Primary repair of esophageal atresia: how long a gap?

Delayed primary anastomosis for repair of long-gap esophageal atresia: technique revisited

The operative management of patients born with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) remains a major challenge for most pediatric surgeons, due to the rarity and complex nature of this malformation. In LGEA, the distance between the proximal and distal esophageal end is too wide, making a primary anastomosis often impossible. Still, every effort should be made to preserve the native esophagus as no other conduit can replace its function in transporting food from the oral cavity to the stomach satisfactorily. In 1981, Puri et al. observed that in newborns with LGEA spontaneous growth and hypertrophy of the two segments occur at a rate faster than overall somatic growth in the absence of any form of mechanical stretching, traction or bouginage. They further noted that maximal natural growth arises in the first 8-12 weeks of life, stimulated by the swallowing reflex and reflux of gastric contents into the lower esophageal pouch. Since then, creation of an initial gastrostomy and continuous suction of the upper esophageal pouch followed by delayed primary anastomosis at approximately 3 months of age has been widely accepted as the preferred treatment option in most LGEA cases, generally providing good functional results. The current article offers a comprehensive update on the various aspects and challenges of this technique including initial preoperative management and subsequent gap assessment, while also discussing potential postoperative complications and long-term outcome.

Prophylactic negative vacuum therapy of high-risk esophageal anastomoses in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Esophageal anastomoses are at risk for leak or stricture. Negative pressure vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy is used to treat leak. We hypothesized that a prophylactic VAC (pEVAC) at the time of new anastomosis may lead to fewer leaks and strictures.

METHODS

Single center retrospective case-control study of patients undergoing high-risk esophageal anastomoses between July 2015 and January 2019. Outcomes of leak and long-term anastomotic failure (refractory stricture requiring surgery) were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients had a pEVAC placed during LGEA repair (N = 10) or stricture resection (N = 6). Of pEVAC cases, 3 (N = 1 Foker, N = 2 stricture resections) experienced leak (18.8%). In comparison, leak occurred in 9/41 (22%) Foker patients and in 1/20 (5%) stricture resections without pEVAC, all p > 0.05. Long-term anastomotic failure was more common in the pEVAC cohort versus controls (56.3% versus 11.5%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic EVAC placement does not appear to reduce leak and is associated with significantly greater odds of long-term anastomotic failure. Further device refinement could improve its potential role in prophylaxis of high-risk anastomoses, but future research is needed to better understand optimal patient selection, device design, and duration of pEVAC therapy.

Elongation of esophageal segments by bougienage stretching technique for long gap esophageal atresia to achieve delayed primary anastomosis by thoracotomy or thoracoscopic repair: A first experience from China

OBJECTIVES

The treatment of long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is one of the most challenging congenital malformations in neonatal surgery. A preoperative bougienage stretching technique for elongation of the two segments of esophagus is applied to achieve utilizing the native esophagus to establish esophageal continuity by open or thoracoscopic approach.

METHODS

From January 2015 to May 2017, 12 neonates who suffered from LGEA were admitted to our department. They were divided into 2 groups (A and B) according to their admission time. They all accepted bougienage stretching technique before esophageal anastomosis.

RESULTS

Initially the lengths of esophageal gap in 12 infants ranged from 4 to 7.5 vertebral bodies (M=5.8±1.1). The gap lengths became -1 to 2.5 vertebral bodies after bougienage stretching technique and tension-free anastomosis were performed successfully for all 12 cases: Group A (n=5) by thoracotomy and group B (n=7) by thoracoscopic approach. 12 cases have been followed up for 1-25 months (M=12.4±8.5) after definitive surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Bougienage stretching technique for LGEA is feasible with satisfactory clinical results. Thoracoscopic approach is a good choice for primary anastomosis in LGEA.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Treatment Study Level IV.

Delayed primary anastomosis for management of long-gap esophageal atresia: a meta-analysis of complications and long-term outcome

PURPOSE

Management of newborns with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) remains a challenge for pediatric surgeons. Since spontaneous growth of the esophageal segments occurs without mechanical stretching, initial gastrostomy followed by delayed primary anastomosis (DPA) comprises treatment in most LGEA patients. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the complications and long-term outcome in patients with LGEA managed by DPA.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted for relevant articles published between 1981 and 2011, and a meta-analysis of complications and long-term outcome was performed.

RESULTS

Forty-four articles presented data on 451 newborns with LGEA managed by DPA. Most common variants were pure LGEA (194/451) and LGEA with tracheoesophageal fistula (257/451). Initial gap lengths ranged from 1.9 to 7.0 cm. At the time of DPA, performed at a mean of 11.9 weeks (range 0.5-54.0), the gap had decreased to 0.5-3.0 cm. Mean follow-up was 5.5 years (range 0.5-27.0). Frequent complications were anastomotic leaks/strictures, gastroesophageal reflux (GER), esophagitis and dysphagia. Relative risk for strictures was significantly higher in patients who previously had a leak (p < 0.0001) or GER (p < 0.0001). Patients with GER also had a significantly higher risk for esophagitis (p = 0.0283) and dysphagia (p = 0.0174). The majority of patients could eat without swallowing difficulties at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

DPA provides good long-term functional results. However, the high incidence of GER and associated strictures requires early intervention to prevent feeding problems.

Magnetic compression anastomosis as a nonsurgical treatment for esophageal atresia

BACKGROUND

We describe a unique technique to promote a nonsurgical esophageal anastomosis with magnets in children with esophageal atresia.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of magnetic lengthening of atretic esophageal ends to produce an anastomosis and to communicate our results after more than 2 years of follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between September 2001 and March 2004, five children were selected for treatment. Two of the children had esophageal atresia without fistula (type A) and three had atresia with fistula converted to type A surgically; however, surgeons failed to achieve an anastomosis because of the width of the gap. Neodymium-iron-boron magnets were used. Daily chest radiographs were taken until union of the magnets was observed. They were then replaced with an orogastric tube.

RESULTS

Anastomosis was achieved in all patients in an average of 4.8 days. One patient, with signs of early sepsis, was successfully treated with antibiotics. In four of the five patients, esophageal stenosis developed. At the time of this report, two patients were free of treatment and on an oral diet (after 26 months), two patients required periodic balloon dilatation, and one patient had recently undergone surgery due to recurrent esophageal stenosis not amenable to balloon dilatation.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic esophageal anastomosis is a feasible method in selected patients with esophageal atresia. Esophageal anastomosis was achieved in all patients. The only observed complication of significance was esophageal stenosis. One patient needed surgery because of stenosis.

Long-term results of delayed primary anastomosis for pure oesophageal atresia: a 27-year follow up

The management of a newborn with pure oesophageal atresia continues to be challenging. We started treating babies with pure oesophageal atresia by delayed primary anastomosis in 1977. The purpose of this study was to review the long-term outcome in infants with pure oesophageal atresia (EA) treated by delayed primary anastomosis with special emphasis on gastroesophageal reflux (GOR) related morbidity. The medical charts of all patients treated by delayed primary anastomosis between 1977 and 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. All survivors were followed up with completion of a questionnaire and personal/phone interviews. There were 26 patients in total admitted during the 27-year study period with the diagnosis of pure oesophageal atresia. Three died prior to surgery due to associated anomalies; two had almost no distal oesophageal segment and underwent oesophageal replacement surgery. The remaining 21 children were treated with delayed primary anastomosis and made up our study group. There were four deaths (19%) in this group, and all were prior to 1980. The median gestational age was 35.5 weeks and the median birth weight was 2.6 kg; median initial gap was 3.7 cm and median preoperative gap was 1.5 cm; median age at operation was 80 days and the median hospital stay was 5.5 months. The median follow-up period was 13.5 years. Fourteen children (66%) developed symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux and nine of these needed fundoplication (43%). Sixteen children developed strictures at the anastomotic site; ten responded to repeated dilatations while six needed resection and reanastomosis. At the time of this study, 15 out of the 17 survivors (88%) were on normal diet with no respiratory problems and 2 (12%) were dependent on gastrostomy feeds. Our long-term follow-up data shows that the delayed primary anastomosis provides excellent functional results in patients born with pure oesophageal atresia. The high incidence of gastroesophageal reflux and associated morbidity requires early intervention to prevent ongoing feeding problems due to oesophagitis and stricture formation.

Very long gap esophageal atresia successfully treated by esophageal lengthening using external traction sutures

Esophageal atresia with a 6-cm gap or longer and a very short distal segment represents the extreme of this disorder's spectrum, the treatment of which can be challenging. Very often, several surgical procedures have to be carried out to maintain the patient's own esophagus. The authors report on a child born with isolated esophageal atresia without fistula and a very long gap (8.5 vertebral spaces in length). Delayed anastomosis was accomplished using a combination of various procedures that included a waiting period allowing for spontaneous esophageal growth, mobilization of the distal segment, and esophageal lengthening by external traction sutures. The aim of this report is to define the role of the traction method in the repair of this kind of atresia.

High submucosal blood flow and low anastomotic tension prevent anastomotic leakage in rabbits

In many cases of long-gap congenital esophageal atresia, direct anastomosis is difficult. In these cases, the esophagus is first lengthened by myotomy before anastomosis. We determined the degree of submucosal blood flow and/or approximation force at the site of anastomosis in rabbits after (1) separation of the esophagus from the outer membrane, (2) 1 cm and 2 cm resection of the esophagus, and (3) circular or spiral myotomy of the esophagus after 2 cm resection. In the first experimental group, submucosal blood flow volume < 115.2 ml/min/100 g resulted in anastomotic leakage. In the second experimental group, a 1 cm resected esophagus with an approximation force of 33.3 +/- 8.2 g did not result in leakage, while a 2 cm resected esophagus with an approximation force of 111.7 +/- 13.3 g resulted in leakage. It was found that leakage occurred when the approximation force was higher than 49.1 g even if submucosal blood flow volume was greater than 131.8 ml/min/100 g. In the third experiment, both circular and spiral myotomy reduced the approximation force. Although there was no difference in the changes in submucosal blood flow volume between the two types myotomy, circular myotomy was superior to spiral myotomy in the reduction of the approximation force at the site of anastomosis. We conclude that both approximation force and submucosal blood flow are important factors in preventing anastomotic leakage.

Preoperative home care for esophageal atresia--a survey

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Long gap esophageal atresia may require months of preoperative management before definitive repair. When 2 recent patients prompted the authors to consider preoperative home care, no published protocol could be identified. This survey is undertaken to determine pediatric surgeons' experience with preoperative home care for long gap atresia.

METHODS

A total of 543 surgeons were asked if any patients with long gap atresia had been treated preoperatively at home. For patients sent home, information on nursing care, insurance issues, complications, and timing or type of repair was requested.

RESULTS

A total of 380 surveys (70%) were returned. A total of 165 surveys representing 348 patients were included. Forty-one of 165 surgeons (25%) treated 63 of 87 patients (72%) with long gap atresia and an intact upper pouch at home. Home nursing care was provided for 44 patients (70%): 16 (36.4%) night shift, 2 (4.5%) day shift, 3 (6.8%) 24 hour, and 23 (52.3%) intermittent care. No complications referable to preoperative home care were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant hesitancy and practice variance exists regarding preoperative home care of patients with long gap esophageal atresia. Many surgeons are satisfied with the safety and cost effectiveness of this technique, although a prospective, multicenter trial is needed to study it in a randomized, controlled fashion.

Aortic arch anomalies associated with long gap esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether aortic arch anomalies are associated with long gap esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF).

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of all infants who had EA-TEF from 1980 to 1996 at two pediatric surgery centers. Two hundred three infants who had EA-TEF were identified.

RESULTS

Twelve infants were noted to have both long gap EA-TEF defined as a gap length greater than 3 cm and aortic arch anomalies. Of these 12, 7 had aberrant right subclavian arteries originating from the descending aorta. Four of the seven infants who had aberrant right subclavian artery (SCA) had gap lengths greater than 4 cm. All four had their fistulae divided initially through a right thoracotomy with primary repair performed at a later date. The remaining five infants who had long gap EA-TEF had right-sided aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian arteries. All five initially underwent exploration through the right chest. On discovery of the long gap EA and concurrent vascular anomaly, the thoracotomies were closed, and the infants underwent definitive repair of both their EA-TEF and their vascular anomaly through a left thoracotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors find that aortic arch anomalies are associated with long gap EA-TEF. Patients who have these two anomalies tend to have a long gap. Preoperative diagnosis of these anomalies may alter the timing and technique of surgical intervention. The embryogenesis of these vascular lesions may account for this more severe form of esophageal atresia.

Anastomotic leakage following surgery for esophageal atresia

Of 199 neonates undergoing primary or delayed primary repair of esophageal atresia, 34 (17%) developed anastomotic leakage, 7 of which (3.5%) were major anastomotic disruptions. Infants with major leaks developed signs within 5 days and all required early reoperation, necessitating abandonment of the esophagus in 6. The remaining 27 were minor leaks demonstrated by water-soluble contrast studies and were successfully treated nonoperatively. Gastroesophageal reflux was unassociated with this complication but the use of braided silk sutures was associated with a significantly increased risk of anastomotic leakage when compared with polyglycolic acid (relative risk, 3.2) or polypropylene (relative risk, 2.6) sutures. Following anastomotic leakage there was a significantly increased risk (relative risk, 2.04) of subsequent esophageal stricture formation.

Cervical repair of esophageal atresia

This report describes three neonates with Type IIIb3 esophageal atresia treated by primary repair utilizing a combined thoracic and cervical approach.