Subcutaneously administered Repronex in oligoovulatory female patients undergoing ovulation induction is as effective and well tolerated as intramuscular human menopausal gonadotropin treatment

Predictive factors for intrauterine insemination outcomes: a review

PURPOSE

Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a frequently utilized method of assisted reproduction for patients with mild male factor infertility, anovulation, endometriosis, and unexplained infertility. The purpose of this review is to discuss factors that affect IUI outcomes, including infertility diagnosis, semen parameters, and stimulation regimens.

METHODS

We reviewed the published literature to evaluate how patient and cycle specific factors affect IUI outcomes, specifically clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, spontaneous abortion rate and multiple pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

Most data support IUI for men with a total motile count > 5 million and post-wash sperm count > 1 million. High sperm DNA fragmentation does not consistently affect pregnancy rates in IUI cycles. Advancing maternal and paternal age negatively impact pregnancy rates. Paternal obesity contributes to infertility while elevated maternal BMI increases medication requirements without impacting pregnancy outcomes. For ovulation induction, letrozole and clomiphene citrate result in similar pregnancy outcomes and are recommended over gonadotropins given increased risk for multiple pregnancies with gonadotropins. Letrozole is preferred for obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. IUI is most effective for women with ovulatory dysfunction and unexplained infertility, and least effective for women with tubal factor and stage III-IV endometriosis. Outcomes are similar when IUI is performed with ovulation trigger or spontaneous ovulatory surge, and ovulation may be monitored by urine or serum. Most pregnancies occur within the first four IUI cycles, after which in vitro fertilization should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers recommending IUI for treatment of infertility should take into account all of these factors when evaluating patients and making treatment recommendations.

Hormonal medication in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review of assessments from patients

Several hormonal fertility medications have comparable effectiveness. A literature review was conducted into patients' assessments regarding seven medication characteristics including 'side effects' and 'ease of use'. Medline, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched for female fertility patients' written assessments of a hormonal medication. The tools used were appraised and common (i.e. ≥10%) unpleasant consequences were distinguished from rare ones. The 35 eligible studies did not rely on valid and reliable tools and did not provide patient assessments regarding all seven medication characteristics for any of the globally used medications. Evidence on medications for oocyte triggering was absent and for induction of pituitary quiescence it was scarce. Regarding medications for ovarian stimulation and luteal support, evidence on general side effects (mostly headache), local side effects (mostly pain), 'interference with home life' and 'impact on psychological wellbeing' was found. Evidence on 'ease of use' and 'required education' was only identified for medication for ovarian stimulation. Evidence on 'interference with work life' and 'compliance worry' was absent. This review calls for randomized controlled trials questioning patients with valid and reliable tools. In the meantime, this review's summary of the best available evidence can be integrated in decision aids facilitating personalized and informed medication choices.

Drug tolerability in assisted reproduction techniques: a longitudinal study

A longitudinal, observational prospective panel cohort study of 61 patients lasting one year was undertaken. Explanatory variables included sociodemographic factors along with factors related to the underlying pathology as well as the protocol used and the type of treatment received. These variables were analyzed both individually and in combination to account for confounding effects and model interactions. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was constructed for each adverse effect. Associations were calculated as odds ratios (OR). Confounding variables related to drug tolerability were identified. Follitropin-alpha and cetrorelix exhibited the poorest safety profile. With respect to local adverse drug reactions (ADEs), the results obtained in our study point to statistically significant tolerability improvements for menotropin when administered in insemination. For gastrointestinal ADEs, ganirelix was the drug that showed the highest tolerability in in vitro treatments whereas follitropin-alpha showed the lowest tolerability in insemination treatments. Diverse factors related to assisted reproduction techniques (ART) influence the incidence of adverse effects. Each drug has a different safety profile with possible interactions depending on the type of assisted reproduction therapy used.

Safety of drugs used in assisted reproduction techniques

Infertility may affect one in six couples; however, the development of the assisted reproduction technique (ART) created the opportunity for a large proportion of the infertile population to bear children. Pharmacological agents are routinely used in ART, and new ones are introduced regularly, with the aim of retrieving multiple oocytes to increase the prospect of pregnancy. The combinations of drugs that are used have specific adverse effects, but it is mostly the combined action of more than one agent that causes the greatest concern. The matter is complicated by the suspicion that some techniques in ART, for example intracytoplasmic sperm injection for severe male infertility problems (including azoospermia), may also contribute to the increase in adverse effects, especially congenital malformation. Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists are widely used in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. It may give rise to a short period of estradiol withdrawal symptoms and it may also lead to luteal phase deficiency. Similarly GnRHa antagonists, which have been recently introduced to control ovarian hyperstimulation, can lead to luteal phase deficiency and may cause some local injection site reactions. The more pure form of gonadotropin leads to less local injection site reactions and their main adverse effects are associated with the consequences of multiple ovulations. It has been proposed that gonadotropins may be a factor in the increasing risk of ovarian cancer and possibly breast cancer, but this has not been substantiated. Prion infection is another potential hazard, although no cases have been reported. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a well recognised complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in ART. It is usually a result of recruitment of a large number of ovarian follicles. Efforts to minimise the incidence of this syndrome and its severity are now well developed. Congenital malformations are another possible adverse effect of fertility drugs, but it is more probable that the increase in congenital abnormality that is reported in ART is because of the population studied, i.e. patients already at high risk of congenital malformation, rather than the fertility drugs used or the technique employed. High order multiple pregnancy and its sequela is a well established complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. This could be a result of multiple ovulations or more than one embryo replacement. Reducing the number of embryos transferred can reduce this more serious adverse effect for expectant mothers and for children conceived from ART.

Evaluation of mixed protocols with bravelle® (human-derived FSH) and repronex® (hMG) to assess clinical efficacy (EMBRACE) in women undergoing in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of three different ratios of human-derived follicle-stimulating hormone/human menopausal gonadotropin (human-derived FSH:hMG, Bravelle and Repronex) mixed together in the same syringe and administered subcutaneously once daily, to in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients <34 years or 34 to 40 years of age.

DESIGN

Two randomized, prospective, age stratified, IVF studies.

SETTING

Twenty-one academic and private clinics with experience in IVF/embryo transfer (ET).

PATIENT(S)

Infertile premenopausal women undergoing IVF-ET.

INTERVENTION(S)

Pituitary suppression with leuprolide acetate, randomization to one of three treatment groups, followed by gonadotropin stimulation (GS) for up to 15 days. The human-derived FSH:hMG ratios were the following: Group 1, a 1:1 ratio throughout; Group 2, a 3:0 ratio that was changed to 1:1 after GS day 5; Group 3, a 2:1 ratio that was increased to 3:1, 4:1, or 5:1 after GS day 5, as needed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Mean number of oocytes retrieved; peak estradiol levels; dose and duration of stimulation; implantation rates; adverse events; injection site pain; and pregnancy and live birth rates.

RESULT(S)

Overall, women <34 years had higher E(2) levels, more oocytes retrieved, and improved implantation and live birth rates compared with women 34 to 40 years old. Nonetheless, each ratio of human-derived FSH:hMG produced comparable implantation rates, and continuing pregnancy and take-home baby rates.

CONCLUSION(S)

All three ratios of human-derived FSH:hMG in both age groups produced comparable pregnancy and live birth rates with similar safety results.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a highly purified human follicle-stimulating hormone (Bravelle) and recombinant follitropin-beta for in vitro fertilization: a prospective, randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of Bravelle s.c., Bravelle i.m., and Follistim s.c. in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF-ET.

DESIGN

Open-label, randomized, parallel group, multicenter study.

SETTING

Eleven academic and private fertility clinics with experience in IVF-ET.

PATIENT(S)

Infertile premenopausal women with regular ovulatory menstrual cycles undergoing IVF-ET.

INTERVENTION(S)

Down-regulation with leuprolide acetate followed by up to 12 days of Bravelle s.c. (n = 60), Bravelle i.m. (n = 59), or Follistim s.c. (n = 58); hCG administration, oocyte retrieval, and ET.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Mean number of oocytes retrieved; patients with ET, chemical, clinical and continuing pregnancies; mean peak serum E2 levels; adverse events and injection site pain scores.

RESULT(S)

There were no significant differences among treatment groups in mean number of oocytes retrieved, peak serum E2 levels, patients with ET, continuing pregnancies, or live births. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups in the number, nature, or intensity of adverse events. Patients treated with Bravelle s.c. or Bravelle i.m. experienced significantly less injection site pain than patients treated with Follistim s.c.

CONCLUSION(S)

Bravelle s.c. and Bravelle i.m. are comparable in efficacy and safety to Follistim s.c. in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF-ET.