediatrics, geriatrics, First Nations (i.e. indigenous peoples), home care, mental health, radiology, renal dialysis, rural/remote health services and rehabilitation. A systematic search led to the identification of 4646 citations or abstracts; from these, 306 sources were analysed. A central finding was that telehealth studies to date have not used socio-economic indicators consistently. However, specific telehealth applications have been shown to offer significant socio-economic benefit, to patients and families, health-care providers and the health-care system. The main benefits identified were: increased access to health services, cost-effectiveness, enhanced educational opportunities, improved health outcomes, better quality of care, better quality of life and enhanced social support. Although the review found a number of areas of socio-economic benefit, there is the continuing problem of limited generalizability.

Teleradiology from primary care: comparison of user activity in two different scenarios

We recorded the activity over one year of users of two identical teleradiology systems installed at different primary care centres. In one centre, which generated 3711 cases, the process was conducted according to the decisions made by the general practitioner (GP); in the second, which generated 3786 cases, the radiologist at the referral hospital controlled the process. In a one-year study, the number of studies created, transmitted and interpreted per day was similar in the two scenarios (14.3 vs 14.6, respectively); however, there were considerable differences in the number of images (2.2 vs 1.8, respectively) and folder volume (19.2 vs 14.3 Mbyte, respectively) per study. Also, there were differences in the time taken to create the patient folders (4 min 35 s vs 2 min 55 s, respectively) and the time taken for the radiologist to diagnose a case (3 min 32 s vs 2 min 47 s, respectively), which may be important at high workloads. The radiologist-driven scenario included 64 rejected requests (1.6% of cases) and 280 studies in which additional images were required (7.4% of cases). Whenever it is possible to choose, the radiologist-driven scenario for teleradiology appears to be preferable. A prerequisite for successful teleradiology is the availability of appropriate bandwidth and operational protocols.

Imaging and the Internet

Internet-based imaging is changing the way urology services are delivered by allowing rapid communication between remote locations. This review focuses on Internet-based imaging modalities, the hardware needed to transmit and view these images, and current applications. With the continuing expansion of Internet-based resources, all physicians must become accustomed to integrating the Internet and Internet-based imaging into their practices.

Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future

Early picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) were characterized by the use of very expensive hardware devices, cumbersome display stations, duplication of database content, lack of interfaces to other clinical information systems, and immaturity in their understanding of the folder manager concepts and workflow reengineering. They were implemented historically at large academic medical centers by biomedical engineers and imaging informaticists. PACS were nonstandard, home-grown projects with mixed clinical acceptance. However, they clearly showed the great potential for PACS and filmless medical imaging. Filmless radiology is a reality today. The advent of efficient softcopy display of images provides a means for dealing with the ever-increasing number of studies and number of images per study. Computer power has increased, and archival storage cost has decreased to the extent that the economics of PACS is justifiable with respect to film. Network bandwidths have increased to allow large studies of many megabytes to arrive at display stations within seconds of examination completion. PACS vendors have recognized the need for efficient workflow and have built systems with intelligence in the management of patient data. Close integration with the hospital information system (HIS)-radiology information system (RIS) is critical for system functionality. Successful implementation of PACS requires integration or interoperation with hospital and radiology information systems. Besides the economic advantages, secure rapid access to all clinical information on patients, including imaging studies, anytime and anywhere, enhances the quality of patient care, although it is difficult to quantify. Medical image management systems are maturing, providing access outside of the radiology department to images and clinical information throughout the hospital or the enterprise via the Internet. Small and medium-sized community hospitals, private practices, and outpatient centers in rural areas will begin realizing the benefits of PACS already realized by the large tertiary care academic medical centers and research institutions. Hand-held devices and the Worldwide Web are going to change the way people communicate and do business. The impact on health care will be huge, including radiology. Computer-aided diagnosis, decision support tools, virtual imaging, and guidance systems will transform our practice as value-added applications utilizing the technologies pushed by PACS development efforts. Outcomes data and the electronic medical record (EMR) will drive our interactions with referring physicians and we expect the radiologist to become the informaticist, a new version of the medical management consultant.

Assessment of telemedicine in surgical education and patient care

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the value of teleconferencing for patient care and surgical education by assessing the activity of an international academic network.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The uses of telemedicine include teleeducation, training, and consulting, and surgical teams are now involved, sharing diagnostic information and opinions without the need for travel. However, the value of telematics in surgery remains to be assessed.

METHODS

During a 2-year period, weekly surgical teleconferences were held among six university hospitals in four European countries. To assess the accuracy of telediagnosis for surgical cases, 60 randomly selected cases were analyzed by a panel of surgeons. Participants' opinions were analyzed by questionnaire.

RESULTS

Seventy teleconferences (50 lectures and 271 case presentations) were held. Ninety-five of the 114 participants (83.3%) completed the final questionnaire. Eighty-six percent rated the surgical activity as good or excellent, 75.7% rated the scientific level as good or excellent, 55.8% rated the daily clinical activity as good or excellent, and 28.4% rated the manual surgical technique as good or excellent. The target organ was identified in all the cases; the organ structure and pathology were considered well defined in 93.3%, and the fine structure was considered well defined in 58.3%. Diagnosis was accurate in 17 cases (28.3%), probable in 25 (41.7%), possible but uncertain in 16 (26.7%), and not possible in 2 cases (3.3%). Discussion among the remote sites increased the rate of valuable therapeutic advice from 55% of cases before the discussion to 95% after the discussion. Eighty-six percent of the surgeons expressed satisfaction with telematics for medical education and patient care.

CONCLUSIONS

Participant satisfaction was high, transmission of clinical documents was accurate, and the opportunity to discuss case documentation and management significantly improved diagnostic potential, resulting in an accuracy rate of up to 95%. Teleeducation and teleconsultation in surgery appear to be beneficial.

A review of minor injuries telemedicine

Video support in the management of minor injuries was pioneered in the mid-1970s in the USA, but remained little more than a technical curiosity pending the development of acceptable equipment some 20 years later. Minor injuries telemedicine has developed very successfully over the last few years in the UK, the first reported UK minor injuries telemedicine link being set up in 1994. Peripheral services are generally staffed by emergency nurse practitioners, who can use a telemedicine link when required to obtain realtime advice from a doctor at a main hospital accident and emergency department. There is now a considerable body of experience to show that the technique is safe and effective, and also some limited data about its economic benefits. The majority of minor injuries teleconsultations involve transmission of radiographs and most minor injuries teleradiology is undertaken on the understanding that a definitive radiologist's report will be issued in due course. Studies show that satisfactory interpretation of plain radiographs is possible using a low-cost/low-resolution telemedicine link. This is supported by other studies which have shown that even a teleradiology system at reduced cost and technical specifications can yield adequate images. It seems likely that teleconsultation will become an essential component in the provision of accident and emergency services.

Nuclear medicine teleradiology in regional and rural centres of Western Australia

We have established a nuclear medicine teleradiology service for rural and regional areas of south-west Western Australia. This study aimed to evaluate whether existing treatment models had altered in ways which were directly related to improved medical outcomes and reduced cost. Preliminary observation into musculoskeletal injury of the ankle joint included diagnosis of 10 radio-occult talar dome lesions which in some cases had not been identified until six months after the trauma. Several cases suggest that nuclear medicine provided a more timely diagnosis and actively altered treatment. Further, the potential role of radiologists as primary-care extenders in guiding appropriate investigations and defining the nature of the illness before specialist consultation may lessen the economic burden on public health care while creating economies of scale by expanding the clinical usefulness of the nuclear physician over a large rural area.

The use of teleradiology in an emergency setting with speculation on the near future

None of these models will automatically come to pass but all are possible today. Radiologists have to realize that the teleimaging era for emergency patients is here to stay. Successful utilization for good and gain may no longer be accomplished by a reliance on old or outmoded practice assumptions. The virtual turf, prepared by the rapidity of the remote transmission of electronically generated pictures, is a real phenomenon for which radiology has and will play a major role. The practice opportunities may not be vast in scope, but on a regional basis the imaging landscape is still green and up for grabs.