When should endoscopic screening in familial adenomatous polyposis be started?

Recent progress of metal-based nanomaterials with anti-tumor biological effects for enhanced cancer therapy

Metal-based nanomaterials have attracted broad attention recently due to their unique biological physical and chemical properties after entering tumor cells, namely biological effects. In particular, the abilities of Ca2+ to modulate T cell receptors activation, K+ to regulate stem cell differentiation, Mn2+ to activate the STING pathway, and Fe2+/3+ to induce tumor ferroptosis and enhance catalytic therapy, make the metal ions and metal-based nanomaterials play crucial roles in the cancer treatments. Therefore, due to the superior advantages of metal-based nanomaterials and the characteristics of the tumor microenvironment, we will summarize the recent progress of the anti-tumor biological effects of metal-based nanomaterials. Based on the different effects of metal-based nanomaterials on tumor cells, this review mainly focuses on the following five aspects: (1) metal-enhanced radiotherapy sensitization, (2) metal-enhanced catalytic therapy, (3) metal-enhanced ferroptosis, (4) metal-enhanced pyroptosis, and (5) metal-enhanced immunotherapy. At the same time, the shortcomings of the biological effects of metal-based nanomaterials on tumor therapy are also discussed, and the future research directions have been prospected. The highlights of promising biosafety, potent efficacy on biological effects for tumor therapy, and the in-depth various biological effects mechanism studies of metal-based nanomaterials provide novel ideas for the future biological application of the nanomaterials.

Familial colorectal cancer: Patient assessment, surveillance and surgical management

Germline mutations account for 5-10% of colorectal cancer. Most mutations are autosomal dominant with high penetrance and affected patients benefit greatly from appropriate treatment. This review presents the current knowledge regarding familial colorectal cancer and provides practical information based on international guidelines and the best available evidence regarding patient assessment, surveillance and surgical management. Surgeons are often the first point of contact and frequently, the main provider of care for families with cancer syndromes or patients with familial cancer. Patients with a polyposis phenotype should undergo appropriate genetic testing. In non-polyposis patients with a cancer diagnosis, tumor testing for Lynch syndrome can guide the use of genetic testing. In patients without a personal history of cancer or polyposis, a carefully obtained family history with testing of available tumor tissue or of a living relative affected by colorectal cancer informs the need for genetic testing. Surveillance and surgical management should be planned following thorough assessment of familial cancer risk. Evidence exists to provide guidance as to the surveillance strategies required, the specific indications of genetic testing and the appropriate timing of operative intervention. A carefully obtained family history with selective genetic testing should inform surveillance and surgical management in patients who have a genetic predisposition for the development of colorectal cancer.

The epidemiological and clinical features of familial adenomatous polyposis in Ribeirão Preto

Purpose to study 75 familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients treated in a single institution in Ribeirão Preto/SP, from January 1981 to December 2011.

Methods this is a retrospective study and the following data were collected: gender, age, main symptoms, familial history, coexisting malignancies, surgical treatment, surgical morbidity and mortality, factors related to life quality.

Results median age was 29 years. Male-to-female ratio was 1.2:1. Bleeding was the most common symptom (62.6%). Colorectal cancer incidence was 25.5% (n = 19). Extracolonic neoplasia incidence was 8%. Colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) was performed in 72% of the patients. Eighteen patients (24%) were submitted to proctocolectomy with “J-pouch” ileoanal anastomosis. In three patients (4%) proctocolectomy with terminal ileostomy was performed. Early and late complication rate were similar (22.7% × 24%). Ileal pouch surgery exhibited tendency to a higher morbidity and mortality but no significance could be found. Overall mortality rate was 7.46%. Malignant neoplasia was the main cause of mortality, accounting for 60% of deaths.

Conclusion FAP is a rare pathology in our country. Genetic counseling and proper screening programs are essential tools to early diagnosis and follow-up. Surgery is the most effective treatment and the best option to prevent malignant neoplasia.

Germline mutations in APC and MUTYH are responsible for the majority of families with attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis

A small fraction of families with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) display an attenuated form of FAP (AFAP). We aimed to assess the presence of germline mutations in the MUTYH and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) genes in AFAP families and to compare the clinical features between the two causative genes. Families with clinical AFAP were selected from the Dutch Polyposis Registry according to the following criteria: (a) at least two patients with 10-99 adenomas diagnosed at age >30 years or (b) one patient with 10-99 adenomas at age >30 years and a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer (CRC) with a few adenomas, and, applying for both criteria, no family members with more than 100 polyps before the age of 30 years. All probands were screened for germline mutations in the APC and MUTYH genes. Twenty-five of 315 Dutch families with FAP (8%) met our criteria for AFAP. These families included 146 patients with adenomas and/or CRC. Germline APC mutations were identified in nine families and biallelic MUTYH mutations in another nine families. CRC was identified at a mean age of 54 years (range 24-83 years) in families with APC and at 50 years (range 39-70 years) in families with MUTYH (p = 0.29). APC and biallelic MUTYH mutations are responsible for the majority of AFAP families. Based on our results and those reported in the literature, we recommend colonoscopy once every 2 years in AFAP families, starting surveillance from the late teens in APC mutation carriers and from age 20-25 years in biallelic MUTYH mutation carriers.

Severe dysplasia in children with familial adenomatous polyposis: rare or simply overlooked?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Because severe dysplasia and carcinoma in children with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) younger than 18 years is rare, earlier surgical intervention is not common. The purpose of this study is to report the prevalence of dysplasia and carcinoma among children with FAP in our institution.

METHODS

From 1998 through 2004, children 18 years or younger with FAP that underwent total proctocolectomy at a large children's hospital were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Eleven children underwent surgery for FAP. The mean age at surgery was 13 +/- 3.2 years. Approximately half of the patients who underwent preoperative endoscopy had evidence of dysplasia. Nine (82%) patients had dysplasia on preoperative biopsy and/or operative specimen, and 3 (27%) of these patients had severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ. Four of the 5 patients without symptoms had evidence of dysplasia. No patients had invasive carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

We observed a higher incidence of severe colonic dysplasia in young children with FAP compared with the current literature. A significant number of patients with dysplasia at surgery had no symptoms and no evidence of dysplasia on preoperative endoscopic biopsies. These data suggest that earlier intervention in children with FAP may be beneficial and should be investigated further.

Colon cancer: detection and prevention

Recent data have advanced our ability to detect, survey, and manage patients with colonic neoplasia. Current studies and consensus statements increasingly support the role of colonoscopic screening over less invasive testing such as FOBT or FS for appropriately selected individuals. There are many issues, however, that remain unresolved. What is the appropriate surveillance of an individual with a single family member who had colon cancer at an early age? How should family members of suspected HNPCC kindreds be managed? There has yet to be a prospective cohort validation of the Bethesda criteria in directing clinical practice, with the endpoint of mortality reduction. Questions regarding prophylaxis with dietary supplements and medications are exciting areas that are currently under study. As newer technologies become clinically available for molecular diagnostics and screening, and virtual colonoscopy with computed tomography and magnetic resonance disseminates, there will undoubtedly be new questions to be answered regarding their ability to aid in the detection and management of colon cancer.