Sensitivity of chest X-ray for detecting lung cancer in people presenting with symptoms: a systematic review.
Br J Gen Pract 2019;
69:e827-e835. [PMID:
31636130 DOI:
10.3399/bjgp19x706853]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Despite increasing use of computed tomography (CT), chest X-ray remains the first-line investigation for suspected lung cancer in primary care in the UK. No systematic review evidence exists as to the sensitivity of chest X-ray for detecting lung cancer in people presenting with symptoms.
AIM
To estimate the sensitivity of chest X-ray for detecting lung cancer in symptomatic people.
DESIGN AND SETTING
A systematic review was conducted to determine the sensitivity of chest X-ray for the detection of lung cancer.
METHOD
Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched; a grey literature search was also performed.
RESULTS
A total of 21 studies met the eligibility criteria. Almost all were of poor quality. Only one study had the diagnostic accuracy of chest X-ray as its primary objective. Most articles were case studies with a high risk of bias. Several were drawn from non-representative groups, for example, specific presentations, histological subtypes, or comorbidities. Only three studies had a low risk of bias. Two primary care studies reported sensitivities of 76.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 64.5 to 84.2%) and 79.3% (95% CI = 67.6 to 91.0%). One secondary care study reported a sensitivity of 79.7% (95% CI = 72.7 to 86.8%).
CONCLUSION
Though there is a paucity of evidence, the highest-quality studies suggest that the sensitivity of chest X-ray for symptomatic lung cancer is only 77% to 80%. GPs should consider if further investigation is necessary in high-risk patients who have had a negative chest X-ray.
Collapse