Laparoscopic Hill repair

Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIPTM) and surgical outcomes after Hill compared to Toupet fundoplication

INTRODUCTION

Endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) provides a real-time assessment of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) compliance during fundoplication. Given the limited data on EndoFLIP measurements during the Hill procedure, we investigated the impact of the Hill procedure on GEJ compliance compared to Toupet fundoplication.

METHODS

Patients who underwent robotic Hill or Toupet fundoplication with intraoperative EndoFLIP between 2017 and 2022 were included. EndoFLIP measurements of the GEJ included cross sectional surface area (CSA), intra-balloon pressure, high pressure zone length (HPZ), distensibility index (DI), and compliance. Subjective reflux symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux disease-health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score, and dysphagia score were assessed pre-operatively as well as at short- and longer-term follow-up.

RESULTS

One-hundred and fifty-four patients (71.9%) had a Toupet fundoplication while sixty (28%) patients underwent the Hill procedure. The CSA [27.7 ± 10.9 mm2 vs 42.2 ± 17.8 mm2, p < 0.0001], pressure [29.5 ± 6.2 mmHg vs 33.9 ± 8.5 mmHg, p = 0.0009], DI [0.9 ± 0.4 mm2/mmHg vs 1.3 ± 0.6 mm2/mmHg, p = 0.001], and compliance [25.9 ± 12.8 mm3/mmHg vs 35.4 ± 13.4 mm3/mmHg, p = 0.01] were lower after the Hill procedure compared to Toupet. However, there was no difference in post-fundoplication HPZ between procedures [Hill: 2.9 ± 0.4 cm, Toupet: 3.1 ± 0.6 cm, p = 0.15]. Follow-up showed no significant differences in GERD-HRQL scores, overall dysphagia scores or atypical symptoms between groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The Hill procedure is as effective to the Toupet fundoplication in surgically treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) despite the lower CSA, DI, and compliance after the Hill procedure. Both procedures led to DI < 2 mm2/mmHg with no significant differences in dysphagia reporting (12-24) months after the procedure. Further studies to elucidate a cutoff value for DI for postoperative dysphagia development are still warranted.

Sleeve gastrectomy and anti-reflux procedures

BACKGROUND

Obesity is an epidemic in the USA that continues to grow, becoming a leading cause of premature avoidable death. Bariatric surgery has become an effective solution for obesity and its comorbidities, and one of the most commonly utilized procedures, the sleeve gastrectomy, can lead to an increase in gastroesophageal reflux following the operation. While these data are controversial, sometimes operative intervention can be necessary to provide durable relief for this problem.

METHODS

We performed an extensive literature review examining the different methods of anti-reflux procedures that are available both before and after a sleeve gastrectomy.

RESULTS

We reviewed several different types of anti-reflux procedures, including those that supplement the lower esophageal sphincter anatomy, such as magnetic sphincter augmentation and radiofrequency ablation procedures. Re-operation was also discussed as a possible treatment of reflux in sleeve gastrectomy, especially if the original sleeve becomes dilated or if a conversion to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion is deemed necessary. Sleeve gastrectomy with concomitant anti-reflux procedure was also reviewed, including the anti-reflux gastroplasty, hiatal hernia repair, and limited fundoplication.

CONCLUSION

A number of techniques can be used to mitigate the severity of reflux, either by maintaining the normal anatomic structures that limit reflux or by supplementing these structures with a plication or gastroplasty. Individuals with existing severe reflux should not be considered for a sleeve gastrectomy. New techniques that incorporate plication at the time of the index sleeve gastrectomy show some improvement, but these are in small series that will need to be further evaluated. The only proven method of treating intractable reflux after sleeve gastrectomy is conversion to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Antireflux transoral incisionless fundoplication using EsophyX: 12-month results of a prospective multicenter study

Background

A novel transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) procedure using the EsophyX system with SerosaFuse fasteners was designed to reconstruct a full-thickness valve at the gastroesophageal junction through tailored delivery of multiple fasteners during a single-device insertion. The safety and efficacy of TIF for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were evaluated in a prospective multicenter trial.

Methods

Patients (n = 86) with chronic GERD treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included an irreducible hiatal hernia > 2 cm.

Results

The TIF procedure (n = 84) reduced all hiatal hernias (n = 49) and constructed valves measuring 4 cm (2–6 cm) and 230° (160°–300°). Serious adverse events consisted of two esophageal perforations upon device insertion and one case of postoperative intraluminal bleeding. Other adverse events were mild and transient. At 12 months, aggregate (n = 79) and stratified Hill grade I tight (n = 21) results showed 73% and 86% of patients with ≥50% improvement in GERD health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores, 85% discontinuation of daily PPI use, and 81% complete cessation of PPIs; 37% and 48% normalization of esophageal acid exposure; 60% and 89% hiatal hernia reduction; and 62% and 80% esophagitis reduction, respectively. More than 50% of patients with Hill grade I tight valves had a normalized cardia circumference. Resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) was improved significantly (p < 0.001), by 53%. EsophyX-TIF cured GERD in 56% of patients based on their symptom reduction and PPI discontinuation.

Conclusion

The 12-month results showed that EsophyX-TIF was safe and effective in improving quality of life and for reducing symptoms, PPI use, hiatal hernia, and esophagitis, as well as increasing the LES resting pressure and normalizing esophageal pH and cardia circumference in chronic GERD patients.

Laparoscopic cardial calibration and gastropexy for treatment of patients with reflux esophagitis: pathophysiological basis and result

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is the gold standard procedure for treatment of patients with reflux esophagitis. The current results of the laparoscopic approach are absolutely comparables with the results obtained during the open surgery era. The Nissen, Nissen-Rossetti, or Toupet techniques are the more frequently used. We have performed cardial calibration and posterior gastropexy or Nissen fundoplication by the open approach with similar results. The purpose of this article is to present the anatomo-physiological basis for employing cardial calibration and posterior gastropexy in patients with reflux esophagitis. This study includes 108 symptomatic patients, 12 of them with associated extraesophageal manifestations ( posterior laryngitis). Endoscopic mild or moderate esophagitis was confirmed in 83 patients, Barrett's esophagus in 12 patients, and type I or II hiatal hernia in 13 patients. All patients were also submitted to manometry, 24 hour intraesophageal pH monitoring, and barium swallow before and after surgery. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 36 months. There were no conversion, major intraoperative, or postoperative complications; nor were there any deaths. Postoperative dysphagia was present in 5% of cases. Symptomatic recurrence of reflux was observed in 10.3% and endoscopic presence of esophagitis in 12.3% of cases . Lower esophageal sphincter pressure increased significantly after surgery, even in patients with endoscopic recurrence. 24-hour intraesophageal monitoring improved after surgery, except in patients with objective recurrence of esophagitis. In conclusion, laparoscopic cardial calibration with posterior gastropexy presents comparable results to those reported after Nissen fundoplication and therefore could be another excellent therapeutic option in patients with reflux esophagitis.

A current assessment of endoluminal approaches to the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Over the past decade, a number of endoscopic techniques have been developed as alternatives to medical and surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The driving force was to provide an outpatient transoral, endoscopic procedure effective in controlling reflux in a portion of patients with GERD. Three major technologies emerged, although each use different approaches to augment the barrier function of the lower esophageal sphincter, mechanisms may be similar. These include Endocinch which tightens the gastroesophageal junction via a set of suture plications around the lower esophageal sphincter, Stretta, which delivers radiofrequency energy at the cardia, and Enteryx, which is an inert polymer injected into the muscle layer of the gastroesophageal junction. To date, the underlying mechanism of action of these procedures has not been completely elucidated, although each alters the compliance of the GEJ and thus its ability to respond to a "refluxogenic stress". The target population currently consists of proton pump inhibitor-dependent GERD patients, with little or no hiatal hernia and without severe esophagitis or Barrett's. The Stretta procedure is the only procedure to date to be subjected to a sham-controlled trial. Registries of complications suggest that these techniques are relatively safe, but serious morbidity including rare mortality have been reported. All can be performed on an outpatient basis. Future comparative studies with predetermined end points, validated outcome measures, prolonged follow-up, and complete complication registries are needed to determine the role of endoscopic procedures in the clinical practice of patients with GERD. Evolution of the current technologies will almost certainly occur, and a commonly performed, efficacious endoscopic antireflux procedure is likely to emerge.

Antireflux surgery. Indications, preoperative evaluation, and outcome

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an extremely common disorder. Many patients require lifelong medical therapy for symptom control. In patients being considered for antireflux surgery, thorough evaluation is required. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is a safe and effective method of treating patients who have severe, refractory, or complicated GERD. Excellent long-term results are obtained with minimal morbidity, freeing the patient from the burden of chronic medical therapy.

Prospective randomized double-blind trial between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and anterior partial fundoplication

BACKGROUND

In the operative management of gastro-oesophageal reflux, a balance must be achieved between adequate control of reflux and excessive dysphagia. The ideal technique is not known. A randomized study was performed to determine whether laparoscopic anterior fundoplication is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia than laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, while achieving equivalent control of reflux.

METHODS

Patients presenting for laparoscopic antireflux surgery were randomized to undergo either a Nissen fundoplication (n = 53) or an anterior 180 degrees hemifundoplication (n = 54). Patients were blinded to which procedure had been performed, and follow-up was obtained by a blinded independent investigator. Standardized clinical grading systems were used to assess dysphagia, heartburn and patient satisfaction 1, 3 and 6 months after operation. Objective measurement of lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, oesophageal emptying time, distal oesophageal acid exposure and endoscopic healing of oesophagitis was also performed.

RESULTS

Operating time was similar for the two procedures (58 min for the Nissen procedure versus 60 min for anterior fundoplication). Resting and residual lower oesophageal sphincter pressures were lower following anterior fundoplication (29 versus 18 mmHg, and 13 versus 6 mmHg), and oesophageal emptying times were faster (92 versus 116 s). Acid exposure times and ability to heal oesophagitis were similar. At 3 months' follow-up clinical outcomes were similar for the two procedures. At 6 months, however, patients who had undergone anterior fundoplication experienced significantly less dysphagia for solid food and were more likely to be satisfied with the clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic anterior fundoplication achieved equivalent control of reflux, more physiological postoperative manometry parameters, and an improved clinical outcome at 6 months. Continued follow-up remains necessary to confirm the long-term efficacy of the partial fundoplication procedure.

Antireflux surgery in the laparoscopic era

BACKGROUND

The recent development of laparoscopic techniques for fundoplication has created renewed interest in surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, leading to reports of large clinical series from many centres. However, controversy remains about technical aspects of laparoscopic antireflux surgery, with no consensus yet reached about a standard operative technique. It is important, therefore, to reassess critically the results of laparoscopic surgery for reflux disease, so that its current status can be determined.

METHODS

Published outcome studies for laparoscopic antireflux surgery, as well as selected studies from the era of open antireflux surgery, were reviewed to assess outcomes.

RESULTS

The results of case series for laparoscopic antireflux surgery with short- and medium-term follow-up, as well as the early results of randomized trials, confirm that this approach reduces the early overall morbidity of surgery for reflux disease. However, certain complications may be more common, for instance paraoesophageal hiatus herniation, pneumothorax and oesophageal perforation, requiring surgeons to use specific strategies which can help to avoid these problems. Published studies and trials do not support the routine or selective application of a posterior partial fundoplication technique or routine division of the short gastric vessels during Nissen fundoplication.

CONCLUSION

At present, a short loose Nissen fundoplication performed laparoscopically, with or without division of the short gastric vessels, is an appropriate surgical approach for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, long-term outcomes following laparoscopic antireflux surgery will not be available for some years, and must be awaited before the final status of the various laparoscopic techniques can be confirmed.

Antireflux operations at flexible endoscopy using endoluminal stitching techniques: an experimental study

BACKGROUND

Three antireflux operations-gastroplasty, fundoplication, and anterior gastropexy-were developed for performance at flexible endoscopy without laparotomy or laparoscopy.

METHODS

An endoscopic sewing machine mounted on a standard gastroscope, endoscopic knotting devices, overtube, and nylon thread were used to perform these operations in adult beagle dogs.

RESULTS

Gastroplasty (n = 10) was accomplished by suturing the anterior and posterior wall of the stomach to create a gastric tube (neoesophagus) along the lesser curve. An anatomic arrangement similar to fundoplication (n = 6) was achieved by invaginating the esophagus and fixing it to the stomach 2 cm distal to the cardioesophageal junction. Anterior gastropexy (n = 6) was performed using a technique similar to that used in creating percutaneous gastrostomies. There was no mortality. Ninety percent of sutures were seen at repeat endoscopy at 4 to 8 week intervals. The gastroplasty group was selected for more extensive evaluation. Manometry using a three-channel perfused catheter system before and after the procedures showed an increase in the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (preoperative median 4.6 mm Hg; post-operative median 13.33 mm Hg, p = 0.008) and cardiac yield pressures (preoperative median 10 mm Hg; postoperative median 19 mm Hg, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility of performing antireflux operations at flexible endoscopy, without laparoscopy or laparotomy, by use of endoluminal suturing techniques.