Humeral head necrosis after proximal humeral nailing: what are the reasons for bad outcomes?

Greater tuberosity medial malposition: does it affect shoulder abductor moment?

PURPOSE

The detrimental effect of greater tuberosity malposition on functional scores is well known. Superior or posterior malpositions exceeding five mm lead to excessive loading on the deltoid strength. However, the significance of situations where greater tuberosity becomes medialized due to the compressive effect of the locking plate fixation, especially in fractures with metaphyseal dead space, has not been emphasized. It is hypothesized that this condition may cause shortening of the rotator cuff moment arm and consequently impact functional scores.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2018, 52 patients, aged 65,28 (ranging 40-85) proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plate fixation were included in the study. Cephalodiaphyseal angle, greater tuberosity displacement , patients reported outcome and Constant-Murley scores were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean Constant Murley score was determined to be 78.76 (ranging from 38 to 100). According to the patients reported outcome 39 excellent , five good , two fair, six poor results were observed. Avascular necrosis with screw migration was detected in five cases, while one patient experienced implant insufficiency along with varus deformity. Greater tuberosity was found to be positioned between 6 mm posterior-superior and -13 mm medial. Significant medial malposition was observed in three patients, with -9, -12, and -13 mm of medialization, respectively. Cephalodiaphysial angle was determined as 139.30 degrees (ranging from 120 to 150 degrees) and showed weak correlation with the functional score. Greater tuberosity medialization also showed weak correlation with the Constant-Murley score. The values exhibiting deviation were associated with low patient-reported outcome results and functional scores. In the examination of greater tuberosity displacement values, it was observed that Neer type 3 and 4 fractures differed significantly from Neer type 2 fractures regarding to Kruskal-Wallis test.

CONCLUSIONS

Medial impaction of greater tuberosity may be the reason of decreased functional scores, similar to superior or posterior malposition. The medialization of greater tuberosity should be considered as a potential factor leading to the shortening of the rotator cuff's abductor moment.

Shoulder-specific Outcome after Proximal Humerus Fracture Influences Medium-term Overall Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of proximal humerus fracture is an established procedure. Postoperative complications have been shown to have a significant impact on shoulder-specific outcome. Little is known to date about an influence on injury-independent quality of life.

AIM OF THE WORK

The aim of this retrospective study is to analyse whether patients with a poor functional outcome after surgically treated proximal humerus fracture also show a reduced general quality of life in the medium term. Emphasis is placed on the analysis of patients with poor functional outcome due to postsurgical complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Evaluation of all patients operated at one level 1 trauma centre with a proximal humerus fracture in the period 01.01.2005 to 31.12.2015 and follow-up using validated scores (Constant-Murley Score [CMS], EQ-5D). Two groups, group A with good outcome (∆CMS ≤ 15P.) and group B with poor outcome (∆CMS ≥ 16P.), were defined. Furthermore, descriptive variables including definition of a complication were defined in advance.

RESULTS

138 patients were included in the study (group A: 91, group B: 47). The mean follow-up was 93.86 months ± 37.33 (36-167). Group B had significantly more complications. Furthermore, patients with poor outcome regarding the shoulder (group B) were also found to have significantly lower EQ-VAS (78.9 ± 19.2 [20.0-100] vs. 70.4 ± 19.5 [15.0-98.0]; p = 0.008) and EQ index (0.91 ± 0.14 [0.19-1.00] vs. 0.82 ± 0.17 [0.18-1.00]; p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, in the present study, the patients with poor outcome of shoulder function in CMS have significantly lower overall quality of life after a mean of more than 6 years of follow-up. The poor outcome was due to a significantly higher postoperative complication rate. This was independent of the fracture morphology present and the surgical procedure used.

Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes after Antegrade Intramedullary Nailing in Proximal Humeral Fractures: Insights and Implications for Patient Satisfaction

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are common injuries that can lead to significant functional impairment. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications associated with the use of the Targon PH+ (Fa. Aesculap, Germany) intramedullary nail for the treatment of PHFs.

METHODS

A subgroup consisting of 70 patients with a mean follow-up of 4.91 years out of 479 patients who underwent treatment with the Targon PH+ intramedullary nail for PHFs at a single center between 2014 and 2021 were included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed using validated German versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L). Radiographic assessment was performed using pre- and postoperative imaging.

RESULTS

Among the 70 patients of the subgroup who completed follow-up, 21.4% experienced complications, including major complications in 15.7% of cases, all of which were revised (revision rate of 15.7%). Anatomical reduction was achieved in 48,5% of cases. The mean DASH, ASES, and OSS scores were 25.4 ± 22.0, 76.2 ± 21.1, and 38.8 ± 10.3, respectively. Significant correlations were observed among the PROMs, indicating their convergent validity. Additionally, a significant correlation of all used PROMs and patient well-being (HRQoL) was observed. Severe complications and revisions were associated with significantly lower ASES scores (-11.1%, p = 0.013). There was a tendency for PROM scores to slightly decline with increasing fracture complexity, although this trend did not reach statistical significance. Our findings indicate that patients over the age of 65 years tend to exhibit lower scores in PROMs and HRQoL measures.

CONCLUSION

The use of the Targon PH+ intramedullary nail for the treatment of PHFs resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes and acceptable complication and revision rates. The PROMs and HRQoL measures indicated varying levels of disability and symptoms, with major complications, revision surgery, and age negatively impacting shoulder function after midterm follow-up.

Humeral Head Avascular Necrosis: Pathophysiology, Work-up, and Treatment Options

» Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head is the result of ischemic injury to the epiphyseal bone leading to humeral head collapse and arthritis.» Common causes include trauma, chronic corticosteroid use, or systemic disease processes, such as sickle cell disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, or alcohol abuse.» Nonoperative treatment consists of risk factor management, physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, and activity modification.» Surgical treatment options include arthroscopic debridement, core decompression, vascularized bone grafts, and shoulder arthroplasty.

[An integrated approach for early recovery of function in patients after fractures of the humerus in its proximal section]

The frequency of fractures of the proximal humerus (PH) is 4-5% of fractures of all human bones and can reach 80% of all bone injuries of the humerus. An analysis of the long-term results of the methods used to treat fractures of the proximal humerus showed the absence of a generally accepted universal method that provides consistently good results for all variants of fractures of the PH.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Creation of a complex highly effective system for the treatment of PH fractures, which includes a minimally invasive method of surgical treatment using the method of cephalomedullary osteosynthesis with direct locking pins and a highly specialized program of rehabilitation measures using a biofeedback (BFB) device, which will reduce the duration of treatment and improve the results of functional recovery injured limb.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The results of treatment of 214 patients with fractures of the proximal humerus were analyzed. Of these, in 122 (57%) patients (the main group) osteosynthesis was used with a direct cephalomedullary fixator with the possibility of blocking the screws in the nail in different planes. The comparison group included 92 (43.0%) patients treated using other surgical techniques. Rehabilitation measures were started in the early postoperative period (from the 2nd day) in both groups and included a complex of physiotherapeutic treatment, physical exercises in different modes, in addition in the main group of the study, training was performed using a device with biofeedback.

RESULTS

It is shown that the used treatment approach allows to increase the frequency of achieving good and excellent (52.4% in the main group and 27.2% in the comparison group) results and reduce the frequency of unsatisfactory results of treatment (9.8% in the main group and 21.7% in the comparison group) on the Constant score.

CONCLUSION

The data obtained prove the high efficiency of the developed complex method for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures and restoration of the function of the upper limb.

Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the transosseous suture fixation

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures is commonly affected by implant-related complications. We evaluated the functional and radiographic results of transosseous suture fixation in a series of displaced proximal humeral fractures (PHF).

METHODS

Sixty-four patients were retrospectively classified by age, sex, and the Neer fracture classification. Two-part greater tuberosity (2pGT) displaced fractures and 3-part (varus and valgus) and 4-part valgus impacted fractures were managed with fragment reduction and transosseous suture fixation. Patients with minimum follow-up of 24 months and assessed with the Constant-Murley score (CMS) were included. Radiological and medical complications, as well as reinterventions were also recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients with a mean follow-up of 58 (24-132) and a mean age of 58 years old were analyzed. Patients with 2pGT (n = 10) fractures had a CMS of 76 points (59-89); patients with 3-part fractures (n = 22) had a score of 67 points (13-91); and those with 4-part fractures (n = 14) had a score of 64 (24-76) points. The overall complication rate was 6 out of 46, and 4 patients required reintervention for different reasons. Patients presenting with 3-part varus fractures had significantly lower functional outcomes scores (p = 0.007). Humeral head osteonecrosis was present in 9 patients and significantly affected the functional outcomes (p < 0.05). However, only three out of nine patients with osteonecrosis required subsequent surgery at the indicated follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The fracture reduction and transosseous fixation technique represents a safe technique with low complication and reintervention rates. The presence of humeral head necrosis did not lead to subsequent surgical intervention because no hardware had protruded.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective study.

Humeral head necrosis associated to shaft non-union with massive bone loss: a case report

Humeral non-union is a rare complication in shaft fractures, as well as humeral head necrosis is a possible complication in fracture involving the proximal third especially in four-part fractures. The presence of head osteonecrosis and diaphyseal non-union in the same arm represents a formidable challenge for an orthopaedic surgeon. We could not find any similar report in the literature dealing with this issue thus far. We present a case of a 65 years old woman referred to our hospital being affected by an atrophic humeral diaphyseal non-union with a massive bone loss (>10cm) associated to a humeral head osteonecrosis following a previous surgical procedures with a clear loosening of the hardware. At our institution,she was treated with hardware removal and insertion of a diaphyseal antibiotic spacer with Gentamycin for 2 months suspecting an active septic process at the union site despite negative cultural exams. Finally, she was treated with a cemented modular humeral megaprosthesis. At 20 months follow up, the patient, despite a reduced shoulder range of motion, referred to a pain-free recovery to an almost normal lifestyle, including car driving with no major disturbances. This case suggests that, in extreme selected cases following several failed treatments, megaprosthesis can represent a viable solution, especially in huge bone loss associated to joint degeneration, to ensure an acceptable return to a normal lifestyle.

The Current State of the Problem of Treatment of Patients with Proximal Humeral Fractures against the Background of Osteoporosis

This study focuses on problems of treatment of proximal humeral fractures occurring against the background of osteoporosis. It presents statistics on osteoporosis and lower energy trauma among patients in the Russian Federation and abroad. The high susceptibility to osteoporotic changes in the bone structure of the male population of Russia compared to the global statistics of osteoporosis among men was emphasized. The main classifications used in the clinical practice of orthopedists and traumatologists allow to identify the type of fracture by clinical and anatomical basis and to structure the existing patient management tactics to achieve the most optimal result of treatment and restoration of limb function. There is an analysis of publications representing various methods of fracture treatment, which helps to use the most optimal methods of relevant fractures treatment.

DOES SURGEON SPECIALIZATION CHANGE THE PROXIMAL HUMERAL OSTEO-SYNTHESIS APPROACH?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the choice of surgical approach among Brazilian orthopedists and whether shoulder surgery specialty training or duration of experience influences the decision-making.

METHODS

A questionnaire on the preferred approach and complications was administered to orthopedic surgeons with and without shoulder specialization training. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was applied.

RESULTS

We interviewed 114 orthopedists, 49 (43.0%) traumatologists, 36 (31.5%) specialist surgeons, and 29 (25%) shoulder surgery specialist residents. In cases of fracture without dislocation, specialized training and duration of experience did not influence the approach used (primarily deltopectoral). In cases of fracture/dislocation, 97.2% of the specialists versus 82.1% of the traumatologists opted for the deltopectoral approach (p = 0.034). In cases of fractures/dislocation, 92.5% of surgeons with more than 5 years of experience and 78.7% with less than 5 years of experience opted for the deltopectoral approach (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Specialization in shoulder surgery did not influence surgeons' approaches to manage fractures without dislocation. In cases of fracture/dislocation, shoulder surgery specialization training and duration of experience were associated with selection of the deltopectoral approach. Level of Evidence V, Expert opinion.