The effect of gonadotropin suppression on the induction of ovulation in premature ovarian failure patients

Follicle development and its prediction in patients with primary ovarian insufficiency: Possible treatments and markers to maximize the ability to conceive with residual follicles

Background

Primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) is characterized by the development of hypergonadotropic hypogonadism before 40 years of age and leads to intractable infertility. Although in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer with donated eggs enables pregnancy, not a few patients desire pregnancy using their oocytes. However, follicular development is rare and unpredictable in patients with POI. Thus, there is a need for treatments that promote the development of residual follicles and methods to accurately predict infrequent ovulation.

Methods

This review discusses the effects of various treatments for obtaining eggs from POI patients. Furthermore, this study focused a potential marker for predicting follicular growth in patients with POI.

Main Findings

Different treatments such as hormone-replacement therapy, dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation, platelet-rich plasma injection, and in vitro activation have shown varying degrees of effectiveness in retrieving oocytes from patients with POI. To predict follicle development in the cycle, elevated serum estradiol and reduced follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels are important. However, these markers are not always reliable under continuous estradiol-replacement therapy. As a novel marker for predicting follicle growth, serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, measured using the picoAMH enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, were found to predict follicle growth in patients and the cycle.

Conclusion

This review highlights the challenges and available interventions for achieving pregnancy using a patient's oocytes in cases of POI. We believe that a combination of currently available treatments and prediction methods is the best strategy to enable patients with POI to conceive using their own eggs. Although AMH levels may predict follicle growth, further research is necessary to improve the chances of successful follicular development and conception in patients with POI.

Failed ovarian cortex transplant but successful ovulation induction in a cancer survivor with premature ovarian failure: A paradox

Better diagnostic and treatment modalities for malignancies occurring in childhood and young age have increased the overall survival of the affected young girls and boys, but this has come at a cost of developing premature ovarian failure in girls and azoospermia in boys because of the gonadotoxicity of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Thus, young girls and women of reproductive age who are at risk of ovarian failure due to cancer treatment must be mandatorily offered fertility preservation in any form such as cryopreservation of mature metaphase II oocytes after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins and oocyte recovery and cryopreservation of embryos if the young female has a partner. However, these modalities may require the postponement of chemotherapy. Thus, in such instances, cryopreservation of ovarian tissue remains the only option. Herein, we report a case of a nulligravid young female patient who had stage IV Hodgkin's lymphoma and had to be taken up for immediate fertility preservation owing to the advanced stage of the disease. Therefore, cryopreservation of ovarian tissue was performed. The uniqueness of the case is that after remission of the disease was achieved with chemotherapy, transplantation of the ovarian tissue was carried out which was not successful, but the desire for motherhood prompted to carry out an ovulation induction in the remnant native ovary with a severely compromised ovarian reserve, and she conceived.

Very Low Levels of Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone as a Possible Marker for Follicle Growth in Patients with Primary Ovarian Insufficiency Under Hormone Replacement Therapy

Patients with primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) occasionally present with follicle growth; however, accurately predicting cycles accompanied by follicle growth is challenging. Early-stage follicles produce serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a useful marker of ovarian reserve. Therefore, serum AMH levels indicate growth of small follicles (which are difficult to detect ultrasonographically) and may predict follicle growth in patients with POI. Using an ultrasensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit, we observed very low serum AMH levels in patients with POI. We further evaluated follicle growth in each patient during each cycle to determine the usefulness of measuring serum AMH levels as a predictor of follicle growth in patients with POI who receive hormone replacement therapy (HRT). We investigated 19 patients with POI in whom we analyzed 91 cycles; 14 cycles showed positive and 77 cycles showed negative results on serum AMH testing. The rate of cycles showing follicle growth in AMH-positive cycles was higher than that in AMH-negative cycles (64.3% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.0001). The median serum AMH level (7.7 pg/mL [25th and 75th percentiles 4.6 pg/mL and 22.3 pg/mL, respectively]) in AMH-positive cycles was lower than the lower limit of detection of conventional AMH ELISA kits. The positive predictive value of positive serum AMH levels for follicle growth was higher than that of follicle-stimulating hormone (< 10 mIU/mL). These results indicate that a very low level of serum AMH detected using picoAMH assays is a useful predictor of follicle growth in patients with POI receiving HRT.

Oral contraceptive pill, progestogen or oestrogen pretreatment for ovarian stimulation protocols for women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques

BACKGROUND

Among subfertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART), hormone pills given before ovarian stimulation may improve outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether pretreatment with the combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) or with a progestogen or oestrogen alone in ovarian stimulation protocols affects outcomes in subfertile couples undergoing ART.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases from inception to January 2017: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, The Cochrane Central Register Studies Online, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and registers of ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of hormonal pretreatment in women undergoing ART.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary review outcomes were live birth or ongoing pregnancy and pregnancy loss.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 29 RCTs (4701 women) of pretreatment with COCPs, progestogens or oestrogens versus no pretreatment or alternative pretreatments, in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or antagonist cycles. Overall, evidence quality ranged from very low to moderate. The main limitations were risk of bias and imprecision. Most studies did not describe their methods in adequate detail. Combined oral contraceptive pill versus no pretreatmentWith antagonist cycles in both groups the rate of live birth or ongoing pregnancy was lower in the pretreatment group (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.95; 6 RCTs; 1335 women; I² = 0%; moderate quality evidence). There was insufficient evidence to determine whether the groups differed in rates of pregnancy loss (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.26; 5 RCTs; 868 women; I² = 0%; moderate quality evidence), multiple pregnancy (OR 2.21, 95% CI 0.53 to 9.26; 2 RCTs; 125 women; I² = 0%; low quality evidence), ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS; OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.28 to 3.40; 2 RCTs; 642 women; I² = 0%, low quality evidence), or ovarian cyst formation (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.75; 1 RCT; 64 women; very low quality evidence).In COCP plus antagonist cycles versus no pretreatment in agonist cycles, there was insufficient evidence to determine whether the groups differed in rates of live birth or ongoing pregnancy (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.25; 4 RCTs; 724 women; I² = 0%; moderate quality evidence), multiple pregnancy (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.19; 4 RCTs; 546 women; I² = 0%; moderate quality evidence), or OHSS (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.96; 2 RCTs; 290 women, I² = 0%), but there were fewer pregnancy losses in the pretreatment group (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.72; 5 RCTs; 780 women; I² = 0%; moderate quality evidence). There were no data suitable for analysis on ovarian cyst formation.One small study comparing COCP versus no pretreatment in agonist cycles showed no clear difference between the groups for any of the reported outcomes. Progestogen versus no pretreatmentAll studies used the same protocol (antagonist, agonist or gonadotrophins) in both groups. There was insufficient evidence to determine any differences in rates of live birth or ongoing pregnancy (agonist: OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.65; 2 RCTs; 222 women; I² = 24%; low quality evidence; antagonist: OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.18 to 2.54; 1 RCT; 47 women; low quality evidence; gonadotrophins: OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.09 to 4.23; 1 RCT; 42 women; very low quality evidence), pregnancy loss (agonist: OR 2.26, 95% CI 0.67 to 7.55; 2 RCTs; 222 women; I² = 0%; low quality evidence; antagonist: OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.06 to 2.09; 1 RCT; 47 women; low quality evidence; gonadotrophins: OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 17.12; 1 RCT; 42 women; very low quality evidence) or multiple pregnancy (agonist: no data available; antagonist: OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.06 to 17.76; 1 RCT; 47 women; low quality evidence; gonadotrophins: no data available). Three studies, all using agonist cycles, reported ovarian cyst formation: rates were lower in the pretreatment group (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.32; 374 women; I² = 1%; moderate quality evidence). There were no data on OHSS. Oestrogen versus no pretreatmentIn antagonist or agonist cycles, there was insufficient evidence to determine whether the groups differed in rates of live birth or ongoing pregnancy (antagonist versus antagonist: OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.17; 2 RCTs; 502 women; I² = 0%; low quality evidence; antagonist versus agonist: OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.50; 2 RCTs; 242 women; I² = 0%; very low quality evidence), pregnancy loss (antagonist versus antagonist: OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.47; 1 RCT; 49 women; very low quality evidence; antagonist versus agonist: OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.62 to 4.06; 1 RCT; 220 women; very low quality evidence), multiple pregnancy (antagonist versus antagonist: no data available; antagonist versus agonist: OR 2.24, 95% CI 0.09 to 53.59; 1 RCT; 22 women; very low quality evidence) or OHSS (antagonist versus antagonist: no data available; antagonist versus agonist: OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.25 to 9.42; 1 RCT; 220 women). Ovarian cyst formation was not reported. Head-to-head comparisonsCOCP was compared with progestogen (1 RCT, 44 women), and with oestrogen (2 RCTs, 146 women), and progestogen was compared with oestrogen (1 RCT, 48 women), with an antagonist cycle in both groups. COCP in an agonist cycle was compared with oestrogen in an antagonist cycle (1 RCT, 25 women). Data were scant but there was no clear evidence that any of the groups differed in rates of live birth or ongoing pregnancy, pregnancy loss or other adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Among women undergoing ovarian stimulation in antagonist protocols, COCP pretreatment was associated with a lower rate of live birth or ongoing pregnancy than no pretreatment. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether rates of live birth or ongoing pregnancy were influenced by pretreatment with progestogens or oestrogens, or by COCP pretreatment using other stimulation protocols. Findings on adverse events were inconclusive, except that progesterone pretreatment may reduce the risk of ovarian cysts in agonist cycles, and COCP in antagonist cycles may reduce the risk of pregnancy loss compared with no pretreatment in agonist cycles.

Long-term outcome of ovarian function in women with intermittent premature ovarian insufficiency

CONTEXT

Spontaneous resumption of ovarian function is not a rare phenomenon in patients with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). The outcome of this resumption is not known.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the outcome following the resumption of ovarian function in POI patients.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

University medical centre.

PATIENTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cumulative incidence of ovarian function resumption and risk factors arresting this resumption during follow-up were determined in a large cohort of POI women.

RESULTS

Five hundred and seven patients were included in the study, with a follow-up of 3·44 ± 4·05 years (0-29). Of these, 117 (23%) had features of ovarian function resumption. The cumulative incidence of pregnancy was 3·5% among the whole cohort and 15·3% among patients with resumption of ovarian function. Fifty-five patients (47%) experienced an arrest of their resumption during the follow-up period. In univariate analysis, high FSH and DHEA levels at initial evaluation were risk factors for the arrest of the resumption of ovarian function. In multivariate analysis, high FSH levels at the initial evaluation [1·89 (1·10-3·23), P = 0·03] and older age at diagnosis [1·53 (1·01-2·33), P = 0·04] were risk factors for the arrest of this resumption.

CONCLUSION

Resumption of ovarian function is not a rare or brief phenomenon in POI women. The identification of predictive factors of this resumption, as well as its duration, increases our knowledge of the natural history of POI, and will improve the medical management, especially infertility counselling of these patients.

[Premature ovarian failure]

This article is a review on different aspects of premature ovarian failure (POF) defined as the development of hypogonadism in women before 40 years of age. The review will discuss the etiopathogeny, autoimmune and iatrogenic causes, abnormalities of chromosome X, as well as clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment. Most of the women with this disorder do not have menstrual history, specific of POF development, but infertility associated with the diagnosis is the most problematic aspect of the disease.

Premature ovarian insufficiency: how to improve reproductive outcome?

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a life-changing condition that affects women in their reproductive age. The condition is not necessarily permanent but is associated with intermittent and unpredictable ovarian activity. Hence, spontaneous pregnancies have been reported to be 5-10%. However, pregnancy in patients with POI is still unlikely and rare. Although, there are reviews on POI in the literature, there is a lack of reports which focus on how to improve the reproductive outcome of these women who wish to conceive spontaneously or use assisted conception with their own oocytes. We found that there is no conclusive evidence of which treatment is optimal for women with POI who wish to conceive using their own gametes. However, one could surmise that it is important to lower gonadotropin levels into the physiological range before embarking on any treatment, even if natural conception is the only choice for the woman/couple. In the future, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials should be carried out, which may entail recruitment of patients from various centers nationally and internationally to increase the sample size and therefore achieve a powered study. This may standardize the treatment of women with POI who wish to conceive and ultimately have their biological child.

Medical alternatives to oocyte donation in women with premature ovarian failure: a systematic review

Oocyte donation can satisfy the desire to have children in women with premature ovarian failure (POF) but little progress has been made to improve reproduction using the patients' own gametes. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of alternative treatments to oocyte donation in patients with POF. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from January 1988 to January 2012 using descriptors related to POF, ovulation induction, and pregnancy was made. Randomized clinical trials of women with POF undergoing various treatments to achieve ovulation induction, often compared with alternative treatment and placebo groups, were only selected. Outcomes of interest were those related to pregnancy (biochemical and live birth). Twelve trials were included and analysed for methodology, inclusion and exclusion criteria, number of patients included, characteristics and type of intervention, and results in terms of ovulation rate, pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate. The large methodological variability among studies prevented to combined data for a meta-analysis. None of the studies showed statistically significant differences between the study groups. The lack of case-control studies with a placebo group makes it impossible to establish differences between a treatment and no treatment.

Oral contraceptive pill, progestogen or estrogen pre-treatment for ovarian stimulation protocols for women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques

BACKGROUND

For many subfertile women, assisted reproductive techniques (ART) is the only hope for a pregnancy and live birth. The combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP) given prior to the hormone therapy in an IVF cycle may result in better pregnancy outcomes of ART.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether pre-treatment with combined OCPs, progestogens or estrogens in ovarian stimulation protocols affects outcomes in subfertile couples undergoing ART.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO. Other electronic resources on the Internet, reference list of relevant articles were also searched as well as the ESHRE abstracts (2008). All these searches were conducted in November 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of pre-treatment with combined OCP, progestogen or estrogen in subfertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed risk of bias. We calculated Peto odds ratios for dichotomous data and weighted mean difference for continuous variables. Authors of trials were contacted in case of missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

No evidence of effect was found with regard to the number of live births when using a pre-treatment. However, the combined OCP in GnRH antagonist cycles, compared to no pre-treatment, is associated with fewer clinical pregnancies (Peto OR 0.69, P = 0.03) and more days and a higher amount of gonadotrophin therapy (respectively: MD 1.44, P < 0.00001; and MD 691.69, P < 0.00001). Also compared to placebo or no pre-treatment, a progestogen pre-treatment in GnRH agonist cycles, is associated with more clinical pregnancies (Peto OR 1.95, P = 0.007) and fewer ovarian cysts (Peto OR 0.21, P < 0.00001). At last, in estrogen pre-treated GnRH antagonist cycles, compared to no pre-treatment, more oocytes are retrieved (MD 2.01, P < 0.00001), but a higher amount of gonadotrophin therapy is needed (MD 207.08, P < 0.00001). For the other outcomes no evidence of effect was found or there were not enough studies available in the subgroup for pooling.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was evidence of improved pregnancy outcomes with progestogen pre-treatment and poorer pregnancy outcomes with a combined OCP pre-treatment. However, we conclude that major changes in ART protocols should not be made at this time, since the number of overall studies in the subgroups is small and reporting of the major outcomes is inadequate.

A prospective evaluation of antral follicle function in women with 46,XX spontaneous primary ovarian insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

To assess ovarian follicle function in women with 46,XX spontaneous primary ovarian insufficiency.

DESIGN

Case-control with nested prospective cohort.

SETTING

Clinical Research Center, National Institutes of Health.

PATIENT(S)

Women with primary ovarian insufficiency without estrogen replacement for 2 weeks (N = 97) and regularly menstruating control women (N = 42).

INTERVENTION(S)

Single injection of 300 IU hrFSH.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Change in serum estradiol at 24 hours.

RESULT(S)

Antral follicles ≥3 mm were detected in 73% (69/95) of patients; both serum estradiol and progesterone levels correlated significantly with maximum follicle diameter in these women. Patients with a maximum follicle diameter ≥8 mm had significantly higher serum estradiol and progesterone levels and significantly lower FSH and LH levels compared with patients without such follicles. In controls estradiol levels increased significantly after FSH administration, but in patients this was not the case despite the presence of an antral follicle ≥8 mm.

CONCLUSION(S)

Most women with 46,XX spontaneous primary ovarian insufficiency have antral follicles detectable by ultrasound, suggesting that down-regulation of FSH receptors is not the predominant mechanism of follicle dysfunction. Evidence of progesterone secretion by antral follicles ≥8 mm in these patients is consistent with prior histologic evidence that follicle luteinization is the predominant mechanism of follicle dysfunction in this condition. Prospective controlled investigation designed to improve ovulatory function and fertility in these women is indicated.

Effects of pretreatment with estrogens on ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins in women with premature ovarian failure: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the hypothesis that pretreatment with estrogens in women affected by premature ovarian failure (POF) may improve the results of ovarian stimulation.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Outpatient department in an academic research environment.

PATIENT(S)

Fifty women with POF seeking pregnancy.

INTERVENTION(S)

Before starting ovarian stimulation, group 1 received 0.05 mg ethinyl-E(2) (EE) three times a day for 2 weeks, while group 2 received placebo. Ovarian stimulation was carried out with recombinant FSH (r-betaFSH), 200 IU/day/SC. Both EE and placebo were administered during ovarian stimulation. Human chorionic gonadotropin (10,000 IU/IM) was added when the follicle exceeded a mean diameter of 18 mm.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Rate of ovulation in women with POF.

RESULT(S)

Levels of FSH before stimulation were significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2. The rate of ovulation in group 1 (8/25; 32%) was significantly higher than in group 2 (0/25; 0%). Notably, induction of ovulation was successful only in patients whose FSH levels after EE treatment were < or =15 mIU/mL.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our data suggest that pretreatment with EE improves the success of rate of ovulation induction with exogenous gonadotropins in patients with POF. A threshold of FSH < or =15 mIU/mL should be achieved before starting ovarian stimulation.

Premature ovarian failure

Premature ovarian failure (POF) causing hypergonadotrophic hypogonadism occurs in 1% of women. In majority of cases the underlying cause is not identified. The known causes include: (a) Genetic aberrations, which could involve the X chromosome or autosomes. A large number of genes have been screened as candidates for causing POF; however, few clear causal mutations have been identified. (b) Autoimmune ovarian damage, as suggested by the observed association of POF with other autoimmune disorders. Anti-ovarian antibodies are reported in POF by several studies, but their specificity and pathogenic role are questionable. (c) Iatrogenic following surgical, radiotherapeutic or chemotherapeutic interventions as in malignancies. (d) Environmental factors like viral infections and toxins for whom no clear mechanism is known. The diagnosis is based on finding of amenorrhoea before age 40 associated with FSH levels in the menopausal range. Screening for associated autoimmune disorders and karyotyping, particularly in early onset disease, constitute part of the diagnostic work-up. There is no role of ovarian biopsy or ultrasound in making the diagnosis. Management essentially involves hormone replacement and infertility treatment, the only proven means for the latter being assisted conception with donated oocytes. Embryo cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation and oocyte cryopreservation hold promise in cases where ovarian failure is foreseeable as in women undergoing cancer treatments.

Egg donation--the donor's view: an aid to future recruitment

The major stumbling block for egg donation lies in the recruitment of sufficient suitable donors. This study ascertained the views of egg donors in the UK by analysing 113 completed questionnaires that asked questions about demographics, stimulus to donate, support network available, ethics, the 'process' of donation and payment. Ideas for future recruitment were also sought. The mean age of donors was 31.7 years, and most donors were donating for the first time. Ninety-one per cent of donors were Caucasian and 93% had children of their own. Ninety-six (85%) donors felt fully supported in their decision to become an egg donor and 60 (53%) discussed their donation with their GP. Information regarding egg donation came from many sources. The main motivation to donate was a desire to help childless couples. Many respondents had themselves suffered, or knew of couples with, infertility. Eighty-three (73.5%) respondents felt that expenses alone should be paid to egg donors, and many expressed concerns that large financial incentives may attract the 'wrong women' to donate. Forty-nine (43%) respondents found the procedure painful or stressful in some way, although 95% had no regrets concerning their donation, and 72% would donate again. A common reason for donors not wishing to donate again was age restriction. Respondents were asked their opinion with regard to recruitment and the enthusiasm they expressed needs to be harnessed if the current shortcomings in available donors are to be overcome. Specific recommendations to achieve this are made.

Premature ovarian failure: etiology and prospects

A search of past and current articles on ovarian physiology and premature ovarian failure (POF) using MEDLINE was performed in order to present an overview of clinical manifestations, necessary laboratory investigations, possible etiologies and treatments for POF. POF is defined as gonadal failure before the age of 40 years. Initially, POF was thought to be permanent, but it is now believed that spontaneous remissions and even pregnancies are possible in affected women. In most cases, the etiology of POF remains elusive, but several rare specific causes have been identified. Although the etiology of POF is heterogenic, the treatment principles are the same. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is still the cornerstone of treatment. The only proven method of obtaining a pregnancy in patients with POF is fertilization of a donor oocyte. Cryopreservation of oocytes has worked well in animals but awaits refinement before it can be applied routinely to humans with prodromal POF, or to patients before chemotherapy or irradiation in order to save their oocytes for future fertilization. New alternatives to traditional HRT and methods of fertility preservation are under development, but understanding of the basic pathophysiology of POF is necessary for the development and use of innovative treatments.

Unexpected pregnancy during hormone-replacement therapy in a woman with elevated follicle-stimulating hormone levels and amenorrhea

Pregnancy in patients with hypergonadotropic amenorrhea, although previously reported, remains quite rare. Women may conceive spontaneously or following different regimens of ovulation induction, thus indicating that ovarian failure is not always permanent. The case of an 18-year-old woman with premature ovarian failure, who conceived during hormone-replacement therapy, is reported. During hormone-replacement therapy, elevated gonadotropin levels returned to the physiologically normal range. It is suggested that this restored the receptors to luteinizing hormone and to follicle-stimulating hormone, which might have been downregulated. This hypothesis is supported by previous results from clinical trials and experimental work on a rat model.

The significance of elevated early follicular-phase follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels: observations in unstimulated in vitro fertilization cycles

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine the effect of elevated early follicular-phase serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels on follicle growth and oocyte maturity in unstimulated in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.

STUDY DESIGN

We compared cycles with elevated day 3 FSH levels (> 20 mIU/ml) to subsequent cycles in the same patients when day 3 FSH returned to normal and to cycles among women with normal day 3 FSH levels.

PATIENTS

Seven cycles in seven patients had an elevated day 3 FSH (high-FSH group). These were compared to 11 subsequent cycles in which there was a return to a normal baseline FSH and to 13 cycles in 13 patients that entered the unstimulated protocol with a normal baseline day 3 FSH.

RESULTS

The day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration was similar in all groups as were the serum estradiol (E2) levels. Although the high-FSH group tended to have smaller maximum follicular diameters, the difference was not statistically significant. The highest FSH level on cycle day 3 in a completed cycle was 56.2 mIU/ml. The total number of oocytes aspirated and the number of embryos obtained was similar in all groups. Whereas there were no pregnancies in the high-FSH group, 2 of the subsequent 11 normal day 3 FSH cycles resulted in clinical pregnancies. Two of the 13 patients in the normal day 3 FSH values also achieved pregnancies.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that cycle day 3 serum FSH levels as high as 56.2 mIU/ml may be associated with apparently normal follicular growth, oocyte fertilization, and embryo cleavage in unstimulated cycles. However, pregnancies are not observed. In addition, FSH levels vary widely from cycle to cycle and elevated levels in one cycle do not necessarily imply that pregnancy may not occur in a subsequent cycle when FSH levels return to normal.

Ovulation induction in premature ovarian failure: a placebo-controlled randomized trial combining pituitary suppression with gonadotropin stimulation

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of pituitary suppression with a GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) on the success of ovulation induction with exogenous gonadotropins in patients with premature ovarian failure (POF).

DESIGN

Placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study. The data were analyzed with a Fisher exact test.

SETTING

A tertiary care academic center for Reproductive Endocrinology and Fertility.

PATIENTS

Thirty patients with POF, 15 in each group.

INTERVENTIONS

The study consisted of four phases: phase 1, no interventions; phase 2, a 4-week period in which the patients received either 1,000 micrograms intranasal buserelin acetate daily or placebo; phase 3, a 3-week period during which the patients additionally received hMG in weekly augmented doses, two, four, and six ampules daily in the first, second, and third weeks, respectively. Ovulation was induced whenever the follicular diameter reached 18 mm and/or total 24-hour estrogen excretion > 140 micrograms (500 nmol). Luteal support was 5,000 IU hCG every 72 hours; phase 4, no interventions.

RESULTS

Follicular growth was seen in five patients of the agonist group and in four patients of the placebo group. Three of 15 patients in the agonist group ovulated versus none in the placebo group. The difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The fact that 3 of 15 cycles cotreated with a GnRH-a were ovulatory versus none in the placebo-treated group appeared not to be enough evidence to demonstrate that pituitary suppression with a GnRH-a improves the success of ovulation induction with exogenous gonadotropins in patients with POF.

Amenorrhea during the reproductive years--is it safe?

OBJECTIVE

To collate information relating specifically to amenorrhea of different etiologies in young women, the long- and short-term implications of these states, and the optimal therapeutic strategy to treat these conditions.

DATA IDENTIFICATION

Studies related to these topics were identified through literature and Medline searches.

STUDY SELECTION

Those studies that relate specifically to amenorrhea in women of reproductive age, including etiology, diagnosis, and the implications of replacement therapy or nontreatment of this state, were selected.

RESULTS

Amenorrhea, as defined by the absence of menses for > or = 6 months, may be found in up to 3% of women in the reproductive years. Classification of amenorrhea involves defining the exact cause for the cessation of menses, be it hypothalamic, pituitary, ovarian, or lower genital tract in origin. The majority of amenorrheic young women have very low levels of estrogens, and a minority will have subnormal noncyclic estrogen levels, unopposed by P, due to anovulation. This distinction is important in considering the long-term implications of amenorrhea. Hypoestrogenic amenorrhea is associated with a significant loss of bone mineral density and the associated risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Lipoprotein profiles are also adversely affected, and this is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Anovulatory amenorrhea due to "unopposed" estrogen is associated with an increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma even in young patients. Therapy should be aimed at treating the underlying cause of amenorrhea, if possible, or reconstitution of an estrogen-P biphasic monthly cycle if not.

CONCLUSIONS

Untreated amenorrhea is associated with significant long-term morbidity, especially in young women. Early recognition and institution of treatment will minimize late complications.

Case report: spontaneous pregnancy following thymectomy for myasthenia gravis associated with premature ovarian failure

We report the case of a 29-year-old woman who was diagnosed to have premature ovarian failure (POF) and myasthenia gravis at the age of 27 years. She was treated by thymectomy and pyridostigmine. Hormone replacement was started after the operation and she subsequently conceived spontaneously. We believe this is the first report of a spontaneous pregnancy after the diagnosis of POF associated with myasthenia gravis.

Successful pregnancy in a woman with premature ovarian failure

A case of a patient with premature ovarian failure (POF) is discussed. Ovulation failed to occur for 5 years by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) treatment following estrogen-progesterone replacement therapy. After laparoscopic ovarian biopsy, ovulation was successfully induced by hMG, although gonadotropins were not suppressed enough, and the patient achieved pregnancy.

Does gonadotropin suppression result in follicular development in premature ovarian failure?

It was hypothesized that premature ovarian failure is a self-perpetuating problem and that suppression of the endogenously raised gonadotropin levels may allow synchronization of follicular growth, so that when the suppression is removed, follicular development may be stimulated by the rapid rise in follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels. Microgynon (ethinylestradiol, 30 micrograms and levonorgestrel, 150 micrograms) was administered to eight women with premature ovarian failure for 12 weeks. Serum samples were collected weekly for radioimmunoassay of FSH, luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol, progesterone and inhibin. On stopping Microgynon, ovarian ultrasonography was carried out, in addition to blood sampling, to monitor any follicular growth. Both FSH and LH levels declined to the normal follicular-phase range after 5 weeks of Microgynon treatment (mean +/- SD: FSH, 6.5 +/- 1.2 IU/l; LH, 8.9 +/- 1.6 IU/l). Both hormone levels rose rapidly after stopping treatment and were above the normal follicular-phase range by the 1st week. FSH reached pretreatment levels by 3 weeks, but LH did not reach the previously high levels until 7 weeks after stopping Microgynon administration. Estradiol and immunoreactive inhibin levels in serum were undetectable throughout the study. No follicular growth was seen on ultrasound scanning. Therefore, gonadotropin suppression in premature ovarian failure does not result in a resumption of follicular activity.

High-dose, short-term glucocorticoids for the treatment of infertility resulting from premature ovarian failure

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate prospectively the effects of high-dose, short-term treatment with a glucocorticoid in an attempt to normalize ovarian failure and induce pregnancy in women presenting with infertility.

DESIGN

Uncontrolled, nonrandomized prospective study.

SETTING

Two university-based reproductive endocrinology clinics.

PATIENTS

Eleven consecutive women with premature ovarian failure (POF) who were desirous of pregnancy.

INTERVENTIONS

Prednisone 25 mg four times per day for 2 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Two women demonstrated normalization of their serum gonadotropins, an increase of serum E2, and ultrasonographic visualization of follicular growth, with both conceiving. The other nine demonstrated no biochemical or clinical response.

CONCLUSIONS

Premature ovarian failure may not be an irreversible process and may either spontaneously resolve or may respond to therapeutic modalities such as high-dose glucocorticoids in selected patients. In this uncontrolled study, the results were best with women with concomitant autoimmune thyroid disease and POF of < 2 years' duration.

Ovulation induction in women with premature ovarian failure: a prospective, crossover study

A prospective crossover study comparing ovulation induction techniques in eight women with premature ovarian failure is presented. These patients were treated with FSH rebound techniques using the GnRH-a, LA, alone in one treatment cycle and the same plus menopausal gonadotropins in the other treatment cycle. Two women ovulated in each group. We conclude that ovulation does occur in women with premature ovarian failure, but that luteal P may be inadequately secreted.

Gonadotropin suppression for the treatment of karyotypically normal spontaneous premature ovarian failure: a controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine if gonadotropin suppression improves ovarian follicle function or ovulation rates in patients with karyotypically normal spontaneous premature ovarian failure.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

SETTING

Tertiary care research institution.

INTERVENTIONS

Two intervention phases lasting 4 months each: one placebo phase, and one treatment phase during which each patient received daily subcutaneous injections of 300 micrograms of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) deslorelin. During both phases, patients took a standardized estrogen (E) replacement regimen.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-six patients with karyotypically normal spontaneous premature ovarian failure ranging in age from 18 to 39 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We measured serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) levels weekly during the 2 months after each intervention. We defined a serum E2 greater than 50 pg/mL (184 pmol/L) as evidence for ovarian follicle function and a serum P greater than 3.0 ng/mL (9.5 nmol/L) as evidence for ovulation.

RESULTS

The GnRH-a therapy did not significantly enhance recovery of ovarian follicle function or the chance of ovulation. The power to detect a 40% and a 33% ovulation success rate with therapy was 0.95 and 0.83, respectively. We found evidence for ovarian follicle function in 11 of 23 women (48%), and 4 women (17%) ovulated.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with karyotypically normal spontaneous premature ovarian failure treated with E replacement did not benefit from the additional gonadotropin suppression achieved with GnRH-a. Because these patients have a significant possibility of spontaneous remission, attempts to induce ovulation should be limited to controlled trials designed to determine safety and effectiveness.

A randomized prospective study on the effect of short and long buserelin treatment in women with repeated unsuccessful in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles due to inadequate ovarian response

Fifty four women with repeated unsuccessful in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles due to inadequate ovarian response to stimulation with human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG) participated in this study. They were randomized to receive either gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GNRHa), Buserelin, prior to and during induction of ovulation by hMG (Group I--long protocol), or GnRHa starting on the first day of the cycle together with induction of ovulation by hMG (Group II--short protocol). Mean follicular phase serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone (P) levels were significantly lower in Group I than in Group II (P less than 0.01). Cancellation rate was significantly lower in Group I than in Group II (P less than 0.01). The long GNRHa protocol resulted in statistically significant lower cancellation rates, more oocytes per pickup (OPU), more embryos transferred per patient, and a higher pregnancy rate. Significantly more hMG ampoules and more treatments days were required in the long GNRHa protocol. Our data demonstrate that the use of GNRHa prior to and during ovarian stimulation with hMG offers a very good alternative for patients with repetitive unsuccessful IVF cycles due to inadequate response.

Common problems in induction of ovulation

There are many groups of women with anovulatory infertility who respond abnormally to conventional treatment. It is important to diagnose the underlying disorder correctly before commencing treatment. In this chapter we have discussed the various treatment modalities available and how they may be adapted to fit the particular clinical needs. In women who are profoundly hypo-oestrogenic, the 'priming' of the ovary using prolonged low-dose gonadotrophins offers a possible solution if both subcutaneous and intravenous pulsatile GnRH therapy has failed. It may also reduce the incidence of multiple pregnancies in these women. Growth hormone seems to augment the response to gonadotrophin in these women and may prove a useful adjunct to therapy once further experience of its use has been reported. Women with PCO have been a difficult group to treat because of their tendency to hyperstimulate. The low-dose gonadotrophin regimen outlined in this chapter overcomes the majority of these problems without reducing the rate of conception. This group continue to have an increased incidence of miscarriage. The introduction of combined therapy of hMG with a GnRH analogue may improve this situation, but the data from randomized controlled studies are still awaited. Ovarian failure remains an untreatable cause of infertility. A few women may become pregnant spontaneously, but these are the exception rather than the rule. Hormone replacement therapy should be offered to all these women because of the long-term problems of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Products containing a low dose of oestrogen (e.g. Premarin 0.625 mg) will not interfere with ovulation if there should be a spontaneous resumption of ovarian activity.

Ovulation induction and pregnancies in 100 consecutive women with hypergonadotropic amenorrhea

The efficacy of a technique of gonadotropin suppression and human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG) to induce ovulation in women with hypergonadotropic amenorrhea was evaluated in 100 consecutive women. Ovulation was achieved in 19% of cycles (68/361), the pregnancy rate per cycle was 5.2% (19/361), and the viable pregnancy rate was 2.2% (8/361). In the majority of the successful cases, estrogen was used to decrease the elevated luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels, especially where the ethinyl estradiol therapy alone induced a rise in endogenous 17 beta-estradiol levels with hMG used to boost the follicle to maturation. Although the success rate is low, this technique can result in some successes in otherwise almost hopeless cases.