Prognostic factors in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Groupe d'Etude des Néoplasies Endocriniennes Multiples (GENEM and groupe de Recherche et d'Etude du Syndrome de Zollinger-Ellison (GRESZE)

Molecular and Clinical Spectrum of Primary Hyperparathyroidism

Recent data suggest an increase in the overall incidence of parathyroid disorders, with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) being the most prevalent parathyroid disorder. PHPT is associated with morbidities (fractures, kidney stones, chronic kidney disease) and increased risk of death. The symptoms of PHPT can be nonspecific, potentially delaying the diagnosis. Approximately 15% of patients with PHPT have an underlying heritable form of PHPT that may be associated with extraparathyroidal manifestations, requiring active surveillance for these manifestations as seen in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and 2A. Genetic testing for heritable forms should be offered to patients with multiglandular disease, recurrent PHPT, young onset PHPT (age ≤40 years), and those with a family history of parathyroid tumors. However, the underlying genetic cause for the majority of patients with heritable forms of PHPT remains unknown. Distinction between sporadic and heritable forms of PHPT is useful in surgical planning for parathyroidectomy and has implications for the family. The genes currently known to be associated with heritable forms of PHPT account for approximately half of sporadic parathyroid tumors. But the genetic cause in approximately half of the sporadic parathyroid tumors remains unknown. Furthermore, there is no systemic therapy for parathyroid carcinoma, a rare but potentially fatal cause of PHPT. Improved understanding of the molecular characteristics of parathyroid tumors will allow us to identify biomarkers for diagnosis and novel targets for therapy.

Successful Lifetime/Long-Term Medical Treatment of Acid Hypersecretion in Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome (ZES): Myth or Fact? Insights from an Analysis of Results of NIH Long-Term Prospective Studies of ZES

Analysis of the efficacy/pharmacology of long-term/lifetime medical treatment of acid hypersecretion in a large cohort of ZES patients in a prospective study. This study includes the results from all 303 patients with established ZES who were prospectively followed and received acid antisecretory treatment with either H2Rs or PPIs, with antisecretory doses individually titrated by the results of regular gastric acid testing. The study includes patients treated for short-term periods (<5 yrs), patients treated long-term (>5 yrs), and patients with lifetime treatment (30%) followed for up to 48 years (mean 14 yrs). Long-term/lifelong acid antisecretory treatment with H2Rs/PPIs can be successfully carried out in all patients with both uncomplicated and complicated ZES (i.e., with MEN1/ZES, previous Billroth 2, severe GERD). This is only possible if drug doses are individually set by assessing acid secretory control to establish proven criteria, with regular reassessments and readjustments. Frequent dose changes both upward and downward are needed, as well as regulation of the dosing frequency, and there is a primary reliance on the use of PPIs. Prognostic factors predicting patients with PPI dose changes are identified, which need to be studied prospectively to develop a useful predictive algorithm that could be clinically useful for tailored long-term/lifetime therapy in these patients.

Recurrence after surgical resection of nonmetastatic sporadic gastrinoma: Which prognostic factors and surgical procedure?

BACKGROUND

The only curative treatment of gastrinoma is complete resection, but its surgical management remains controversial and prognostic factors of sporadic nonmetastatic gastrinoma are poorly known.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study including all patients who underwent elective surgery for nonmetastatic sporadic gastrinoma between 2000 and 2020 in 15 hospitals. The primary and secondary outcomes were overall survival and disease-free survival predictive factors.

RESULTS

In total, 108 patients were included, of which 68 (63%) were duodenal, 19 (18%) pancreatic, and 21 (19%) primary lymph node gastrinomas, with no major difference in clinical presentation. Among the 68 duodenal gastrinomas, 26% (n = 18) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and 74% (n = 50) underwent duodenotomy with the excision of duodenal wall tumors and lymphadenectomy (DUODX + LN). Overall, the median overall survival was 173 months, and the 5-year overall survival was 94%, with no predictive factors identified. The median disease-free survival was 93 months, and the 5-year disease-free survival was 63%. Tumor size >2 cm (P = .00001), grade (P = .00001), and pancreatic tumor location (P = .0001) were predictive factors of recurrence; however, in multivariate analysis, only tumor size >2 cm (P = .005) and grade (P = .013) were independent predictors of recurrence. Age, sex, preoperative gastrin level, lymphadenectomy <10 resected lymph nodes, and metastatic lymph nodes on surgical specimens were not predictors of recurrence. For duodenal gastrinomas, surgical procedures (PD versus DUODX + LN) did not have a significant effect on overall survival and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Sporadic nonmetastatic gastrinomas had an excellent overall survival. Recurrence is frequent and influenced by tumor size and grade. Regarding sporadic duodenal gastrinoma, duodenotomy with excision of duodenal wall tumors with lymphadenectomy could be considered a valid surgical option, in the absence of clear oncologic superiority of PD.

Secretin Stimulation Test and Early Diagnosis of Gastrinoma in MEN1 Syndrome: Survey on the MEN1 Florentine Database

CONTEXT

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare inherited endocrine cancer syndrome. Multiple gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) affect 30% to 80% of MEN1 patients, with the most common functioning GEP-NET being gastrinoma. Biochemical identification of hypergastrinemia may help to recognize the presence of gastrinomas before they are detectable by instrumental screening, enabling early diagnosis and start of therapy, preferably before tumor progression and metastases occurrence.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the effectiveness of secretin stimulation test to precociously diagnose the presence of gastrin-secreting tumors.

DESIGN

Results of secretin stimulation tests, performed between 1991 and February 2020, were retrospectively analyzed, as aggregate, in a cohort of MEN1 patients with GEP-NETs.

SETTING

Data were extracted from the MEN1 Florentine database.

PATIENTS

The study included 72 MEN1 patients with GEP-NETs who underwent a secretin stimulation test for the evaluation of gastrin secretion.

OUTCOMES

A positive secretin stimulation test was assumed with a difference between basal fasting serum gastrin (FSG) and the maximum stimulated value of gastrin over 120 pg/mL.

RESULTS

The secretin stimulation test showed a secretin-induced hypergastrinemia in 27.8% (20/72) of patients with GEP-NETs, and a positive test in 18 cases. The test allowed the identification of a positively stimulated hypergastrinemia in 75.0% (3/4) of patients who presented a basal FSG within the normal range.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of gastrinoma is complex, difficult, and controversial. Results of this study confirm that a positive secretin stimulation test allows early diagnosis of gastrinomas, even in the presence of borderline or normal levels of nonstimulated FSG.

Occult insulinoma with treatment refractory, severe hypoglycaemia in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome; difficulties faced during diagnosis, localization and management; a case report

BACKGROUND

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) syndrome is a rare, complex genetic disorder characterized by increased predisposition to tumorigenesis in multiple endocrine and non-endocrine tissues. Diagnosis and management of MEN 1 syndrome is challenging due to its vast heterogeneity in clinical presentation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 23-year-old female, previously diagnosed with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) and pituitary microprolactinoma presented with drowsiness,confusion and profuse sweating developing over a period of one day. It was preceded by fluctuating, hallucinatory behavior for two weeks duration. There was recent increase in appetite with significant weight gain. There was no fever, seizures or symptoms suggestive of meningism. Her Body mass index(BMI) was 32 kg/m².She had signs of hyperandrogenism. Multiple cutaneous collagenomas were noted on anterior chest and abdominal wall. Her Glasgow Coma Scale was 9/15. Pupils were sluggishly reactive to light. Tendon reflexes were exaggerated with up going planter reflexes. Moderate hepatomegaly was present. Rest of the clinical examination was normal. Laboratory evaluation confirmed endogenous hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia suggestive of an insulinoma. Hypercalcemia with elevated parathyroid hormone level suggested a parathyroid adenoma. Presence of insulinoma, primary hyperparathyroidism and pituitary microadenoma, in 3^rd decade of life with characteristic cutaneous tumours was suggestive of a clinical diagnosis of MEN 1 syndrome. Recurrent, severe hypoglycaemia complicated with hypoglycaemic encephalopathy refractory to continuous, parenteral glucose supplementation and optimal pharmacotherapy complicated the clinical course. Insulinoma was localized with selective arterial calcium stimulation test. Distal pancreatectomy and four gland parathyroidectomy was performed leading to resolution of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal calculi or characteristic cutaneous lesions might be the only forewarning clinical manifestations of an undiagnosed MEN 1 syndrome impending a life-threatening presentation. Comprehensive management of MEN 1 syndrome requires multi-disciplinary approach with advanced imaging modalities, advanced surgical procedures and long-term follow up due to its heterogeneous presentation and the varying severity depending on the disease phenotype.

Beyond the "3 Ps": A critical appraisal of the non-endocrine manifestations of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), an autosomal-dominantly inherited tumor syndrome, is classically defined by tumors arising from the "3 Ps": Parathyroids, Pituitary, and the endocrine Pancreas. From its earliest descriptions, MEN1 has been associated with other endocrine and non-endocrine neoplastic manifestations. High quality evidence supports a direct association between pathogenic MEN1 variants and neoplasms of the skin (angiofibromas and collagenomas), adipose tissue (lipomas and hibernomas), and smooth muscle (leiomyomas). Although CNS tumors, melanoma, and, most recently, breast cancer have been reported as MEN1 clinical manifestations, the published evidence to date is not yet sufficient to establish causality. Well-designed, multicenter prospective studies will help us to understand better the relationship of these tumors to MEN1, in addition to verifying the true prevalence and penetrance of the well-documented neoplastic associations. Nevertheless, patients affected by MEN1 should be aware of these non-endocrine manifestations, and providers should be encouraged always to think beyond the "3 Ps" when treating an MEN1 patient.

New therapies for patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

In 1953, for the first time, Paul Wermer described a family presenting endocrine gland neoplasms over several generations. The transmission was autosomal dominant and the penetrance was high. Forty years later in 1997, the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) gene was sequenced, thus enabling diagnosis and early optimal treatment. Patients carrying the MEN1 gene present endocrine but also non-endocrine tumors. Parathyroid, pancreatic and pituitary impairment are the three main types of endocrine involvement. The present article details therapeutic management of hyperparathyroidism, neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors and pituitary adenomas in patients carrying the MEN1 gene. Significant therapeutic progress has in fact been made in the last few years. As concerns the parathyroid glands, screening of family members and regular monitoring of affected subjects now raise the question of early management of parathyroid lesions and optimal timing of parathyroid surgery. As concerns the duodenum-pancreas, proton-pump inhibitors are able to control gastrin-secreting syndrome, reducing mortality in MEN1 patients. Mortality in MEN1 patients is no longer mainly secondary to uncontrolled hormonal secretion but to metastatic (mainly pancreatic) disease progression. Tumor risk requires regular monitoring of morphological assessment, leading to iterative pancreatic surgery in a large number of patients. Finally, pituitary adenomas in MEN1 patients are traditionally described as aggressive, invasive and resistant to medical treatment. However, regular pituitary screening showed them to be in fact infra-centimetric and non-secreting in the majority of patients. Consequently, it is necessary to regularly monitor MEN1 patients, with regular clinical, biological and morphological work-up. Several studies showed that this regular monitoring impairs quality of life. Building a relationship of trust between patients and care provider is therefore essential. It enables the patient to be referred for psychological or psychiatric care in difficult times, providing long-term support and preventing any breakdown in continuity of care.

Clinical aspects of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare syndrome characterized by the co-occurrence of primary hyperparathyroidism, duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and/or pituitary adenomas. MEN1 can predispose patients to other endocrine and non-endocrine tumours, such as cutaneous tumours, central nervous system tumours and breast cancer. Endocrine tumours in patients with MEN1 differ from sporadic tumours in that they have a younger age at onset, present as multiple tumours in the same organ and have a different clinical course. Therefore, patients with overt MEN1 and those who carry a MEN1 mutation should be offered tailored biochemical and imaging screening to detect tumours and evaluate their progression over time. Fortunately, over the past 10 years, knowledge about the clinical phenotype of these tumours has markedly progressed, thanks to the implementation of national registries, particularly in France and the Netherlands. This Review provides an update on the clinical management of MEN1-related tumours. Epidemiology, the clinical picture, diagnostic work-up and the main lines of treatment for MEN1-related tumours are summarized. Controversial therapeutic aspects and issues that still need to be addressed are also discussed. Moreover, special attention is given to MEN1 manifestations in children and adolescents.

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: Latest Insights

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), a rare tumor syndrome that is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, is continuing to raise great interest for endocrinology, gastroenterology, surgery, radiology, genetics, and molecular biology specialists. There have been 2 major clinical practice guidance papers published in the past 2 decades, with the most recent published 8 years ago. Since then, several new insights on the basic biology and clinical features of MEN1 have appeared in the literature, and those data are discussed in this review. The genetic and molecular interactions of the MEN1-encoded protein menin with transcription factors and chromatin-modifying proteins in cell signaling pathways mediated by transforming growth factor β/bone morphogenetic protein, a few nuclear receptors, Wnt/β-catenin, and Hedgehog, and preclinical studies in mouse models have facilitated the understanding of the pathogenesis of MEN1-associated tumors and potential pharmacological interventions. The advancements in genetic diagnosis have offered a chance to recognize MEN1-related conditions in germline MEN1 mutation-negative patients. There is rapidly accumulating knowledge about clinical presentation in children, adolescents, and pregnancy that is translatable into the management of these very fragile patients. The discoveries about the genetic and molecular signatures of sporadic neuroendocrine tumors support the development of clinical trials with novel targeted therapies, along with advancements in diagnostic tools and surgical approaches. Finally, quality of life studies in patients affected by MEN1 and related conditions represent an effort necessary to develop a pharmacoeconomic interpretation of the problem. Because advances are being made both broadly and in focused areas, this timely review presents and discusses those studies collectively.

Pancreatoduodenectomy for Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: An AFCE (Association Francophone de Chirurgie Endocrinienne) and GTE (Groupe d'étude des Tumeurs Endocrines) Study

Aim

To assess postoperative complications and control of hormone secretions following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) performed on multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) patients with duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (DP-NETs).

Background

The use of PD to treat MEN1 remains controversial, and evaluating the right place of PD in MEN1 disease makes sense.

Methods

Thirty-one MEN1 patients from the Groupe d’étude des Tumeurs Endocrines MEN1 cohort who underwent PD for DP-NETs between 1971 and 2013 were included. Early and late postoperative complications, secretory control and overall survival were analyzed.

Results

Indication for surgery was: Zollinger–Ellison syndrome (n = 18; 58%), nonfunctioning tumor (n = 9; 29%), insulinoma (n = 2; 7%), VIPoma (n = 1; 3%) and glucagonoma (n = 1; 3%). Mean follow-up was 141 months (range 0–433). Pancreatic fistulas occurred in 5 patients (16.1%), distant metastases in 6 (mean onset of 43 months; range 13–110 months), postoperative diabetes mellitus in 7 (22%), and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in 6 (19%). Five-year overall survival was 93.3% [CI 75.8–98.3] and ten-year overall survival was 89.1% [CI 69.6–96.4]. After a mean follow-up of 151 months (range 0–433), the biochemical cure rate for MEN-1 related gastrinomas was 61%.

Conclusion

In MEN1 patients, pancreatoduodenectomy can be used to control hormone secretions (gastrin, glucagon, VIP) and to remove large NETs. PD was found to control gastrin secretions in about 60% of cases.

Complications After Major Surgery for Duodenopancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with MEN1: Results from a Nationwide Cohort

Background

Little is known about complications after major duodenopancreatic surgery for duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (dpNETs) in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Therefore, the incidence and severity of complications after major surgery for MEN1-related dpNETs were assessed.

Methods

Patients were selected from the population-based Dutch MEN1 database if they had undergone a Whipple procedure or total pancreatectomy from 2003 to 2017. Complications were graded according to the Clavien–Dindo classification (grade III or higher complications were considered a severe complication) and definitions from the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. The Cumulative Complication Index (CCI^®) was calculated as the sum of all complications weighted for their severity. Univariable logistic regression was performed to assess potential associations between predictor candidates and a severe complication.

Results

Twenty-seven patients (median age 43 years) underwent a major duodenopancreatic resection, including 14 Whipple procedures and 13 total pancreatectomies. Morbidity and mortality were 100% (27/27) and 4% (1/27), respectively. A severe complication occurred in 17/27 (63%) patients. The median CCI^® was 47.8 [range 8.7–100]. Grade B/C pancreatic fistulas, delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage, hemorrhage, and chyle leakage occurred in 7/14 (50%), 10/27 (37%), 1/27 (4%), 7/27 (26%), 3/27 (11%) patients, respectively. Patients with a severe complication had longer operative time and higher blood loss. After Whipple, new-onset endocrine and exocrine insufficiency occurred in 1/13 and 9/14 patients, respectively.

Conclusions

Major duodenopancreatic surgery in MEN1 is associated with a very high risk of severe complications and cumulative burden of complications and should therefore be reserved for a select subgroup of patients with MEN1-related dpNETs.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-09496-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Metastatic Potential and Survival of Duodenal and Pancreatic Tumors in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: A GTE and AFCE Cohort Study (Groupe d'étude des Tumeurs Endocrines and Association Francophone de Chirurgie Endocrinienne)

OBJECTIVE

To assess the distant metastatic potential of duodeno-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (DP-NETs) in patients with MEN1, according to functional status and size.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

DP-NETs, with their numerous lesions and endocrine secretion-related symptoms, continue to be a medical challenge; unfortunately they can become aggressive tumors associated with distant metastasis, shortening survival. The survival of patients with large nonfunctional DP-NETs is known to be poor, but the overall contribution of DP-NETs to metastatic spread is poorly known.

METHODS

The study population included patients with DP-NETs diagnosed after 1990 and followed in the MEN1 cohort of the Groupe d'étude des Tumeurs Endocrines (GTE). A multistate Markov piecewise constant intensities model was applied to separate the effects of prognostic factors on 1) metastasis, and 2) metastasis-free death or 3) death after appearance of metastases.

RESULTS

Among the 603 patients included, 39 had metastasis at diagnosis of DP-NET, 50 developed metastases during follow-up, and 69 died. The Markov model showed that Zollinger-Ellison-related tumors (regardless of tumor size and thymic tumor pejorative impact), large tumors over 2 cm, and age over 40 years were independently associated with an increased risk of metastases. Men, patients over 40 years old and patients with tumors larger than 2 cm, also had an increased risk of death once metastasis appeared.

CONCLUSIONS

DP-NETs of 2 cm in size or more, regardless of the associated secretion, should be removed to prevent metastasis and increase survival. Surgery for gastrinoma remains debatable.

Surgical Management of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the Pancreas

Neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas (pNET) are rare, accounting for 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. They develop from pancreatic islet cells and cover a wide range of heterogeneous neoplasms. While most pNETs are sporadic, some are associated with genetic syndromes. Furthermore, some pNETs are 'functioning' when there is clinical hypersecretion of metabolically active peptides, whereas others are 'non-functioning'. pNET can be diagnosed at a localised stage or a more advanced stage, including regional or distant metastasis (in 50% of cases) mainly located in the liver. While surgical resection is the cornerstone of the curative treatment of those patients, pNET management requires a multidisciplinary discussion between the oncologist, radiologist, pathologist, and surgeon. However, the scarcity of pNET patients constrains centralised management in high-volume centres to provide the best patient-tailored approach. Nonetheless, no treatment should be initiated without precise diagnosis and staging. In this review, the steps from the essential comprehensive preoperative evaluation of the best surgical approach (open versus laparoscopic, standard versus sparing parenchymal pancreatectomy, lymphadenectomy) according to pNET staging are analysed. Strategies to enhance the short- and long-term benefit/risk ratio in these particular patients are discussed.

Contemporary surgical management of the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

About 30% of patients with MEN1 develop a Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Meanwhile it is well established that the causative gastrinomas are almost exclusively localized in the duodenum and not in the pancreas, MEN1 gastrinomas occur multicentric and are associated with hyperplastic gastrin cell lesions and tiny gastrin-producing micro tumors in contrast to sporadic duodenal gastrinomas. Regardless of the high prevalence of early lymphatic metastases, the survival is generally good with an aggressive course of disease in only about 20% of patients. Symptoms can be controlled medically. The indication, timing, type, and extent of surgery are highly controversial and are discussed in detail in this article by a thorough and critical review of literature. More radical procedures, like partial pancreaticoduodenectomy, are weighed against less aggressive local excision of gastrinomas and the pros and cons of both approaches are discussed in terms of long-term morbidity, biochemical cure, and survival.

Prognostic factors and survival in MEN1 patients with gastrinomas: Results from the DutchMEN study group (DMSG)

Background and objectives

Gastrinomas are the most prevalent functioning neuroendocrine tumors (NET) in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Guidelines suggest medical therapy in most patients, but surgery may be considered in a subgroup. Currently, factors to guide management are necessary. This population‐based cohort study assessed prognostic factors of survival in patients with MEN1‐related gastrinomas.

Methods

Patients with MEN1 having gastrinomas were identified in the Dutch MEN1 database from 1990 to 2014 based on fasting serum gastrin (FSG) levels and/or pathology. Predictors of overall survival were assessed using Cox regression.

Results

Sixty‐three patients with gastrinoma (16% of the MEN1 population) were identified. Five‐ and 10‐year overall survival rates were 83% and 65%, respectively. Prognostic factors associated with overall survival were initial FSG levels ≥20x upper limit of normal (ULN) (hazard ratio [HR], 6.2 [95% confidence interval, 1.7‐23.0]), pancreatic NET ≥2 cm (HR 4.5; [1.5‐13.1]), synchronous liver metastases (HR 8.9; [2.1‐36.7]), gastroduodenoscopy suspicious for gastric NETs (HR 12.7; [1.4‐115.6]), and multiple concurrent NETs (HR 5.9; [1.2‐27.7]).

Conclusion

Life expectancy of patients with MEN1 gastrinoma is reduced. FSG levels and pancreatic NETs ≥2 cm are prognostic factors. FSG levels might guide surveillance intensity, step‐up to additional diagnostics, or provide arguments in selecting patients who might benefit from surgery.

Current and emerging therapies for PNETs in patients with or without MEN1

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs) might occur as a non-familial isolated endocrinopathy or as part of a complex hereditary syndrome, such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). MEN1 is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by the combined occurrence of PNETs with tumours of the parathyroids and anterior pituitary. Treatments for primary PNETs include surgery. Treatments for non-resectable PNETs and metastases include biotherapy (for example, somatostatin analogues, inhibitors of receptors and monoclonal antibodies), chemotherapy and radiological therapy. All these treatments are effective for PNETs in patients without MEN1; however, there is a scarcity of clinical trials reporting the efficacy of the same treatments of PNETs in patients with MEN1. Treatment of PNETs in patients with MEN1 is challenging owing to the concomitant development of other tumours, which might have metastasized. In recent years, preclinical studies have identified potential new therapeutic targets for treating MEN1-associated neuroendocrine tumours (including PNETs), and these include epigenetic modification, the β-catenin-wingless (WNT) pathway, Hedgehog signalling, somatostatin receptors and MEN1 gene replacement therapy. This Review discusses these advances.

The future: surgical advances in MEN1 therapeutic approaches and management strategies

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a hereditary autosomal dominant disorder associated with numerous neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Recent advances in the management of MEN1 have led to a decrease in mortality due to excess hormones; however, they have also led to an increase in mortality from malignancy, particularly NETs. The main challenges are to localize these tumors, to select those that need therapy because of the risk of aggressive behavior and to select the appropriate therapy associated with minimal morbidity. This must be applied to a hereditary disease with a high risk of recurrence. The overall aim of management in MEN1 is to ensure that the patient remains disease- and symptom-free for as long as possible and maintains a good quality of life. Herein, we review the changes that occurred in the last 20 years in the surgical management of MEN1-associated functional and non-functional pancreatico-duodenal NETs and thymic and bronchial NETs.

Prognostic value of WHO grade in pancreatic neuro-endocrine tumors in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1: Results from the DutchMEN1 Study Group

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of WHO grade in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1) is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study using the Dutch National MEN1 database, which includes >90% of the Dutch MEN1 population with data collected between 1990 and 2014. Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks from the largest resected PanNET per patient were collected. MIB1 staining was performed and KI67 labeling index (LI) was determined by manual eye-counting under a microscope and by digital image analysis. Mitotic count was evaluated from hematoxylin & eosin stains. Association between WHO grade and (time until) development of liver metastases was calculated.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine MEN1 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery were included. Ten patients (14%) developed liver metastases and all had PanNETs ≥3 cm. WHO G1, G2 and G3 PanNETs were seen in 83% (n = 57), 16% (n = 11) and 1% (n = 1) respectively. In non-functioning PanNETs >2 cm, liver metastases occurred in 80% of WHO G2 PanNETs (4/5) compared to 23% (5/22) in WHO G1 PanNETs (p = 0.03) when WHO grade was based on mitotic count only. This significant association was not seen for WHO grade based on Ki67 LI. After five years, liver metastases in non-functioning PanNETs were not seen in tumors ≤2 cm, in 10% of the large WHO G1 (according to mitotic count only) tumors and in 60% of large WHO G2 tumors (p-value 0.000).

CONCLUSION

High mitotic count is correlated with poor prognosis in MEN1 patients with large non-functioning PanNETs.

The LARO-MEN1 study: a longitudinal clinical experience with octreotide Long-Acting Release in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 Syndrome

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare hereditary tumoral syndrome, featured by a combination of neoplasms of various endocrine and nonendocrine tissues. Approximately 33% of MEN1-related deaths are due to the malignant behaviour of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), for which a preventive surgical treatment is not feasible. Somatostatin analogues (SSA) have been employed in the treatment of NETs in the stage of advanced or metastatic disease, in order to control the growth and secretion of tumor lesions. A longitudinal, open label study named "LARO-MEN1" was undertaken in order to assess whether early medical treatment with long-acting SSA could act as a preventive approach in small MEN1-related gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs. Thirty consecutive patients affected by MEN1 were screened and 8 patients with small (<2 cm) NETs and abnormal laboratory values of at least one of the GEP hormones were administered octreotide acetate slow-release formulation (LAR) (10 mg i.m. every 28 days). Octreotide LAR was effective in decreasing GEP hormones and overall safe in the majority of patients up to six years of treatment, maintaining the disease stable also in terms of tumor size. The positive outcomes of this study in MEN1 patients reinforce the results obtained in advanced NETs on the use of SSA, opening to the opportunity for preventive use of octreotide LAR, aimed to delay or even avoid surgery in these patients.

Imaging of secretory tumors of the gastrointestinal tract

Gastrointestinal secretory tumors, or gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, encompass a wide array of endocrine cell tumors. The significance of these tumors lies in their ability to alter physiology through hormone production as we well as in their malignant potential. Functioning tumors may present earlier due to symptomatology; conversely, non-functioning tumors are often diagnosed late as they reach large sizes, causing symptoms secondary to local mass effect. Imaging aids in the diagnosis, staging, and prognosis and provides key information for presurgical planning. Although most of these tumors are sporadic, some are associated with important syndromes and associations, knowledge of which is critical for patient management. In this article, we provide an overview of secretory and neuroendocrine tumors of the GI tract and pancreas.

Long-term outcomes in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and pancreaticoduodenal neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

In patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), pancreaticoduodenal (PD) neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are associated with early mortality, yet the best treatment strategy remains uncertain.

AIM

To assess patient important outcomes (mortality and metastasis) of PD-NETs and predictors of outcomes in patients with MEN-1.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of patients with MEN-1 who attended the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN from 1997 to 2014.

RESULTS

We identified 287 patients with MEN-1; 199 (69%) patients had 217 PD-NETs. Among those with a PD-NETs, 129 (65%) had surgery of which 90 (70%) had their primary surgery performed at Mayo Clinic. The median postoperative follow-up was 8 years during which 13 (14%) patients died. The mean (±standard deviation) age of death was 51 (±9) years. Tumour size, metastasis at surgery or tumour type were not predictive of mortality, but for every year older at surgery, the odds of metastasis increased by 6%. Surgery was not performed in 70 (35%) patients. Among those who were observed/medically managed without known metastatic disease, mean tumour growth was 0·02 cm/year (range, -0·13-0·4 cm/year). Four patients (7%) died at a median age of 77 (range, 51-89) years.

CONCLUSION

PD-NETs are common in patients with MEN-1 and are associated with early mortality even after surgical intervention. Active surveillance is a viable option in nonaggressive PD-NETs, although definitive factors identifying such patients are lacking. Therefore, counselling regarding risks and benefits of current treatment options remains integral to the care of patients with MEN-1.

Synchronous Peripancreatic Lymph Node Gastrinoma and Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor Type 2

A 34-year-old man was referred to our hospital with gastric polypoid lesions and biopsy-confirmed neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Computed tomography (CT) revealed a 3×3.5×8-cm retroperitoneal mass behind the pancreas, with multiple hepatic metastases. His serum gastrin level was elevated to 1,396 pg/mL. We performed a wedge resection of the stomach, a right hemi-hepatectomy, and a retroperitoneal mass excision. After careful review of the clinical, radiological, histopathological, and immunohistochemical findings, peripancreatic gastrinoma, and synchronous gastric NET were ultimately diagnosed. We reviewed a CT scan that had been performed 6 years previously after surgery for a duodenal perforation. There was no evidence of gastric or hepatic lesions, but the retroperitoneal mass was present at the same site. Had gastrinoma been detected earlier, our patient could have been cured using less invasive treatment. This case demonstrates how important it is to consider Zollinger-Ellison syndrome in patients with a recurrent or aggressive ulcer.

Surgical management of neuroendocrine tumors

During the last decades an increase in the incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) was observed. Gastroenteropancreatic NETs represent the majority of NETs. Compared with their epithelial counterpart they usually have a more indolent behaviour and surgical resection improves survival. Tumor diameter is one of the main parameter in the decision making process for nonfunctioning forms. Generally, small lesions can be treated conservatively whereas larger tumors should be treated with standard surgical resection and lymphadenectomy. Functioning tumors should be resected regardless the dimension of the lesion. Locally advanced and metastatic disease should be also treated with extended resections, keeping in consideration the grading, size, Ki67, and presence of extra-abdominal disease. In the case of metastases the panel of operative treatment includes resection, ablation, up to liver transplantation.

Controversies in surgery for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-associated Zollinger–Ellison syndrome

Zollinger–Ellison syndrome (ZES) is a common manifestation of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). At least 90% of MEN1-ZES patients have multiple duodenal gastrinomas, making the duodenum the target organ of ZES. The indication and the timing of surgery in MEN1-ZES is controversial, since there is yet no parameter that indicates an aggressive course of disease and long-term survival is generally good. An imageable, most likely nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (pNEN) >1–2 cm seems to be a good surrogate parameter to indicate surgery in order to prevent distant metastatic pNEN disease, although some groups indicate surgery at the time of biochemical ZES evidence. The optimal surgical procedure is also controversial. Different strategies encomprise local excision via duodenotomy with or without distal pancreatic resection and regional lymphadenectomy to partial pancreaticoduodenectomy. At present, the timing and type of surgery for MEN1-ZES should be individualized according to patient’s characteristics and preference.

Challenges and controversies in management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours in patients with MEN1

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), an autosomal dominant disorder, is characterised by the occurrence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (P-NETs) in association with parathyroid and pituitary tumours. P-NETs, which include gastrinomas, insulinomas, and non-functioning tumours, occur in more than 80% of MEN1 patients and account for 50% of disease-specific deaths. However, there is no consensus about the optimal methods for detecting and treating P-NETs in MEN1 patients, and extrapolations from approaches used in patients with non-familial (sporadic) P-NETs require caution because of differences, such as the younger age of onset, multi-focality of P-NETs, and concomitant presence of other tumours in MEN1 patients. Thus, the early detection of P-NETs by circulating biomarkers and imaging modalities, and their appropriate treatments by surgical approaches and/or radionuclide therapy, chemotherapy, and biotherapy pose challenges and controversies. These challenges and controversies will be reviewed and possible approaches proposed.

Thoracic and duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: natural history and function of menin in tumorigenesis

Mutations of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) gene lead to loss of function of its protein product menin. In keeping with its tumor suppressor function in endocrine tissues, the majority of the MEN1-related neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) show loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 11q13. In sporadic NETs, MEN1 mutations and LOH are also reported, indicating common pathways in tumor development. Prevalence of thymic NETs (thNETs) and pulmonary carcinoids in MEN1 patients is 2-8%. Pulmonary carcinoids may be underreported and research on natural history is limited, but disease-related mortality is low. thNETs have a high mortality rate. Duodenopancreatic NETs (dpNETs) are multiple, almost universally found at pathology, and associated with precursor lesions. Gastrinomas are usually located in the duodenal submucosa while other dpNETs are predominantly pancreatic. dpNETs are an important determinant of MEN1-related survival, with an estimated 10-year survival of 75%. Survival differs between subtypes and apart from tumor size there are no known prognostic factors. Natural history of nonfunctioning pancreatic NETs needs to be redefined because of increased detection of small tumors. MEN1-related gastrinomas seem to behave similar to their sporadic counterparts, while insulinomas seem to be more aggressive. Investigations into the molecular functions of menin have led to new insights into MEN1-related tumorigenesis. Menin is involved in gene transcription, both as an activator and repressor. It is part of chromatin-modifying protein complexes, indicating involvement of epigenetic pathways in MEN1-related NET development. Future basic and translational research aimed at NETs in large unbiased cohorts will clarify the role of menin in NET tumorigenesis and might lead to new therapeutic options.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: diagnosis and management

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are uncommon but rising in incidence. There have been recent changes in the WHO nomenclature and a newly proposed American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging, which complement each other. These neoplasms are of great medical and radiological interest because of their diverse presenting features and imaging appearances. There is an increased role for both anatomic and functional imaging in the assessment of these neoplasms. A review of the nomenclature, staging, and imaging is presented in this paper.

Causes of death and prognostic factors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a prospective study: comparison of 106 MEN1/Zollinger-Ellison syndrome patients with 1613 literature MEN1 patients with or without pancreatic endocrine tumors

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is classically characterized by the development of functional or nonfunctional hyperplasia or tumors in endocrine tissues (parathyroid, pancreas, pituitary, adrenal). Because effective treatments have been developed for the hormone excess state, which was a major cause of death in these patients in the past, coupled with the recognition that nonendocrine tumors increasingly develop late in the disease course, the natural history of the disease has changed. An understanding of the current causes of death is important to tailor treatment for these patients and to help identify prognostic factors; however, it is generally lacking.To add to our understanding, we conducted a detailed analysis of the causes of death and prognostic factors from a prospective long-term National Institutes of Health (NIH) study of 106 MEN1 patients with pancreatic endocrine tumors with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (MEN1/ZES patients) and compared our results to those from the pooled literature data of 227 patients with MEN1 with pancreatic endocrine tumors (MEN1/PET patients) reported in case reports or small series, and to 1386 patients reported in large MEN1 literature series. In the NIH series over a mean follow-up of 24.5 years, 24 (23%) patients died (14 MEN1-related and 10 non-MEN1-related deaths). Comparing the causes of death with the results from the 227 patients in the pooled literature series, we found that no patients died of acute complications due to acid hypersecretion, and 8%-14% died of other hormone excess causes, which is similar to the results in 10 large MEN1 literature series published since 1995. In the 2 series (the NIH and pooled literature series), two-thirds of patients died from an MEN1-related cause and one-third from a non-MEN1-related cause, which agrees with the mean values reported in 10 large MEN1 series in the literature, although in the literature the causes of death varied widely. In the NIH and pooled literature series, the main causes of MEN1-related deaths were due to the malignant nature of the PETs, followed by the malignant nature of thymic carcinoid tumors. These results differ from the results of a number of the literature series, especially those reported before the 1990s. The causes of non-MEN1-related death for the 2 series, in decreasing frequency, were cardiovascular disease, other nonendocrine tumors > lung diseases, cerebrovascular diseases. The most frequent non-MEN1-related tumor deaths were colorectal, renal > lung > breast, oropharyngeal. Although both overall and disease-related survival are better than in the past (30-yr survival of NIH series: 82% overall, 88% disease-related), the mean age at death was 55 years, which is younger than expected for the general population.Detailed analysis of causes of death correlated with clinical, laboratory, and tumor characteristics of patients in the 2 series allowed identification of a number of prognostic factors. Poor prognostic factors included higher fasting gastrin levels, presence of other functional hormonal syndromes, need for >3 parathyroidectomies, presence of liver metastases or distant metastases, aggressive PET growth, large PETs, or the development of new lesions.The results of this study have helped define the causes of death of MEN1 patients at present, and have enabled us to identify a number of prognostic factors that should be helpful in tailoring treatment for these patients for both short- and long-term management, as well as in directing research efforts to better define the natural history of the disease and the most important factors determining long-term survival at present.

Neuroendocrine liver metastasis treated by using intraarterial therapy: volumetric functional imaging biomarkers of early tumor response and survival

PURPOSE

To determine if volumetric changes of diffusion-weighted and contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can help assess early tumor response to intraarterial therapy (IAT) in neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center comprehensive imaging analysis was performed in compliance with HIPAA and was institutional review board approved. Informed patient consent was waived. Seventy-one patients (39 men; mean age, 62.3 years) with NELM treated with IAT were analyzed retrospectively. MR studies were performed before and 3-4 weeks after therapy. The index lesion was segmented to provide volumetric functional analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the hepatic arterial phase (HAP) and portal venous phase (PVP). Tumor response was defined as increase in volumetric ADC of 15% or greater and decrease in volumetric enhancement of 25% or greater during the HAP or of 50% or greater during the PVP. Patient overall survival was the primary end point after therapy initiation. Univariate analysis included Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to detect interactions between volumetric ADC and contrast-enhanced MR imaging and to calculate the hazard ratio.

RESULTS

There was significant increase in mean volumetric ADC (27%, P < .0001) and significant decrease in mean volumetric enhancement during the HAP (-25.3%, P < .0001) and the PVP (-22.4%, P < .0001) in all patients. Patients who had 15% or greater volumetric ADC increase (n = 49) after therapy had better prognosis than those who had less than 15% increase in volumetric ADC (n = 22) (log-rank test, P < .002). Patients who had 25% or greater decrease in volumetric arterial enhancement (n = 40) or 50% or greater decrease in venous enhancement (n = 18) had better prognosis than those who had less than 25% decrease in volumetric arterial enhancement (n = 31) or less than 50% decrease in venous enhancement (n = 53) (log-rank test, P < .02).

CONCLUSION

Volumetric functional MR imaging criteria may act as biomarkers of early response, indicating that these criteria may be important to incorporate in future NELM clinical trials.

Importance of surveillance for multiple endocrine neoplasia-1 and surgery in patients with sporadic Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is a rare disorder characterized by gastrin-secreting tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and gastric acid hypersecretion. There is controversy over the best way to manage these patients; we investigated outcomes of patients with different forms of the disease, who did and did not undergo surgery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with ZES associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) (n = 16) and those with sporadic ZES (n = 33) seen at a tertiary care center from August 1994 to January 2012. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to compare survival times among groups, based on treatment with surgery (n = 34) and the presence of MEN-1 (n = 9 with surgery; n = 7 without surgery). Differences were compared using the unpaired Student t test and the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Patients with MEN-1 syndrome-associated ZES presented at a younger age than patients with sporadic ZES (34.9 vs 45.7 y, respectively; P < .05) and were diagnosed at a younger age (39.3 vs 49.7 y, respectively; P < .01), yet lived a similar number of years (55.9 vs 55.1 y, respectively; P = .91). None of the patients with MEN-1-associated ZES died of progressive disease, compared with 86% of deaths among patients with sporadic ZES (P < .05). Lymph node involvement, detected during surgery, increased the risk of metastasis to liver (P = .13) and lack of cure by surgery (P = .01). Surgery reduced all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.6; P = .011) and disease-related mortality (hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.84; P = .032) of patients with sporadic, but not MEN-1 syndrome-associated, ZES.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of MEN-1 is associated with earlier onset and diagnosis of ZES, but a benign clinical course that rarely results in disease-related death; surgery therefore can be deferred for these patients. However, 86% of deaths among patients with sporadic ZES are attributed to disease-related causes, and mortality is reduced by early surgical intervention. Patients with sporadic ZES should undergo surgery soon after diagnosis.

Lymph nodes and survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

HYPOTHESIS

Lymph node metastases decrease survival in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs).

DESIGN

Prospective database searches.

SETTING

National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Stanford University Hospital (SUH).

PATIENTS

A total of 326 patients underwent surgical exploration for pNETs at the NIH (n = 216) and SUH (n = 110).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival, disease-related survival, and time to development of liver metastases.

RESULTS

Forty patients (12.3%) underwent enucleation and 305 (93.6%) underwent resection. Of the patients who underwent resection, 117 (35.9%) had partial pancreatectomy and 30 (9.2%) had a Whipple procedure. Forty-one patients also had liver resections, 21 had wedge resections, and 20 had lobectomies. Mean follow-up was 8.1 years (range, 0.3-28.6 years). The 10-year overall survival for patients with no metastases or lymph node metastases only was similar at 80%. As expected, patients with liver metastases had a significantly decreased 10-year survival of 30% (P < .001). The time to development of liver metastases was significantly reduced for patients with lymph node metastases alone compared with those with none (P < .001). For the NIH cohort with longer follow-up, disease-related survival was significantly different for those patients with no metastases, lymph node metastases alone, and liver metastases (P < .001). Extent of lymph node involvement in this subgroup showed that disease-related survival decreased as a function of the number of lymph nodes involved (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

As expected, liver metastases decrease survival of patients with pNETs. Patients with lymph node metastases alone have a shorter time to the development of liver metastases that is dependent on the number of lymph nodes involved. With sufficient long-term follow-up, lymph node metastases decrease disease-related survival. Careful evaluation of number and extent of lymph node involvement is warranted in all surgical procedures for pNETs.

Clinical practice guidelines for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to provide guidelines for evaluation, treatment, and genetic testing for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1).

PARTICIPANTS

The group, which comprised 10 experts, including physicians, surgeons, and geneticists from international centers, received no corporate funding or remuneration.

PROCESS

Guidelines were developed by reviews of peer-reviewed publications; a draft was prepared, reviewed, and rigorously revised at several stages; and agreed-upon revisions were incorporated.

CONCLUSIONS

MEN1 is an autosomal dominant disorder that is due to mutations in the tumor suppressor gene MEN1, which encodes a 610-amino acid protein, menin. Thus, the finding of MEN1 in a patient has important implications for family members because first-degree relatives have a 50% risk of developing the disease and can often be identified by MEN1 mutational analysis. MEN1 is characterized by the occurrence of parathyroid, pancreatic islet, and anterior pituitary tumors. Some patients may also develop carcinoid tumors, adrenocortical tumors, meningiomas, facial angiofibromas, collagenomas, and lipomas. Patients with MEN1 have a decreased life expectancy, and the outcomes of current treatments, which are generally similar to those for the respective tumors occurring in non-MEN1 patients, are not as successful because of multiple tumors, which may be larger, more aggressive, and resistant to treatment, and the concurrence of metastases. The prognosis for MEN1 patients might be improved by presymptomatic tumor detection and undertaking treatment specific for MEN1 tumors. Thus, it is recommended that MEN1 patients and their families should be cared for by multidisciplinary teams comprising relevant specialists with experience in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with endocrine tumors.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

We reviewed the literature about entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 syndrome (MEN1) to clarify their demographic features, localization imaging, practice, and appropriate therapeutical strategies, analyzing the current approach to entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in MEN1. Despite the fact that hyperparathyroidism is usually the first manifestation of MEN1, the penetrance of these tumors is similar. They are characterized by multiplicity of lesions, variable expression of the tumors, and propensity for malignant degeneration. Both the histological type and the size of MEN1 neuroendocrine tumors correlate with malignancy. Monitoring of pancreatic peptides and use of imaging exams allow early diagnosis and prompt surgical treatment, resulting in prevention of metastatic disease and improvement of long-term survival. Surgery is often the treatment of choice for MEN1-neuroendocrine tumors. The rationale for surgical approach is to curtail malignant progression of the disease, and to cure the associated biochemical syndrome, should it be present.

Magnetic resonance imaging versus endoscopic ultrasonography for the detection of pancreatic tumours in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

OBJECTIVE

In multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, the main risk factor for metastases is pancreatic tumour size. We and others recommend limiting surgery to non-functioning pancreatic tumors ≥20 mm or growing, based on their size measured with endoscopic ultrasonography. Because endoscopic ultrasonography is invasive, we compared endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) to non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of pancreatic tumours ≥10 mm in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 patients.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed in nine participating centres; 90 patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 underwent EUS and MRI with gadolinium infusion. Gastroenterologists and radiologists were blinded to the results, magnetic resonance images were reviewed centrally.

RESULTS

EUS detected 86 tumours ≥10 mm, and 48 (53.3%) patients had at least one tumour ≥10 mm. MRI detected 67 tumours ≥10 mm, and 46 (51.1%) patients had at least one tumour ≥10 mm. EUS and MRI agreement was moderate for detection of tumours ≥10 mm (Kappa coefficient=0.49), and for selection of patients with tumours ≥10 mm (Kappa coefficient=0.55). EUS and MRI missed 11/24 and 4/24 lesions ≥20 mm, respectively. EUS failed to identify 9/57 (15.7%) patients with pancreatic tumours ≥10 mm, and MRI failed to identify 11/57 (19.3%) patients with pancreatic tumours ≥10 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS and MRI are complementary and should be performed at initial evaluation in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 patients. Whether follow-up should be based on either technique or both, requires further evaluation.

Pancreatic endocrine tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome: review of literature

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the surgical approach to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1)-related pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs).

METHODS

We reviewed selected publications and our personal experience with MEN 1-associated PETs to delineate their general characteristics, current practice and controversies, preoperative imaging and intraoperative assessment, and appropriate therapeutic strategies including radical surgical procedures.

RESULTS

The penetrance of PETs in the setting of MEN 1 is similar to that of parathyroid tumors, even though hyperparathyroidism is usually the first manifestation of MEN 1 syndrome. In contrast with the sporadic counterparts, MEN 1-related PETs are characterized by an early onset, multiplicity of lesions, variable expression of the tumors, and propensity for malignant degeneration. Both the histologic type and the size of these tumors correlate with malignant potential.

CONCLUSION

The rationale for surgical considerations for these tumors is to curtail the malignant progression of the disease and to cure or aid in management of the associated biochemical syndromes. A surgical procedure is often the treatment of choice for PETs in patients with MEN 1. Monitoring of pancreatic peptides and use of diagnostic imaging allow an early pancreatic resection, in conjunction with prevention of metastatic PETs and improvement of long-term survival. Hepatic metastatic lesions can be successfully treated by surgical resection.

A 41-Year-Old Man with Two Types of Metachronous Peptic Ulcer Complication due to Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome-Regression of Pancreatic Primary after Chemoembolization of Hepatic Metastases: A Case Report

Introduction. Gastrinoma should be suspected when the peptic ulcer(s) is postbulbar, multiple, refractory, or recurrent, or ulcer is associated with nephrolithiasis, hypocalcaemia, or erosive esophagitis. The majority of gastrinomas are malignant. Case Presentation. The patient is a 41-year-old Iranian man who has been in good health until 36 months ago when duodenal perforation and two bouts of upper GI bleeding (GIB), each two months apart occurred. He also mentioned mild watery diarrhoea and decreased appetite. Serum gastrin level was elevated. Abdominal CT scan revealed pancreatic mass and three enhancing hepatic masses. CT-guided pancreatic biopsy revealed monotonous cells. Chemoembolization of hepatic metastases was done. New ct images 6 months later showed nearly total regressed hepatic and pancreatic lesions. Conclusion. Beside previously defined situations that take gastrinoma into account as the etiology of PUD, accumulation of PUD complications is highly suggestive of Zollinger-Ellisone syndrome (ZES). Regression of pancreatic primary after chemoembolization of hepatic metastases is unexplainable at the present time.

Long-term results of surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in patients with MEN1

PURPOSE

This study was made to evaluate long-term results of an aggressive surgical approach for pancreaticoduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1).

METHODS

MEN1 patients with either biochemical evidence of functioning or non-functioning pNENs larger than 1 cm in size on imaging underwent duodenopancreatic surgery. Since 1997, patients were followed annually by biochemical testing and imaging studies.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight genetically confirmed MEN1 patients underwent duodenopancreatic resection for functioning (n = 22) or non-functioning (n = 16) pNENs, nine patients were yet not operated. Malignant disease occurred in 12 (35%) patients defined by either lymph node (12 patients) and/or distant metastases (2 patients). Six patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) required pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) as initial or redo procedure and 32 patients underwent other duodenopancreatic resections. Ten (26%) patients underwent up to four reoperations for either recurrent or metastatic disease that resulted in completion pancreatectomy in four patients. After median 109 months, 44 patients were alive and three patients died, one due to thymic carcinoid and two of unrelated causes. All eight patients with organic hyperinsulinism and 7 of 13 patients with ZES were biochemically cured. However, 24 of 38 (78%) patients developed new pNENs in the pancreatic remnant, but none developed distant metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Early resection of pNENs in MEN1 may prevent the development of distant metastases. However, the majority of patients develop new pNENs in the duodenopancreatic remnant which may require completion pancreatectomy in the long term.

[About a case of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Review of some clinical manifestations and treatment controversies]

The rare hereditary syndrome, multiple endocrine neoplasia type1 (MEN-1), is known to predispose affected individuals to endocrine neoplasms in a variety of tissues such as the parathyroid glands, the pituitary gland and the gastrointestinal tract. We describe the case of a man with traditionally-described manifestations (hyperparathyroidism and gastrinoma) and with other tumoral lesions arising from endocrine cells (insulinoma, gastric carcinoid, adrenal adenoma and pancreatic non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors) and non-endocrine cells (lipoma and collagenoma). Frequent recurrences in susceptible tissues that are not totally removed (as occurs in hyperparathyroidism and duodenal gastrinoma) and their unknown clinical significance have aroused current controversies in the therapeutic management of these entities, which is briefly reviewed.

Impact of CT-based diagnostic imaging on management and outcome of nonfunctioning pancreatic tumors

BACKGROUND

Sporadic malignant non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumors (NF-PETs) are an important subset of pancreatic neoplasms. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of improved imaging on these features in a tertiary referral centre within a 20-year follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1988 to 2009, 51 patients were treated for sporadic malignant NF-PETs. Forty-one patients who underwent tumor resection were retrospectively attributed according to the date of the initial diagnosis, group 1: 1988-1999 vs. group 2: 2000-2009.

RESULTS

Cross-sectional imaging led to positive prediction of NF-PETs in all patients. Curative resection was achieved in 76%. Synchronous metastases were present in 56% with a positive prediction of 43%. In group 1, the mean reported CT-determined tumor size was 56 vs. 54 mm in group 2 (p = 0.89). Synchronous metastases were present in 61% in group 1 vs. 57% (p = 0.99) in group 2. Metachronous metastases were recorded in 39% in group 1 vs. 43% (p = 0.84) in group 2. The mean interval from initial resection to diagnosis of metastatic disease was significantly shorter (p = 0.01) in patients from group 1 (14 vs. 61 months). Cumulative 5- and 10-year survival rates were 77% and 72% in group 1 vs. a 5-year survival rate of 66% in group 2.

CONCLUSION

So far, improved CT-based imaging has no impact on earlier detection of initial synchronous metastases in sporadic malignant NF-PETs, while metachronous metastases are detected earlier.

Pancreatic endocrine tumors

Pancreatic endocrine tumors have been steadily growing in incidence and prevalence during the last two decades, showing an incidence of 4-5/1,000,000 population. They represent a heterogeneous group with very varying tumor biology and prognosis. About half of the patients present clinical symptoms and syndromes related to substances released from the tumors (Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, insulinoma, glucagonoma, etc) and the other half are so-called nonfunctioning tumors mainly presenting with symptoms such as obstruction, jaundice, bleeding, and abdominal mass. Ten percent to 15% of the pancreatic endocrine tumors are part of an inherited syndrome such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), neurofibromatosis, or tuberousclerosis. The diagnosis is based on histopathology demonstrating neuroendocrine features such as positive staining for chromogranin A and specific hormones such as gastrin, proinsulin, and glucagon. Moreover, the biochemical diagnosis includes measurement of chromogranins A and B or specific hormones such as gastrin, insulin, glucagon, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in the circulation. In addition to standard localization procedures, radiology (computed tomography [CT] scan, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], ultrasound [US]), somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and most recently positron emission tomography with specific isotopes such as (11)C-5 hydroxytryptamin ((11)C-5-HTP), fluorodopa and (68)Ga-1,4,7,10-tetra-azacyclododecane-N,N',N″,N‴-tetra-acetic acid (DOTA)-octreotate are performed. Surgery is still one of the cornerstones in the management of pancreatic endocrine tumors, but curative surgery is rarely obtained in most cases because of metastatic disease. Debulking and other cytoreductive procedures might facilitate systemic treatment. Cytotoxic drugs, biological agents, such as somatostatin analogs, alpha interferons, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are routinely used. Tumor-targeted radioactive treatment is available in many centres in Europe and is effective in patients with tumors that express high content of somatostatin receptors type 2 and 5. In the future, treatment will be based on tumor biology and molecular genetics with the aim of so-called personalized medicine.

Presentation and outcome of pancreaticoduodenal endocrine tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome

AIM

To assess presentation and outcome of pancreaticoduodenal endocrine tumors (PDETs) in a single center series of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of MEN1 patients observed at the University of Verona.

RESULTS

Thirty-one MEN1 patients had PDETs, including 16 nonfunctioning (NF), 6 insulinomas and 9 Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). In 16 of these patients (52%), PDET was the manifestation which led to the diagnosis of MEN1; among this group, 15 patients (94%) previously had unidentified primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), which was asymptomatic in 9 cases (60%). Of the 31 patients, 19 (61%) underwent curativesurgery and 13 (68%, 7 NF-PDETs, 4 insulinomas and 2 ZES) were disease-free after a median follow-up of 3 years (range: 0.5-15). One patient had debulking surgery with stable disease after 2 years of follow-up. Eight patients with NF-PDETs ≤20 mm and 2 with ZES, treated with a conservative approach, showed stable disease. One patient with insulinoma was lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

PDET may be the manifestation that leads to MEN1 diagnosis since the almost constant presence of PHPT is very often unrecognized or considered sporadic. Conversely, the presence of PDETs should be looked for in all patients presenting PHPT, even if asymptomatic, particularly before age 50. Surgery may be curative in the majority of insulinomas and can prolong disease-free survival in NF-PDET, but is not proven to be effective in ZES. A conservative approach can be safely reserved for patients with NF-PDETs ≤20 mm.

Treatment strategies for Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

BACKGROUND

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is a rare disorder caused by tumor secretion of the hormone gastrin, which results in gastric acid hypersecretion and secondarily complicated peptic ulcer and diarrhea. Until the development of H(2)-receptor antagonists and later proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), the disease was virulent, often associated with ulcer-related mortality, and the mainstay of treatment was total gastrectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate current approaches to diagnosis and therapy, focusing on the role of PPIs.

METHODS

An extensive literature search through PubMed using the search term 'Zollinger-Ellison syndrome' from 1964 to the present was performed. Primary articles were identified, and pertinent articles obtained from the reference lists were also examined.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

The clinical manifestations of ZES are well described, but overlaps with other more common disorders delay diagnosis. The use of abdominal imaging with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and endoscopic ultrasound has improved tumor staging. PPI therapy is remarkably effective in controlling gastric acid hypersecretion, thereby reducing morbidity and potential mortality of this syndrome. The dose of drug necessary to control symptoms is highly variable but, even when used in high doses for prolonged periods of time, the disease remained controlled with very few drug-related side effects.

Article Commentary: Surgical Prophylaxis for Inheritable Malignant Diseases: Breast Cancer and Endocrine Disease

Despite advances in modern medicine, cancer remains all too common and deadly. At its core, cancer is a disease of our DNA. As such, many cancers are passed from parents to children, making cancer one of the most commonly inherited diseases. Presently, we have no meaningful methods of “preventing” the malignant transformation that occurs as a result of an inherited gene, but investigators have identified several genetic mutations and subsequently developed risk-reduction strategies that sometimes involve surgery.