A direct method for fabricating tongue-shielding stent

The application of 3D-printed oral stents in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer and their dosimetric effect on organs at risk

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the accuracy of 3D-printed dental stents in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and their dosimetric effects on normal tissues.

METHODS

We selected 60 patients with OPC who underwent IMRT in the Department of Oncology, Special Medical Center of Army Medical University. These patients were randomly assigned into 3D-printed oral stent, simple glass bottle, and nonstent groups (20 patients/group). The positioning error was analyzed with the onboard imaging system once a week after 5 fractions of IMRT. The conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), radiation dose of organs at risk (OARs), and oral mucosal reaction were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in the conformity and uniformity of the target dose and the dose received by the spinal cord, larynx, and bilateral parotid glands among the three groups (P > 0.05). Meanwhile, the dose received by the upper cheek, hard palate, and soft palate of patients was significantly lower in the 3D-printed oral stent group than in the nonstent group (P < 0.05) but insignificantly different between the 3D-printed oral stent and simple glass bottle groups (P > 0.05). When compared with the nonstent group, the simple glass bottle group showed a markedly lower dose received by the upper cheek (P < 0.05) and an insignificantly different dose received by the hard palate and soft palate (P > 0.05). According to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.5.0, the adverse response rate of the hard palate mucosa was lower in the 3D-printed oral stent group than in the simple glass bottle and nonstent groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For OPC patients undergoing IMRT, the application of 3D-printed oral stents can significantly reduce the exposure dose of the upper cheek and hard palate and decrease the occurrence of adverse events such as oral mucositis although it cannot affect the positioning error.

Assessment of mouth opening before and after head and neck radiotherapy in patients with intraoral stents

Background

We evaluated the evolution of mouth opening before and after radiotherapy of the head and neck in patients using intraoral stents.

Materials and methods

Twenty-one patients with head and neck cancer who were indicated for radiotherapy participated in this study. Maximum interincisal opening measurements were performed before and after radiotherapy. Paired analyses of the pre- and post-radiotherapy groups were performed using paired samples t-tests and correlation analyses using Spearman's correlation test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

Paired analyses of the pre- and post-radiotherapy groups revealed a statistically significant reduction in post-radiotherapy maximum interincisal opening (p < 0.001). However, only four individuals were diagnosed with trismus after radiotherapy. Regarding the correlation tests, no statistically significant differences were observed between the differences in pre- and post-radiotherapy maximum interincisal opening values and the study variables.

Conclusion

The use of prosthetic devices during head and neck radiotherapy can reduce radiation doses in areas of no interest, thereby preventing the acute and late toxicities associated with cancer therapy.

Benefits of intraoral stents in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy: Systematic review

Intraoral stents aim to reduce the oral complications associated with head and neck cancers radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to determine the benefits associated with these devices. A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases selecting full articles published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish until June 6, 2020 (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020185065). The studies were evaluated by Hadorn and Somerfield criteria and guidelines were established. Nineteen studies were identified suggesting the use of intraoral stent for radiotherapy for patients with cancer on/near the mandible to reduce oral mucositis, trismus, xerostomia (LoE III), and dose in healthy structures (LoE IV) and for cancer on/near the maxilla to reduce oral mucositis and dose in healthy structures (LoE IV). Despite the limited scientific evidence, several benefits associated with the use of intraoral stent for radiotherapy of the head and neck neoplasia have been reported.

The efficacy of positioning stents in preventing Oral complications after head and neck radiotherapy: a systematic literature review

Background

Positioning stent in head and neck radiotherapy seems to have benefit to prevent oral complications but it hasn’t been summarized by an evidence-based method.

Objectives

This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of positioning stents in preventing oral complications after radiotherapy.

Methods

We conducted an electronic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CDSR, and Cochrane CENTRAL database for randomized-controlled clinical trials, controlled clinical trials and cohort studies that assessed oral complications after head and neck radiotherapy with positioning stents. Two reviewers extracted information on radiotherapy, follow-up period, oral complications and assessments independently.

Results

Three RCTs and two cohort studies were included in this review. Oral complications such as mucositis, xerostomia, taste alteration, trismus, salivary changes, dysphagia and pain on swallowing were assessed by different methods in these studies.

Conclusions

Oral complications were common in patients after head and neck radiotherapy. There is insufficient evidence that positioning stents have a preventive effect against xerostomia, and it needs more high-quality and prospective trials with long-term follow-up to support it.

Are intraoral customized stents still necessary in the era of Highly Conformal Radiotherapy for Head & Neck cancer? Case series and literature review

Aim

To evaluate the dose sparing efficacy of intraoral customized stents in combination with IGRT/VMAT in Head & Neck cancer patients.

Background

Despite advances in high-dose conformal radiotherapy (RT) techniques, adverse effects (such as oral mucositis) during and after RT often require temporary suspension of treatment and affect the quality of life in survivors. Intraoral customized stents can decrease radiation doses in healthy tissues and minimize damage from radiations. At the best of our knowledge the clinical impact of such devices in combination with VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) is not reported in the literature.

Cases description

Three Head & Neck cancer patients were submitted to image guided (IG) RT/VMAT in their treatment protocol. Dose distribution with and without the use of an intraoral stent was compared in each patient. Mean radiation doses proved to be lower in all patients, especially in the subsite: oral cavity.

Conclusions

There are several reports on the efficacy of IS during RT for Head & Neck cancer. Despite technological advances, the combination between high conformal RT and intraoral stents could still play a role in the management of this kind of patients. This strengthens the usefulness of the individualization of treatments and multidisciplinary approach.

Development of a semi-customized tongue displacement device using a 3D printer for head and neck IMRT

Purpose

To reduce radiation doses to the tongue, a patient-specific semi-customized tongue displacement device (SCTDD) was developed using a 3D printer (3DP) for head and neck (H&N) radiation therapy (RT). Dosimetric characteristics of the SCTDD were compared with those of a standard mouthpiece (SMP).

Materials and methods

The SCTDD consists of three parts: a mouthpiece, connector with an immobilization mask, and tongue displacer, which can displace the tongue to the contralateral side of the planning target volume. Semi-customization was enabled by changing the thickness and length of the SCTDD. The instrument was printed using a 3DP with a biocompatible material. With the SCTDD and SMP, two sets of planning computed tomography (CT) and tomotherapy plans were obtained for seven H&N cancer patients. Dosimetric and geometric characteristics were compared.

Results

Using the SCTDD, the tongue was effectively displaced from the planning target volume without significant tongue volume change compared to the SMP. The median tongue dose was significantly reduced (29.6 Gy vs. 34.3 Gy). The volumes of the tongue receiving a dose of 15 Gy, 30 Gy, 35 Gy, 45 Gy, and 60 Gy were significantly lower than using the SMP.

Conclusion

The SCTDD significantly decreased the radiation dose to the tongue compared to the SMP, which may potentially reduce RT-related tongue toxicity.

Utility of intraoral stents in external beam radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

AIM

This study aimed to assess the utility and stability of intraoral stent during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

BACKGROUND

The benefits of intraoral stents in radiotherapy are unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 386 setup errors in 12 patients who received IMRT for head and neck cancers without intraoral stents (intraoral stent [-]) and 183 setup errors in 6 patients who received IMRT with intraoral stents (intraoral stent [+]). All patients were matched according to the immobilization method (masks and boards). Setup errors were measured as the distance from the initial setup based on the marking on the skin and mask to the corrected position based on bone matching on cone beam computed tomography.

RESULTS

The mean interfractional setup errors in the right-left, craniocaudal, anterior-posterior (AP), and three-dimensional (3D) directions were -0.33, 0.08, -0.25, and 2.75 mm in the intraoral stent (-) group and -0.37, 0.24, -0.63, and 2.42 mm in the intraoral stent (+) group, respectively (P = 0.50, 0.65, 0.01, and 0.02, respectively). The systematic errors for the same directions were 0.89, 1.46, 1.15, and 0.88 mm in the intraoral stent (-) group and 0.62, 1.69, 0.68, and 0.56 mm in the intraoral stents (+) group, respectively. The random errors were 1.43, 1.43, 1.44, and 1.22 mm in the intraoral stent (-) group and 1.06, 1.11, 1.05, and 0.92 mm in the intraoral stents (+) group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Setup errors can be significantly reduced in the AP and 3D-directions by using intraoral stents.

A study on a dental device for the prevention of mucosal dose enhancement caused by backscatter radiation from dental alloy during external beam radiotherapy

The changes in dose distribution caused by backscatter radiation from a common commercial dental alloy (Au-Ag-Pd dental alloy; DA) were investigated to identify the optimal material and thicknesses of a dental device (DD) for effective prevention of mucositis. To this end, 1 cm³ of DA was irradiated with a 6-MV X-ray beam (100 MU) in a field size of 10 × 10 cm² using a Novalis TX linear accelerator. Ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, polyolefin elastomer, and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) were selected as DD materials. The depth dose along the central axis was determined with respect to the presence/absence of DA and DDs at thicknesses of 1-10 mm using a parallel-plate ionization chamber. The dose in the absence of DDs showed the lowest value at a distance of 5 mm from the DA surface and gradually increased with distance between the measurement point and the DA surface for distances of ≥5 mm. Except for PET, no significant difference between the DA dose curves for the presence and absence of DDs was observed. In the dose curve, PET showed a slightly higher dose for DA with DD than for DA without DD for thicknesses of ≥4 mm. The findings herein suggest that the optimal DD material for preventing local dose enhancement of the mucosa caused by DA backscatter radiation should have a relatively low atomic number and physical density and that optimal DD thickness should be chosen considering backscatter radiation and percentage depth dose.

A new, simple maxillary-sparing tongue depressor for external mandibular radiotherapy: a case report

BACKGROUND

In external radiotherapy, the use of leaded intraoral devices to shield adjacent tissues is well described, but stabilization of the mandible is often realized with standard bite blocks, which do not allow a good stabilization of the mandible.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 40-year-old patient presenting with a local recurrence of a tumor of the floor of the mouth underwent external radiotherapy. To shield the maxilla during mandibular irradiation and to ensure mandible and tongue immobility during external radiotherapy, a custom-made device was realized. The apparatus consists of a polymethylmethacrylate resin plate and 2 wedges. Only 2 steps are needed.

CONCLUSION

The realization is simple and cheap, the apparatus is comfortable, and modifications are easy. It can be used in all patients, except in patients with totally mandibular edentulous with severe bone resorption.

Effect of dental restorations and prostheses on radiotherapy dose distribution: a Monte Carlo study

Dental restorations, fixed prosthodontics, and implants affect dose distribution in head and neck radiation therapy due to the high atomic number of the materials utilized. The backscatter of electrons from metallic materials due to the impinging treatment x‐ray results in localized dose enhancements. These dose enhancements cause localized mucositis in patients who have dental work, a significant clinical complication. We investigated the backscatter effect of 23 configurations of dental work using the EGS4nrc Monte Carlo (MC) simulation system. We found that all‐metal fixed partial dentures caused the highest amount of dose enhancement – up to 33% – while amalgam restorations did not cause a significant amount. Restorations with a ceramic veneer caused up to 8% enhancement. Between 3 mm and 5 mm of water‐equivalent material almost completely absorbed the backscatter. MC simulations provide an accurate estimate of backscatter dose, and may provide patient‐specific estimates in future.