Pituitary function is altered during the same cycle in women with polycystic ovary syndrome treated with continuous or cyclic oral contraceptives or a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist

Contraception Selection, Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects: A Review

IMPORTANCE

Many women spend a substantial proportion of their lives preventing or planning for pregnancy, and approximately 87% of US women use contraception during their lifetime.

OBSERVATIONS

Contraceptive effectiveness is determined by a combination of drug or device efficacy, individual fecundability, coital frequency, and user adherence and continuation. In the US, oral contraceptive pills are the most commonly used reversible method of contraception and comprise 21.9% of all contraception in current use. Pregnancy rates of women using oral contraceptives are 4% to 7% per year. Use of long-acting methods, such as intrauterine devices and subdermal implants, has increased substantially, from 6% of all contraceptive users in 2008 to 17.8% in 2016; these methods have failure rates of less than 1% per year. Estrogen-containing methods, such as combined oral contraceptive pills, increase the risk of venous thrombosis from 2 to 10 venous thrombotic events per 10 000 women-years to 7 to 10 venous thrombotic events per 10 000 women-years, whereas progestin-only and nonhormonal methods, such as implants and condoms, are associated with rare serious risks. Hormonal contraceptives can improve medical conditions associated with hormonal changes related to the menstrual cycle, such as acne, endometriosis, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Optimal contraceptive selection requires patient and clinician discussion of the patient's tolerance for risk of pregnancy, menstrual bleeding changes, other risks, and personal values and preferences.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Oral contraceptive pills are the most commonly used reversible contraceptives, intrauterine devices and subdermal implants have the highest effectiveness, and progestin-only and nonhormonal methods have the lowest risks. Optimal contraceptive selection incorporates patient values and preferences.

Extended and Continuous Use of Hormonal Contraceptives to Reduce Menstruation

During the use of long-cycle regimens of monophasic oral contraceptives, the total number of bleeding and cycle-dependent complaints is considerably lower than during conventional treatment with oral contraceptives. Despite an initially higher rate of irregular bleeding, the majority of women prefer the long-cycle treatment since it may improve quality of life. As this regimen provides an enhanced ovarian suppression, it may prevent pregnancies, especially in noncompliant women or patients who are concomitantly treated with drugs that may impair the efficacy of oral contraceptives. Postponement or suppression of withdrawal bleeding also reduces menses-associated disorders such as menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea, and has beneficial effects in patients with hemorrhagic diathesis, endometriosis, uterine leiomyomas and polycystic ovary syndrome. Long-term studies are necessary to assess the impact of long-term use of extended regimens of oral contraceptives on safety, for example, the risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease, and on fertility after discontinuation of treatment.

Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception

BACKGROUND

The avoidance of menstruation through continuous or extended (greater than 28 days) administration of combination hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) has gained legitimacy through its use in treating endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, and menstruation-associated symptoms. Avoidance of menstruation through extended or continuous use of CHCs for reasons of personal preference may have additional advantages to women, including improved compliance, greater satisfaction, fewer menstrual symptoms, and less menstruation-related absenteeism from work or school.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the differences between continuous or extended-cycle CHCs (pills, patch, ring) in regimens of greater than 28 days of active hormone compared with traditional cyclic dosing (21 days of active hormone and 7 days of placebo, or 24 days of active hormones and 4 days of placebo). Our hypothesis was that continuous or extended-cycle CHCs have equivalent efficacy and safety but improved bleeding profiles, amenorrhea rates, adherence, continuation, participant satisfaction, and menstrual symptoms compared with standard cyclic CHCs.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched computerized databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PUBMED, EMBASE, POPLINE, LILACS) for trials using continuous or extended CHCs (oral contraceptives, contraceptive ring and patch) during the years 1966 to 2013. We also searched the references in review articles and publications identified for inclusion in the protocol. Investigators were contacted regarding additional references.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials in any language comparing continuous or extended-cycle (greater than 28 days of active hormones) versus traditional cyclic administration (21 days of active hormones and 7 days of placebo, or 24 days of active hormones and 4 days of placebo) of CHCs for contraception.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Titles and abstracts identified from the literature searches were assessed for potential inclusion. Data were extracted onto data collection forms and then entered into RevMan 5. Peto odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for all outcomes for dichotomous outcomes. Weighted mean difference was calculated for continuous outcomes. The trials were critically appraised by examining the following factors: study design, blinding, randomization method, group allocation concealment, exclusions after randomization, loss to follow-up, and early discontinuation. Because the included trials did not have a standard treatment (type of CHC formulation, route of delivery, or time length for continuous dosing), we could not aggregate data into meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. Study findings were similar between 28-day and extended or continuous regimens in regard to contraceptive efficacy (i.e., pregnancy rates) and safety profiles. When compliance was reported, no difference between 28-day and extended or continuous cycles was found. Participants reported high satisfaction with both dosing regimens, but this was not an outcome universally studied. Overall discontinuation and discontinuation for bleeding problems were not uniformly higher in either group. The studies that reported menstrual symptoms found that the extended or continuous group fared better in terms of headaches, genital irritation, tiredness, bloating, and menstrual pain. Eleven out of the twelve studies found that bleeding patterns were either equivalent between groups or improved with extended or continuous cycles over time. Endometrial lining assessments by ultrasound and/or endometrial biopsy were done in some participants and were all normal after cyclic or extended CHC use.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The 2014 update yielded four additional trials but unchanged conclusions. Evidence from existing randomized control trials comparing continuous or extended-cycle CHCs (greater than 28 days of active combined hormones) to traditional cyclic dosing (21 days of active hormone and 7 days of placebo, or 24 days of active hormone and 4 days of placebo) is of good quality. However, the variations in type of hormones and time length for extended-cycle dosing make a formal meta-analysis impossible. Future studies should choose a previously described type of CHC and dosing regimen. More attention needs to be directed towards participant satisfaction, continuation, and menstruation-associated symptoms.

Missed hormonal contraceptives: new recommendations

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based guidance for women and their health care providers on the management of missed or delayed hormonal contraceptive doses in order to prevent unintended pregnancy.

EVIDENCE

Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database were searched for articles published in English, from 1974 to 2007, about hormonal contraceptive methods that are available in Canada and that may be missed or delayed. Relevant publications and position papers from appropriate reproductive health and family planning organizations were also reviewed. The quality of evidence is rated using the criteria developed by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

This committee opinion will help health care providers offer clear information to women who have not been adherent in using hormonal contraception with the purpose of preventing unintended pregnancy.

SPONSORS

The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: 1. Instructions for what women should do when they miss hormonal contraception have been complex and women do not understand them correctly. (I) 2. The highest risk of ovulation occurs when the hormone-free interval is prolonged for more than seven days, either by delaying the start of combined hormonal contraceptives or by missing active hormone doses during the first or third weeks of combined oral contraceptives. (II) Ovulation rarely occurs after seven consecutive days of combined oral contraceptive use. (II) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Health care providers should give clear, simple instructions, both written and oral, on missed hormonal contraceptive pills as part of contraceptive counselling. (III-A) 2. Health care providers should provide women with telephone/electronic resources for reference in the event of missed or delayed hormonal contraceptives. (III-A) 3. In order to avoid an increased risk of unintended pregnancy, the hormone-free interval should not exceed seven days in combined hormonal contraceptive users. (II-A) 4. Back-up contraception should be used after one missed dose in the first week of hormones until seven consecutive days of correct hormone use are established. In the case of missed combined hormonal contraceptives in the second or third week of hormones, the hormone-free interval should be eliminated for that cycle. (III-A) 5. Emergency contraception and back-up contraception may be required in some instances of missed hormonal contraceptives, in particular when the hormone-free interval has been extended for more than seven days. (III-A) 6. Back-up contraception should be used when three or more consecutive doses/days of combined hormonal contraceptives are missed in the second and third week until seven consecutive days of correct hormone use are established. For practical reasons, the scheduled hormone-free interval should be eliminated in these cases. (II-A) 7. Emergency contraception is rarely indicated for missed combined hormonal contraceptives in the second or third week of the cycle unless there are repeated omissions or failure to institute back-up contraception after the missed doses. In cases of repeated omissions of combined hormonal contraceptives, emergency contraception may be required, and back-up contraception should be used. Health care professionals should counsel women in these situations on alternative methods of contraception that do not demand such stringent compliance. (III-A).

Effects of an oral contraceptive containing 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 2 mg dienogest on thyroid hormones and androgen parameters: conventional vs. extended-cycle use

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of an oral contraceptive containing 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 2 mg dienogest on thyroid hormones and androgen parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

Thyroid and androgen parameters were measured in 59 women treated with a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 2 mg dienogest (EE/DNG) either conventionally (13 cycles with 21 days of treatment+7 days without hormones) or according to an extended-cycle regimen (four extended cycles with 84 days of continuous administration of EE/DNG, followed by a hormone-free interval of 7 days). Blood samples were taken on Days 21-26 of the preceding control cycle and on Days 19-21 of the 3rd and 13th conventional cycle, or on Days 82-84 of the first and fourth extended cycle.

RESULTS

At both time points, the serum concentrations of thyroxine-binding globulin were elevated by about 65% in both treatment regimens. Likewise, both groups showed an increase in total triiodothyronine (T3) and total thyroxine (T4) by 30-40%, and no change in free T4. Until the 12th month of conventional treatment, the level of free T3 remained unchanged but decreased slightly during the extended-cycle regimen. In both groups there was a rise of sex hormone-binding globulin by 210-230% after 3 months and by 220-250% after 12 months. The levels of total testosterone were reduced by about 40% and those of free testosterone by 55-65% after 3 and 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that, during conventional and extended-cycle treatment with EE/DNG, a steady state in the effects on thyroid hormones and androgen parameters was reached within 3 months and that the changes in the various hormonal parameters did not substantially differ between conventional and extended-cycle regimen.

Treatment of PCOS in adolescence

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is increasingly being recognized in adolescent girls seeking treatment for signs and symptoms of hyperandrogenism. It is difficult to diagnose PCOS in adolescents, therefore a high index of suspicion is necessary. Timely screening and treatment are crucial because another important component of the syndrome is insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia increasing the risk for type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular sequelae. Diagnosis of PCOS in adolescents should include a thorough family history, exclusion of other causes of hyperandrogenism, and appropriate laboratory evaluation. The scarcity of controlled clinical trials makes treatment controversial. Therapeutic options include lifestyle intervention, oral contraceptive pills, and insulin sensitizers. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the effectiveness of these approaches in changing the natural history of the reproductive and metabolic outcomes without causing undue harm.

Continuous versus cyclic use of combined oral contraceptives for contraception: systematic Cochrane review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

With the recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of a combination oral contraceptive that causes a withdrawal bleed every 3 months instead of monthly, avoidance of menstruation through extended or continuous administration (>28 days of active pills) of combined oral contraceptives may become more commonplace for reasons of personal preference rather than limited to treatment of menstrual-associated medical disorders.

METHODS

The review aimed to compare contraceptive efficacy, compliance, continuation, satisfaction, bleeding profiles, and menstrual symptoms of combined oral contraceptives with continuous dosing (>28 days of active pills) versus traditional cyclic dosing (21 days of active pills and 7 days of placebo). We searched five computerized databases as well as reference lists of relevant articles for randomized controlled trials (RCT) using continuous or extended combined oral contraceptives for contraception. Two reviewers independently extracted data from eligible articles.

RESULTS

Six RCT met inclusion criteria and were of good quality. Contraceptive efficacy and compliance were similar between groups. Discontinuation overall, and for bleeding problems, was not uniformly higher in either group. When studied, participants reported high satisfaction with both dosing regimens. Five out of the six studies found that bleeding patterns were either equivalent or improved with continuous-dosing regimens. The continuous-dosing group had greater improvement of menstrual-associated symptoms (headaches, genital irritation, tiredness, bloating, and menstrual pain).

CONCLUSIONS

The variations in pill type and time-interval for continuous dosing make direct comparisons between regimens unfeasible. To allow for comparisons, future studies should choose a previously researched pill and dosing regimen. More attention needs to be directed towards participant satisfaction and menstruation-associated symptoms.

Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined oral contraceptives for contraception

BACKGROUND

The avoidance of menstruation through extended or continuous administration (greater than 28 days of active pills) of combination oral contraceptives (COCs) has gained legitimacy through its use in treating endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, and menstruation-associated symptoms. Avoidance of menstruation through continuous use of COCs for reasons of personal preference may have additional advantages to women, including improved compliance, greater satisfaction, fewer menstrual symptoms, and less menstruation-related absenteeism from work or school.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the differences between COCs dosed continuously (greater than 28 days of active pills) compared with traditional cyclic dosing (21 days of active pills and 7 days of placebo). Our hypothesis was that continuously administered COCs have equivalent efficacy and safety but improved bleeding profiles, amenorrhea rates, adherence, continuation, participant satisfaction, and menstrual symptoms compared with cyclic COCs.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched computerized databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE, LILACS) for trials using continuous or extended COCs during the years 1966 to 2005. We also searched the references in review articles and publications identified for inclusion in the protocol. Investigators were contacted regarding additional references.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials in any language comparing continuous (greater than 28 days of active pills) versus traditional cyclic administration (21 days of active pills and 7 days of placebo) of COCs for contraception.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Titles and abstracts identified from the literature searches were assessed for potential inclusion. Data were extracted onto data collection forms and then entered into RevMan 4.2. Peto odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for all outcomes for dichotomous outcomes. Weighted mean difference was calculated for continuous outcomes. The trials were critically appraised by examining the following factors: study design, blinding, randomization method, group allocation concealment, exclusions after randomization, loss to follow-up, and early discontinuation. Because the included trials did not have a standard treatment (type of pill and time length for continuous dosing), we could not aggregate data into meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. Study findings were similar between 28-day and extended cycles in regard to contraceptive efficacy (i.e., pregnancy rates) and safety profiles. When compliance was reported, no difference between 28-day and extended cycles was found. Participants reported high satisfaction with both dosing regimens, but this was not an outcome universally studied. Overall discontinuation and discontinuation for bleeding problems were not uniformly higher in either group in most studies. The few studies that reported menstrual symptoms found that the extended cycle group fared better in terms of headaches, genital irritation, tiredness, bloating, and menstrual pain. Five out of the six studies found that bleeding patterns were either equivalent between groups or improved with continuous-dosing regimens. Endometrial lining assessments by ultrasound were done in a small number of participants but all endometrial stripe measurements were less than 5 mm.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from existing randomized control trials comparing COCs given continuously (greater than 28 days of active pills) to traditional monthly cyclic dosing (21 days of active pills and 7 days of placebo) is of good quality. However, the variations in type of pill and time length for continuous dosing make direct comparisons between regimens impossible. Future studies should choose a previously described type of pill and dosing regimen. More attention needs to be directed towards participant satisfaction and menstruation-associated symptoms.

Combined oral contraceptives in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome

Combined oral contraceptives (COC) are the most often used treatment modality for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Undisputedly, COC suppress androgen production, thus ameliorating skin androgenic symptoms and improving menstrual dysfunction. On the other hand, there are still many unresolved issues concerning their metabolic effects. COC could decrease insulin sensitivity and deteriorate glucose tolerance, although the negative influence on insulin sensitivity is dependent on other factors (especially obesity) and this need not be expressed in non-obese patients. It is probable that the impairment of glucose tolerance is reversible, as the incidence of diabetes is not increased in past COC users. The effects of COC on the lipid spectrum are dependent on the type of gestagen, but lipid levels usually remain within the reference limits. Combination therapy of COC with weight reduction or insulin sensitizers could further suppress androgen levels and improve metabolic parameters. The establishment of COC after laparoscopic ovarian drilling may further decrease androgen levels. The combination of COC and GnRH analogues is not superior to COC therapy alone. Prospective data about the influence of COC on the risk of diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease and endometrial cancer in PCOS women are lacking.

Long-Cycle Treatment with Oral Contraceptives

The conventional regimen of oral contraceptive (OC) use mimics the natural cycles by causing regular withdrawal bleeding, which can be avoided by omission of the hormone-free interval of 7 days. Consequently, long-cycle regimens with continuous administration of OCs for 3 or 6 months followed by a hormone-free interval of 7 days may reduce the frequency of menstruations and cycle-dependent complaints. Surveys have revealed that, despite a higher rate of irregular bleeding, the majority of women prefer the long-cycle regimen to the conventional OC regimen with regular bleeds every 4 weeks because it may improve quality of life. As this regimen increases the contraceptive efficacy to a large degree, continuous treatment with OCs may prevent unintended pregnancies in women who miss a pill or are concomitantly treated with drugs that are able to impair the efficacy of OCs. Postponement of withdrawal bleeding may also reduce or prevent menses-associated disorders such as hypermenorrhoea and dysmenorrhoea, and have beneficial effects in patients with haemorrhagic diathesis, endometriosis, uterine leiomyoma and polycystic ovary syndrome. Continuous use of OCs prevents the cyclic fluctuations of serum levels of ethinylestradiol and progestogen and, hence, the cyclic variations of metabolic serum parameters. Although the long-cycle regimen is initially associated with an elevated rate of irregular bleeding, the total number of bleeding days that require sanitary product protection is lower than during conventional OC treatment. Many physicians tend to prescribe extended OC cycles for postponement of menstruation or reduction of frequency of regular bleeding. This review summarises and examines the available data on OC long-cycle regimens. The data suggest that the rate of treatment-related side effects with OCs according to the long-cycle regimen is similar to that of conventional OC regimens. However, clinical trials are necessary to assess the impact of long-term OC long cycles on safety, particularly the risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease, and fertility after discontinuation of treatment.

The debate regarding continuous use of oral contraceptives

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether oral contraceptives (OCs) can be used safely in a continuous manner to prevent monthly withdrawal bleeding.

DATA SOURCES

Search of MEDLINE (1966-2000), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-2000), and the Internet.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Several prospective studies have assessed the efficacy of continuous cycle OCs in preventing monthly withdrawal bleeding. Monophasic OCs are useful for this purpose. In studies using traditional OC regimens as a control, patients receiving continuously administered OCs experienced more breakthrough bleeding and spotting. Continuous use of OCs decreased headache and other menstruation-associated symptoms. No long-term trials have assessed the impact of continuous use of OCs on risk of cancer, thromboembolic disease, or fertility, concems raised by opponents of the method.

CONCLUSIONS

From the data available, continuous use of OCs is an effective method for delaying withdrawal bleeding. Long-term safety data are not available.

The trimonthly combination oral contraceptive regimen: is it cost effective?

The extended use of combination oral contraceptive pills (COCPs) to decrease the frequency of withdrawal bleeding can be convenient and beneficial to women. We conducted a cost-effective analysis comparing the standard regimen (21 days of estrogen/progestin) to a trimonthly regimen (84 days of estrogen/progestin) followed by a pill-free week for 1-year. The economic savings for patient out-of-pocket expenses from decreased sanitary product usage as a result of nine fewer withdrawal bleeding episodes is offset by the cost of three extra packages of COCPs from the trimonthly regimen. On the basis of an average use of 18 tampons per month, the trimonthly regimen is cost effective when the patient cost per package of pills is less than $9.45. The trimonthly regimen is also cost effective when the sanitary product usage is in the higher range; an above average use of 48 tampons per month is cost effective when the patient cost per package of pills is less than $25.20. Therefore, the trimonthly regimen may be useful for women with menorrhagia, but for the average women, the qualitative benefits of less frequent withdrawal bleeding need to be weighed against an increase in cost.

Role of the mutations Trp8 => Arg and Ile15 => Thr of the human luteinizing hormone beta-subunit in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical significance of LH in the form of a mutant beta-subunit in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

DESIGN

Prospective, controlled study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Thirty healthy women and 30 women with PCOS.

INTERVENTION(S)

Clinical, ultrasonographic, and hormonal findings were used to define PCOS. Nucleotide mutations within codons 8 and 15 in the LH beta-subunit gene (Trp8 => Arg and Ile15 => Thr) were analyzed with the use of polymerase chain reaction and subsequent restriction fragment length polymorphism.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Serum levels of gonadotropins, androgens, E2, and prolactin were determined, and the results of restriction fragment length polymorphism were analyzed.

RESULT(S)

Five women in the control group and one woman in the PCOS group were found to be affected by the LHbeta gene mutations. No difference was observed in serum androgen and E2 levels between the affected women and 25 healthy women who were homozygous for the wild-type LH. However, women whose serum LH levels were < or = 5.1 mIU/mL had a higher risk of having mutant LH.

CONCLUSION(S)

The frequency of LH mutations in women with PCOS is similar to that in healthy women. The presence of the variant does not cause any significant change in serum levels of androgens and E2.

Role of GnRH drive in the pathophysiology of polycystic ovary syndrome

Polycystic ovary syndrome may result from multiple mechanisms, but full expression of the PCO syndrome with hyperandrogenic anovulation depends upon sustained LH drive and relative FSH deficiency. We have described possible intrinsic and extrinsic factors capable of modifying the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis. Available evidence suggests the presence of an intrinsic alteration in GnRH-LH drive. The long-term natural history of HAA is variable and depends on several factors including obesity, aberrations in insulin action, intrinsic ovarian function, and end-organ responsiveness to androgens. Figure 1 presents a conceptualization of the pathogenesis of PCOS diagramming the multiple modulators of its expression. Long-term suppression of androgens when fertility is not desired should modify the full expression of the PCO syndrome. It is important to appreciate that therapy with oral contraceptive agents has few drawbacks and many immediate and potential long-term benefits for women with HAA. This therapy may be of greatest benefit when started in adolescence prior to the progression of obesity, hirsutism, and thecal-stromal hyperplasia. Women with HAA represent a large subgroup of patients who require individualization of their health care with sensitivity to issues surrounding anovulation, obesity, hirsutism, and infertility.

Combined oral contraceptives and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonistic analogs in polycystic ovary syndrome: clinical and experimental studies

Polycystic ovary syndrome is a common endocrine disorder, presenting with menstrual irregularities, hirsutism, obesity, infertility and abnormal ovarian morphology. In addition, polycystic ovary syndrome is associated with a self-perpetuating imbalance involving the endocrine system and metabolic pathways, in which carbohydrates, lipids and growth factors are involved. Because of its chronicity, it is considered to be a substantial risk factor for atherogenesis and hormone-dependent neoplasia. The etiology and pathophysiology of the syndrome remain elusive. However, during the last decade, several clues have emerged from human and animal studies that may have significant repercussions in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome. Therapeutic maneuvers should be directed towards the dominant abnormalities present in individual patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists can directly affect the gonadotropin generator and secondary downstream derangements, whereas combined oral contraceptives (COCs) can modify hypothalamic as well as peripheral abnormalities. In view of the fact that GnRH agonistic analogs (GnRH-a) will induce hypoestrogenemia and its sequelae, the add-back strategy of estrogenic supplementation is recommended for preventive reasons and, as it transpires from some studies, for enhancement of GnRH-a effectiveness.

Resistance of gonadotropin releasing hormone drive to sex steroid-induced suppression in hyperandrogenic anovulation

Women with hyperandrogenic anovulation (HAA) exhibit increased GnRH drive, as evidenced by a faster LH pulse frequency that slows in response to progestin-induced opioidergic tone. To determine whether increased GnRH-LH drive in HAA reflects altered sex steroid exposure caused by chronic anovulation or is an intrinsic hypothalamic attribute, we compared the pulsatile LH response to oral contraceptive (OC)-induced suppression in seven women with HAA, with that of seven eumenorrheic women (EW). LH levels were determined at 10-min intervals for 12 h after 19-21 days of OC use and 5-7 days after cessation. Testosterone, androstenedione, estradiol, FSH, and LH levels were determined at weekly intervals before, during, and after OC use. LH pulse number/12 h was higher (P < 0.001) in HAA during and after OCs, when compared with that of EW. Mean LH was increased in HAA before, during, and after OCs. Testosterone, androstenedione, and estradiol levels were higher in HAA before OCs, but they decreased to similar levels during OC use in both groups. FSH concentrations were similar before and during OCs but rose more after cessation of OCs in EW. These findings indicate that GnRH drive in HAA is resistant to OC-induced suppression and, therefore, could be an intrinsic hypothalamic attribute.