Vascular stents

Comparative occupational radiation exposure between fixed and mobile imaging systems

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular intervention exposes surgical staff to scattered radiation, which varies according to procedure and imaging equipment. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in occupational exposure between procedures performed with fixed imaging (FI) in an endovascular suite compared with conventional mobile imaging (MI) in a standard operating room.

METHODS

A series of 116 endovascular cases were performed over a 4-month interval in a dedicated endovascular suite with FI and conventional operating room with MI. All cases were performed at a single institution and radiation dose was recorded using real-time dosimetry badges from Unfors RaySafe (Hopkinton, Mass). A dosimeter was mounted in each room to establish a radiation baseline. Staff dose was recorded using individual badges worn on the torso lead. Total mean air kerma (Kar; mGy, patient dose) and mean case dose (mSv, scattered radiation) were compared between rooms and across all staff positions for cases of varying complexity. Statistical analyses for all continuous variables were performed using t test and analysis of variance where appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 43 cases with MI and 73 cases with FI were performed by four vascular surgeons. Total mean Kar, and case dose were significantly higher with FI compared with MI. (mean ± standard error of the mean, 523 ± 49 mGy vs 98 ± 19 mGy; P < .00001; 0.77 ± 0.03 mSv vs 0.16 ± 0.08 mSv, P < .00001). Exposure for the primary surgeon and assistant was significantly higher with FI compared with MI. Mean exposure for all cases using either imaging modality, was significantly higher for the primary surgeon and assistant than for support staff (ie, nurse, radiology technologist) beyond 6 feet from the X-ray source, indicated according to one-way analysis of variance (MI: P < .00001; FI: P < .00001). Support staff exposure was negligible and did not differ between FI and MI. Room dose stratified according to case complexity (Kar) showed statistically significantly higher scattered radiation in FI vs MI across all quartiles.

CONCLUSIONS

The scattered radiation is several-fold higher with FI than MI across all levels of case complexity. Radiation exposure decreases with distance from the radiation source, and is negligible outside of a 6-foot radius. Modern endovascular suites allow high-fidelity imaging, yet additional strategies to minimize exposure and occupational risk are needed.

A new stent with streamlined cross-section can suppress monocyte cell adhesion in the flow disturbance zones of the endovascular stent

We proposed a new stent with streamlined cross-sectional wires, which is different from the clinical coronary stents with square or round cross-sections. We believe the new stent might have better hemodynamic performance than the clinical metal stents. To test the hypothesis, we designed an experimental study to compare the performance of the new stent with the clinical stents in terms of monocyte (U-937 cells) adhesion. The results showed that when compared with the clinical stents, the adhesion of U-937 cells were much less in the new stent. The results also showed that, when Reynolds number increased from 180 (the rest condition for the coronary arteries) to 360 (the strenuous exercise condition for the coronary arteries), the flow disturbance zones in the clinical stents became larger, while they became smaller with the new stent. The present experimental study therefore suggests that the optimization of the cross-sectional shape of stent wires ought to be taken into consideration in the design of endovascular stents.

A new way to reduce flow disturbance in endovascular stents: a numerical study

Traditional commercial stents are made of wires with square or semi-circular cross-sections that lead to flow disturbance, which plays an important role in the initiation and progression of restenosis. A new stent with streamlined cross-sectional wires was proposed and researched numerically for its hemodynamic performance. Simplified models of stents with square, semi-circular, or streamlined cross-sectional wires were constructed numerically. Blood flows in the three models were simulated using computational fluid dynamics methods, and compared in terms of flow pattern, wall shear stress (WSS), and oscillating shear index (OSI). The results showed that when compared with the two traditional stents, the new stent with streamlined cross-sectional wires induced almost no flow disturbance, significantly enhanced WSS, and reduced the value of OSI within the stent. The present preliminary study indicates that the optimization of the cross-sectional shape of stent wires ought to be considered in the structural design for endovascular stents.

Prophylactic antibiotics prior to bacteremia decrease endovascular graft infection in dogs

Endovascular placement of vascular stent grafts in the aorta and peripheral vessels has become a prominent tool in the armamentaria of the vascular surgeon. Despite, several reports of stent graft infection, no current guidelines exist regarding the administration of antibiotics prior to episodes of potential bacterial seeding. We sought to clarify the role of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing stent graft infection after the parenteral administration of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) at various intervals following device placement. A stent graft device was constructed from a 4 mm thin-walled polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft attached to the outside of a balloon expandable 394-Palmaz stent (Johnson and Johnson Interventional Systems, Warren, NJ). It was then inserted into the common iliac artery through an 11F peal-away sheath placed in the femoral artery. Sixty grafts were placed into 30 dogs. There were 5 groups of equal number (groups A-E). In group A, six dogs received intravenous injection of 3 cc x 104 CFU (colony forming units), biotype 31375 S. aureus, 1 day after stent graft implantation. An identically treated group B received antibiotic prophylaxis (1 gm cefazolin 30 minutes prior to bacterial challenge). Group C received bacterial injection 7 days after graft implantation with no antibiotic prophylaxis. Group D received bacterial injection 7 days after graft implantation with antibiotic prophylaxis. A control group E received no antibiotics and was not infected. All infected animals were sacrificed 7 days following bacterial challenge and the stent graft complex cultured. One half of the control group was sacrificed at 7 days and the other half at 14 days. The overall stent graft patency was 90%. Four of the six graft occlusions occurred in group A. Eleven of 12 (92%) dogs cultured S. aureus (biotype 31375) from the explanted stent graft complex. Two localized perforations occurred at the site of the infected complex. In group B, C, and D, no explanted graft complex cultured S. aureus. One graft occluded in group C and D. No stent graft in the control (group E) cultured S. aureus. A stent graft infection model can be consistently produced. In the canine model, the stent graft is more susceptible to infection in the early postoperative period and becomes less susceptible to bacterial seeding at one week after implantation. The authors recommend the use of prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of endovascular graft infections in the early postoperative period during times when bacterial seeding may occur. They postulate that pseudointima formation during graft incorporation into the vessel wall may be responsible for the resistance to infection.