Interobserver agreement on endoscopic diagnosis of bleeding peptic ulcers

Forrest Classification for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: A New Look at the Old Endoscopic Classification

The management of peptic ulcer bleeding is clinically challenging. For decades, the Forrest classification has been used for risk stratification for nonvariceal ulcer bleeding. The perception and interpretation of the Forrest classification vary among different endoscopists. The relationship between the bleeder and ulcer images and the different stages of the Forrest classification has not been studied yet. Endoscopic still images of 276 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding for the past 3 years were retrieved and reviewed. The intra-rater agreement and inter-rater agreement were compared. The obtained endoscopic images were manually drawn to delineate the extent of the ulcer and bleeding area. The areas of the region of interest were compared between the different stages of the Forrest classification. A total of 276 images were first classified by two experienced tutor endoscopists. The images were reviewed by six other endoscopists. A good intra-rater correlation was observed (0.92–0.98). A good inter-rater correlation was observed among the different levels of experience (0.639–0.859). The correlation was higher among tutor and junior endoscopists than among experienced endoscopists. Low-risk Forrest IIC and III lesions show distinct patterns compared to high-risk Forrest I, IIA, or IIB lesions. We found good agreement of the Forrest classification among different endoscopists in a single institution. This is the first study to quantitively analyze the obtained and explain the distinct patterns of bleeding ulcers from endoscopy images.

Association between ulcer site and outcome in complicated peptic ulcer disease: a Danish nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Mortality rates in complicated peptic ulcer disease are high. This study aimed to examine the prognostic importance of ulcer site in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) and perforated peptic ulcer (PPU).

DESIGN

a nationwide cohort study with prospective and consecutive data collection.

POPULATION

all patients treated for PUB and PPU at Danish hospitals between 2003 and 2014.

DATA

demographic and clinical data reported to the Danish Clinical Registry of Emergency Surgery.

OUTCOME MEASURES

90- and 30-d mortality and re-intervention.

STATISTICS

the crude and adjusted association between ulcer site (gastric and duodenal) and the outcome measures of interest were assessed by binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Some 20,059 patients with PUB and 4273 patients with PPU were included; 90-d mortality was 15.3% for PUB and 29.8% for PPU; 30-d mortality was 10.2% and 24.7%, respectively. Duodenal bleeding ulcer, as compared to gastric ulcer (GU), was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality within 90 and 30 d, and with re-intervention: adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.47 (95% confidence interval 1.30-1.67); p < 0.001, OR 1.60 (1.43-1.77); p < 0.001, and OR 1.86 (1.68-2.06); p < 0.001, respectively. There was no difference in outcomes between gastric and duodenal ulcers (DUs) in PPU patients: adjusted OR 0.99 (0.84-1.16); p = 0.698, OR 0.93 (0.78 to 1.10); p = 0.409, and OR 0.97 (0.80-1.19); p = 0.799, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DU site is a significant predictor of death and re-intervention in patients with PUB, as compared to GU site. This does not seem to be the case for patients with PPU.

Improving quality of care in peptic ulcer bleeding: nationwide cohort study of 13,498 consecutive patients in the Danish Clinical Register of Emergency Surgery

OBJECTIVES

The treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) is complex, and mortality remains high. We present results from a nationwide initiative to monitor and improve the quality of care (QOC) in PUB.

METHODS

All Danish hospitals treating PUB patients between 2004 and 2011 prospectively registered demographic, clinical, and prognostic data. QOC was evaluated using eight process and outcome indicators, including time to initial endoscopy, hemostasis obtainment, proportion undergoing surgery, rebleeding risks, and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 13,498 PUB patients (median age 74 years) were included, of which one-quarter were in-hospital bleeders. Preadmission use of anticoagulants, multiple coexisting diseases, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists scores increased between 2004 and 2011. Considerable improvements were observed for most QOC indicators over time. Endoscopic treatment was successful with primary hemostasis achieved in more patients (94% in 2010-2011 vs. 89% in 2004-2006, relative risk (RR) 1.06 (95% confidence intervals 1.04-1.08)), endoscopy delay for hemodynamically unstable patients decreased during this period (43% vs. 34% had endoscopy within 6 h, RR 1.33 (1.10-1.61)), and fewer patients underwent open surgery (4% vs. 6%, RR 0.72 (0.59-0.87)). After controlling for time changes in prognostic factors, rebleeding rates improved (13% vs. 18%, adjusted RR 0.77 (0.66-0.91)). Crude 30-day mortality was unchanged (11% vs. 11%), whereas adjusted mortality decreased nonsignificantly over time (adjusted RR 0.89 (0.78-1.00)).

CONCLUSIONS

QOC in PUB has improved substantially in Denmark, but the 30-day mortality remains high. Future initiatives to improve outcomes may include earlier endoscopy, having fully trained endoscopists on call, and increased focus on managing coexisting disease.

Management of peptic ulcer bleeding in different case volume workplaces: results of a nationwide inquiry in hungary

The aim of this study was to conduct a national survey to evaluate the recent endoscopic treatment and drug therapy of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) patients and to compare practices in high and low case volume Hungarian workplaces. A total of 62 gastroenterology units participated in the six-month study. A total of 3033 PUB cases and a mean of 8.15 ± 3.9 PUB cases per month per unit were reported. In the 23 high case volume units (HCV), there was a mean of 12.9 ± 5.4 PUB cases/month, whereas in the 39 low case volume units (LCV), a mean of 5.3 ± 2.9 PUB cases/month were treated during the study period. In HCV units, endoscopic therapies for Forrest Ia, Ib, and IIa ulcers were significantly more often used than in LCV units (86% versus 68%; P = 0.001). Among patients with stigmata of recent haemorrhage (Forrest I, II), bolus + continuous infusion PPI was given significantly more frequently in HCV than in LCV units (49.6% versus 33.2%; P = 0.001). Mortality in HCV units was less than in LCV units (2.7% versus 4.3%; P = 0.023). The penetration of evidence-based recommendations for PUB management is stronger in HCV units resulting lower mortality.

In-hospital mortality in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding Forrest 1 patients

OBJECTIVE

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is recognized world-wide as a common cause of emergency hospitalization, and it often represents a life-threatening event. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess in-hospital mortality in NVUGIB Forrest 1 patients admitted to the emergency unit owing to active bleeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We enrolled all patients consecutively admitted to the emergency unit for NVUGIB, acutely bleeding at endoscopy (spurting or oozing). Demographic characteristics, clinical and biochemical parameters, endoscopic findings and treatments were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of a total of 142 patients (98 M (69%), mean age+/-SD=66+/-14 years), spurting (16 (11.3%)) and oozing (126 (88.7%)) were identified. All patients received endoscopic treatment within 6 h of admission and were managed according to the guidelines. Seventeen (12%) patients suffered rebleeding, 4 patients (2.8%) required surgery to stop the bleeding, and 8 (5.6%) died during hospitalization (4 within 5 days and the remainder within 24 days of admission) - 3 as a consequence of bleeding (2.1%) and 5 of non-surgical complications (3.5%). Cox regression analysis showed that the lesions in more than one segment of the esophagogastroduodenal tract (p=0.008, hazard ratio (95% CI)=7.623 (1.680-34.600)) and the number of blood units transfused during the first 48 h of hospitalization (p=0.038, 2.075 (1.041-4.135)) were predictive of in-hospital death.

CONCLUSIONS

In Forrest 1 patients given rapid endoscopic treatment, in-hospital mortality seems to be related to the contemporaneous presence of bleeding and non-bleeding lesions in more than one segment of the esophagogastroduodenal tract and the number of blood units transfused during the first 48 h of hospitalization.

Capsule endoscopy examination--preliminary review by a nurse

Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been recommended as the method of choice for diagnostic endoscopy of the small bowel. An experienced nurse, after proper training, may contribute to the endoscopy procedures as previously described for sigmoidoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of an experienced gastroenterology nurse to prepare CE records for physician interpretation, by detecting abnormal thumbnails. A prospective, observational design was used. Fifty CE videos were pre-read by a specially trained gastroenterology nurse who thumbnailed the abnormalities detected for interpretation by the gastroenterologist. The nurse's description of the lesions and the calculated gastric and bowel transit times were compared to the interpretation of the videos made directly by the gastroenterologist (gold standard). The primary end point of the study was the quality of the nurse's pathology findings; the secondary end point was the cost effectiveness of this practice. There was complete agreement between the nurse and gastroenterologist for all 12 cases interpreted as normal by the gastroenterologist. In the remaining 38 cases, the nurse created 130 thumbnail selections and the physician, 99. Complete interobserver agreement was achieved for 93 of the 96 lesions categorized as "significant" by the physician (96.9%). After all relevant variables were taken into account, this approach saved dollar 324 per CE examination. The use of nurse practitioner to pre-read CE videos and prepare thumbnail selections for further assessment by the gastroenterologist appears to be safe, reliable, and cost effective.

Management of bleeding peptic ulcer in France: a national inquiry

AIMS OF THE STUDY

To evaluate and compare management practices in France for bleeding peptic ulcers using a national inquiry of university and non-university hospitals.

METHOD

Responses to questionnaires sent to 812 gastroenterologists, 496 practicing in non-university hospitals and 316 in university hospitals, were compared.

RESULTS

An analysis was possible in 279 (34% response rate) of the questionnaires. Forrest classification was used more frequently in university hospitals (83% vs 60%, P<0.01). Endoscopic hemostatic therapy was used more frequently in university hospitals for Forrest Ib (92% vs 81%, P=0.02), IIa (93% vs 73%, P<0.001), and IIb (58% vs 29%, P<0.001) ulcers. Injection therapy, mainly epinephrine, was the first-intention treatment for 99% of the responding gastroenterologists. Proportions of clinicians employing hemoclips (27%) or argon plasma coagulation (21%) were similar in both types of practice. Anti-secretory treatment included mainly omeprazole (82%), given intravenously (76%), sometimes as bolus i.v. doses followed by i.v. high-dose continuous infusion (15%) with some variations according to the type of hospital. In the event of recurrent or persistent bleeding, surgery was more frequent in non-university hospitals. When rebleeding occurred, a second endoscopic treatment was performed in about one quarter of patients.

CONCLUSION

In France, management practices for bleeding peptic ulcer vary between university and non-university hospitals.

Variable use of endoscopic haemostasis in the management of bleeding peptic ulcers

BACKGROUND

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that endoscopic haemostasis is beneficial for patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer. The relevance of such data to management outside of RCTs is unclear. Therefore we examined management of patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer in a UK teaching hospital.

METHODS

All patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy for bleeding peptic ulcer between 1997 and 1999 were identified from an endoscopy database and the clinical records reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 872 patients underwent UGI endoscopy for presumed acute UGI haemorrhage; 179 (21%) had an endoscopic diagnosis of bleeding peptic ulcer. Seventy nine patients had a peptic ulcer with stigmata of recent haemorrhage (SRH) but only 61 (77%) of these patients received endoscopic haemostasis (77% adrenaline, 23% combination therapy). Re-bleeding occurred in 24 patients with SRH in whom transfusion requirement was the sole predictor of re-bleeding. The re-bleeding rate among patients who received adrenaline was 25% (n=12), compared with 57% (n=8) in the combination group and 31% (n=4) in those who did not receive endoscopic haemostasis. Patients who received combination endoscopic haemostasis had an increased incidence of active bleeding (p=0.007) and an increased transfusion requirement (p=0.002). Eleven of 20 patients who re-bled had repeat endoscopic haemostasis, with 45% eventually requiring surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of endoscopic management of bleeding peptic ulcers in the unit studied differ markedly from those published by specialised centres. The data reported here suggest that increased standardisation of endoscopic haemostasis is required, especially in units with provision for emergency "out-of-hours" endoscopy, performed by several individuals of different grades.

Effectiveness of endoscopy in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with upper GI hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is generally indicated for the management of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with upper gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage but its impact in community practice has not been measured. Thus, the effectiveness of 3 EGD factors, viz., accurate initial diagnosis, performance within 24 hours of admission (early EGD), and appropriate intervention, was examined.

METHODS

Records of 214 patients admitted to the ICU of 10 metropolitan hospitals with upper GI hemorrhage were reviewed. Unadjusted and severity-adjusted associations of the 3 EGD factors with length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, readmission to ICU, recurrent bleeding, surgery, and death were evaluated.

RESULTS

Inaccurate diagnosis occurred in 10% of patients at initial EGD and was associated with significant increases in risk of recurrent bleeding (70% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), rate of surgery (20% vs. 4%, p < 0.05), length of hospital stay (median 7.5 vs. 5 days, p < 0.005), length of ICU stay (median 4 vs. 2 days, p < 0.005), and rate of readmission to ICU (20% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001). These associations persisted after adjusting for severity of illness. Early EGD performed in 82% of patients was associated with significant severity-adjusted reductions in hospital (-33%: 95% CI [-45%, -18%]) and ICU (-20%: 95% CI [-24%, -3%]) stay. Appropriate intervention at initial EGD, performed in 84% of patients, was associated with reductions in severity-adjusted length of ICU stay (-18%: 95% CI [-32%, 0%]) and rate of recurrent bleeding (odds ratio = 0.37, 95% CI [0.13, 1.06]).

CONCLUSIONS

Early, accurate EGD with appropriate therapeutic intervention is effective as practiced in the community and is associated with improved outcomes for patients with upper GI hemorrhage admitted to the ICU. Inaccurate diagnosis at initial EGD is uncommon but has a significant adverse association with all outcome measures.

The role of Doppler ultrasound in gastrointestinal bleeding

The management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding is the domain of endoscopy. More than half of all episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding are attributed to bleeding peptic ulcers, and it is important to assess the risk of recurrent bleeding and to determine the appropriate treatment. However, the visual assessment of lesions (Forrest classification) is not always accurate and shows high interobserver variability (especially for visible vessels at the ulcer base, associated with a high rate of re-bleeding). Doppler ultrasound was thus introduced, and several studies have demonstrated that, with Doppler examination, these vessels can be identified. Doppler ultrasound is also used to monitor the effects of endoscopic therapy. In a prospective randomized trial, Doppler ultrasound proved superior to the Forrest classification. Treatment based on this technique resulted in significantly lower rates of re-bleeding and mortality. The Doppler classification may be able to contribute to a safer and more cost-effective management of patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding.

Value of stigmata in decision-making in gastrointestinal haemorrhage

The stigmata of recent haemorrhage are endoscopically identified features that have a predictive value for the risk of further bleeding and thus help to determine which patients should receive endoscopic therapy. In conjunction with endoscopic features, clinical features related to the magnitude of bleeding and to patient co-morbidity have important independent effects on the risk of further haemorrhage. Stigmata have been best studied in the context of bleeding ulcers, the most common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Stigmata in ulcers are usually classified as active bleeding (spurting or oozing), a non-bleeding visible vessel, an adherent clot, a flat pigmented spot, or a clean base, in order of decreasing risk of further haemorrhage. Ulcer size and location may also affect the re-bleeding potential. Recent data suggest that both non-pigmented visible vessels and adherent clots have a higher risk of re-bleeding than was previously thought. The wide variation in prevalence and re-bleeding rates reported for various stigmata in the literature probably reflects variations in the definitions of stigmata and of re-bleeding, the vigour with which the ulcer bases are washed, the co-morbidity and ages of the patients, and the severity of bleeding encountered. Inter-observer agreement in the classification of stigmata is relatively poor and limits the utility of endoscopic features alone in making decisions regarding the management of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. Imaging devices such as Doppler probes are being evaluated to refine the identification of underlying vessels and their re-bleeding potential, but the utility of these is currently uncertain. The findings of low-risk endoscopic stigmata in a haemodynamically and otherwise stable patient can in many cases allow out-patient management.

Endoscopic practice for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: differences between major teaching and community-based hospitals

BACKGROUND

Differences in endoscopic practice in major teaching and community hospitals are not known.

METHODS

A total of 1031 consecutive patients discharged from 13 hospitals (4 major teaching, 9 others) in 1994 with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage were studied. Data obtained from chart abstraction included endoscopic findings and therapy and selected outcomes. Multivariable analyses adjusted for admission severity of illness and endoscopic findings.

RESULTS

Rates of endoscopy were similar between patients admitted to major teaching and other hospitals, although procedures to control hemorrhage were used more often in major teaching hospitals (35% vs. 19%, p < 0.001). Use of endoscopic therapy was higher in major teaching hospitals for lesions in which therapy is recommended, as well as other lesions. Recurrent bleeding was also more common in major teaching hospitals (14.3% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.001), and the difference persisted in multivariable analysis (odds ratio 1.69: 95% CI [1.09 to 2.64], p = 0.02). Unadjusted and adjusted length of stay were somewhat shorter in major teaching hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

There was large variation in the use of endoscopic therapy, with higher rates observed in major teaching hospitals for lesions in which therapy is recommended, as well as other stigmata. Further studies are needed to better define the reasons for the practice variation and to assess the impact on other outcomes such as readmission and costs.