Efficacy of prophylactic sclerotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and varices negative for the red color sign

Endoscopic variceal ligation versus propranolol for the primary prevention of oesophageal variceal bleeding in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: an open-label, two-centre, randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This randomised trial aimed to address whether endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) or propranolol (PPL) is more effective at preventing initial oesophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

DESIGN

Patients with HCC and medium-to-large oesophageal varices (EVs) but without previous EVB were randomised to receive EVL (every 3-4 weeks until variceal eradication) or PPL (up to 320 mg daily) at a 1:1 ratio. Long-term follow-up data on EVB, other upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), non-bleeding liver decompensation, overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) were analysed using competing risk regression.

RESULTS

Between June 2011 and April 2021, 144 patients were randomised to receive EVL (n=72) or PPL (n=72). In the EVL group, 7 patients experienced EVB, and 30 died; in the PPL group, 19 patients had EVB, and 40 died. The EVL group had a lower cumulative incidence of EVB (Gray's test, p=0.009) than its counterpart, with no mortality difference (Gray's test, p=0.085). For patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A/B, EVL was better than PPL in reducing EVB (p<0.001) and mortality (p=0.003). For patients beyond BCLC stage B, between-group outcomes were similar. Other UGIB, non-bleeding liver decompensation and AEs did not differ between groups. A competing risk regression model confirmed the prognostic value of EVL.

CONCLUSION

EVL is superior to PPL in preventing initial EVB in patients with HCC. The benefits of EVL on EVB and OS may be limited to patients with BCLC stage A/B and not to those with BCLC stage C/D.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01970748.

Primary prevention of variceal bleeding in people with oesophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40% to 95% of people with cirrhosis have oesophageal varices. About 15% to 20% of oesophageal varices bleed in about one to three years. There are several different treatments to prevent bleeding, including: beta-blockers, endoscopic sclerotherapy, and variceal band ligation. However, there is uncertainty surrounding their individual and relative benefits and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the benefits and harms of different treatments for prevention of first variceal bleeding from oesophageal varices in adults with liver cirrhosis through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different treatments for prevention of first variceal bleeding from oesophageal varices according to their safety and efficacy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers to December 2019 to identify randomised clinical trials in people with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or status) in adults with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding. We excluded randomised clinical trials in which participants had previous bleeding from oesophageal varices and those who had previously undergone liver transplantation or previously received prophylactic treatment for oesophageal varices.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the differences in treatments using hazard ratios (HR), odds ratios (OR), and rate ratios with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance. We performed the direct comparisons from randomised clinical trials using the same codes and the same technical details.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 66 randomised clinical trials (6653 participants) in the review. Sixty trials (6212 participants) provided data for one or more comparisons in the review. The trials that provided the information included people with cirrhosis due to varied aetiologies and those at high risk of bleeding from oesophageal varices. The follow-up in the trials that reported outcomes ranged from 6 months to 60 months. All but one of the trials were at high risk of bias. The interventions compared included beta-blockers, no active intervention, variceal band ligation, sclerotherapy, beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation, beta-blockers plus nitrates, nitrates, beta-blockers plus sclerotherapy, and portocaval shunt. Overall, 21.2% of participants who received non-selective beta-blockers ('beta-blockers') - the reference treatment (chosen because this was the most common treatment compared in the trials) - died during 8-month to 60-month follow-up. Based on low-certainty evidence, beta-blockers, variceal band ligation, sclerotherapy, and beta-blockers plus nitrates all had lower mortality versus no active intervention (beta-blockers: HR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.36 to 0.67; direct comparison HR: 0.59, 95% CrI 0.42 to 0.83; 10 trials, 1200 participants; variceal band ligation: HR 0.51, 95% CrI 0.35 to 0.74; direct comparison HR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.12 to 2.14; 3 trials, 355 participants; sclerotherapy: HR 0.66, 95% CrI 0.51 to 0.85; direct comparison HR 0.61, 95% CrI 0.41 to 0.90; 18 trials, 1666 participants; beta-blockers plus nitrates: HR 0.41, 95% CrI 0.20 to 0.85; no direct comparison). No trials reported health-related quality of life. Based on low-certainty evidence, variceal band ligation had a higher number of serious adverse events (number of events) than beta-blockers (rate ratio 10.49, 95% CrI 2.83 to 60.64; 1 trial, 168 participants). Based on low-certainty evidence, beta-blockers plus nitrates had a higher number of 'any adverse events (number of participants)' than beta-blockers alone (OR 3.41, 95% CrI 1.11 to 11.28; 1 trial, 57 participants). Based on low-certainty evidence, adverse events (number of events) were higher in sclerotherapy than in beta-blockers (rate ratio 2.49, 95% CrI 1.53 to 4.22; direct comparison rate ratio 2.47, 95% CrI 1.27 to 5.06; 2 trials, 90 participants), and in beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation than in beta-blockers (direct comparison rate ratio 1.72, 95% CrI 1.08 to 2.76; 1 trial, 140 participants). Based on low-certainty evidence, any variceal bleed was lower in beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation than in beta-blockers (direct comparison HR 0.21, 95% CrI 0.04 to 0.71; 1 trial, 173 participants). Based on low-certainty evidence, any variceal bleed was higher in nitrates than beta-blockers (direct comparison HR 6.40, 95% CrI 1.58 to 47.42; 1 trial, 52 participants). The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions in the remaining comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on low-certainty evidence, beta-blockers, variceal band ligation, sclerotherapy, and beta-blockers plus nitrates may decrease mortality compared to no intervention in people with high-risk oesophageal varices in people with cirrhosis and no previous history of bleeding. Based on low-certainty evidence, variceal band ligation may result in a higher number of serious adverse events than beta-blockers. The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of beta-blockers versus variceal band ligation on variceal bleeding. The evidence also indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions in most of the remaining comparisons.

Automated and real-time validation of gastroesophageal varices under esophagogastroduodenoscopy using a deep convolutional neural network: a multicenter retrospective study (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Rupture of gastroesophageal varices is the most common fatal adverse event of cirrhosis. EGD is considered the criterion standard for diagnosis and risk stratification of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding. The aim of this study was to train and validate a real-time deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) system, named ENDOANGEL, for diagnosing gastroesophageal varices and predicting the risk of rupture.

METHODS

After training with 8566 images of endoscopic gastroesophageal varices from 3021 patients and 6152 images of normal esophagus/stomach from 3168 patients, ENDOANGEL was also tested with independent images and videos. It was also compared with endoscopists in several aspects.

RESULTS

ENDOANGEL, in contrast with endoscopists, displayed higher accuracy of 97.00% and 92.00% in terms of detecting esophageal varices (EVs) and gastric varices (GVs) in an image contest (97.00% vs 93.94% , P < .01; 92.00% vs 84.43%, P < .05). It also surpassed endoscopists for red color signs of EVs and red spots of GVs (84.21% vs 73.45%, P < .01; 85.26% vs 77.52%, P < .05). Moreover, ENDOANGEL achieved comparable performance in the determination of size, form, color, and bleeding signs. ENDOANGEL also had good performance in making treatment suggestions. With regard to predicting risk factors in multicenter videos, ENDOANGEL showed great stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that DCNNs were precise in detecting both EVs and GVs and performed excellently in uncovering the endoscopic risk factors of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding. Thus, the application of DCNNs will assist endoscopists in evaluating gastroesophageal varices more objectively and precisely. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR1900023970.).

Role of dual red imaging to guide intravariceal sclerotherapy injection of esophageal varices (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Dual red imaging (DRI) is a novel image-enhanced endoscopy technique that can increase the visibility and predict the depth of esophageal varices (EVs). The recurrence rate of EVs after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) reportedly decreases by intravariceal injection of a sclerosant. We evaluated prospectively whether the EIS success rate was increased by DRI compared with the white-light imaging (WLI) mode.

METHODS

A total of 79 patients with EVs were randomly divided into the DRI (n = 40) and WLI (n = 39) groups. The primary endpoint was the success rate of intravariceal injection on the first EIS puncture. The secondary endpoint was the recurrence rate. A variable puncture needle was used, and the length was adjusted according to the EV visibility change by DRI. In the WLI group, DRI was not used.

RESULTS

The success rate of the first puncture was significantly higher in the DRI group than in the WLI group (80.0% vs 46.2%; P = .0018). The cumulative recurrence rate was significantly lower in the DRI group (P = .031). The sum of the depth and luminal diameter of EVs was investigated by EUS. The Pearson correlation coefficient between this value and the needle length was higher in the DRI group than in the WLI group (r = 0.878 vs 0.603).

CONCLUSIONS

DRI increased the EIS success rate and decreased the recurrence rate. This resulted from the puncture needle adjustment to the appropriate length via EV depth prediction by DRI.

Does gastroesophageal reflux have an influence on bleeding from esophageal varices?

BACKGROUND

Mucosal breaks induced by gastroesophageal reflux of gastric contents were more frequently found on the right anterior wall of the lower esophagus. Bleeding from esophageal varices may be also derived from gastroesophageal reflux. The circumferential location of the ruptured esophageal varices was evaluated to elucidate the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and variceal rupture.

METHODS

Between January 2004 and December 2006, 26 patients who had primary bleeding from esophageal varices and 74 patients without evidence of bleeding with positive red color signs on varices were enrolled in this study retrospectively. Locations of bleeding spots and nonbleeding red color signs of esophageal varices were retrospectively evaluated by endoscopic photographs, and the relationship between the location of red color signs and the risk of bleeding was evaluated. Other possible predictors for bleeding were also investigated by multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

Red color signs were frequently found in the right posterior wall of the lower esophagus. However, bleeding spots of esophageal varices were more frequently seen in the right anterior side (64.0%) than in others. The positive predictor for bleeding from esophageal varices was the presence of red color sign in the right anterior wall of the esophagus, and the administration of proton pomp inhibitor was the negative predictor.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastroesophageal acid reflex may be a risk factor of bleeding from esophageal varices. Attention should be paid to the circumferential location of red color signs in endoscopic screening of patients with esophageal varices to predict future bleeding.

Prognosis following endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices in adults: 20-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) is beneficial in the management of active hemorrhaging and prevention of recurrent bleeding from esophageal varices. However, its long-term efficacy and safety are poorly defined. The aim of this study was to determine long-term cumulative survival and clarify negative predictive factors for survival following EIS in patients with esophageal varices.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1981 and 1987, 72 patients were prospectively enrolled in a post-EIS follow-up program. Variceal rebleeding, recurrence, and survival were recorded in follow-up examinations conducted for up to 20 years.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 86.9 months. The cumulative survival rates were 65.2%, 53.6%, 26.1%, and 11.6% at 36, 60, 120, and 240 months, respectively, with liver failure the most common cause of death. Esophageal varices were eradicated in 93.1% of the patients following EIS and no recurrence of varices was seen beyond 7 years. Significant negative predictive factors for survival rate shown by Cox's proportional multivariate hazard model analysis were older age, advanced liver damage, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, and occurrence of rebleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival, rebleeding, and recurrence rates following EIS were clarified. Furthermore, our results clearly demonstrate negative predictive factors for survival after EIS.

The role of endoscopic therapy in the treatment of bleeding varices

The role of endoscopy in bleeding varices is both diagnostic and therapeutic. While sclerotherapy of oesophageal varices remains an established modality, ligation has, in view of its higher safety margin, turned out to be superior in recent years. The excellent initial results of ligation are, however, tainted by a higher recurrence rate in the long term. Since the end-point of treatment is the achievement and maintenance of variceal eradication, the addition of low-dose sclerotherapy following initial eradication by ligation seems to be the optimal method to combine the best of both techniques. In the management of life-threatening bleeding from oesophageal varices and gastric varices, cyanoacrylate remains the only promising non-surgical option. Primary endoscopic prophylaxis is still under evaluation. It is only justified in high-risk patients with large varices bearing red colour signs and in the presence of an intolerance of or contra-indication to propranolol. When indicated, ligation seems to be preferable, and the addition of low-dose sclerotherapy after initial variceal eradication may maintain the benefits accrued in such high-risk patients. The present review examines the available evidence regarding the above issues in the recent literature.