Safe intramedullary fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures with 2.5mm Kirschner wires - technique description and a two-part versus multifragmentary fracture fixation outcome comparison

Clinical effect of nice knot-assisted minimally invasive titanium elastic nail fixation to treat Robinson 2B midshaft clavicular fracture

BACKGROUND

The treatment of completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures is still controversial, especially Robinson 2B fractures. Titanium elastic nail (TEN) fixation is a good option for simple fractures, but no reports exist on its use in complex fractures. This study aimed to present a surgical method using the Nice knot-assisted TEN fixation to treat Robinson 2B midshaft clavicular fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 29 patients who underwent fixation with TEN and had a 1-year postoperative follow-up between 2016 and 2020 was performed. The fractures were classified as Robinson type 2B1 in 17 cases and type 2B2 in 12 cases. Length of the incision, postoperative shoulder function Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and Constant score, complications rate, and second surgical incision length were recorded.

RESULTS

The length of the incision was 2-6 cm (average 3.7 cm). All incisions healed by first intention, and no infection or nerve injury occurred. The Constant score was 92-100 (average 96) and the DASH score was 0-6.2 (mean, 2.64). TEN bending and hypertrophic nonunion occurred in one case (3.4%) and implant irritation occurred in four cases (13.8%) Fixation implants were removed at 12-26 months (mean, 14.6 months) after surgery, and the length of the second incision was 1-2.5 cm (average 1.3 cm).

CONCLUSIONS

Intramedullary fixation by TEN is approved as a suitable surgical technique in clavicular fracture treatment. Nice knot-assisted fixation provides multifragmentary fracture stabilization, contributing to good fracture healing. Surgeons should consider this technique in treating Robinson 2B midshaft clavicular fractures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Wuxi Ninth People's Hospital (LW20220021).

Bilateral clavicle fracture: A case report

Clavicle fractures are among the most common fractures in adults. Nevertheless, bilateral fractures are rarely reported in the literature. We present the case of a 35-year-old male patient who was admitted with a bilateral clavicle fracture following a motorcycle accident. The patient underwent open reduction and bilateral intramedullary fixation with Kirschner wires. After six months of follow-up, the functional result was satisfactory; the patient achieved full range of motion in both shoulders and was free from pain. X-rays showed a complete fusion of the fracture on both sides.

External fixator combined with three different fixation methods of fibula for treatment of extra-articular open fractures of distal tibia and fibula: a retrospective study

Background

To compare the efficacy of three different fixation methods of fibula combined with external fixation of tibia for the treatment of extra-articular open fractures of distal tibia and fibula.

Methods

From January 2017 to July 2019, 91 cases of open fractures of distal tibia and fibula were treated with external fixator, and the fibula was fixed with non-fixation (group A, n = 35), plate-screw (group B, n = 30) and Kirschner wire (group C, n = 26). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, surgical and implants costs, fracture healing time, postoperative complications, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle surgery (AOFAS) scores were compared among the groups.

Results

Four patients were lost to follow-up, and 87 patients were followed up for 5–35 months (average, 14.2 months). The operation time of group C (114.92 ± 36.09 min) was shorter than that of group A (142.27 ± 47.05 min) and group B (184.00 ± 48.56 min) (P < 0.05). There was no difference in intraoperative blood loss among the three groups (P > 0.05). The surgical and implants costs in group C (5.24 ± 1.21, thousand dollars) is lower than that in group A (6.48 ± 1.11, thousand dollars) and group B (9.37 ± 2.16, thousand dollars) (P < 0.05). The fracture healing time of group C (5.67 ± 1.42 months) was significantly less than that of group A (6.90 ± 1.33 months) and group B (6.70 ± 1.12 months) (P < 0.05). The postoperative complications such as fractures delayed union and nonunion in group C (2 cases, 8.00%) is less than that in group A (13 cases, 39.39%) and group B (11cases, 37.93%) (P < 0.05). The wound infection and needle-tract infection did not differ among the three groups (P > 0.05). The excellent or good rate of ankle function was 69.70% in group A, 72.41% in group B and 84.00% in group C, with no statistical difference among the three groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with simple external fixator fixation and external fixator combined with plate-screw osteosynthesis, external fixator combined with K-wire intramedullary fixation shortens the operative time and fracture healing time, reduced costs and complications of fracture healing, while the blood loss, infection complications and ankle function recovery showed no difference with the other two groups. External fixator combined with plate-screw osteosynthesis had no advantage in treating extra-articular open fractures of distal tibia and fibula when compared with simple external fixation.

S-shaped titanium endomedullary nail reduces telescoping of comminuted midshaft clavicular fractures

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures (DMCF) is clinically relevant and a much discussed topic. The axial stability of DMCF after intramedullary nailing (IMN) is still a matter of debate.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to present a modification of IMN of DMCF with S-shaped titanium endomedullary nail (TEN) and determine fracture telescoping from day one after surgery to the time of fracture healing.

METHOD

In a prospective analytic cohort study over a 6-year period (2012-2017) at a Level II trauma care centre, a total of 128 patients with DMCF were included and classified according to the AO/OTA classification system. Group I was AO/OTA type 15.2A/15.2B (N = 68) and group II was AO/OTA type 15.2C (N = 60). After a modified open stabilization technique of each DMCF with IMN (S-shaped TEN), the dynamics of radiological assessed telescoping until union and rate of surgical adverse events were measured. Significance was assumed for p < 0.05.

RESULTS

One day after surgery, fractured clavicles were lengthened slightly in both groups compared to the unfractured clavicules (group I: 1.2%; group II: 0.9%). After osseus consolidation, the fractured clavicules were significantly shortened in both groups (group I: - 2.9%; group II: - 3.6%). Measurement of the clavicular shortening at one day postsurgically and at consolidation revealed a mean telescoping of - 3.99% in group I and of - 4.6% in group II. The difference between the two groups was not significant (P = 0.522). The overall rate of major surgical adverse events was 2.3%.

CONCLUSION

The proposed operative technique of IMN (stabilization of the DMCF with a long, S-shaped, tight-fitting TEN) provides enough axial stability to prevent significant telescoping of the comminuted fractures. The rate of nonunion is low and the overall rate of major adverse events is similar to the reported events after plate fixation in the literature.

Management of clavicle shaft fractures with intramedullary devices: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Displaced and shortened clavicle fractures are frequently treated surgically. Although extramedullary fixation using a plate and screws is most commonly used, intramedullary nailing has become increasingly popular over the last decade. Traditional intramedullary nailing is usually associated with a high risk of hardware migration as well as hardware irritation at its entry point. Newer devices, however, seem to mitigate these problems. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of clavicle shaft fractures and treatment with intramedullary nails, in particular the newer, locked devices.

AREAS COVERED

In general, this review covers current literature related to clavicle shaft fractures with a specific focus on the treatment of displaced and shortened fractures with intramedullary nails.

EXPERT OPINION

Clavicle shaft fractures can be effectively treated with an intramedullary nail. The risk of hardware migration when employing the newer, improved designs appears to be minimal. The advantages of using intramedullary fixation include smaller incision sizes as well as the avoidance of routine procedures generally associated with the removal of prominent subcutaneous hardware as per extramedullary fixation.

Clavicle hook plate versus distal clavicle locking plate for Neer type II distal clavicle fractures

Background

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare clavicle hook plates versus distal clavicle locking plates for the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures.

Methods

PubMed (1996 to January 2019), Embase (1980 to January 2019), Web of Science (1990 to January 2019), the Cochrane Library (January 2019), and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (January 2019) were systematically searched without language restrictions for literature retrieval. The Constant-Murley shoulder joint function score at 3 and 6 months after the operation and the postoperative complications after the operation (shoulder joint pain, abduction restriction, fracture delay healing, subacromial impingement) were the outcomes. Stata 12.0 was used for the meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 9 clinical trials involving 446 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the improvement in the Constant-Murley shoulder joint function score in the distal locking plate group was better than that in the clavicle hook plate group at 3 and 6 months after the operation (P < 0.05). There were fewer cases of shoulder joint pain and restricted shoulder abduction range of motion in the distal locking plate group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in fracture delay healing and subacromial impingement between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the clavicular hook plate, the distal clavicle locking plate for the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures is associated with better shoulder function recovery and fewer complications related to pain and abduction restriction.