Economic evaluation of highly purified menotropin compared with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in assisted reproduction

Highly Purified Human Menopausal Gonadotropin (HP-hMG) Versus Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (rFSH) for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in US Predicted High-Responder Patients: A Cost-Comparison Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Infertility imposes considerable clinical and economic burden, and the high costs of fertility care are a major barrier to payers. This study assessed the cost differences of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) versus recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols in predicted high-responders from the US payer perspective.

METHODS

A discrete event simulation model was built to perform a cost-comparison analysis of HP-hMG versus rFSH in a cohort of predicted high-responders undergoing up to three embryo transfer cycles, informed by efficacy data from the MEGASET-HR trial. The model considered an event-based treatment pathway and transition probabilities were derived from MEGASET-HR. A variable time horizon was employed, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses conducted.

RESULTS

Subjects undergoing COS with HP-hMG and rFSH demonstrated comparable live birth rates following three in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, with 161 live births with HP-hMG and 152 live births with rFSH, per 310 high-responders. The total cost saving per live birth in subjects receiving HP-hMG versus rFSH was US$3024. These cost savings were largely driven by the need for fewer embryo transfers to achieve similar efficacy outcomes and a reduced rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Following deterministic sensitivity analysis, HP-hMG remained cost saving in all baseline parameter variations. No parameters led to rFSH providing cost savings when compared with HP-hMG.

CONCLUSION

Comparable clinical outcomes can be achieved at a lower cost when using HP-hMG versus rFSH based COS protocols in a cohort of predicted high-responders. Such cost savings may reduce the economic burden infertility currently presents to US healthcare providers and those seeking fertility care.

What Does Unexpected Suboptimal Response During Ovarian Stimulation Suggest, an Overlooked Group?

Unlike poor ovarian response, despite being predicted to be normal responders based on their ovarian reserve markers, many patients respond suboptimally to ovarian stimulation. Although we can improve the number of retrieved oocytes by increasing the recombinant FSH dose and adding LH, the effect of suboptimal ovarian response on cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and offspring safety is unclear. This study focuses on the unexpected suboptimal response during ovulation induction, and its causes and outcomes are analysed for the first time with a large amount of data used to compare the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR), CLBR and offspring safety of patients with one complete ART cycle with all embryos used. Our analysis included 5218 patients treated with the GnRH agonist long protocol for their first IVF-embryo transfer (ET) cycles. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether the ovarian response was suboptimal. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized for sampling at up to 1:1 nearest-neighbour matching with caliper 0.05 to balance the baseline and improve comparability between the groups. Results showed that age, BMI and basal FSH were independent risk factors for slow response; the initial dosage of Gn, FSH on the first day of Gn, and LH on the first day of Gn were independent protective factors for suboptimal response. Suboptimal responders were also more likely to have irregular menses. Regarding the clinical pregnancy rate of the fresh IVF/ICSI-ET cycles, the adjusted results of the two groups were not significantly different. There was no difference in the CPR, CLBR, or offspring safety-related data, such as gestational age, preterm delivery rate, birthweight, birth-height and Apgar Scores between the two groups after PSM. Age-related changes in the number of oocytes retrieved from women aged 20-40 years old between the two groups were different, indicating that suboptimal response in elderly patients suggests a decline in ovarian reserve. Although we can now improve the outcomes of suboptimal responders, it increases the cost to the patients and the time to live birth, which requires further attention.

Economic evaluation of highly purified human menotropin or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian stimulation in high-responder patients: analysis of the Menopur in Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonist Single Embryo Transfer-High Responder (MEGASET-HR) trial

Objective

To determine the cost of achieving a live birth after first transfer using highly purified human menotropin (HP-hMG) or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) for controlled ovarian stimulation in predicted high-responder patients in the Menopur in Gonadotropin-releasing hormone Antagonist Single Embryo Transfer-High Responder (MEGASET-HR) trial.

Design

Cost minimization analysis of trial results.

Setting

Thirty-one fertility centers.

Patients

Six hundred and nineteen women with serum antimüllerian hormone ≥5 ng/mL.

Interventions

Controlled ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist assisted reproduction cycle where fresh transfer of a single blastocyst was performed unless ovarian response was excessive whereupon all embryos were cryopreserved and patients could undergo subsequent frozen blastocyst transfer within 6 months of randomization.

Main Outcome Measures

Mean cost of achieving live birth after first transfer (fresh or frozen).

Results

First-transfer efficacy, defined as live birth after first fresh or frozen transfer, was 54.5% for HP-hMG and 48.0% for recombinant FSH (difference 6.5%). Average cost to achieve a live birth after first transfer (fresh or frozen) was lower with HP-hMG compared with recombinant FSH. For fresh transfers, the cost was lower with HP-hMG compared with recombinant FSH. The average cost to achieve a live birth after first frozen transfer was also lower in patients treated with HP-hMG compared with recombinant FSH.

Conclusions

Treatment of predicted high-responders with HP-hMG was associated with lower cost to achieve a live birth after first transfer compared with recombinant FSH.

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02554279.

Comparative economic study of the use of corifollitropin alfa and daily rFSH for controlled ovarian stimulation in older patients: Cost-minimization analysis based on the PURSUE study

This study presents an economic assessment of controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology procedures in Spain, comparing the use of corifollitropin alfa and various forms of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) in women of advanced maternal age. A cost-minimization analysis (CMA) was performed to assess the cost per cycle of controlled controlled ovarian stimulation, including only direct costs associated with the stimulation phase. The CMA was based on the population characteristics, the protocol, and the results obtained from the PURSUE study, taking into account 9 days of controlled controlled ovarian stimulation and 300 IU rFSH/day. The primary analysis included pharmacological costs alone. Different scenarios were evaluated including various doses and possible additional days (0-5) for rFSH. For the alternative analyses, the total costs (direct pharmacological costs, costs of visits and follow-up tests, and any additional pharmacological costs) were considered in both the private and public sectors. Treatment with corifollitropin alfa resulted in a lower pharmacological cost compared with rFSH (€757.25 and €950.30, respectively), creating a saving of approximately -20%. The results of the scenario analyses showed that corifollitropin alfa reduced the pharmacological cost of controlled ovarian stimulation in comparison with daily administration of doses ≥ 250 IU rFSH (considering same daily dose for all days), regardless of the additional days required (7-12 days) (average -€223; range -€488 to -€44). In conclusion, in addition to the efficacy shown in the PURSUE study, the use of corifollitropin alfa results in a decrease in the direct costs associated with controlled ovarian stimulation in older women in Spain.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Gonadotropin Treatments HP-hMG and rFSH for Assisted Reproductive Technology in France: A Markov Model Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to assess (1) the expected cost of a live birth (LB) after in vitro fertilization with two different gonadotropin treatments [high purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH)] as the single cost variable, and (2) the cost effectiveness of HP-hMG relative to rFSH in the context of the routine practice of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in France.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to simulate the therapeutic management, the in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) courses, and the effects of complications in hypothetical cohorts of 30,000 patients undergoing IVF/ICSI with fresh embryo transfer (up to four attempts) using data from the MERIT and MEGASET clinical trials or from French routine ART practice.

RESULTS

The cost per LB was estimated at €12,145 and at €14,247 with HP-hMG and rFSH, respectively, using efficacy data from published clinical trials. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was - €11,616 per LB. HP-hMG was less expensive by around €15.0 million and more effective by 1289 additional LBs. Using French clinical data, the cost per LB was €16,415 and €18,7531 with HP-hMG and rFSH, respectively. The ICER for HP-hMG versus rFSH was estimated at - €7,719 per LB with a saving of about €8.54 million and 1097 additional LBs. Deterministic sensitivity analyses showed that the main ICER drivers were the LB rate, followed by the total gonadotropin doses. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that HP-hMG was the dominant strategy in 71.2% of cases using the clinical trial data and in 50.2% of cases using the French data.

CONCLUSION

This analysis indicates that compared with rFSH, HP-hMG is less costly for IVF/ICSI management from the French healthcare payer's viewpoint. The results of the present Markov model analysis are consistent with previous findings in other European countries.

Systematic review of drug administration costs and implications for biopharmaceutical manufacturing

BACKGROUND

The acquisition costs of biologic drugs are often considered to be relatively high compared with those of nonbiologics. However, the total costs of delivering these drugs also depend on the cost of administration. Ignoring drug administration costs may distort resource allocation decisions because these affect cost effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this systematic review were to develop a framework of drug administration costs that considers both the costs of physical administration and the associated proximal costs; and, as a case example, to use this framework to evaluate administration costs for biologics within the UK National Health Service (NHS).

METHODS

We reviewed literature that reported estimates of administration costs for biologics within the UK NHS to identify how these costs were quantified and to examine how differences in dosage forms and regimens influenced administration costs. The literature reviewed were identified by searching the Centre for Review and Dissemination Databases (DARE, NHS EED and HTA); EMBASE (The Excerpta Medica Database); MEDLINE (using the OVID interface); Econlit (EBSCO); Tufts Medical Center Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry; and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

We identified 4,344 potentially relevant studies, of which 43 studies were selected for this systematic review. We extracted estimates of the administration costs of biologics from these studies. We found evidence of variation in the way that administration costs were measured, and that this affected the magnitude of costs reported, which could then influence cost effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that manufacturers of biologic medicines should pay attention to formulation issues and their impact on administration costs, because these affect the total costs of healthcare delivery and cost effectiveness.

In vitro fertilisation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone requires less IU usage compared with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin: results from a European retrospective observational chart review

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported conflicting results for the comparative doses of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) and highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG-HP) required per cycle of in vitro fertilisation (IVF); the aim of this study was to determine the average total usage of rFSH versus hMG-HP in a 'real-world' setting using routine clinical practice.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review of databases from four European countries investigated gonadotrophin usage, oocyte and embryo yield, and pregnancy outcomes in IVF cycles (± intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection) using rFSH or hMG-HP alone. Included patients met the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline criteria for IVF and received either rFSH or hMG-HP. Statistical tests were conducted at 5% significance using Chi-square or t-tests.

RESULTS

Of 30,630 IVF cycles included in this review, 74% used rFSH and 26% used hMG-HP. A significantly lower drug usage per cycle for rFSH than hMG-HP (2072.53 +/- 76.73 IU vs. 2540.14 +/- 883.08 IU, 22.6% higher for hMG-HP; p < 0.01) was demonstrated. The median starting dose was also significantly lower for rFSH than for hMG-HP (150 IU vs. 225 IU, 50% higher for hMG-HP, p < 0.01). The average oocyte yield per IVF cycle in patients treated with rFSH was significantly greater than with hMG-HP (10.80 +/- 6.02 vs. 9.77 +/- 5.53; p < 0.01), as was the average mature oocyte yield (8.58 +/- 5.27 vs. 7.72 +/- 4.59; p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in pregnancy outcomes including spontaneous abortion between the two treatments. There was a significantly higher rate of OHSS (all grades) with rFSH (18.92% vs. 14.09%; p < 0.0001). The hospitalisation rate due to OHSS was low but significantly higher in the rFSH group (1.07% of cycles started vs. 0.67% of cycles started with rFSH and hMG-HP, respectively; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, IVF treatment cycles with rFSH yield statistically more oocytes (and more mature oocytes), using significantly less IU per cycle, versus hMG-HP. The incidence of all OHSS and hospitalisations due to OHSS was significantly higher in the rFSH cycles compared to the hMG-HP cycles. However, the absolute incidence of hospitalisations due to OHSS was similar to that reported previously. These results suggest that the perceived required dosage with rFSH is currently over-estimated, and the higher unit cost of rFSH may be offset by a lower required dosage compared with hMG-HP.

HP-HMG versus rFSH in treatments combining fresh and frozen IVF cycles: success rates and economic evaluation

The economic implications of the choice of gonadotrophin influence decision making but their cost-effectiveness in frozen-embryo transfer cycles has not been adequately studied. An economic evaluation was performed comparing highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG) and recombinant FSH (rFSH) using individual patient data (n=986) from two large randomized controlled trials using a long agonist IVF protocol. The simulation model incorporated live birth data and published UK costs of IVF-related medical resources. After treatment for up-to-three cycles (one fresh and up to two subsequent fresh or frozen cycles conditional on availability of cryopreserved embryos), the cumulative live birth rate was 53.7% (95% CI 49.3-58.1%) for HP-HMG and 44.6% (40.2-49.0%) for rFSH (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.12-1.85; P<0.005). The mean costs per IVF treatment for HP-HMG and rFSH were pound5393 ( pound5341-5449) and pound6269 ( pound6210-6324), respectively (number needed to treat to fund one additional treatment was seven; P<0.001). With maternal and neonatal costs applied, the median cost per IVF baby delivered with HP-HMG was pound11,157 ( pound11,089-11,129) and pound14,227 ( pound14,183-14,222) with rFSH (P<0.001). The cost saving using HP-HMG remained after varying model parameters in a probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

Assisted reproductive technologies in public and private clinics

The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of the type of service provided by assisted reproduction clinics. The activities, treatment patterns and results achieved by assisted reproduction centres in Spain were examined, comparing public and private clinics. A retrospective study was carried out using the Assisted Reproductive Technology Register of the Spanish Fertility Society for 2002-2004. The results showed that 74%, 96% and 99% of IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, oocyte donation and preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles, respectively, were carried out in the private sector. Public clinics performed proportionally more transfers of three embryos than the private clinics (48.1% versus 41.7%). More elective transfers were performed in private clinics. Pregnancy rates per cycle started, per puncture and per transfer were significantly higher among private than public clinics (29.1%, 32.7% and 35.9% versus 25.2%, 28.5% and 32.6%, respectively) (P < 0.05). Implantation rate has risen year on year in both types of clinic and was significantly higher (P < 0.05), every year, among the private clinics. The multiple-pregnancy rate was significantly higher among the private clinics (30.8% versus 26.4%) (P < 0.05). In conclusion, differences exist between public and private clinics as regards to their volume of activity, the range of services offered, clinical practice and results achieved.

Costs and outcomes associated with IVF using recombinant FSH

Cost and outcome estimates based on clinical trial data may not reflect usual clinical practice, yet they are often used to inform service provision and budget decisions. To expand understanding of assisted reproduction treatment in clinical practice, an economic evaluation of IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) data from a single assisted conception unit (ACU) in England was performed. A total of 1418 IVF/ICSI cycles undertaken there between October 2001 and January 2006 in 1001 women were analysed. The overall live birth rate was 22% (95% CI: 19.7-24.2), with the 30- to 34-year age group achieving the highest rate (28%). The average recombinant FSH (rFSH) dose/cycle prescribed was 1855 IU. Average cost of rFSH/cycle was 646 pound(SD: 219 pound), and average total cost/cycle was 2932 pound (SD: 422 pound). Economic data based on clinical trials informing current UK guidance assumes higher doses of rFSH dose/cycle (1750-2625 IU), higher average cost of drugs/cycle (1179 pound), and higher average total cost/cycle (3266 pound). While the outcomes in this study matched UK averages, total cost/cycle was lower than those cited in UK guidelines. Utilizing the protocols and (lower) rFSH dosages reported in this study may enable other ACU to provide a greater number of IVF/ICSI cycles to patients within given budgets.

A cost per live birth comparison of HMG and rFSH randomized trials

To help inform healthcare treatment practices and funding decisions, an economic evaluation was conducted to compare the two leading gonadotrophins used for IVF in Belgium. Based on the results of a recently published meta-analysis, a simulated decision tree model was constructed with four states: (i) fresh cycle, (ii) cryopreserved cycle, (iii) live birth and (iv) treatment withdrawal. Gonadotrophin costs were based on highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG; Menopur) and recombinant FSH (rFSH) alpha (Gonal-F). After one fresh and one cryopreserved cycle the average treatment cost with HP-HMG was lower than with rFSH (HP-HMG euro3635; rFSH euro4103). The average cost saving per person started on HP-HMG when compared with rFSH was euro468. Additionally, the average costs per live birth of HP-HMG and rFSH were found to be significantly different: HP-HMG euro9996; rFSH euro13,009 (P < 0.0001). HP-HMG remained cost-saving even after key parameters in the model were varied in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Treatment with HP-HMG was found to be the dominant treatment strategy in IVF because of improved live birth rates and lower costs. Within a fixed healthcare budget, the cost-savings achieved using HP-HMG would allow for the delivery of additional IVF cycles.

Cost-saving treatment strategies in in vitro fertilization: a combined economic evaluation of two large randomized clinical trials comparing highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alpha

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost-effectiveness of two gonadotropin treatments that are available in the United Kingdom in light of limited public funding and the fundamental role of costs in IVF treatment decisions.

DESIGN

An economic evaluation based on two large randomized clinical trials in IVF patients using a simulation model.

SETTING

Fifty-three fertility clinics in 13 European countries and Israel.

PATIENT(S)

Women indicated for treatment with IVF (N = 986), aged 18-38, participating in double-blind, randomized controlled trials.

INTERVENTION(S)

Highly purified menotropin (HP-hMG, Menopur) or recombinant follitropin alpha (rFSH, Gonal-F).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Cost per IVF cycle and cost per live birth for HP-hMG and rFSH alpha.

RESULT(S)

HP-hMG was more effective and less costly versus rFSH for both IVF cost per live birth and for IVF cost per baby (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was negative). The mean costs per IVF treatment for HP-hMG and rFSH were 2408 pounds (95% confidence interval [CI], 2392 pounds, 2421 pounds) and 2660 pounds (95% CI 2644 pounds, 2678 pounds), respectively. The mean cost saving of 253 pounds per cycle using HP-hMG allows one additional cycle to be delivered for every 9.5 cycles.

CONCLUSION(S)

Treatment with HP-hMG was dominant compared with rFSH in the United Kingdom. Gonadotropin costs should be considered alongside live-birth rates to optimize outcomes using scarce health-care resources.

Cost-effectiveness of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus human FSH in intrauterine insemination cycles: a statistical model-derived analysis

OBJECTIVE

Recently we proposed a randomized trial specifically designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two different protocols of stimulation in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. Computer-simulated clinical models have been developed to perform pharmacoeconomic studies, creating a decision tree in which the complex procedure is performed and repeated. The present study was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) and human-derived FSH (hFSH) in ovarian stimulation and to indicate which protocol should be used in IUI cycles.

STUDY DESIGN

Two computer-generated decision tree models were constructed to compare the clinical effects and costs of rFSH versus hFSH in IUI cycles. A first decision tree model was built according to the trial previously published. In a second model, 10 000 hypothetical infertile patients were entered in a computer-generated simulation and were stimulated with two different protocols for IUI. IUI was hypothetically performed in both groups of patients with a known pregnancy, cancellation, miscarriage and abandonment rate. The two protocols were compared using a cost-effective analysis: cost-effectiveness ratios (CE) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) was constructed.

RESULTS

The overall estimated costs with each ovarian stimulation strategy in the first model demonstrated that rFSH was a less cost-effective strategy, with an ICER of euro 13,727. The CEAC showed that at a level of euro 0 of willingness to pay, hFSH was cost-effective in 73% of the samples while rFSH was cost-effective in 27% only. Recombinant FSH would be more cost-effective than hFSH at an effectiveness threshold of 0.170 and at a cost per cycle of euro 235. This finding was also confirmed by the acceptability curve obtained with 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, in which hFSH was cost-effective in about 96-98% of samples at any threshold of willingness to pay.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first statistical model developed with a computer-generated clinical simulation with the intent to elaborate a pharmacoeconomic comparison between rFSH and hFSH in ovarian stimulation for IUI cycles. Results demonstrated that hFSH is more cost-effective than rFSH.

A detailed cost analysis of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment

OBJECTIVE

To provide detailed information about costs of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment stages and to estimate the cost per IVF and ICSI treatment cycle and ongoing pregnancy.

DESIGN

Descriptive micro-costing study.

SETTING

Four Dutch IVF centers.

PATIENT(S)

Women undergoing their first treatment cycle with IVF or ICSI.

INTERVENTION(S)

IVF or ICSI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Costs per treatment stage, per cycle started, and for ongoing pregnancy.

RESULT(S)

Average costs of IVF and ICSI hormonal stimulation were euro 1630 and euro 1585; the costs of oocyte retrieval were euro 500 and euro 725, respectively. The cost of embryo transfer was euro 185. Costs per IVF and ICSI cycle started were euro 2381 and euro 2578, respectively. Costs per ongoing pregnancy were euro 10,482 and euro 10,036, respectively.

CONCLUSION(S)

Hormonal stimulation covered the main part of the costs per cycle (on average 68% and 61% for IVF and ICSI, respectively) due to the relatively high cost of medication. The costs of medication increased with increasing age of the women, irrespective of the type of treatment (IVF or ICSI). Fertilization costs (IVF laboratory) constituted 12% and 20% of the total costs of IVF and ICSI. The total cost per ICSI cycle was 8.3% higher than IVF.

Clinical effects of ovulation induction with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone supplemented with recombinant luteinizing hormone or low-dose recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin in the midfollicular phase in microdose cycles in poor responders

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical effects of recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) or low-dose recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) supplementation administered in the midfollicular phase in microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) flare-up cycles.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized study.

SETTING

Private infertility clinic.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 170 women enrolled, with 145 women eligible for randomization.

INTERVENTION(S)

After randomization, 51 patients (group A) received only 600 IU of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as the control group, 46 patients (group B) received 600 IU of recombinant FSH plus daily supplementation with 75 IU of recombinant luteinizing hormone, and 48 patients (group C) received 600 IU of recombinant FSH plus daily supplementation with 75 IU of recombinant hCG.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Peak estradiol (E(2)) levels, days of stimulation with recombinant FSH, total recombinant FSH dosage, metaphase II oocytes retrieved, pregnancy rate (positive hCG levels), clinical pregnancy rate (positive fetal cardiac activity), and cancellation rates of stimulation and embryo transfer.

RESULT(S)

The pregnancy rates were 35.1%, 27.6% and 31.2% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Clinical pregnancy rates were 27.1%, 27.5, and 21.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the age, peak serum E(2) concentration, total recombinant FSH dosage, days of stimulation with recombinant FSH, total number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved, number of embryos transferred, pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rates, or cancellation rates of stimulation and embryo transfer among the three groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Additional exogenous LH activity in the form of either recombinant luteinizing hormone or low-dose recombinant hCG is unnecessary in microdose cycles to increase pregnancy rates.

Optimal stimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To update clinicians on different gonadotropin regimens for ovarian stimulation for IVF including the use of urinary and recombinant gonadotropins, the value of added LH to FSH in the stimulation regimen, the use of GnRH agonists and antagonists, and the role of minimal stimulation protocols.

DESIGN

Literature review and critical analysis of major articles during the last five years on ovarian stimulation for IVF.

CONCLUSION(S)

Urinary and recombinant gonadotropins, for ovarian stimulation for IVF, are probably equally safe and effective. The higher cost for recombinant products limits their worldwide use in IVF. Conflicting data exist regarding the benefit of adding LH to FSH in the stimulation regimens. The use of different GnRH-agonists, of varying potency, may account for different levels of LH suppression. Adding LH should be considered in severe situations of LH suppression such as with the use of potent GnRH-agonists or when GnRH-antagonists are introduced during the course of stimulation. GnRH-antagonists provide advantages to patients in terms of fewer injections, shorter stimulation days, and avoidance of adverse effects of agonists. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is probably less with antagonists compared to agonists, with the option to use an agonist as a surrogate LH surge. Fixed and early start of the antagonist is probably more effective than an individualized and late start. The earlier reported lower pregnancy rates with antagonists compared to agonists is not fully understood and needs to be continually monitored. Minimal stimulation protocols using a combination of clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins are attractive and should be considered in some patients owing to lower costs and acceptable success rates. The optimal stimulation protocol for IVF should be an individualized regimen based on the patient's ovarian physiology and prior IVF experience, if any.

HMG versus rFSH for ovulation induction in developing countries: a cost–effectiveness analysis based on the results of a recent meta-analysis

Both cost and effectiveness should be considered conjointly to aid judgments about drug choice. Therefore, based on the results of a recent published meta-analysis, a Markov model was developed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis for estimation of the cost of an ongoing pregnancy in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. In addition, Monte Carlo micro-simulation was used to examine the potential impact of assumptions and other uncertainties represented in the model. The results of the study reveal that the estimated average cost of an ongoing pregnancy is 13,946 Egyptian pounds (EGP), and 18,721 EGP for a human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) and rFSH cycle respectively. On performing a sensitivity analysis on cycle costs, it was demonstrated that the rFSH price should be 0.61 EGP/IU to be as cost-effective as HMG at the price of 0.64 EGP/IU (i.e. around 60% reduction in its current price). The difference in cost between HMG and rFSH in over 100,000 cycles would result in an additional 4565 ongoing pregnancies if HMG was used. Therefore, HMG was clearly more cost-effective than rFSH. The decision to adopt a more expensive, cost-ineffective treatment could result in a lower number of cycles of IVF/ICSI treatment undertaken, especially in the case of most developing countries.

Emerging drugs in assisted reproduction

Infertility affects approximately 15% of couples of reproductive age. In assisted reproductive technology (ART), medications play a crucial role in stimulating ovaries to produce several oocytes and prepare the endometrium to be receptive after replacing one or more embryos into the uterine cavity. The availability of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone, luteinising hormone and human chorionic gonadotrophin; of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists; and of luteal supplementation with progesterone have allowed the tailoring of several stimulation schemes, which have enhanced the pregnancy outcome after ART treatment. However, the remaining risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, the still low implantation rates, the unacceptably high rates of multiple pregnancies and the daily parenteral administration of medications do not constitute the features of a patient-friendly procedure. Therefore, a number of molecules with gonadotrophin-like activity, inhibition of GnRH receptor ability, or endometrium receptivity enhancement properties are currently under active investigation. Orally bioactive therapeutic preparations, in particular, may revolutionize in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment in the near future. Nevertheless, the implementation of mild ovarian stimulation protocols with single embryo transfer policy and further development of oocyte in vitro maturation techniques may lead to a less drug orientated IVF treatment.

Exogenous luteinizing hormone in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction techniques

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of exogenous LH in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproductive technologies.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized study.

SETTING

SISMER fertility unit.

PATIENT(S)

Women showing a hyporesponsiveness to FSH under GnRH agonist down-regulation were randomized into three groups: group A (n = 54) received an increased dosage of FSH; group B (n = 54) was administered recombinant LH in addition to the increased dose of FSH; group C (n = 22) was given additional FSH and LH using hMG as a combined drug. Fifty-four age-matched women with no need to increase the FSH dose were included as a control group (D).

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Implantation and live birth rate per started cycles.

RESULT(S)

In group B, the pregnancy and implantation rates were statistically higher when compared with groups A and C and did not differ from the control group for normal response. The live birth rate was similar in groups B and D but was half as high in groups A and C.

CONCLUSION(S)

Hyporesponsiveness to FSH could be related to iatrogenic LH deficiency that, in turn, could affect oocyte competence. Addition of a small amount of recombinant LH is able to rescue oocyte competence to produce viable embryos.

Immature oocyte in-vitro maturation: clinical aspects

The development of immature oocyte collection techniques for in-vitro maturation (IVM), combined with novel culture techniques, opens new possibilities for assisted reproductive technology. Optimization of clinical management of IVM cycles will enhance pregnancy outcome, so that IVM might become an effective alternative assisted reproduction treatment for infertile patients irrespective of the cause of infertility. Parameters such as age and baseline antral follicular count are predictive of outcome and should be used as selection criteria for IVM treatment. Women with polycystic ovary disease and normo-ovulatory patients at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome might benefit from earlier retrieval of oocytes followed by IVM and embryo transfer. HCG priming before oocyte retrieval seems beneficial in terms of oocyte yield and maturational competence, and may increase the harvest of mature oocytes and lead to better endometrial synchronization with the developing embryo. The timing of aspiration may be crucial in IVM and selection criteria for follicle size at aspiration need defining prospectively for infertility type. Finer calibre aspiration needles and low aspiration pressure yield more oocytes. A combination of natural cycle IVF with IVM is a promising, mild and inexpensive assisted reproduction treatment, widely accessible the infertile population.

Contemporary Pharmacological Manipulation in Assisted Reproduction

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) treatment to induce follicular development in anovulating women and multiple follicular development for assisted conception has been incorporated in almost all reproductive treatment cycles in the form of either urinary, purified urinary or recombinant preparations. Besides improved tolerance and theoretically lower chances of infection by prions, the latter may be more effective in terms of clinical pregnancy rates, FSH requirement and cost effectiveness. The low-dose, step-up protocol to induce monofollicular development, which is applied worldwide, has to compete with the equally effective but health economically beneficial step-down protocol. The long protocol using recombinant FSH 150 IU/day is advocated when using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmatic sperm injection treatment. However, the current paradigmatic hyperstimulation came under scrutiny after the introduction of the GnRH antagonists, which allow milder and more convenient approaches with acceptable cancellation and pregnancy rates but lower requirements for FSH. Risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) can be further eliminated if recombinant luteinising hormone (rLH) or GnRH agonists are used to trigger oocyte maturation and ovulation; the latter require pituitary responsiveness and are therefore excluded in agonist protocols. FSH and LH are both required for appropriate folliculo- and steroidogenesis. In hypogonadotropic women, the addition of LH (human menopausal gonadotropin, human chorionic gonadotropin or rLH) is therefore obligate to achieve appropriate follicular growth and pregnancy. The role of LH in ovulation induction is still a matter of debate, although in GnRH agonistic protocols there seems to be a 'therapeutic window'; levels that are too high or too low have detrimental effects on IVF outcome. To broaden the pharmaceutical armoury, recent efforts have been directed towards the development of novel GnRH antagonists and FSH preparations with optimal pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profiles. Alternative strategies with fewer adverse effects and higher benefit/cost ratios are under development. However, before the GnRH agonist is abandoned for the antagonist as standard therapy, the cause of the observed possible lower pregnancy rates with the latter need to be clarified. In addition, prospective studies investigating possible direct effects of GnRH analogues, optimal dose-finding studies and treatment regimens under different conditions, with or without pharmacological coadministration and for different indications, should be performed to optimise the efficacy and tailor treatment strategies to individual needs.