Severe acute pancreatitis complicating sphincter of Oddi manometry

Endoclip papillaplasty restores sphincter of Oddi function: Pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) damaged the sphincter of Oddi (SO) function. This study aimed to explore the feasibility and efficacy of endoclip papillaplasty in restoring SO function.

METHODS

This prospective pilot study included consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis (stone size ≥10 mm) who underwent large-EST for stone removal, followed by endoclip papillaplasty, between May 2018 and March 2019.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled in this trail. Overall, 80% of the patients had a SO basal pressure of >10 mmHg after endoclip papillaplasty. Manometric parameters, including SO basal pressure, phasic wave contraction amplitude, phasic waves per minute, recovered after endoclip papillaplasty (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the manometric parameters of SO between healing grades A and B. Six patients developed mild post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, including three that had pancreatic stenting. Bile duct stone recurrence developed in 3.3% of the patients (1/30) during an 18-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoclip papillaplasty might restore SO function and possibly prevented biliary stone and cholangitis recurrence.

Risk factors of post- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in biliary type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in Japanese patients

OBJECTIVE

Suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a well-known risk factor for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). The indication of ERCP for suspected SOD patients was very low in Japan compared to other countries. Therefore, the risk of PEP may be different in Japanese SOD patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of PEP in suspected biliary type SOD in Japan.

METHODS

From December 1996 to January 2017, 72 patients were suspected as having biliary type SOD, by questionnaire, liver function tests, hepatobiliary scintigraphy, abdominal ultrasonography, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Finally, 60 patients who underwent ERCP were included in this study, and the factors associated with PEP were evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall PEP rate was 23.3% (n = 14). Diagnostic ERCP alone for SOD did not increase the risk of PEP. The correlation of PEP incidence with pancreatic duct guidewire (PGW) technique and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) was indicated in univariate and multivariate analysis. Pancreatic stent placement was a risk in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

PGW technique and EST for biliary type SOD were important risk factors for PEP. Pancreatic stenting was ineffective for prevention of PEP.

Sphincter of Oddi manometry using guide-wire-type manometer is feasible for examination of sphincter of Oddi motility

BACKGROUND

Sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) is recognized as the standard diagnostic modality for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). However, SOM is not commonly performed because of its technical difficulty and the high incidence of post-procedural pancreatitis. To diminish post-procedural pancreatitis, we tried to develop a new method of SOM. This study examined the feasibility of SOM with a guide-wire-type manometer, which is commonly used to measure the arterial pressure for coronary angiography, for the assessment of SO motility.

METHODS

A total of 35 procedures were performed in 8 patients with biliary type III SOD and 14 patients with other disease. We performed SOM using the guide-wire-type manometer on SOD cases and other cases [amplitude, duration, frequency and the area under the curve (AUC) of SO contractions].

RESULTS

The mean time required for the measurement was 7.5 ± 4.1 min. The amplitude, frequency and AUC of SO contractions were significantly larger in the SOD cases than in other diseases (147.2 vs. 92.8 mmHg, p = 0.042; 10 vs. 5/min, p = 0.007; 2,837 vs. 1,122 mmHg s, p = 0.003, respectively). In 6 patients who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), the SO amplitude decreased dramatically after EST. In this study, mild pancreatitis was observed in only one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

SOM using a guide-wire-type manometer is safe, reliable and easy to apply for the clinical assessment of SO motility. The guide-wire-type manometer may become a new method to measure SO function for the diagnosis of SOD.

Sphincter of Oddi disorder: what is the clinical issue?

Sphincter of Oddi disorder (SOD) is a functional disorder of the sphincter of Oddi (SO) and is pathophysiologically equivalent to functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID) of the digestive tract. SOD is important as a cause of biliary pain of unknown origin and idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis; however, the concept of SOD has not generally spread in the same way as FGID. SOD is diagnosed using ROME III criteria which were revised in 2006 to reduce the number of unnecessary and potentially risky procedures. Many cases of SOD still need SO manometry (SOM) which is performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). It is problematic that SOD patients, who already have a high risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis, require SOM for a definitive diagnosis. SOM is an invasive examination that is accompanied by a high risk of post-procedure pancreatitis and can be performed only at a limited number of institutions because of technical difficulties. In the treatment of SOD, the effectiveness of the drugs is uncertain, and the role of drug therapy in the management of SOD has not yet been established. In recent years, endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has been recognized as standard treatment for SOD; however, the effect of EST is not yet clear. The development of less invasive diagnostic techniques is desirable in the future. Furthermore, patient eligibility criteria for EST and the long-term prognosis after EST should be clarified.

Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years

BACKGROUND

Complications of ERCP are an important concern. We sought to determine predictors of post-ERCP complications at our institution.

METHODS

GI TRAC is a comprehensive data set of patients who underwent ERCP at our institution from 1994 through 2006. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate 4 categories of complications: (1) overall complications, (2) pancreatitis, (3) bleeding, and (4) severe or fatal complications. Independent predictors of complications were determined with multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 11,497 ERCP procedures were analyzed. There were 462 complications (4.0%), 42 of which were severe (0.36%) and 7 were fatal (0.06%). Specific complications of pancreatitis (2.6%) and bleeding (0.3%) were identified. Overall complications were statistically more likely among individuals with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) (odds ratio [OR] 1.91) and after a biliary sphincterotomy (OR 1.32). Subjects with a history of acute or chronic pancreatitis (OR 0.78) or who received a temporary small-caliber pancreatic stent (OR 0.69) had fewer complications. Post-ERCP pancreatitis was more likely to occur after a pancreatogram via the major papilla (OR 1.70) or minor papilla (OR 1.54) and among subjects with suspected SOD with stent placement (OR 1.45) or without stent placement (OR 1.84). Individuals undergoing biliary-stent exchange had less-frequent pancreatitis (OR 0.38). Biliary sphincterotomy was associated with bleeding (OR 4.71). Severe or fatal complications were associated with severe (OR 2.38) and incapacitating (OR 7.65) systemic disease, obesity (OR 5.18), known or suspected bile-duct stones (OR 4.08), pancreatic manometry (OR 3.57), and complex (grade 3) procedures (OR 2.86).

CONCLUSIONS

This study characterizes a large series of ERCP procedures from a single institution and outlines the incidence and predictors of complications.

Solid state biliary manometry catheter: impact on diagnosis and post-study pancreatitis

Perfusion manometry of the sphincter of Oddi has been the standard for the investigation of patients with presumed sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). Microtransducer manometry (MTM) of the sphincter of Oddi represents an alternative to perfusion manometry. The technical success and reproducibility of MTM are as good as for perfusion manometry. Current data suggest that the upper limit for normal of basal sphincter of Oddi pressures measured with MTM lies at approximately 35 mm Hg. Pancreatitis risk after MTM in patients with SOD compares favorably with that after perfusion manometry. Low cost and ease of handling make MTM of the sphincter of Oddi an attractive alternative.

Is sphincter of Oddi manometry a risk factor for pancreatitis? A different view

Studies suggest a causal relationship between sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) and acute pancreatitis, presumably due to water instillation in the ductal system. In this article, critical analysis of the existing studies attributes the high risk of acute pancreatitis with SOM to "association due to confounding" rather than to "causation." This conclusion is based on two pieces of evidence: The first is lack of biologic plausibility: Biologic evidence is lacking to support the hypothesis that water instillation during SOM can induce acute pancreatitis. The second is confounding evidence: Manometric studies show considerable variation in the risk of post-procedure pancreatitis (4% to 30%), which suggests that other important factors besides SOM influence the adverse outcome. These studies did not control for other variables, which are well known to predispose to pancreatitis and therefore may act as confounding factors. Two studies that assessed the independent role of SOM in causation of acute pancreatitis showed that SOM is not an independent predictor of acute pancreatitis. It is the underlying disorder sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and not the "SOM" procedure, that predisposes patients to post-procedure acute pancreatitis.

Sphincter of Oddi manometry does not predispose to post-ERCP acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Sphincter of Oddi manometry is helpful in selecting patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction who will respond to sphincterotomy. However, studies have shown that sphincter of Oddi manometry is associated with a high risk of post-procedure pancreatitis. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of sphincter of Oddi manometry in patients with sphincter of 2Oddi dysfunction. The secondary objective was to determine the risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively for 268 patients who had elective ERCP performed at 3 tertiary care medical centers between 1996 and 2000. Consecutive patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction formed the case group; the control group consisted of patients with bile duct stone. The case group was further subclassified into group A, patients who underwent sphincter of Oddi manometry followed by immediate ERCP, and group B, patients who had ERCP without manometry. The rate of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis was compared between case and control groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven percent of patients in the case group with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction developed acute pancreatitis compared with 3.2% of patients in the control group with bile duct stone (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the rate of acute pancreatitis in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction who underwent sphincter of Oddi manometry and ERCP compared with patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction who had ERCP without sphincter of Oddi manometry (odds ratio 0.72: 95% CI[0.08, 9.2]). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that biliary sphincterotomy (p=0.006) and pancreatography (p=0.03) were independent predictors of acute pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction are at higher risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. Sphincter of Oddi manometry by itself does not appear to predispose to this complication.

Controversies in clinical pancreatology: should the sphincter of Oddi be measured in patients with idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis, and should sphincterotomy be performed if the pressure is high?

The risk benefit ratio of measuring the sphincter of Oddi pressure and performing sphincterotomy in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis with high sphincter pressures has not been assessed. Few healthy controls have had sphincter measurements so that the definition of an abnormal sphincter remains understudied. The procedures involved have significant risks and the benefits are hard to measure considering the variable natural history of this disorder. No prospective, randomized investigations have been performed to evaluate efficacy of these invasive procedures. It is the author's opinion that until appropriate studies prove efficacy that these interventions be considered experimental.

Reduction in the incidence of pancreatitis in patients undergoing sphincter of Oddi manometry: a successful quality improvement project

OBJECTIVE

Acute pancreatitis is a recognized complication of sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM). Its frequency of occurrence has been reported in the range of 4 to 31%. In an earlier retrospective study performed at this institution, the incidence of pancreatitis was 9.3% in patients who only had SOM compared with 26.1% in those patients who had SOM and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with or without sphincterotomy at the same session. On the basis of these data, a quality-improvement project was initiated at two university-affiliated hospitals. This involved performance of SOM without ERCP. If ERCP was required, it was performed at a different session. The purpose of this project was to decrease the incidence of pancreatitis associated with SOM.

METHODS

This study involved prospective patient identification and retrospective chart review of patients who underwent SOM without ERCP between May 1998 and December 2000. SOM was performed using a triple-lumen catheter with water perfusion at a rate of 0.25 ml/min using an Arndorfer pneumohydraulic capillary perfusion system. The data recorded included pancreatitis after SOM, pancreatitis after ERCP and sphincterotomy, average days in the hospital after pancreatitis, and time between SOM and ERCP.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were studied. Three (7.32%) patients had pancreatitis after SOM. Five patients subsequently underwent ERCP and sphincterotomy and one (20%) patient had pancreatitis. The overall frequency of pancreatitis after SOM and any subsequent ERCP or sphincterotomy was 4 (9.78%) of 41 (95% confidence interval, 3.9-22.5%). The odds ratio for pancreatitis with ERCP and SOM at the same time compared with the SOM-only strategy was 3.26 (P = 0.05). The average stay in the hospital after pancreatitis ranged from 2 to 4 days, with a mean length of stay of 2.75 days. The time between SOM and subsequent ERCP ranged from 6 to 20 days, with a mean of 10.4 days.

CONCLUSION

By adopting a protocol to perform diagnostic SOM, separate from ERCP and sphincterotomy, we were able to decrease the incidence of pancreatitis considerably at our institutions.

Incidence of pancreatitis in patients undergoing sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM)

OBJECTIVE

Sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) is a useful diagnostic procedure when evaluating patients with unexplained biliary pain or idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis. Acute pancreatitis is a recognized complication of SOM whose pathogenesis appears to be multifactoral. We conducted this study to determine the incidence of pancreatitis in patients after SOM and to identify any variables that may lead to an increased incidence of pancreatitis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients who underwent SOM between 1992 and 1996 at two university-affiliated hospitals was done. SOM was performed using a triple lumen catheter with each lumen perfused at a rate of 0.25 cc/min using an Arndorfer pneumohydraulic capillary perfusion system. The following data were recorded: age, gender, clinical type of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, length of procedure, doses of medications used, duct cannulated, sphincter of Oddi pressure, whether endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with or without sphincterotomy was performed, and the number of patients developing pancreatitis. Statistical analysis was performed using a T test, chi2, and multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of pancreatitis was 17%. Six patients with type II SO dysfunction and 11 patients with type III SO dysfunction developed pancreatitis. The incidence of pancreatitis was significantly lower in those patients who only had SOM, compared with those patients who had SOM and ERCP (9.3% vs 26.1%, p < 0.026). There was no significant correlation between age, gender, duration of procedure, dose of midazolam used, sphincter of Oddi pressure, or type of SO dysfunction with the development of SOM-induced pancreatitis. Multiple regression analysis showed that sphincterotomy added no additional risk, beyond that associated with ERCP, for the development of pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the incidence of pancreatitis was highest when SOM was followed by ERCP. A potential method of decreasing the incidence of pancreatitis after SOM is performing ERCP with or without sphincterotomy at another session, separated from the SOM by at least 24 h. Before this can be definitely recommended, the results of this study must be validated by others or by a prospective study.

Effects of trimebutine on sphincter of Oddi motility in patients with post-cholecystectomy pain

BACKGROUND

Trimebutine is an opiate modulator of the gastrointestinal motility that interacts with enkephalinergic receptors.

AIM

To evaluate the effects of trimebutine (50 mg intravenous injection) on the motility of the sphincter of Oddi (SO) as assessed by endoscopic manometry.

METHODS

Endoscopic manometry was performed on 15 cholecystectomized patients who presented with symptoms suggestive of SO dysfunction. Prior to the endoscopic manometry, endoscopic ultrasonography was performed in order to rule out the possible presence of a bile duct stone.

RESULTS

Injecting trimebutine resulted in a significant increase in the SO antegrade phasic contraction rate (P = 0.02). Trimebutine decreased the basal pressure of the SO (32.5 vs. 27.5 mmHg), but the difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.11). The effects of trimebutine differed depending on the basal SO motility anomalies involved, but the period of latency was similar (mean 89 s: range 30-240 s). The basal anomalies were an increased basal SO pressure of > 40 mmHg in three patients, a tachyoddia (frequency of phasic contractions (PC) > 10/min) in six patients, prolonged PC (> 10 s) in two patients and an absence of phasic contraction in one patient. The basal pressure of the SO decreased in the three patients presenting with SO hyperpressure, but returned to a normal value in one case. The frequency of the PC decreased to normal in three out of the six patients with tachyoddia. The duration of the PC returned to normal in the two patients with prolonged PC whereas their frequencies increased. Prolonged PC developed in the patient without any detectable phasic contraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Trimebutine modulates SO motility in various ways depending on the basal SO motility anomaly observed after cholecystectomy. This regulatory effect suggests the existence of encephalinergic control of SO motility.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Evidence continues to accumulate indicating that sphincter of Oddi dysfunction may give rise to cholestasis, pancreatitis, or upper abdominal pain syndromes. Diagnosis of such dysfunction may be inferred from noninvasive tests or more precisely defined by manometric studies. Both the biliary and pancreatic sphincters are commonly involved. If medical therapy is ineffective, sphincter ablation via endoscopy or laparotomy should be considered for highly symptomatic patients. Complication rates of invasive techniques remain relatively high and risk:benefit ratio should be carefully considered. Future research as to etiology, more defined pathophysiology, more accurate noninvasive evaluation, and optimal therapies are awaited.

Ampulla of Vater/duodenal wall spasm diagnosed by antroduodenal manometry

Patients with chronic epigastric to right upper quadrant pain are often considered to have gallbladder of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, but standard tests are nondiagnostic. In 62 consecutive patients with this compliant undergoing antroduodenal manometry, we correlated a change on duodenal motility with spasm of the ampulla of Vater/duodenal wall. This distinctive motility pattern occurred and was analyzed in 35% of patients. It is characterized by increased duodenal wall tone with phasic contractions of 19-22 or 41-44 contractions/min or by phasic activity alone. The subjects with spasm also underwent cholecystokinin cholescintigraphy, and 50% showed either significantly delayed gallbladder emptying of hilum to small intestine emptying, or both. The disorder appears to be secondary to a loss of neural inhibitory control and a dysfunctional small-bowel pacemaker. Antroduodenal manometry is an essential diagnostic procedure that complements sphincter of Oddi manometry in evaluation of unexplained right upper quadrant pain.

How safe is endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry?

The safety of endoscopic manometry of the sphincter of Oddi was evaluated in a prospective survey of 158 consecutive procedures in 126 patients with either unexplained pain after cholecystectomy or idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis. The only complication was that of pancreatitis which was defined as the development of abdominal pain in association with a plasma amylase above the reference range. This occurred in 13 patients (8%) and was more frequent (P = 0.001) when the indication for the procedure was idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis (29%) than unexplained pain (6%). Pancreatitis was also more frequent (P = 0.02) in patients with abnormal manometry (14%) than in those with normal manometry (3%) and occurred at highest frequency (50%) in a subgroup of patients with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis and sphincter stenosis (high sphincter basal pressure). All episodes of pancreatitis were mild with a median increase in hospital stay of 2 days; no patients died. The risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic manometry is relatively low but increases in patients with abnormal sphincter manometry, particularly those with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis.

Effect of gastric distension and duodenal fat infusion on biliary sphincter of Oddi motility in healthy volunteers

Although sphincter of Oddi (SO) dysfunction has been implicated in the pathogenesis of postcholecystectomy syndrome and pancreatitis, little is known about normal physiologic stimuli, such as intraduodenal fat on human SO motility. Furthermore, gastric distension that frequently accompanies endoscopic manometry has been shown in animal studies to affect SO motility. We evaluated the effects of intraduodenal fat and gastric distension on SO basal pressure. Asymptomatic volunteers had SO manometry performed while sequentially performing gastric distension and intraduodenal fat perfusion. Five subjects (ages 29.8 +/- 4.8 years, range 22-35 years) had a mean basal sphincter of Oddi pressure of 23.4 +/- 5 mm Hg (range 17-31 mm Hg). Injection of air into the stomach caused no appreciable change in either intragastric pressure or SO pressure. Intraduodenal fat infusion resulted in a decrease in mean SO basal pressure from 23.4 +/- 5.0 to 4.4 +/- 4.4 mm Hg (P = 0.004). These results demonstrate that gastric distension does not affect SO basal pressure and that intraduodenal fat infusion reduces SO basal pressure.

Pathophysiology of the sphincter of Oddi

Pathophysiology of the sphincter of Oddi--or sphincter of Oddi dysfunction--manifests as either a biliary-type pain syndrome or recurrent pancreatitis. Imaging studies are unreliable, and direct endoscopic manometry is used to diagnose this entity. Milwaukee biliary classification, in addition to manometry, helps guide therapy. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in selected patients achieves permanent relief of symptoms. Endoscopic therapy for recurrent pancreatitis is still experimental.

Correlation of basal sphincter pressures measured from the bile duct and the pancreatic duct in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

If basal sphincter of Oddi pressures measured from the pancreatic duct and the bile duct are essentially equal, then measurement of basal pressures from only one duct would be adequate in evaluating sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. We report a series of 88 patients whom we evaluated with sphincter of Oddi manometry. Cannulation of both the biliary sphincter segment and pancreatic sphincter segment was achieved in these patients. Basal sphincter pressures were measured (normal, less than 40 mm Hg). In 45 of the 88 patients (51%), normal sphincter of Oddi basal pressures were seen in both ducts. Elevated basal sphincter of Oddi pressures were seen in both ducts in 28 of 88 patients (32%). In 15 of 88 cases (17%) there was an elevation of only one sphincter segment. Elevation in only the biliary sphincter segment occurred in 7 of 88 patients (8%). Elevation in the pancreatic sphincter segment alone occurred in 8 of 88 patients (9%). We conclude that sphincter of Oddi manometry of both the pancreatic and bile ducts is needed if complete manometric information is desired.

Effect of somatostatin analog octreotide on human sphincter of Oddi

The effect of the long-acting somatostatin analog octreotide on the sphincter of Oddi was investigated in seven subjects referred for endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry. Six patients had unexplained right upper quadrant pain and one had bile duct dilatation without evidence of fixed obstruction on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. A triple-lumen low-compliance system was used to record the sphincter of Oddi basal pressure, phasic contraction frequency, amplitude, duration, and direction of wave propagation before and after intravenous administration of octreotide in a dose of 50 micrograms. After a mean latency period of 1 min, significant changes included increased basal pressure in all seven patients, increased frequency of wave contractions in six patients, and decreased wave amplitude in six patients. The median duration of wave contraction and wave propagation sequence were not significantly influenced. Thus, octreotide has a significant stimulatory affect on the sphincter of Oddi activity, which may impair biliary and pancreatic flow.

Sphincter of Oddi manometry: decreased risk of clinical pancreatitis with use of a modified aspirating catheter

This study was undertaken to determine whether routine use of a modified triple-lumen five French sphincter of Oddi manometry catheter would reduce the frequency and severity of post-manometry pancreatitis and pancreatic enzyme elevation. Seventy-six patients were alternately assigned to undergo sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) with a standard perfusion (infused group) catheter or the newly developed aspiration (aspirated group) catheter. After SOM, there were significantly more patients in the infused group with both amylase and lipase values elevated at least two times the upper limits of normal at 2 (p less than 0.001), 6 (p = 0.01), and 18 hours (p = 0.03) after the procedure. As compared with the standard perfusion system, the aspiration catheter was associated with a decreased frequency of clinical pancreatitis (23.5% vs. 3%, p = 0.01) reduced hospital stay (5 +/- 1.83 days, mean +/- SE, versus 1 day; p = 0.03) and milder pancreatitis. The aspiration manometry catheter should be considered for standard use for SOM, particularly if the pancreatic duct sphincter is being evaluated.

Pancreatitis after sphincter of Oddi manometry

The nature, frequency, severity, and possible causes of complications after 207 sphincter of Oddi manometry measurements were studied in 146 patients. Acute pancreatitis was diagnosed in 6% (12 of 207) of the investigations and in 8% (12 of 146) of the patients examined. The pancreatitis was mild in all patients. After cannulation of the pancreatic duct, acute pancreatitis occurred in 10 of 95 (11%) patients compared with one of 93 (1%) when the manometry catheter entered the bile duct only (p less than 0.02). Seven (58%) of the patients who developed acute pancreatitis, however, were found to be suffering from chronic pancreatitis. Some 26% of all sphincter of Oddi manometry measurements on patients with this diagnosis were complicated by an acute attack of pancreatitis compared with 3% (p less than 0.001) in patients without signs of chronic pancreatitis. In all patients the pancreatitis developed within three hours of manometry. We conclude that pancreatitis may occasionally follow sphincter of Oddi manometry measurement, even in patients without pancreaticobiliary disease, and that underlying chronic pancreatitis constitutes a definite risk. Sphincter of Oddi manometry measurement in control subjects should therefore be performed only in centres where the safety of the procedure has been established, and the presence of chronic pancreatitis should be excluded beforehand. Cannulation of the pancreatic duct should be avoided. Manometry can be safely performed, however, as an outpatient procedure.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a clinical controversy

This report analyzes the literature on sphincter of Oddi dysfunction as it applies to biliary-type pain. The sensitivities and specificities of the tests used to diagnose this condition (e.g., size of bile duct, drainage time of bile duct, provocative tests with morphine, sphincter of Oddi manometry) are poorly defined. Recent studies suggest that noninvasive tests such as quantitative nuclear scintigraphy and fatty meal sonography may aid in diagnosing functional common bile duct obstruction. Continuous manometry of the biliary tree with microtransducer technologies may allow a greater understanding of the causes of pain in this group of patients. Only 1 case report of pharmacologic management for this disorder exists in the literature. Endoscopic sphincterotomy may be helpful in relieving the pain that occurs in this condition but is associated with increased risks. There is no consensus in the literature as to the best test that will predict response to sphincterotomy. Controlled trials of medical therapies are needed.