Seminal fluid antisperm antibodies measured by direct flow cytometry do not correlate with those measured by indirect flow cytometry, the indirect immunobead test, and the indirect mixed antiglobulin reaction

Antisperm antibodies detection by flow cytometry is affected by aggregation of antigen-antibody complexes on the surface of spermatozoa

Flow cytometry (FCM) analysis of live antibody-coated spermatozoa subjected to immunofluorescence staining (FCM test) is considered an objective method for the quantitative detection of antisperm antibodies (ASA). But the cross-linking of cell surface antigen (Ag) with bivalent antibodies and/or antigen-antibody (Ag-Ab) complexes with second antibodies may induce the reorganization of surface components (patching and capping) and result in their shedding from the sperm surface. The present study estimates the relationship between aggregation of Ag-Ab complexes on the sperm surface and the results of indirect FCM test. Swim-up spermatozoa of normozoospermic men were incubated with ASA-positive sera from infertile patients and with second antibodies fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled goat anti-human IgG polyclonal antiserum under different conditions and then analysed by FCM and fluorescence microscopy. It was shown that low temperature, cytochalasin B, excess or lack of the primary and/or secondary antibodies and sperm fixation by paraformaldehyde may inhibit aggregation and shedding of Ag-Ab complexes and dramatically increase ASA quantity determined on the sperm surface. However, inhibition of aggregation on the live sperm surface was observed only in a minority of ASA-positive samples and was poorly reproducible using semen of different donors. A high probability of Ag-Ab complex shedding from the sperm surface during experimental manipulation limits the use of indirect FCM test for quantitative ASA determination.

Detection of antisperm antibodies in seminal plasma by flow cytometry: comparison with the indirect immunobead binding test

OBJECTIVE

To compare flow cytometry with the established indirect immunobead binding test (IBT) for the detection of antisperm antibodies in seminal plasma.

DESIGN

A prospective, comparative study.

SETTING

University-based andrology unit.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred and fifty-eight men with suspected male factor subfertility.

INTERVENTION(S)

Seminal plasma samples were incubated with antisperm antibody-negative donor sperm. Surface-bound antibody was detected with fluorescence-labeled antihuman antibody in the flow cytometry assay or with immunobead-labeled antihuman antibody in the IBT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The percentage of sperm that tested positive for surface-bound antibody was determined in the two assays. Seminal plasma was antisperm antibody-positive when > or = 20% of the sperm were antibody-bound, and clinically significant levels were present when > or = 50% of the sperm were antibody-bound.

RESULT(S)

Of 71 samples that were negative by the IMT, 66 (93%) also were negative by flow cytometry. Of 63 samples that had > or = 50% immunobead binding, 55 had equivalent results by flow cytometry. Overall statistical analysis showed a good correlation between the two assays.

CONCLUSION(S)

There is a good correlation between the indirect IBT and indirect flow cytometry for the detection of antisperm antibodies in seminal plasma.