Minimal monitoring of ovarian hyperstimulation: a useful simplification of the clinical phase of in vitro fertilization treatment

Monitoring of stimulated cycles in assisted reproduction (IVF and ICSI)

BACKGROUND

Monitoring of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is necessary to detect as well as reduce the incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) whilst achieving the optimal ovarian response needed for assisted reproduction treatment. Traditional monitoring of ovarian hyperstimulation during in vitro fertilisation IVF and ICSI treatment has included transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) plus serum estradiol levels. The need for combined monitoring (using TVUS and serum estradiol) during ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction is controversial. It has been suggested that combined monitoring is time consuming, expensive and inconvenient for women and that simplification of IVF and ICSI therapy by using TVUS only should be considered.  OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of monitoring controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in IVF and ICSI cycles in subfertile couples with TVUS only versus TVUS plus serum estradiol concentration, with respect to rates of live birth, pregnancy and OHSS.

SEARCH METHODS

In this update conducted in March 2020, two review authors searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group's Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the National Research Register, and web-based trial registers. There was no language restriction applied. All references in the identified trials and background papers were checked and authors were contacted to identify relevant published and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials that compared monitoring with TVUS only versus TVUS plus serum estradiol concentrations in women undergoing COH for IVF and ICSI treatment were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (IK, AW) independently selected the studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We resolved disagreements by discussion. Outcomes data were pooled and summary statistics were presented when appropriate. The quality of the evidence was rated using the GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not identify any new eligible studies in this update in 2020. The evidence based on the six trials identified in 2014 remained unchanged. They included 781 women undergoing monitoring of COH with either TVUS alone or a combination of TVUS and serum estradiol concentration during IVF or ICSI treatment. None of the six studies reported our primary outcome of live birth rate. Two studies presented pregnancy rate per initiated cycle and per embryo transfer, respectively. Four studies reported pregnancy rate per woman with pooled data; we are uncertain of the effect of monitoring with TVUS only versus combined monitoring on clinical pregnancy rate per woman (odds ratio (OR) 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 1.54; four studies; N = 617; I² = 5%; low quality evidence). This suggests in women with a 36% chance of clinical pregnancy using monitoring with TVUS plus serum estradiol, the clinical pregnancy rate using TVUS only would be between 31% and 46%. We are uncertain of any effect in the mean number of oocytes retrieved per woman (mean difference (MD) 0.32; 95% CI -0.60 to 1.24; five studies; N = 596; I² = 17%; low quality evidence).  We are uncertain whether monitoring with TVUS only versus combined monitoring affected the incidence of OHSS (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.48 to 2.20; six studies; N = 781; I² = 0%; low quality evidence), suggesting that in women with a 4% chance of OHSS using monitoring with TVUS plus serum estradiol, the OHSS rate monitored by TVUS only would be between 2% and 8%. The cycle cancellation rate was similar in both arms of two studies (0/34 versus 1/31, 1/25 versus 1/25; OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.07 to 4.39; N = 115; I² = 0%; low quality evidence).  The evidence was low quality for all comparisons. Limitations included imprecision and potential bias due to unclear randomisation methods, allocation concealment and blinding, as well as differences in treatment protocols. Quality assessment was hampered by the lack of methodological descriptions in several studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review update found no new randomised trials. Evidence from the six studies previously identified did not suggest that combined monitoring by TVUS and serum estradiol is more efficacious than monitoring by TVUS alone with regard to clinical pregnancy rates and the incidence of OHSS. The number of oocytes retrieved appeared similar for both monitoring protocols. The data suggest that both these monitoring methods are safe and reliable. However, these results should be interpreted with caution because the overall quality of the evidence was low. Results were compromised by imprecision and poor reporting of study methodology. The choice of one or the other method may depend upon the convenience of its use, and the associated costs. An economic evaluation of the costs involved with the two methods and the views of the women undergoing cycle monitoring would be welcome.

Streamlining follicular monitoring during controlled ovarian stimulation: a data-driven approach to efficient IVF care in the new era of social distancing

STUDY QUESTION

What is the optimal follicular tracking strategy for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in order to minimise face-to-face interactions?

SUMMARY ANSWER

As data from follicular tracking scans on Days 5, 6 or 7 of stimulation are the most useful to accurately predict trigger timing and risk of over-response, scans on these days should be prioritised if streamlined monitoring is necessary.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

British Fertility Society guidance for centres restarting ART following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic-related shutdowns recommends reducing the number of patient visits for monitoring during COS. Current evidence on optimal monitoring during ovarian stimulation is sparse, and protocols vary significantly. Small studies of simplifying IVF therapy by minimising monitoring have reported no adverse effects on outcomes, including live birth rate. There are opportunities to learn from the adaptations necessary during these extraordinary times to improve the efficiency of IVF care in the longer term.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective database analysis of 9294 ultrasound scans performed during monitoring of 2322 IVF cycles undertaken by 1875 women in a single centre was performed. The primary objective was to identify when in the IVF cycle the data obtained from ultrasound are most predictive of both oocyte maturation trigger timing and an over-response to stimulation. If a reduced frequency of clinic visits is needed due to COVID-19 precautions, prioritising attendance for monitoring scans on the most predictive cycle days may be prudent.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The study comprised anonymised retrospective database analysis of IVF/ICSI cycles at a tertiary referral IVF centre. Machine learning models are used in combining demographic and follicular tracking data to predict cycle oocyte maturation trigger timing and over-response. The primary outcome was the day or days in cycle from which scan data yield optimal model prediction performance statistics. The model for predicting trigger day uses patient age, number of follicles at baseline scan and follicle count by size for the current scan. The model to predict over-response uses age and number of follicles of a given size.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The earliest cycle day for which our model has high accuracy to predict both trigger day and risk of over-response is stimulation Day 5. The Day 5 model to predict trigger date has a mean squared error 2.16 ± 0.12 and to predict over-response an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.91 ± 0.01.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This is a retrospective single-centre study and the results may not be generalisable to centres using different treatment protocols. The results are derived from modelling, and further clinical validation studies will verify the accuracy of the model.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Follicular tracking starting at Day 5 of stimulation may help to streamline the amount of monitoring required in COS. Previous small studies have shown that minimal monitoring protocols did not adversely impact outcomes. If IVF can safely be made less onerous on the clinic's resources and patient's time, without compromising success, this could help to reduce burden-related treatment drop-out.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

F.P.C. acknowledges funding from the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex. The authors declare they have no competing interests in relation to this work.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Monitoring of stimulated cycles in assisted reproduction (IVF and ICSI)

BACKGROUND

Traditional monitoring of ovarian hyperstimulation during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment has included transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) plus serum estradiol levels to ensure safe practice by reducing the incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) whilst achieving the good ovarian response needed for assisted reproduction treatment. The need for combined monitoring (using TVUS and serum estradiol) during ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction is controversial. It has been suggested that combined monitoring is time consuming, expensive and inconvenient for women and that simplification of IVF and ICSI therapy by using TVUS only should be considered.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of monitoring controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in IVF and ICSI cycles in subfertile couples with TVUS only versus TVUS plus serum estradiol concentration, with respect to rates of live birth, pregnancy and OHSS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the National Research Register, and web-based trial registers such as Current Controlled Trials. The last search was conducted in May 2014. There was no language restriction applied. All references in the identified trials and background papers were checked and authors were contacted to identify relevant published and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials that compared monitoring with TVUS only versus TVUS plus serum estradiol concentrations in women undergoing COH for IVF and ICSI treatment were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently selected the studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. They resolved disagreements by discussion with the rest of the authors. Outcomes data were pooled and summary statistics were presented when appropriate. The quality of the evidence was rated using the GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

With this update, four new studies were identified resulting in a total of six trials including 781 women undergoing monitoring of COH with either TVUS alone or a combination of TVUS and serum estradiol concentration during IVF or ICSI treatment.None of the six studies reported our primary outcome of live birth rate. Pooled data showed no evidence of a difference in clinical pregnancy rate per woman between monitoring with TVUS only and combined monitoring (odds ratio (OR) 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 1.54; four studies; N = 617; I² = 5%; low quality evidence). This suggests that compared with women with a 34% chance of clinical pregnancy using monitoring with TVUS plus serum estradiol, the clinical pregnancy rate in women using TVUS only was between 29% and 44%.There was no evidence of a difference between the groups in the reported cases of OHSS (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.48 to 2.20; six studies; N = 781; I² = 0%; low quality evidence), suggesting that compared with women with a 4% chance of OHSS using monitoring with TVUS plus serum estradiol, the OHSS rate in women monitored by TVUSS only was between 2% and 8%.There was no evidence of a difference between the groups in the mean number of oocytes retrieved pre woman (mean difference (MD) 0.32; 95% CI -0.60 to 1.24; five studies; N = 596; I² = 17%; low quality evidence).The evidence was low quality for all comparisons. Limitations included imprecision and potential bias due to unclear randomisation methods, allocation concealment and blinding, as well as differences in treatment protocols. Quality assessment was hampered by the lack of methodological descriptions in several studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review update found no evidence from randomised trials to suggest that combined monitoring by TVUS and serum estradiol is more efficacious than monitoring by TVUS alone with regard to clinical pregnancy rates and the incidence of OHSS. The number of oocytes retrieved appeared similar for both monitoring protocols. The data suggest that both these monitoring methods are safe and reliable. However, these results should be interpreted with caution because the overall quality of the evidence was low. Results were compromised by imprecision and poor reporting of study methodology. A combined monitoring protocol including both TVUS and serum estradiol may need to be retained as precautionary good clinical practice and as a confirmatory test in a subset of women to identify those at high risk of OHSS. An economic evaluation of the costs involved with the two methods and the views of the women undergoing cycle monitoring would be welcome.

Doppler of the uterine arteries combined with endometrial thickness correlate well with the degree of pituitary suppression in women treated with long-acting GnRH agonists

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries and its association to endometrial thickness as a method to confirm pituitary suppression after administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues in assisted reproduction treatment cycles.

METHODS

A total of 70 patients using gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues for pituitary suppression for in vitro fertilization treatment were studied. To confirm down-regulation, serum estradiol levels and endometrial thickness were evaluated 10 days after gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues administration. When estradiol was <30 pg/ml and endometrial thickness was <3 mm, pituitary suppression was confirmed. Doppler velocimetric measurements were performed at the same day to study the pulsatility index of the uterine arteries, until pituitary suppression was confirmed.

RESULTS

All 70 patients had normal ovarian morphology. For the patients who had estradiol levels ≤30 pg/ml, the mean pulsatility index of the uterine arteries was 2.95 ± 0.79 and for those who had levels >30 pg/ml the mean PI was 2.22 ± 0.8 (p = 0.005). For the patients who had endometrial thickness ≤5 mm the mean PI was 2.86 ± 0.82 and for those with endometrial thickness >5 mm the mean PI was 2.17 ± 0.79 (p = 0.004). Using a cut-off point of 2.51 for the pulsatility index, to compare to estradiol levels, we observed a sensitivity of 72.7 % and specificity of 71 %. The combination of Doppler velocimetric and endometrial thickness showed a sensitivity of 94 % and specificity of 82.3 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Doppler velocimetric analysis of the uterine arteries can be an important tool in the diagnosis of the down-regulation after the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues and might help simplify assisted reproduction programmes.

Monitoring of stimulated cycles in assisted reproduction (IVF and ICSI)

BACKGROUND

Traditional monitoring of ovarian hyperstimulation during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment has included ultrasonography plus serum estradiol concentration to ensure safe practice by reducing the incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The need for intensive monitoring during ovarian stimulation in IVF is controversial. It has been suggested that close monitoring is time consuming, expensive and inconvenient for the woman and simplification of IVF therapy by using ultrasound only should be considered. This systematic review assessed the effects of ovarian monitoring by ultrasound only versus ultrasound plus serum estradiol measurement on IVF outcomes and the occurrence of OHSS in women undergoing stimulated cycles in IVF and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the effect of monitoring controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF and ICSI cycles with ultrasound plus serum estradiol concentration versus ultrasound only in terms of live birth rates, pregnancy rates and the incidence of OHSS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on the latest issue of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1966 to May 2007), EMBASE (1980 to May 2007), CINAHL (1982 to May 2007), the National Research Register, and web-based trial databases such as Current Controlled Trials. There was no language restriction. Additionally all references in the identified trials and background papers were checked and authors were contacted to identify relevant published and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials that compared monitoring with ultrasound plus serum estradiol concentration versus ultrasound only in women undergoing ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF and ICSI treatment were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently examined the electronic search results for relevant trials, extracted data and assessed trial quality. They resolved disagreements by discussion with two other authors. Outcomes data were pooled when appropriate and summary statistics presented when limited data did not allow meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search strategy identified 1119 potentially eligible reports, of which two met our inclusion criteria. These involved 411 women who underwent controlled ovarian stimulation monitoring. Our primary outcome of live birth rate was not reported in either study. One trial reported clinical pregnancy rate per woman (33% versus 31%; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.49), the second trial reported clinical pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval (22% versus 25%). There was no significant difference between the ultrasound plus estradiol group and the ultrasound alone group in the mean number of oocytes retrieved (WMD -0.55, 95% CI -1.79 to 0.69) and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.78) for the two studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from randomised trials to support cycle monitoring by ultrasound plus serum estradiol as more efficacious than cycle monitoring by ultrasound only on outcomes of live birth and pregnancy rates. A large well-designed randomised controlled trial is needed that reports on live birth rates and pregnancy, with economic evaluation of the costs involved and the views of the women undergoing cycle monitoring. A randomised trial with sufficiently large sample size to test the effects of different monitoring protocols on OHSS, a rare outcome, will pose a great challenge. Until such a trial is considered feasible, cycle monitoring by transvaginal ultrasound plus serum estradiol may need to be retained as a precautionary good practice point.

Validity of the in vitro fertilisation league tables: influence of patients' characteristics

We tested the hypothesis that restricting comparison of the live birth rate following in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment in those couples having their first IVF cycle in whom the female is under 35 years of age and has a normal follicle-stimulating hormone level would improve the validity of comparing IVF clinics' success rates. We analysed all cycles performed over a 2-year period in patients who fulfilled these criteria and divided the study population according to the referring primary care trusts: group A (n = 90) were referred from Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham and group B (n = 134) were referred from Brent and Harrow. There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to their IVF cycle characteristics. The two groups differed in their ethnicity, cause of infertility, prevalence of uterine fibroids and smoking and alcohol consumption habits. Group A had a significantly lower live birth rate (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.95, P = 0.02) compared with group B. This study confirms the impact of the non-IVF-related patient characteristics on treatment outcome and the poor validity of comparing IVF clinics' success rates based on the sparse data published by national IVF registries.

Prediction of pituitary down-regulation by evaluation of endometrial thickness in an IVF programme

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether pituitary down-regulation after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) administration can be accurately predicted by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness in the presence of menstruation. All cycles of an IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection programme in which a long protocol of GnRHa was used for ovarian stimulation were analysed. Overall, 209 patients underwent 223 treatment cycles. Using a serum oestradiol concentration of 50 pg/ml as a cut-off point, the sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and false positive and false negative values were calculated for prediction of pituitary down-regulation from endometrial thickness measurements. Pituitary down-regulation was achieved in 223 treatment cycles in 180 patients (80%). The best combination of the highest specificity (71.7%) and sensitivity (62.5%) is achieved with a linear appearance of the endometrium. Therefore, ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness should be used in combination with serum oestradiol concentration in estimating pituitary down-regulation after GnRHa. In conclusion, the linear appearance of endometrium can be as reliable as serum oestradiol concentration in prediction of pituitary down-regulation after GnRHa.

Monitoring of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles by ultrasound versus by ultrasound and hormonal levels: a prospective, multicenter, randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether cycle monitoring using both serum E(2) and ultrasound findings yields superior clinical pregnancy rates during IVF-embryo transfer (ET) compared to monitoring with ultrasound alone.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, multicenter, patient-blinded study.

SETTING

Four assisted conception units in the United Kingdom.

PATIENT(S)

Two hundred ninety-seven women believed to be normal responders undergoing IVF treatment.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients were randomly allocated on day 7 of stimulation to one of the two hCG administration criteria: [1] the E(2)-to-follicle > or =11 mm ratio was between 250 and 500 pmol/L/follicle and at least 2 follicles reached a mean diameter of 18 mm or [2] at least 2 follicles reached a mean diameter of 18 mm and the endometrium thickness was > or =8 mm.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Duration and cumulative dose of recombinant human FSH, total number of growing follicles, oocytes retrieved, number and quality of embryos, pregnancy rates, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rates.

RESULT(S)

Two hundred ninety-seven patients were randomized to one of the two criteria groups. Of these, 288 (97%) received urinary (u)-hCG (143 in group A and 145 in group B). One hundred three women in group A (72%) met both criteria for hCG administration. Pregnancy and OHSS rates were similar (34.3% vs. 31.4% and 4.9% vs. 4.1%, respectively).

CONCLUSION(S)

The addition of E(2)/follicle criteria to ultrasound monitoring of IVF cycles in normal responders seldom changes the timing of hCG, and does not increase pregnancy rates or the risk of OHSS.

Young age does not protect against the adverse effects of reduced ovarian reserve--an eight year study

BACKGROUND

Ovarian reserve significantly influences IVF outcome. Low response to ovarian stimulation due to reduction of ovarian reserve is occasionally encountered in young women. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of IVF treatment in young patients with reduced ovarian reserve.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between January 1993-2001, 762 consecutive patients satisfied the definition of reduced ovarian reserve (raised early follicular phase FSH or gonadotrophin stimulation cycles where three or fewer oocytes were retrieved after routine FSH stimulation) and were included in the study. They were classified into three age groups: young (< or = 30 years), intermediate (31-38 years) and older (>38 years). The three age groups were similar with respect to basal (day 3) serum FSH and estradiol concentrations, cause of infertility and number of previous treatment cycles. Implantation (13, 9.6 and 9.8%), clinical pregnancy (11.8, 10.2 and 10%) and live birth (7.4, 7.3 and 6.8%) rates were not significantly different in the three age groups respectively (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that younger patients with reduced ovarian reserve have a poor outcome of IVF treatment similar to their older counterparts. Such information may be helpful in counselling these patients who otherwise might anticipate an outcome related to their chronological age.

A minimally monitored assisted reproduction stimulation protocol reduces cost without compromising success

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a fixed-dose stimulation protocol with monitoring limited to a single ultrasound can provide acceptable outcomes in assisted reproduction technologies (ART) procedures in appropriately selected patients.

DESIGN

Prospective study of all minimally monitored ART cycles from 1996 through 1998.

SETTING

University ART program.

PATIENTS

Eligibility included Institutional Review Board consent, age 18-37, basal FSH < or = 10, normal semen parameters, and regular menses. IVF (n = 81) and GIFT (n = 14).

INTERVENTIONS

A single ultrasound was performed after 8 or 9 days of stimulation in a fixed-schedule long luteal phase leuprolide protocol. No hormone levels were obtained. Human chorionic gonadotropin was administered when at least 2 follicles were projected to reach 18 mm.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pregnancy, delivery, and implantation rates.

RESULTS

The clinical pregnancy rates were 51% for IVF and 36% for GIFT. Delivery rates were 42% for IVF and 29% for GIFT. The implantation rates for IVF were 23% and 17% for GIFT. No patient was admitted for ovarian hyperstimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to achieve satisfactory pregnancy and delivery rates in properly selected patients with a minimal monitoring protocol, limited to a single ultrasound near the end of a fixed-stimulation regimen. The reduced time commitment and cost led to a very high patient acceptance of this approach.

Optimal pregnancy outcome in a minimal-stimulation in vitro fertilization program

OBJECTIVE

We sought to provide a cost-beneficial approach to in vitro fertilization for infertile patients who could not afford the standard treatment with in vitro fertilization and to determine the optimal level of minimal ovarian stimulation to achieve acceptable pregnancy rates.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 216 patients who underwent "minimal stimulation" in vitro fertilization between January 1994 and December 1998. During the first half of this study, various minimal ovarian stimulation protocols were performed in our private, free-standing center for in vitro fertilization. More recently, more ovarian stimulation, including a 4-day protocol featuring gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare (ultrashort flare), was used. Clinical pregnancy outcome, multiple gestation, complications, and maternal age were compared between the first and second halves of this study.

RESULTS

The average ages of patients in the first half (phase 1) and the second half (phase 2) were similar, 32.4 +/- 0.3 versus 32.6 +/- 0.3 years, respectively. An average of 3.5 oocytes per retrieval was obtained in phase 1 versus 5.9 oocytes in phase 2. Failure to retrieve oocytes occurred in 3% of all cases. The mean number of embryos transferred per patient was 2.0 in phase 1 versus 2.4 in phase 2. In phase 1, 16.1% of patients failed to have viable embryos for transfer, in comparison with 9.7% in phase 2. The overall clinical pregnancy rate per retrieval was 16.9% in phase 1 versus 36. 6% in phase 2. Multiple gestation occurred in 5.0% of clinical pregnancies in phase 1 but increased to 33% in phase 2, with 9 sets of twins and 6 sets of triplets. The implantation rate was 9.3% for phase 1 versus 23.3% for phase 2. The clinical pregnancy rates per retrieval for phase 2 patients were 41.6% in women < or =34 years old and 25.6% for those > or =35 years old. No case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal ovarian stimulation in the setting of in vitro fertilization offers a cost-beneficial alternative to standard treatment with in vitro fertilization in infertile patients who are <35 years old and in women <40 years old who have adequate oocyte reserve. More stimulation improves outcome. Minimalstimulation in vitro fertilization provides an alternative for those patients who cannot afford standard in vitro fertilization or who are concerned with exposure to high dosages of fertility medications.

Simplification of the clinical phase of IVF and ICSI treatment in programmed cycles

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the success of a protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation allowing patient self-selection into groups for ovulation stimulation planned 8 weeks and more in advance following cycle synchronization, drug self-administration as well as a reduced number of folliculometries.

METHODS

A total of 714 patients received the same stimulation protocol. In 260 cases GnRH-a was applied daily and in 454 as depot. In all patients FSH-HP was self-administered subcutaneously for ovarian stimulation. In 316 patients IVF and in 398 patients ICSI was performed.

RESULTS

The delivery rate per started cycle was higher in patients receiving depot GnRH-a in the IVF and ICSI group (30.2 vs. 23.4) than in those receiving subcutaneous GnRH-a (20.2 vs. 22.1).

CONCLUSION

Programming of the IVF/ICSI cycle greatly simplifies treatment. A comparison of pregnancy rate and delivery rate per cycle between depot and subcutaneous daily application of GnRh-a did not confirm any statistically significant difference.

Ultrasound or ultrasound and hormonal determinations for in vitro fertilization monitoring

OBJECTIVE

To compare pregnancy rate, cost effectiveness, patients effort, related stress, and the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate, between patients monitored for ovarian hyperstimulation using a combination of ultrasound and hormonal determination (combination protocol), in contrast to applying ultrasound only, in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF ET).

METHOD

This study was carried out on a total of 206 patients who underwent ovarian hyperstimulation with human menopausal gonadotropin and human chorionic gonadotropin (hMG/hCG) protocol. The first 110 patients were monitored every other day by ultrasound only protocol (Group I) while the next 96 patients were monitored daily by a combination protocol (Group II). The pregnancy rate, taking home baby rate, OHSS rate and total cost of monitoring for each patient in both groups were calculated and compared. The patients and the IVF team effort and stress were also compared.

RESULT

Analysis of this study showed no statistical significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate and taking home baby rate between patients in protocol I and II (23.4% vs. 22.9%) and (14.8% vs. 14.3%), respectively. OHSS developed in only two patients--one in each group. The average cost of monitoring was significantly cheaper in Group I--78 Jordanian dinars (JD) vs. 222 JD in Group II (P < 0.0001). (NB: 1 USD = 0.7 JD).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound monitoring only proved to be cheaper, more convenient and less time consuming for both the patients and the IVF team. However, no significant difference was found regarding the clinical pregnancy rate and taking home baby rate between the two protocols.

Prospective evaluation of endometrial thickness as a predictor of pituitary down-regulation after gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue administration in an in vitro fertilization program

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether pituitary down-regulation after gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) administration can be accurately predicted by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

An IVF unit of an academic medical center.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred eighty-one patients undergoing 265 IVF-ET treatment cycles using GnRH-a in the long protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Serum concentrations of E2 were determined, and endometrial thickness was measured by transvaginal sonography. The accuracy of endometrial thickness for predicting pituitary down-regulation was calculated.

RESULT(S)

Pituitary down-regulation, defined as a serum E2 concentration of < or = 55 pg/mL, was achieved in 77% (204 of 265) of the cycles. An endometrial thickness of < or = 6 mm was found in 92.2% (188 of 204) of cycles in which down-regulation was achieved. An estradiol level of < or = 55 pg/mL was present in 95.9% (188 of 196) of cycles with endometrial thickness of < or = 6 mm.

CONCLUSION(S)

A state of relative hypoestrogenism after GnRH-a administration, indicative of pituitary down-regulation, can be predicted with a high degree of accuracy by ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness. Thus, routine testing for serum E2 concentration may be safely omitted. This may allow further simplification of IVF protocols and increase both cost-effectiveness and patients' convenience.

Preprogrammed, unmonitored ovarian stimulation reduces expense without compromising the outcome of assisted reproduction

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a novel, preprogrammed, unmonitored stimulation protocol could reduce the cost of assisted reproductive technology (ART) without compromising outcome or safety.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized study of unmonitored ART versus traditional monitoring.

SETTING

University ART program.

PATIENT(S)

Infertile women aged < 39 years, with a basal FSH level < 15 mIU/mL (conversion factor to SI unit, 1.00) and regular menstrual cycles, undergoing ART.

INTERVENTION(S)

Oocyte retrieval was performed at a predetermined time in 72 unmonitored cycles based on age and basal FSH level. No monitoring of any type was performed before retrieval. There were 86 monitored control cycles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The number of oocytes, and embryos; complications including ovarian hyperstimulation.

RESULT(S)

The total cost for unmonitored ART was significantly less than for monitored cycles. There was no difference between groups for patient age, number of oocytes obtained, or number of metaphase II oocytes. For non-male-factor patients, the number of oocytes fertilized, number of embryos transferred, and the clinical pregnancy rates were comparable. There was one case of severe hyperstimulation requiring hospitalization in the unmonitored group.

CONCLUSION(S)

This novel, unmonitored ovarian stimulation protocol provides ART at a significantly lower cost than is incurred with traditional monitoring, with no apparent compromise in outcome.

The ovarian response as a predictor for successful in vitro fertilization treatment after the age of 40 years

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether age or response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is a better predictor of IVF outcome in women > or = 40 years.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

A transport IVF program.

PATIENT(S)

For patients undergoing IVF treatment the correlation between treatment outcome and age and response to COH was analyzed using the data of 2,588 consecutive cycles.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy.

RESULT(S)

The incidence of poor ovarian response rises significantly with increasing age. Analysis of all cycles showed a significant decrease in clinical and ongoing pregnancy rate for women > or = 40 years. Analysis of cycles with a good ovarian response showed no statistically significant differences for these parameters between women > or = 40 years and those younger. A logistic regression analysis on pregnancy showed that ovarian response contributes more to the prediction of pregnancy than age.

CONCLUSION(S)

Patients aged > or = 40 years with a good response to COH have a good prognosis for IVF treatment. The age limit for acceptance of patients should not be set at 40 years. Instead, the response to COH can be used to predict candidates likely to have a successful IVF outcome.