Perendoscopic injection of botulinum toxin is effective in achalasia after failure of myotomy or pneumatic dilation

What to do when Heller's myotomy fails? Pneumatic dilatation, laparoscopic remyotomy or peroral endoscopic myotomy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of achalasia fails in 10%-20% of patients. The most frequent responsible cause is the performance of an incomplete myotomy at primary surgery. The treatment when the failure happens is not well defined. In this study, we review and evaluate the possible treatments to be carried out when surgical myotomy fails. We define its benefits and results, with the purpose of defining a therapeutic algorithm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The systematic review was performed following the guidelines established by the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement. We searched several electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMED, EMBASE and Cochrane) from January 1991 to March 2017, with the keywords 'recurrent achalasia' 'POEM remyotomy', 'esophagomyotomy failure', 'Heller myotomy failure', 'myotomy failure', 'pneumatic balloon dilatation achalasia' and combinations between them, 'redo Heller', 'redo myotomy', 'reoperative Heller'.

RESULTS

A total of 61 observational studies related to the treatment of patients with failure of Heller's myotomy were initially found. Finally, 37 articles were included in our study that provided data on 289 patients. Of these 289 patients, diagnosed of failed Heller's myotomy, 87 were treated with pneumatic dilatation (PD), 166 underwent surgical revision and finally 36 were treated with POEM. No randomised controlled trial was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The three therapeutic options analysed in this review are effective and safe in the treatment of patients with achalasia with failure of surgical myotomy. The best results can be achieved following an algorithm similar to the one proposed here, where each procedure must be performed by well-experienced team in the selected modality.

Gastrointestinal Dysmotility in the Elderly

The number of persons 60 years and older has increased 3-fold between 1950 and 2000. Aging alone does not greatly impact the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Digestive dysfunction, including esophageal reflux, achalasia, dysphagia, dyspepsia, delayed gastric emptying, constipation, fecal incontinence, and fecal impaction, is a result of the highly prevalent comorbid conditions and the medications with which those conditions are treated. A multidisciplinary approach with the expertise of a geriatrician, gastroenterologist, neurologist, speech pathologist, and physical therapist ensures a comprehensive functional and neurological assessment of the older patient. Radiographic and endoscopic evaluation may be warranted in the evaluation of the symptomatic older patient with consideration given to the risks and benefits of the test being used. Treatment of the digestive dysfunction is aimed at improving health-related quality of life if cure cannot be achieved. Promotion of healthy aging, treatment of comorbid conditions, and avoidance of polypharmacy may prevent some of these digestive disorders. The age-related changes in GI motility, clinical presentation of GI dysmotility, and therapeutic principles in the symptomatic older patient are reviewed here.

Achalasia: current treatment options

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder, characterized by impaired swallow-induced, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation and defective esophageal peristalsis. Unfortunately, there are no etiological therapies for achalasia. Patients present with dysphagia, chest pain and regurgitation of undigested food, often leading to weight loss. The currently available treatments have the common aim of relieving symptoms by decreasing the pressure of the LES. This can be achieved with some medications, by inhibiting the cholinergic innervation (botulinum toxin), by stretching (endoscopic dilation) or cutting (surgery) the LES. Recently, other therapeutic options, including per-oral endoscopic myotomy have been developed and are gaining international consensus. The authors report on the benefits and weaknesses of the different therapies and provide an updated approach to the management of achalasia.

Use of Clostridium botulinum toxin in gastrointestinal motility disorders in children

More than a century has elapsed since the identification of Clostridia neurotoxins as the cause of paralytic diseases. Clostridium botulinum is a heterogeneous group of Gram-positive, rod-shaped, spore-forming, obligate anaerobic bacteria that produce a potent neurotoxin. Eight different Clostridium botulinum neurotoxins have been described (A-H) and 5 of those cause disease in humans. These toxins cause paralysis by blocking the presynaptic release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. Advantage can be taken of this blockade to alleviate muscle spams due to excessive neural activity of central origin or to weaken a muscle for treatment purposes. In therapeutic applications, minute quantities of botulinum neurotoxin type A are injected directly into selected muscles. The Food and Drug Administration first approved botulinum toxin (BT) type A in 1989 for the treatment of strabismus and blepharospasm associated with dystonia in patients 12 years of age or older. Ever since, therapeutic applications of BT have expanded to other systems, including the gastrointestinal tract. Although only a single fatality has been reported to our knowledge with use of BT for gastroenterological conditions, there are significant complications ranging from minor pain, rash and allergic reactions to pneumothorax, bowel perforation and significant paralysis of tissues surrounding the injection (including vocal cord paralysis and dysphagia). This editorial describes the clinical experience and evidence for the use BT in gastrointestinal motility disorders in children.

Endoscopic approaches to treatment of achalasia

Endoscopic therapy for achalasia is directed at disrupting or weakening the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The two most commonly utilized endoscopic interventions are large balloon pneumatic dilation (PD) and botulinum toxin injection (BTI). These interventions have been extensively scrutinized and compared with each other as well as with surgical disruption (myotomy) of the LES. PD is generally more effective in improving dysphagia in achalasia than BTI, with the latter reserved for infirm older people, and PD may approach treatment results attained with myotomy. However, PD may need to be repeated. Small balloon dilation and endoscopic stent placement for achalasia have only been used in select centers. Per oral endoscopic myotomy is a newer endoscopic modality that will likely change the treatment paradigm for achalasia. It arose from the field of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and represents a scarless endoscopic approach to Heller myotomy. This is a technique that requires extensive training and preparation and thus there should be rigorous accreditation and monitoring of outcomes to ensure safety and efficacy.

Outcomes promote reoperative Heller myotomy for symptoms of achalasia

BACKGROUND

Heller myotomy is accepted as first-line therapy for achalasia, yet for a small number of patients, symptoms persist or recur after myotomy. This study was undertaken to report our results with reoperative laparoscopic Heller myotomy for recurrent symptoms of achalasia.

METHODS

We have undertaken laparoscopic Heller myotomy in 275 patients and reoperative myotomy in 12 patients for recurrent dysphagia, of which three had their initial myotomy undertaken by us. For each, studies prior to reoperative Heller myotomy documented a nonrelaxing lower esophageal sphincter without stricture. Patients scored symptoms before and after reoperative myotomy.

RESULTS

Before reoperative myotomy, 75% underwent dilation and 42% underwent Botox injection. Ten of twelve reoperative myotomies were undertaken and completed laparoscopically. Median follow-up is 24.1 months (29.0 months + 25.89). Symptom frequency and severity scores improved significantly after reoperative myotomy. Frequency of vomiting and frequency and severity of heartburn were improved after reoperative myotomy, but not to a significant extent. However, they were not particularly notable prior to surgery, compared to obstructive symptoms, such as dysphagia. Excellent or good outcomes were reported in 73%, and notably, 91% stated that they would have the operation again after having been through the process firsthand and knowing their outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patient outcomes promote the application of reoperative Heller myotomy for recurrent or persistent symptoms of achalasia following Heller myotomy.

Non-surgical treatment of esophageal achalasia

Esophageal achalasia is an infrequent motility disorder characterized by a progressive stasis and dilation of the oesophagus; with subsequent risk of aspiration, weight loss, and malnutrition. Although the treatment of achalasia has been traditionally based on a surgical approach, especially with the introduction of laparoscopic techniques, there is still some space for a medical approach. The present article reviews the non-surgical therapeutic options for achalasia.

Review article: the management of achalasia - a comparison of different treatment modalities

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is an uncommon primary oesophageal motor disorder with an unknown aetiology. Therapeutic options for achalasia are aimed at decreasing the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, improving the oesophageal empting, and most importantly, relieving the symptoms of achalasia. Modalities for treatment include pharmacologic, endoscopic, pneumatic dilatation and surgical. The decision of which modality to use involves the consideration of multiple clinical and economic factors.

AIM

To review the management strategies currently available for achalasia.

METHODS

A Medline search identified the original articles and reviews the published in the English language literature between 1966 and 2006.

RESULTS

The results reveal that pharmacotherapy, injection of botulinum toxin, pneumatic dilatation and minimally invasive surgical oesophagomyotomy are variably effective at controlling the symptoms of achalasia but that each modality has specific strengths and weaknesses which make them each suitable in certain populations. Overall, pharmacologic therapy results in the shortest lived, least durable response followed by botulinum toxin injection, pneumatic dilatation and surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The optimal treatment for achalasia remains an area of controversy given our lack of complete understanding about the pathophysiology of the disease as well as the high numbers of clinical relapse after treatment. Further research focusing on optimal dosing of botulinum toxin injection and optimal timing of repeated graduated pneumatic dilatations could add to our knowledge regarding long-term therapy.

Treatment with botulinum toxin of octo-nonagerians with oesophageal achalasia: a two-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of oesophageal achalasia with intrasphincteric injections of botulinum toxin has proved to be a successful alternative treatment modality. However, little is known about its long-term effects in very old patients.

AIM

To evaluate the effects of such treatment in octo-nonagerians during a 2-year follow-up period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients with idiopathic oesophageal achalasia (range 81-94 years) entered the study. After basal evaluation and screening procedures, 100 U of botulinum toxin was injected at the lower oesophageal sphincter, and the procedure was repeated 1 month later. Data were collected at baseline and were compared after 1 and 2 years following the procedure.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight per cent of patients were considered responders at 1 year and 54% were considered responders at 2 years. The weight gain at the end of the follow-up period was 2 (0-3) kg. No significant relationship was found between baseline lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and symptoms score after 1 and 2 years of follow-up; moreover, no major complications of botulinum toxin therapy were reported.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of very old achalasic patients with botulinum toxin is safe, effective and yields good quality of life in a substantial proportion of these subjects.

Treatment with botulinum neurotoxin of gastrointestinal smooth muscles and sphincters spasms

Local injections of botulinum neurotoxin are now considered an efficacious treatment for neurological and non-neurological conditions. One of the most recent achievements in the field is the observation that botulinum neurotoxin provides benefit in diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Botulinum neurotoxin inhibits contraction of gastrointestinal smooth muscles and sphincters; it has also been shown that the neurotoxin blocks cholinergic nerve endings in the autonomic nervous system, but it does not block nonadrenergic responses mediated by nitric oxide. This aspect has further promoted the interest to use botulinum neurotoxin as a treatment for overactive smooth muscles, such as the anal sphincters to treat anal fissure and outlet-type constipation, or the lower esophageal sphincter to treat esophageal achalasia. Knowledge of the anatomical and functional organization of innervation of the gastrointestinal tract is a prerequisite to understanding many features of botulinum neurotoxin action on the gut and the effects of injections placed into specific sphincters. This review presents current data on the use of botulinum neurotoxin to treat diseases of the gastrointestinal tract and summarizes recent knowledge on the pathogenesis of disorders of the gut due to a dysfunction of the enteric nervous system.

Achalasia: a comprehensive review

Achalasia is a rare neurologic deficit of the esophagus, producing a syndrome of impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and decreased motility of the esophageal body for which the cause is unknown. The resultant chronic esophageal stasis produces discomforting symptoms that can be managed with medication, chemical paralysis of the lower esophageal sphincter, mechanical dilation, or surgical esophagomyotomy. Chemical paralysis by injection of the esophagus with botulinum toxin and dilation with an inflatable balloon offers good short-term relief of symptoms; however, the best long-term results are produced by surgery, and advancing minimally invasive techniques continually reduce the morbidity of these operations. The type of surgical procedure, the necessity for fundoplication, and the order of treatment continue to be unresolved issues, but prospective evaluation with objective followup should allow us to provide the optimal treatment regimen to our patients.

[Digestive tract and botulinum toxin]

INTRODUCTION

the aim of this work was to check literature to assess botulinum toxin injection efficacy in gastrointestinal motor disorders with special emphasis on controlled clinical trials.

METHODS

literature was carried out with the Medline data bank.

RESULTS

seventy three articles in French and in English including a recent general review were retained. Comparative clinical trials only concerned achalasia and anal fissure. The other gastrointestinal motor disorders only gave rise to open non-controlled trials assessed on clinical end points.

DISCUSSION

this review of literature helps to determine usefulness and safety of Botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of esophageal achalasia and anal fissure. The main limitation is its brief duration of action. Studies concerning the others spastic motor disorders are based on unknown physiopathology and controlled trials are required to assess its efficacy.

CONCLUSION

botulinum toxin is increasingly used for gastrointestinal motor disorders with worthwhile results. Its efficacy has been yet established for only two disorders : it has a valuable palliative role in achalasia and may be curative for anal fissure.

Treatment of achalasia: the short-term response to botulinum toxin injection seems to be independent of any kind of pretreatment

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin (BTX) may represent an alternative therapy to balloon dilatation in achalasia. The aim of the present study was to test the effectiveness of botulinum toxin injections in achalasia patients, as assessed using lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (LOSP) and symptom scores, and to compare the response in patients with different types of pretreatment (no previous treatment, balloon dilatation, myotomy, BTX injection).

METHODS

Forty patients who presented with symptomatic achalasia were treated with BTX injection (48 injections in 40 patients). Some of the patients had received prior treatment (seven with myotomy, seven with dilatation and eight with BTX). The symptoms were assessed using a global symptom score (0-10), which was evaluated before treatment, 1 week afterwards, and 1 month afterwards. Manometry was also carried out before and after treatment. Three different selections of patients were studied: all patients; untreated patients; and patients with prior BTX, dilatation, or myotomy.

RESULTS

After BTX injection, there was a significant reduction in LOSP (before, 38.2+/-11.3 mmHg; 1 week after, 20.5+/-6.9 mmHg; 1 month after, 17.8+/-6.8 mmHg; P < 0.001). The global symptom score and symptom subscores (dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain) were significantly decreased after 1 week and 1 month. When the beneficial effects following BTX injection were compared (untreated vs. pretreated), neither changes in LOSP nor beneficial effects on the symptom scores significantly differed. After 6 months, 67.7% of all treated patients were still in symptomatic remission (subgroups: previously untreated patients, 61.5%, n = 26; prior dilatation, 71.4%, n = 7; prior myotomy, 71.4%, n = 7; prior BTX, 73.9%, n = 8).

CONCLUSIONS

BTX injection offers an alternative treatment for achalasia which is safe and can be performed in an outpatient setting. The initial response to BTX, in terms of symptom scores and LOSP, appears to be independent of any prior treatment. A number of patients do not adequately respond to balloon dilatation or myotomy, which are the first-line treatment modalities in achalasia patients. BTX injection can be performed in these patients, and symptomatic benefit can be expected in the same percentages as with BTX injection in untreated patients.

Randomized controlled trial of intrasphincteric botulinum toxin A injection versus balloon dilatation in treatment of achalasia cardia

As the few randomized controlled trials available in the literature comparing botulinum toxin (BT) injection with established endoscopic treatment of achalasia cardia, i.e. pneumatic dilatation, showed conflicting results, we conducted a prospective randomized trial. Seventeen consecutive patients with achalasia cardia diagnosed during a period between December 1997 and February 2000 were randomized into two treatment groups [pneumatic dilatation by Rigiflex dilator (n=10), BT injection by sclerotherapy needle into four quadrants of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (n=7) 80 units in five cases, 60 units in two cases] after dysphagia grading, endoscopy, barium esophagogram, and manometry, all of which were repeated 1 week after treatment. Patients were followed up clinically for 35.2+/-14 weeks. Chi-squares, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used for statistical analysis. After 1 week, 6/7 (86%) BT-treated vs. 8/10 (80%) dilatation-treated patients improved (P=NS). There was no difference in LES pressure and maximum esophageal diameter in the barium esophagogram in the two groups before therapy. Both therapies resulted in significant reduction in LES pressure. The cumulative dysphagia-free state using the Kaplan-Meier method decreased progressively in BT-treated compared with dilatation-treated patients (P=0.027). Two patients with tortuous megaesophagus, one of whom had failed dilatation complicated by perforation previously, improved after BT. One other patient in whom pneumatic dilatation had previously failed improved in a similar manner. BT is as good as pneumatic dilatation in achieving an initial improvement in dysphagia of achalasia cardia. It is also effective in patients with tortuous megaesophagus and previous failed pneumatic dilatation. However, dysphagia often recurs during 1-year follow up.

Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of failures after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the causes of failure of laparoscopic Heller myotomy and to verify whether endoscopic pneumatic dilation is a feasible treatment.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy has proved an effective treatment for esophageal achalasia, with good or excellent results in 90% of patients. The treatment of failures remains controversial, however.

METHODS

From 1992 to 1999, 113 patients underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia. Ten patients (8.7%) reported dysphagia (n = 7) or chest pain (n = 3) a median of 5 months after surgery (range 1-12) and were considered surgical failures. Pre- and postoperative radiologic, manometric, and 24-hour pH monitoring findings in patients with achalasia recurrence were compared with those of 74 asymptomatic subjects.

RESULTS

The preoperative characteristics of the two groups were comparable. After surgery, a decrease in resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure was observed in both groups, whereas the abdominal and overall lengths were significantly shorter among the asymptomatic patients. No patients with recurrence had abnormal gastroesophageal reflux. Based on time to recurrence and manometric and fluoroscopic findings, the etiology of the recurrences was classified as incomplete myotomy upward (n = 1), incomplete myotomy or sclerosis of the myotomy downward (n = 7), or sigmoid megaesophagus (n = 1); in one patient the authors could not establish the etiology. Seven of nine patients were effectively treated with endoscopic pneumatic dilations (median 2 dilations, range 1-4); one refused to undergo further treatment. Two patients underwent redo surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence of symptoms after myotomy is mainly related to incomplete myotomy or sclerosis of the distal site of the myotomy; it can be treated by dilations after surgery.

Indications and efficacy of botulinum toxin in disorders of the gastrointestinal tract

In recent years, botulinum toxin type A (BT) has been found to be effective in the treatment of various spastic disorders of smooth muscle in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. The short-term efficacy of intrasphincteric injection of BT in achalasia is now well established, however, because of the chronic nature of the disease, patients will require repeated injections at regular intervals. In contrast, after a single injection into the anal sphincter, BT has impressively high healing rate with minimal side effects. BT remains a novel therapeutic approach in a range of other gastrointestinal motility disorders including diffuse oesophageal spasm, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and anismus, and the list of its indications is increasing. BT seems to be safe but as its long-term effects remain unestablished, it should be used with caution in younger patients. In this review we discuss the mechanism of action, indications, efficacy and side-effects of BT with its use in various areas of gastrointestinal tract.

Evaluation of the use of botulinum toxin in children with achalasia

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is rare in children. Recently, injection of botulinum toxin into the lower esophageal sphincter has been studied as an alternative to esophageal pneumatic dilatation or surgical myotomy as treatment for achalasia. In the current study, the effects of botulinum toxin were investigated in the largest known series of children with achalasia.

METHODS

Treatment for achalasia was assessed in 23 pediatric patients who received botulinum toxin from June 1995 through November 1998. Those who continued to receive botulinum toxin and did not subsequently undergo pneumatic dilatation or surgery were considered repeat responders. Results were compared with those of published studies evaluating the use of botulinum toxin in adults with achalasia.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients initially responded to botulinum toxin. Mean duration of effect was 4.2 months +/- 4.0 (SD). At the end of the study period, three were repeat responders, three experienced dysphagia but did not receive pneumatic dilatation or surgery, three underwent pneumatic dilatation, eight underwent surgery, three underwent pneumatic dilatation with subsequent surgery, and three awaited surgery. Meta-analysis shows that, in the current study group, the data point expressing time of follow-up evaluation versus percentage of patients needing one injection session without additional procedures (botulinum toxin injection, pneumatic dilatation, or surgery) falls within the curve for those in studies on adult patients receiving botulinum toxin for achalasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin effectively initiates the resolution of symptoms associated with achalasia in children. However, one half of patients are expected to need an additional procedure approximately 7 months after one injection session. The authors recommend that botulinum toxin be used only for children with achalasia who are poor candidates for either pneumatic dilatation or surgery.

Comparison of two different formulations of botulinum toxin A for the treatment of oesophageal achalasia. The Gismad Achalasia Study Group

BACKGROUND

Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin has been reported as a safe and effective alternative treatment in oesophageal achalasia, especially in high-risk and elderly patients.

AIM

: To compare two formulations of botulinum toxin in the management of achalasia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomly compared the efficacy and safety of 100 U of Botox (Allergan, Irvine, USA) and 250 U of Dysport (Ipsen, Milan, Italy), injected through a sclerotherapy needle at the level of the lower oesophageal sphincter, in 78 consecutive patients with achalasia. Symptom score, oesophageal manometry and 24 h pH-metry were recorded (before and 1 month after therapy). Symptom score was also obtained 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

One month after treatment, the effects of the toxin on symptoms and oesophageal tests were similar for both formulations. Lower oesophageal sphincter pressure decreased from 31 +/- 12 to 18 +/- 5 mmHg after Botox, and from 35 +/- 9 to 18 +/- 10 after Dysport. At the end of the follow-up period (6 months), symptom score decreased from 5 +/- 1.2 to 1.2 +/- 0.8 after Botox and from 5.2 +/- 1.5 to 1.5 +/- 1 after Dysport. Moreover, the percentages of patients who failed to respond to treatment (10% and 17.5%) and who relapsed during follow-up (12% and 24%) did not differ significantly. No patient complained of reflux symptoms after treatment, although abnormal acid exposure was documented in two subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Both formulations of botulinum toxin have comparable efficacy in the treatment of oesophageal achalasia, for up to 6 months of follow-up.

Use of botulinum toxin as a diagnostic/therapeutic trial to help clarify an indication for definitive therapy in patients with achalasia

OBJECTIVE

Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin is useful in achalasia but is limited by its short term efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of botulinum toxin in selected patients in whom its short duration of action may be useful in guiding therapy before considering more invasive procedures that might not be indicated.

METHODS

Over a 3 yr period, botulinum toxin was injected into the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with: 1) symptoms consistent with achalasia but insufficient manometric criteria to make the diagnosis; 2) complex clinical situations in which there were factors in addition to achalasia that may be contributing to the patient's symptoms and that required different treatment; 3) atypical manifestations of achalasia; 4) advanced achalasia in which it was unclear that sphincter-directed therapy (vs esophagectomy) would be of benefit; and 5) after Heller myotomy. Clinical response was assessed mostly by symptom improvement, but in some patients follow-up barium swallow or radioscintigraphy was available.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were identified. Ten had complete symptomatic response to the injection. Two patients have undergone subsequent successful pneumatic dilation, one a successful laparoscopic myotomy, and another currently scheduled for surgical myotomy. The only patient without response had advanced achalasia requiring esophagectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin into the lower esophageal sphincter is a useful and safe means of guiding therapy in those patients with a variant of achalasia, atypical achalasia, or complex achalasia in which it is unclear that more invasive procedures such as pneumatic dilation or surgical myotomy are the correct therapy.

Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin is effective in long-term treatment of esophageal achalasia

We investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of intrasphincteric injections of botulinum toxin (100 U) in 57 patients with esophageal achalasia. One month after treatment, 50 patients had improved (88%); both symptom score and LES pressure were significantly reduced (P < 0.001). After a mean follow-up of 24+/-15 months (range 6-48), 43 patients (75%) are still in remission, although repeat injections of toxin were needed to achieve a stable effect on symptoms.

Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin is effective in long-term treatment of esophageal achalasia

We investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of intrasphincteric injections of botulinum toxin (100 U) in 57 patients with esophageal achalasia. One month after treatment, 50 patients had improved (88%); both symptom score and LES pressure were significantly reduced (P < 0.001). After a mean follow-up of 24+/-15 months (range 6-48), 43 patients (75%) are still in remission, although repeat injections of toxin were needed to achieve a stable effect on symptoms.