Myocardial perfusion through naturally occurring subendocardial channels

Transmyocardial Revascularization: Peril and Potential

Transmyocardial laser revascularization is a technique for the treatment of patients with chronic angina pectoris that is refractory to medical therapy and who are not eligible for surgical intervention. Percutaneous myocardial revascularization is a less-invasive catheter-based procedure that has been adapted from transmyocardial laser revascularization. Six prospective randomized clinical trials have been performed with transmyocardial laser revascularization and 5 have been performed using percutaneous myocardial revascularization. All of the transmyocardial laser revascularization and 4 of the percutaneous myocardial revascularization studies showed a significant improvement in angina class; however, results for improved survival, increased exercise tolerance, improved ejection fraction, and improved myocardial perfusion were less definitive. Transmyocardial laser revascularization has significant potential for morbidity and mortality. This article summarizes the results of the randomized trials, explains the current theories for the mechanism of transmyocardial laser revascularization, and discusses its current role in treatment for patients, considering the evidence that currently exists.

Transmyocardial laser revascularization with excimer laser: clinical results at 1 year

BACKGROUND

Transmyocardial laser revascularization, a new strategy for the treatment of diffuse ischemic heart disease, uses laser technology for the theoretical purpose of forming transmyocardial channels in the heart to increase perfusion to ischemic zones. This report summarizes our initial clinical experience with the procedure.

METHODS

Excimer transmyocardial laser revascularization was performed in a reversibly ischemic region of the heart in 15 patients. Ischemia and myocardial viability were evaluated by assessment of symptoms and of results of radionuclide single photon emission computed tomography imaging, exercise tolerance testing, and 24-hour Holter monitoring.

RESULTS

No adverse events occurred as a result of the laser revascularization, although 1 patient with preoperative ventricular arrhythmias died 48 hours postoperatively as a result of refractory ventricular tachycardia. Angina class decreased significantly from base line values in patients who had undergone the procedure (mean Canadian Cardiovascular Association angina class, 3.5+/-0.5 at base line, 1.6+/-0.6 at 1 month, 1.5+/-0.8 at 3 months, 1.9+/-0.9 at 6 months, 1.8+/-0.8 at 12 months; p<0.002), and nitroglycerin requirements were similarly decreased in patients who had undergone laser revascularization (mean g/wk of sublingual nitroglycerin, 19+/-4 at baseline, 5+/-3 at 1 month, 4+/-2 at 3 months, 4+/-2 at 6 months, 2+/-1 at 12 months; p<0.02). Exercise tolerance testing demonstrated increase in exercise duration compared with base line values (mean minutes, 7.4+/-3.1 at base line, 8.0+/-3.9 at 1 month, 8.5+/-4.4 at 3 months, and 9.0+/-3.9 at 12 months; p>0.05); those increases were not large enough to be statistically significant, however.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data are consistent with the concept that excimer transmyocardial laser revascularization in individuals with significant ischemic heart disease appears to be well tolerated, can be performed safely, and may lead to a reduction in ischemic symptomatology.

Transmyocardial laser revascularization: current status

Transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMLR) has been widely evaluated for treatment of the ischemic myocardium either in conjunction with coronary artery bypass grafting or as sole therapy. Clinically, it has shown significant improvement for angina symptoms, but the mechanism by which this modality works is unknown at this time. The original premise on which transmyocardial revascularization was established depended on its ability to essentially generate channels that would directly carry blood from the ventricle into the ischemic myocardium. This theory, however, has not been substantiated, so other mechanisms have been postulated. This article gives a historical perspective on the advent of transmyocardial revascularization and the many animal and human studies that have paved the way for its clinical use. Current controversies are examined, along with the new advances in laser technology and where the future of TMLR is headed.

Transmyocardial revascularization: the fate of myocardial channels

Attempted cardiac revascularization through laser-made channels has gained considerable recent notoriety. Although the treatment reduces angina, its ability to enhance perfusion is unclear, and the mechanism of action unknown. The fate of the channels appears an obvious place to look for insight. Therefore, this review focuses on temporal and spatial changes in channel morphology. An appreciation of the natural history of the channels not only has potential to elucidate mechanisms, but also to provide the basis for optimization of channel-making.

Transmyocardial laser revascularisation compared with continued medical therapy for treatment of refractory angina pectoris: a prospective randomised trial. ATLANTIC Investigators. Angina Treatments-Lasers and Normal Therapies in Comparison

BACKGROUND

Transmyocardial revascularisation (TMR) is an operative treatment for refractory angina pectoris when bypass surgery or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is not indicated. We did a prospective randomised trial to compare TMR with continued medication.

METHODS

We recruited 182 patients from 16 US centres with Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina (CCSA) score III (38%) or IV (62%), reversible ischaemia, and incomplete response to other therapies. Patients were randomly assigned TMR and continued medication (n=92) or continued medication alone (n=90). Baseline assessments were angina class, exercise tolerance, Seattle angina questionnaire for quality of life, and dipyridamole thallium stress test. We reassessed patients at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, with independent masked angina assessment at 12 months.

FINDINGS

At 12 months, total exercise tolerance increased by a median of 65 s in the TMR group compared with a 46 s decrease in the medication-only group (p<0.0001, median difference 111 s). Independent CCSA score was II or lower in 47.8% in the TMR group compared with 14.3% in the medication-only group (p<0.001). Each Seattle angina questionnaire index increased in the TMR group significantly more than in the medication-only group (p<0.001).

INTERPRETATION

TMR lowered angina scores, increased exercise tolerance time, and improved patients' perceptions of quality of life. This operative treatment provided clinical benefits in patients with no other therapeutic options.

Transmyocardial and percutaneous myocardial revascularization: current and future role in the treatment of coronary artery disease

Transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) is a new treatment modality under evaluation in patients with severely symptomatic, diffuse coronary artery disease, in whom the potential for medical or interventional management has been exhausted. Preliminary clinical trials show improved ischemic symptoms within the first 3 months in about 70% of TMR-treated patients. The original proposed mechanism of surgical or catheter-based TMR (percutaneous myocardial revascularization [PMR]) was that channels mediate direct blood flow between the left ventricular cavity and ischemic myocardium. However, several alternative explanations for the clinical success of TMR have recently been suggested, including improved perfusion by angiogenesis, an anesthetic effect by nerve destruction, and a potential placebo effect. This article reviews the clinical role of TMR/PMR, its possible pathophysiologic mechanisms, and its controversies. It provides an overview of the actual scientific and clinical status of TMR and details future directions.

Angiogenesis is enhanced in ischemic canine myocardium by transmyocardial laser revascularization

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to test whether transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMLR) stimulates angiogenesis in an animal model of chronic ischemia.

BACKGROUND

TMLR relieves angina and may also improve blood flow in patients who are not candidates for traditional therapies. The mechanisms of these benefits are not fully defined.

METHODS

Ischemia was created in 14 dogs by proximal left anterior descending coronary ameroid constrictors. TMLR was performed in the anterior wall (approximately 1 channel/cm2) of seven dogs; the remaining dogs served as the ischemic control group. Myocardial blood flow was measured (colored microspheres) at rest and during chemical stress (adenosine) in the acute setting and after 2 months.

RESULTS

TMLR did not influence blood flow in the acute setting. After 2 months, resting blood flow increased comparably in the anterior wall in both groups to approximately 80% of normal. However, the TMLR-treated dogs demonstrated an approximately 40% increase in blood flow capacity during stress in the ischemic territory compared with untreated dogs (left anterior descending coronary artery/left circumflex coronary artery flow 0.53+/-0.16 in the control group vs. 0.73+/-0.08 in TMLR animals, p < 0.05). Vascular proliferation, assessed by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and proliferating cell nuclear antigen positivity in endothelial and smooth muscle cells was about four times greater in the TMLR group than in the control group (p < 0.001). The density of vessels with at least one smooth muscle cell layer was approximately 1.4 times greater in the myocardium surrounding the TMLR channel remnants than in control ischemic tissue (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this canine model of chronic ischemia, TMLR significantly enhances angiogenesis as evidenced by the increased number of vessels lined with smooth muscle cells, markedly increased vascular proliferation and increased blood flow capacity during stress.