The relationship of bacteremia to the length of injection needle in endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy

Compared with other methods, cyanoacrylate and lauromacrogol in treating esophagogastric varices did not increase the risk of postoperative infection

BACKGROUND

Patients with cirrhosis commonly undergo endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for gastric and esophageal variceal bleeding. However, postoperative infections can increase the risk of rebleeding and mortality.

AIM

This study aimed to determine the risk of postoperative infections and its associated factors following cyanoacrylate injection treatment in these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 57 patients treated with ligation (ligation group), 66 patients treated with cyanoacrylate injection (injection group), and 91 patients treated with conservative treatment (control group) at the Nanchong Central Hospital.

RESULTS

The rate of postoperative infection was similar among the cyanoacrylate, ligation, and conservative treatment groups, with no significant statistical difference observed ( P  = 0.97). Multivariate analysis identified postoperative Child-Pugh score and renal insufficiency as two independent risk factors for postoperative infection. The rebleeding rate in the injection group was significantly lower than in the other groups ( P  = 0.01). Mortality was significantly higher in the control group compared with the ligation and injection groups ( P  = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Cyanoacrylate combined with lauromacrogol injection did not significantly increase the risk of infection compared with ligation and conservative treatments, and it was more effective in reducing the risk of rebleeding. This method is safe, effective, and holds clinical value for broader application.

Low risk of bacteremia after endoscopic variceal therapy for esophageal varices: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy (EVS) are the main therapeutic procedures for the emergency treatment and secondary prophylaxis of esophageal varices in cirrhotics. Post-endoscopic bacteremia has been reported after EVS and EVL, but data on the frequency of bacteremia are conflicting. This study aims to provide incidences of bacteremia after EVS and EVL in different settings through meta-analysis.

METHODS

Only prospective or randomized studies were included in this meta-analysis. Binomial distribution was used to compute variance for each study. Random effects models were used as the final model for estimating the effect size and 95 % confidence interval. Adjusted effects were obtained using meta-regression analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen prospective studies involving 1001 procedures in 587 patients were included in the meta-analysis on the risk of bacteremia after EVS or EVL in cirrhotics with esophageal varices. The frequency of bacteremia after endoscopic variceal therapy was 13 %. The frequency of bacteremia after EVS (17 %) was higher than after EVL (6 %) with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.106). The frequency of bacteremia after elective EVS (14 %) was significantly less than after emergency EVS (22 %) (P < 0.001). The frequency of bacteremia after elective EVL (7.6 %) was not significantly different from after emergency EVL (3.2 %) (P = 0.850).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of bacteremia is low in patients with cirrhosis and varices after esophageal variceal therapy. These results are consistent with our current guidelines that antibiotic prophylaxis before endoscopic variceal therapy is only necessary for bleeding patients.

N/A

N/A

Bacteremia in cirrhotic patients submitted to endoscopic band ligation of esophageal varices

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic procedures can develop bacteremia. Patients with chronic liver disease are more predisposed to undergo bacteremia and infections because they are immunocompromised.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of bacteremia in cirrhotics submitted to endoscopic variceal ligation.

METHODS

Three groups of 40 patients each were studied. One group was made up of patients with cirrhosis who were submitted to ligation, a second group was composed of cirrhotics who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy only, and a third group was composed of patients without liver disease who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Blood was sampled from all patients for culture, both in aerobic and in anaerobic mediums, immediately before endoscopy and at 5 and 30 minutes after its completion.

RESULTS

Blood culture was positive in 6 samples. In 4 of these, the bacteria (Staphylococcus hominis hominis, Staphylococcus auricularis, Acinetobacter lwoffii, and coagulase-negative staphylococcus) were isolated before the endoscopic procedure and thus were considered as contamination. In the ligation group, a streptococcus of the viridans group was isolated 5 minutes after the procedure, and in the cirrhosis without ligation group, a Staphylococcus epidermidis was isolated at 30 minutes. None of the patients showed clinical evidence of infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The bacteremia incidence in cirrhotic patients submitted to variceal ligation was 2.5%, showing no difference from the control groups.

Frequency of bacteremia after linear EUS of the upper GI tract with and without FNA

BACKGROUND

Few data are available concerning the frequency of bacteremia after diagnostic EUS or EUS-guided FNA. This study was undertaken to provide these data and to determine whether present guidelines for prophylactic administration of antibiotics to prevent endocarditis during upper endoscopy are applicable to EUS and EUS-guided FNA.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients who were to undergo diagnostic EUS of the upper-GI tract and 50 who were to have upper-GI EUS-guided FNA were enrolled in this prospective study. Blood cultures were obtained before and within 5 minutes after the conclusion of the procedure. In case of bacterial growth, patients were observed for at least 3 days for signs of infection.

RESULTS

After diagnostic EUS, significant bacteremia was found in two patients with esophageal carcinoma (2%: 95% CI[0%, 4.8%]) and after EUS-guided FNA in two patients (4%: 95% CI[0%, 9.6%]). The difference was not statistically significant. None of these patients developed clinical signs of infection. Risk factors predisposing to bacteremia could not be identified.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of bacteremia after EUS, with and without FNA, is within the range of that for diagnostic upper endoscopy. Therefore, the same recommendations for prophylactic administration of antibiotics to prevent endocarditis may be applied in patients undergoing EUS and EUS-guided FNA. The role of esophageal cancer as a predisposing factor to EUS-associated infection remains uncertain.

Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy

This is one of a series of statements discussing the utilization of GI endoscopy in common clinical situations. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy prepared this text. In preparing this guideline, a MEDLINE literature search was performed, and additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of the identified articles and from recommendations of expert consultants. When little or no data exist from well-designed prospective trials, emphasis is given to results from large series and reports from recognized experts. Guidelines for appropriate utilization of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus. Further controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement, and revision may be necessary as new data appear. Clinical consideration may justify a course of action at variance to these recommendations.

Infection control during gastrointestinal endoscopy

Infection-control issues during gastrointestinal endoscopy, which are becoming increasingly important, can generally be divided into three major areas: (1) infectious complications resulting from a patient's own microbial flora (autologous), (2) infections transmitted from patient to patient by way of the endoscope (exogenous), and (3) infections transmitted between the patient and the health-care provider. The mean frequency of postprocedure bacteremia ranges from 0.5% for flexible sigmoidoscopy to 2.2% for colonoscopy, 4.2% for esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 8.9% for variceal ligation, 11% for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, 15.4% for variceal sclerotherapy, and 22.8% for esophageal dilation. Although postprocedure bacteremia is not uncommon, it seldom results in infectious complications. Exogenous infections transmitted during endoscopy, which are extremely rare, generally result from failure to follow accepted guidelines for the cleaning and disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscopes, underscoring the importance of meticulous attention to endoscope reprocessing. Finally, although the risk of patient-staff transmission of infection is also rare, standard infection-control recommendations are important in protecting both patients and health-care providers.

Bacteremia after endoscopic injection of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate for gastric variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Cyanoacrylate may form a barrier that prevents bacterial invasion when used in tissue. Because cyanoacrylate polymerizes within seconds on contact with aqueous media, it is used worldwide to arrest gastric variceal bleeding. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of bacteremia after endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for gastric variceal bleeding.

METHODS

Patients with cirrhosis who underwent endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for gastric variceal bleeding were included. Patients with cirrhosis who underwent upper endoscopy for nonvariceal upper GI bleeding were recruited as controls. Patients with infection before endoscopy were excluded. Blood was cultured in both groups. Injection needles and endoscope accessory channels were cultured in the cyanoacrylate injection group.

RESULTS

More patients injected with cyanoacrylate had positive blood cultures in comparison with the control group (15/47 vs. 1/47, p < 0.0001). In the cyanoacrylate injection group, the volume of blood transfused and Child-Pugh score were factors associated with the occurrence of bacteremia. Most episodes of bacteremia were transient, except for 1 patient who died of sepsis. Most of the microorganisms cultured from blood samples were identical to those cultured from injection needles (65%) and accessory channels (90%).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for gastric varices does not limit the spread of bacteria. The endoscope accessory channel was the major source of bacteria. Most episodes of bacteremia were transient and uneventful.

Gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly

Among patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding, older age is associated with an increased rate of comorbidity, greater medication use, and atypical clinical presentations. The aging of the population makes the evaluation and management of gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly a special and increasingly common clinical challenge. The unique features and common causes of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly are reviewed. Important management issues considered include hemodynamic resuscitation; anticoagulation; and medical, surgical, and endoscopic therapy.

Preventing nosocomial infections from gastrointestinal endoscopy

Gastrointestinal procedures have been associated with a wide range of infectious complications, including bacterial endocarditis. Although the rate of bacteremia from the patient's own flora is quite high after some procedures, only a few cases of endocarditis caused by gastrointestinal instrumentation have been reported. Because of the severity of the illness, however, antibiotic prophylaxis has been recommended for patients who are categorized as high risk for some procedures. Bacteremia and other infections, such as colitis, may also originate from a contaminated endoscope. To prevent such an occurrence, high-level disinfection has been recommended for gastrointestinal endoscopes. High-level disinfection includes manual cleaning of the endoscope, flushing of internal channels with a liquid chemical sterilant, and thorough rinsing and drying of internal lumens.

Bacterial peritonitis after elective endoscopic variceal ligation: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic variceal ligation is becoming the therapy of choice for esophageal varices, replacing endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy. The latter is associated with a 5-53% incidence of port-procedural bacteremia and a 0.5-3% incidence of peritonitis, whereas the former carries a 3-6% risk of bacteremia. However, the incidence of peritonitis after variceal ligation has not been well studied. This prospective study is designed to investigate the risk of developing bacteremia and bacterial peritonitis after elective endoscopic variceal ligation.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with esophageal varices and ascites secondary to liver cirrhosis underwent elective endoscopic variceal ligation. Before the procedure, ascitic fluid was drawn under ultrasound guidance and sent for cell counts, Gram stain, and cultures. Two to 4 days afterward, a repeat ascitic fluid sample was sent for the same studies whether or not the patient had symptoms or signs suggestive of infection. Blood cultures were drawn both immediately before and after the endoscopic ligation procedure.

RESULTS

Of 67 subjects, 11 developed asymptomatic bacteremia with Gram-positive commensals. However, none of them progressed to peritonitis. Two patients who did not have bacteremia developed mild febrile peritonitis with Escherichia coli and were successfully treated with oral antibiotics. No other infectious complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant risk of asymptomatic bacteremia and bacterial peritonitis after elective variceal ligation. The peritonitis does not seem to be related to the bacteremia, as patients who had bacteremia did not develop peritonitis and vice versa. In addition, the involved organisms were quite different. Unlike the bacteremia, postligation peritonitis may be a consequence of severe liver cirrhosis rather than the procedure itself. The clinical significance of postligation bacteremia is doubtful. With regard to peritonitis, in our opinion the use of prophylactic antibiotics should be reserved for patients with Child's C class cirrhosis, a recent history of variceal bleeding, a past history of bacterial peritonitis, or a comorbid immunosuppressive condition.

Prospective study of bacteremia rate after elastic band ligation and sclerotherapy of esophageal varices in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis

BACKGROUND

Esophageal band ligation is considered to be as efficient as endoscopic sclerotherapy, with a lower complication rate, including bacteremia. There are few studies comparing the two methods. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of bacteremia after both treatments in patients with portal hypertension secondary to schistosomiasis.

METHODS

Endoscopic sclerotherapy and band ligation were performed using standard techniques. Blood samples were obtained 5 and 30 minutes after endoscopic band ligation or sclerotherapy and cultured for aerobic and anaerobic organisms.

RESULTS

In the sclerotherapy group 2 of 43 (4.6%) blood cultures were positive (Peptostreptococcus sp and Streptococcus mitis). A similar result was obtained in the band ligation group: 2 of 35 (5.7%) had positive cultures, both with Staphylococcus aureus.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in the frequency of bacteremia after treatment of esophageal varices with endoscopic sclerotherapy or endoscopic band ligation in patients with portal hypertension secondary to schistosomiasis.

New approaches to endoscopic therapy for a haemostasis upper GI bleed

Haematemesis and/or melaena are the most common presentations of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopic haemostasis after diagnosis still remains a challenge to the gastroenterologist. Most variceal and peptic ulcer bleeding episodes stop spontaneously, and then prevention of rebleeding might be indicated by endoscopic techniques. In the present article, four less well-known endoscopic haemostasis techniques are discussed and, if available, comparative studies are reviewed.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for gastrointestinal endoscopy. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

This is one of a series of statements discussing the practice of gastrointestinal endoscopy in common clinical situations. It is intended to aid endoscopists in determining the appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Guidelines for the appropriate practice of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus. Controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement, and revision may be necessary as new data appear. Clinical consideration may justify a course of action at variance from these recommendations. Recommendations on prophylaxis against infective endocarditis were developed in conjunction with the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki Disease of the Council of Cardiovascular Disease in the Young of the American Heart Association.

New approaches to endoscopic therapy for hemostasis of upper GI bleed

Hematemesis and/or melena are the most common presentations of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopic hemostasis after diagnosis still remains a challenge to the gastroenterologist. Most variceal and peptic ulcer bleeding episodes stop spontaneously, and then prevention of rebleeding might be indicated by endoscopic techniques. Four not so well known endoscopic hemostasis techniques are discussed and comparative studies are reviewed.

Endoscopic sclerotherapy as compared with endoscopic ligation for bleeding esophageal varices

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sclerotherapy is an accepted treatment for bleeding esophageal varices, but it is associated with substantial local and systemic complications. Endoscopic ligation, a new form of endoscopic treatment for bleeding varices, may be safer. We compared the effectiveness and safety of the two techniques.

METHODS

In this randomized trial we compared endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic ligation in 129 patients with cirrhosis who had proved bleeding from esophageal varices. Sixty-five patients were treated with sclerotherapy, and 64 with ligation. Initial treatment for acute bleeding was followed by elective retreatment to eradicate varices. The patients were followed for a mean of 10 months, during which we determined the incidence of complications and recurrences of bleeding, the number of treatments needed to eradicate varices, and survival.

RESULTS

Active bleeding at the first treatment was controlled by sclerotherapy in 10 of 13 patients (77 percent) and by ligation in 12 of 14 patients (86 percent). Slightly more sclerotherapy-treated patients had recurrent hemorrhage during the study (48 percent vs. 36 percent for the ligation-treated patients, P = 0.072). The eradication of varices required a lower mean (+/- SD) number of treatments with ligation (4 +/- 2 vs. 5 +/- 2, P = 0.056) than with sclerotherapy. The mortality rate was significantly higher in the sclerotherapy group (45 percent vs. 28 percent, P = 0.041), as was the rate of complications (22 percent vs. 2 percent, P less than 0.001). The complications of sclerotherapy were predominantly esophageal strictures, pneumonias, and other infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cirrhosis who have bleeding esophageal varices have fewer treatment-related complications and better survival rates when they are treated by esophageal ligation than when they are treated by sclerotherapy.

Bacteremia after endoscopic band ligation of esophageal varices

In a 6-month period, 17 consecutive unselected patients undergoing emergency or elective endoscopic variceal band ligation were evaluated prospectively for clinical and bacteriological signs of bacteremia after each treatment session. None had signs of sepsis, fever, or chills; however, in one patient, a coagulase-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis was cultured from peripheral blood at 5 but not 30 min after the procedure. These data indicate that, in contrast to sclerotherapy, endoscopic variceal ligation rarely induces bacteremia.

A prospective controlled study of the risk of bacteremia in emergency sclerotherapy of esophageal varices

Reported incidences of bacteremia after endoscopy with esophageal variceal sclerotherapy are conflicting. A prospective controlled study was conducted to determine the frequency of bacteremia after emergency endoscopy with esophageal variceal sclerotherapy compared with frequency after elective esophageal variceal sclerotherapy and after emergency endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding from nonvariceal sources. A total of 126 endoscopies were studied in 72 patients. Groups consisted of (a) emergency endoscopy without esophageal variceal sclerotherapy, 37 sessions with 36 patients; (b) elective esophageal variceal sclerotherapy, 33 sessions with 14 patients; and (c) emergency esophageal variceal sclerotherapy, 56 sessions with 36 patients. Blood cultures were obtained before and 5 and 30 minutes after endoscopy. There was a higher frequency of preendoscopic bacteremia in emergency esophageal variceal sclerotherapy (13%) than in emergency endoscopy alone (0%) (P = 0.02). Clinically significant bacteremia in emergency esophageal variceal sclerotherapy was observed in 7 of 56 (13%) sessions, compared with 0 of 33 in elective esophageal variceal sclerotherapy (P = 0.03) and 1 of 36 (3%) in emergency endoscopy alone (P = 0.45). Of these cases, 3 (5.4%) were potentially caused by emergency esophageal variceal sclerotherapy, but not clinically significant postendoscopic bacteremia was attributable to the procedure in the other groups.

Variceal injection sclerotherapy

With the development and widespread use of flexible endoscopes, injection sclerotherapy of oesophageal varices has advanced beyond the early stages. Although slightly different techniques and different sclerosants are used, the results are not strikingly different. The cumulative rate of adverse effects is in the range of 20 to 40%, with a procedure-related mortality of around 1 to 2%. Sclerotherapy is the best available treatment for haemostasis of acute oesophageal variceal bleeding. However, as a long-term therapy it is less effective in the prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding events, since obliteration of all varices often takes several months. Furthermore, extra-oesophageal bleeding is not amenable to sclerotherapy. Thus, if repeated injections fail to prevent recurrent bleeding, other options such as shunt surgery, transection, chronic medical portal decompression with beta-blockers or even liver transplantation should be considered according to the needs of the individual patient. Prophylaxis of first variceal haemorrhage was beneficial in selected patients with a high bleeding risk. It cannot, however, be generally recommended at present.

Bacterial peritonitis following esophageal injection sclerotherapy for variceal hemorrhage

Patients presenting with ascites and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage were studied prospectively. Five patients presenting with acute variceal hemorrhage were found not to have pre-existing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis on initial paracentesis. However, three of these five developed findings compatible with bacterial peritonitis after sclerotherapy. Although the number of cases is small, our results support the monitoring of ascitic fluid after sclerotherapy.

Bacteremia after injection of esophageal varices

Elective sclerotherapy for esophageal varices produces bacteremia in 4% to 53% of patients. The clinical importance of this phenomenon is uncertain. This study was undertaken to re-assess the incidence and clinical relevance of post-sclerotherapy bacteremia. Blood cultures were taken prior to and at 5 min and 4 h after endoscopy in 50 patients for whom sclerotherapy was planned. In the 41 patients in whom varices were injected, positive cultures were obtained 5 min after sclerotherapy in only 4 patients (10%) and all but 1 patient had other possible causes of bacteremia. After 4 h, all blood cultures were sterile. No infective complications were identified. Bacteremia appears to be an infrequent and transient event after elective sclerotherapy. Only patients with prosthetic heart valves or endocardial abnormalities require antibiotic prophylaxis.

Endoscopic sclerotherapy for esophago-gastric varices: a critical reappraisal

Amongst the many non-surgical techniques for the treatment of variceal bleeding, endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) has shown great promise. EST can successfully obliterate esophageal varices and prevent variceal rebleeding. It is also very effective in the control of active bleeding from esophageal varices. The technique of EST is simple and can be carried out with a conventional, forward viewing, flexible endoscope and a teflon injector. Weekly intravariceal injections of an aqueous sclerosant are preferable. Though complications of EST in experienced hands are low, prophylactic EST at present should be advocated only to patients at high risk of bleeding. While controversy exists, most reports indicate that EST improves survival of patients with portal hypertension who have bled from esophageal varices. With regular follow-up endoscopies, recurrence of varices and bleeding from them can be substantially reduced. Sclerotherapy may successfully obliterate gastric varices in some patients either following EST for esophageal varices or by direct gastric variceal injections. For the long-term management of portal hypertension, combination of pharmacotherapy before as well as after eradication of esophageal varices, needs proper evaluation.

Complications and hazards of gastrointestinal endoscopy

The diagnostic and therapeutic contribution of fiberoptic endoscopy to the advancement of the knowledge of gastrointestinal disease and to its proper management is already established. Technical refinements in the new instruments and extensive acceptance of the advantages of the method makes fiberendoscopy a procedure widely used throughout the world. Therefore, the appreciation of its potential risk of complications and hazards is justified. This review summarizes the complications and hazards of fiberoptic gastrointestinal endoscopy gleaned from reports of endoscopic surveys and individual experiences. Causes and means whereby complications related to upper intestinal and colonic endoscopy can be prevented or treated are discussed.

A clinical controlled trial of endoscopic sclerotherapy for repeated esophageal variceal bleeding

Thirty-seven patients with postnecrotic cirrhosis of the liver and 13 patients with primary hepatoma were proven to have repeated bleeding from ruptured esophageal varices. Clinically controlled trials were performed by assigning patients to either sclerotherapy or control arms (25 patients each). Combined intra-variceal and para-variceal injection before an upper endoscopic examination was performed in the sclerotherapy group. In all 25 sclerotherapy cases (100%) hemostasis was successful, which was a statistically significant success rate compared to the control group (52.0%) (p less than 0.01). In the sclerotherapy group 20% (5/25 cases) developed rebleeding, which was less than the 48.0% (7 cases of continuous bleeding and 5 cases of rebleeding) of the control group (p less than 0.05). Four cases (16.0%) in the sclerotherapy group died of erosive gastritis with massive bleeding, compared to 8 fatalities (32.0%) in the control group, because of uncontrolled esophageal variceal bleeding. Endoscopic sclerotherapy is a very effective method for arresting bleeding esophageal varices, and for decreasing the rebleeding rate.

Bacterial infections complicating liver disease

Bacterial infection is a serious and often fatal complication of patients with liver disease and can prove fatal either directly or by precipitation of gastrointestinal bleeding, renal failure, or hepatic encephalopathy. At greatest risk are patients with alcoholic cirrhosis or decompensated chronic liver disease, or cases of acute liver disease who progress to fulminant hepatic failure or subacute hepatic necrosis. Infection appears to be unusual in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The site and type of infection is unrelated to the aetiology of the liver disease. Bacteraemia, pneumonia, urinary tract infection and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis are most common but infective endocarditis and meningitis, especially with pneumococci, are easily overlooked. Clinical suspicion of infection must be high as the only indication may be a general deterioration in the patients' clinical state, increasing encephalopathy or renal impairment. In the case of patients with fulminant hepatic failure, infection may precipitate the initial or recurrent encephalopathy and contributes to death in 10% of fatal cases. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is now recognized to occur in the absence of clinical features of peritonitis. The PMN content of the ascitic fluid may provide the only indication of infection and is the most readily available screening test. The most common types of organism responsible for all types of infection are Gram-negative enteric and streptococci, especially pneumococci, while infection with anaerobes is rare. Risk factors for infection include decompensated alcoholic liver disease, fulminant hepatic failure, gastrointestinal bleeding, invasive practical procedures and impaired host defence mechanisms against infection. Of the host defence mechanisms, impaired function of the reticuloendothelial system, complement, and PMNs represent the most common and serious defects. Defects of humoral immunity are present in ascitic fluid from patients with cirrhosis and are probably a major reason for development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Diuresis improves these functions and reduces the risk of peritonitis. Treatment of infections even with the appropriate antibiotic is still associated with a high mortality but the use of adjuvant gut sterilization is promising, particularly in cases infected with Gram-negative enteric organisms. Infusions of fresh frozen plasma, blood and cryoprecipitate improve some systemic host defences and may be beneficial in the treatment and reduction of risk of infection.

Bacteriaemia after injection sclerotherapy of oesophageal varices

Thirty consecutive alcoholic patients with biopsy-proven cirrhosis of the liver and oesophageal varices underwent a total of 47 upper intestinal endoscopies. During 31 of the endoscopies paravariceal sclerotherapy of oesophageal varices was performed. Blood cultures were drawn before and after the procedures. Bacteriaemia after endoscopy was detected on seven occasions: six after sclerotherapy and one after endoscopy without sclerotherapy. This difference did not reach statistical significance. The microorganisms cultured belonged to the normal flora of the skin or the oropharynx. Bacteriaemia was transient and had no clinical consequences.