[Preoperative bowel preparation--is it useful?]

A statewide assessment of surgical site infection following colectomy: the role of oral antibiotics

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utility of adding oral nonabsorbable antibiotics to the bowel prep prior to elective colon surgery.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Bowel preparation prior to colectomy remains controversial. We hypothesized that mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics (compared with without) was associated with lower rates of surgical site infection (SSI).

METHODS

Twenty-four Michigan hospitals participated in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative-Colectomy Best Practices Project. Standard perioperative data, bowel preparation process measures, and Clostridium difficile colitis outcomes were prospectively collected. Among patients receiving mechanical bowel preparation, a logistic regression model generated a propensity score that allowed us to match cases differing only in whether or not they had received oral antibiotics.

RESULTS

Overall, 2011 elective colectomies were performed over 16 months. Mechanical bowel prep without oral antibiotics was administered to 49.6% of patients, whereas 36.4% received a mechanical prep and oral antibiotics. Propensity analysis created 370 paired cases (differing only in receiving oral antibiotics). Patients receiving oral antibiotics were less likely to have any SSI (4.5% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.0001), to have an organ space infection (1.8% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.044) and to have a superficial SSI (2.6% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.001). Patients receiving bowel prep with oral antibiotics were also less likely to have a prolonged ileus (3.9% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.011) and had similar rates of C. difficile colitis (1.3% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients in Michigan receive mechanical bowel preparation prior to elective colectomy. Oral antibiotics may reduce the incidence of SSI.

[Unopened colostomy in colorectal surgery: a renewal interest?]

INTRODUCTION

Anastomotic leak or disruption is a grave complication of colorectal surgery. Protection of an at-risk anastomosis by an upstream open diverting colostomy (OC) reduces this gravity. An unopened upstream loop colostomy is a surgical alternative which may diminish the unpleasant consequences of an open colostomy while maintaining the option of diversion in case of need. The aim of this study is to report the results of this approach and to define its indications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

[corrected] We report a retrospective series of 34 cases of unopened diverting loop colostomy to protect an at-risk colorectal anastomosis. Indications for this procedure were stool-laden bowel (59%), low serum albumin (11.5%), local inflammation (11.5%), and very low placed anastomosis (17.5%).

RESULTS

The loop colostomy was eventually opened after surgery in six cases because of anastomotic leakage diagnosed clinically and/or detected by water soluble contrast opacification which was performed routinely on the sixth post-operative day. In all six cases, there was no need for an urgent surgical intervention. In 28 cases, the anastomosis healed without complication and the exteriorized loop was returned to the abdominal cavity seven days after the initial surgery. This was a short, simple procedure with an average operating time of ten minutes. Average hospital stay after returning the unopened colostomy to the abdomen was two days.

CONCLUSION

Unopened loop colostomy offers the advantages of protection of a colorectal anastomosis without proper morbidity or mortality, shorter hospitalization, and improved psychological comfort for the patient. It's principal indication is to minimize the risks related to leakage from an at-risk colorectal anastomosis.

[Experimental study of the influence of the segmental transverse colic reversion on the intestinal transit time]

OBJECTIVE

to study the feasibility of the transverse segment colic reversion and to evaluate its impact on the intestinal transit time in the rat Wistar.

METHOD

On a test group of the rats Wistar males anaesthetized, we isolated a segment from the transverse colon vascularized by a feeder pedicle. This segment colic was reversed and anastomosed into antiperistaltic out of termino-terminal on its site with polyglactine 6/0. Into post-operative, we studied, the weight, the volume of the ingestats, the intestinal transit time, the survival and the histological lesions of the reversed segment colic. On the group controls, we carried out the anastomosis of a segment of the transverse colon isolated and anastomosed into isoperisaltic.

RESULTS

Thirty rats males of 231.5 +/- 8.3g had been operated, 15 for the test group and 15 for the control group. The average weight of the ingestats of the rats of the test group was of 21.87 +/- 3g and of 21.75 +/- 4.8g in the control group without significant difference. The intestinal transit occured at 3 +/- 1 post-operatives days in the test group and at 2 postoperative days in the control group. A mechanical obstruction of the bowels before the 15th post-operative day involved a mortality of 87% in the test group. Thirteen percent of the rats of the test group survived, with a regular catch of weight. The histological analysis showed inflammatory lesions on the proximal portion of the reversed segment and a normal wall without ischaemic injury on its distal portion. No death was observed in the group controls.

CONCLUSION

The antiperistaltic anastomosis of a transverse segment colic within the colic in the rat Wistar, causes a stop of the intestinal transit time by mechanical occlusion without ischaemic lesion of the segment colic reversed.