Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: clinical outcome after 4 years

In vivo microwave-induced porcine kidney thermoablation: results and perspectives from a pilot study of a new probe

OBJECTIVE

To test the in vivo effects (toxicity, completeness of necrosis, dimensions of the lesion) of microwave thermoablation on porcine kidneys, using the Amica Probe v3 (Hospital Service SpA, Aprilia, Italy), in a refrigerated 17-G microwave applicator, that can be used to induce a spherical necrotic area.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six pigs were used; each kidney was treated, with no kidney pedicle clamping, by microwave thermoablation at least in three different zones with different exposure times and power, during open surgery. Twelve kidneys had 32 microwave thermoablations overall. The kidneys were then surgically removed, and necrotic lesions measured and evaluated microscopically. The sphericity index (SI) was also calculated to evaluate lesion reproducibility. Areas of renal tissue that were missed were then microscopically evaluated by NADH in vivo staining.

RESULTS

In all, 32 thermoablations were applied; the mean (sd) lesion diameter ranged from 1.2 (0.3) to 4.2 (0.1) cm and changed in relation to both power and time of exposure. The 50-W power particularly induced necrotic renal lesions ranging from 1.9 (0.2) to 4.2 (0.1) cm as a function of the time of exposure and the optimal SI (1.04). Pathological evaluation showed no skipped areas in the context of the lesion, or healthy kidney tissue damage close to necrotic lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermoablation with the Amica probe is safe and showed excellent in vivo effects in this porcine model. Increasing the exposure time at 50 W power could be a useful percutaneous minimally invasive treatment for small solid masses (<4.2 cm), avoiding the risk of missing tumour areas or kidney parenchymal damage from microwave treatment.

Long-term results of three different minimally invasive therapies for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparison at a single institute

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed the efficacy and durability of three different minimally invasive therapies (MIT) for lower urinary symptoms performed at a single institution based on a 5-year prospective cohort study.

METHODS

The pre- and postoperative evaluation was made in 103 patients with the following three MIT options: (i) transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT, n = 34); (ii) transurethral needle ablation (TUNA, n = 29); and (iii) transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU, n = 40).

RESULTS

All three treatments significantly improved the symptom scores up to 2 years after treatment. However, no statistical difference was observed in the efficacy between MIT. The percentage of men requiring the secondary treatment also showed no statistical differences. Cox's proportional hazards multivariate regression model revealed the baseline peak flow rate (Qmax) and total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) but the types of MIT are independent significant factors for determining the long-term clinical results of MIT.

CONCLUSION

Our data showed no statistical differences in either the efficacy or in the durability between the three MIT. The baseline Qmax and total IPSS are the significant factors for determining the long-term results of MIT.

Long-Term Results of Microwave Thermotherapy for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

PURPOSE

To study the long-term outcomes of men with moderately severe symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who were treated with transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) with the Dornier Urowave machine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 220 patients (mean age 66.2 years) with clinical BPH, an American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Score of >or=13, and a peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) of <or=12 mL/sec were enrolled in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Sham and active treatments were conducted under local anesthesia as an outpatient procedure. Patients were followed up at 1 week and at 1, 3, and 6 months. Patients in the sham-treatment arm who still met the initial enrollment criteria were then offered active treatment. The 6-month interim analysis of the safety and efficacy of this treatment has been previously reported (Urology 1998;51:19). Patients were then followed at 6-month intervals out to 60 months after treatment. At our center, 34 men (mean age 64+/-6 years) continued on the recommended long-term follow-up protocol.

RESULTS

Among the 34 men from our center initially entered in the study, 15 completed the entire 5-year follow-up. Four of the men available for follow-up at the 5-year mark were on alpha-blocker medication, and six men had required transurethral surgery for symptom relief. At 5 years, this cohort of patients maintained improvement in AUA Score (from 20.5+/-6.2 to 11.5+/-5.0; P<0.001) and Quality of Life score (from 3.7+/-1.3 to 1.9+/-1.0; P<0.001) but showed no significant improvement in Qmax (8.2+/-1.9 mL/sec to 8.4+/-4.3 mL/sec). At 5 years, 11 of the 15 patients available for review had not required additional therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

While improvement in voiding symptoms and Quality of Life scores were maintained without the need for adjuvant treatment in approximately one third of men 5 years after TUMT, a significant number had required salvage therapies for symptom relief.

Efficacy of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy in alleviating medically refractory urinary retention due to benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (HE-TUMT) in treating patients with medically refractory complete urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

Between April 2000 and July 2003, 39 patients in urinary retention due to BPH were treated with HE-TUMT. A Foley catheter was reinserted after HE-TUMT and removed at 3 weeks for a voiding trial. Patients unable to void were recatheterized, and voiding trials were repeated at 2-week intervals. Patients were evaluated according to history and physical examination, prostate-specific antigen level, prostate volume, cystourethroscopy, International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score, peak uroflow, and postvoid residual. Success was defined as the ability to urinate after HE-TUMT without the need for further intervention.

RESULTS

The mean (+/- SD) patient age was 72 +/- 9.3 years. Mean follow-up period was 18 +/- 10.2 months. Twenty patients (51%) were characterized as American Society of Anesthesiologists class III or higher. The mean prostate volume was 75.2 +/- 57.6 cm3. The mean length of time that patients were dependent on indwelling Foley catheters before HE-TUMT was 9.6 +/- 14.2 weeks. Thirty-two patients were able to void after HE-TUMT, for an overall success rate of 82%. Patients voiding successfully after HE-TUMT had a mean of 1.6 +/- 0.8 voiding trials and required catheters after HE-TUMT for a mean period of 4.1 +/- 2 weeks. Only 6 (15%) of the patients who were voiding were able to stop their medication for BPH.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an encouraging success rate with HE-TUMT in relieving urinary retention in patients with BPH, including those with large prostate volumes. It is an acceptable option for patients who are considered high risk for surgery. Several patients required multiple voiding trials before spontaneous urination, which suggests that improvements in bladder outlet obstruction might require a prolonged period after HE-TUMT. Finally, many patients might require continued use of medications after HE-TUMT.

Interstitial laser coagulation for management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Long-term follow-up

AIM

We evaluated the long-term results of transurethral interstitial laser coagulation in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with up to 9 years of follow up at the Kurashiki Central Hospital and determined the patient characteristics that predict a favorable outcome.

METHODS

From December 1993 to May 1997, a total of 82 patients were enrolled in the present study. Subjective and objective voiding parameters were collected from medical records and a self-administered questionnaire was sent to the patients. Kaplan-Meier plots were constructed to assess the risk of retreatment.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 48.4 months (range, 3-108 months). A total of 59 patients (72%) did not need any additional treatment at 12 months and 30 patients (37%) did not require additional treatment during the entire follow-up period. A total of 29 patients (35%) were retreated during follow-up. Transurethral prostate resection (TURP) was performed in 18 patients (22%). The remaining 11 patients (13%) were offered additional pharmacotherapy. The minimum and median retreatment-free durations were 3 and 14 months, respectively. Seven patients died and 17 were lost to follow-up. Men aged 71 years or older had greater likelihood of requiring retreatment than those younger than 71 years (P = 0.0397). No significant differences were noted in the other baseline characteristics. Among postoperative parameters, a rate of decrease of the International Prostate Symptom Score of the patient of lower than 60% and a rate of decrease in patient quality of life of lower than 50% at 3 months were associated with greater likelihood of retreatment (P = 0.0083 and P = 0.0006, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Interstitial laser coagulation is effective for the treatment of BPH. Good long-term results and an acceptably low retreatment rate render this modality an effective alternative to TURP, especially for younger patients. Short-term improvement of subjective symptoms was predictive of favorable long-term outcome.

The cost of feedback microwave thermotherapy compared with transurethral resection of the prostate for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of a new microwave thermotherapy for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the ProstaLund Feedback Treatment (PLFT, ProstaLund Operations AB, Lund, Sweden) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a clinical trial to their effectiveness in clinical practice over 1 year, to estimate their cost over 1 year, and to evaluate the cost of re-interventions over a longer period (2-3 years).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a large randomized international 1-year clinical trial PLFT was as effective as TURP in improving symptoms of BPH and urinary flow. Because PLFT is an outpatient procedure it was less costly than TURP. However, the cost-effectiveness of the new procedure depends on its long-term effectiveness in clinical practice. All 146 patients in the randomized clinical trial were included in the present analysis. The outcome was based on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the bother score, and costs were estimated from treatment-related adverse events and hospitalization. To validate the estimates based on the clinical trial 1-year data on effectiveness and complete resource use in clinical practice were collected in a retrospective observational study from hospital charts and patient questionnaires of 88 patients who had undergone either TURP or PLFT. To assess the number of re-interventions after TURP after the first year information was obtained from hospital and surgical procedure data in the Swedish inpatient registry. The 3-year data for a total of 52,010 patients who had an index hospitalization for TURP between 1990 and 1995 were available for the analysis. The estimate of long-term consequences of PLFT was based on complication and re-intervention data for 87 patients who had undergone PLFT between 1997 and 1999.

RESULTS

The mean 1-year costs in the clinical trial were estimated at [symbol: see text] 1763 for PLFT and [symbol: see text] 3209 for TURP. When all treatment-related resource use in clinical practice for 88 patients was included the costs were estimated at [symbol: see text] 1924 and [symbol: see text] 3264 for PLFT and TURP, respectively. The IPSS and bother scores were not significantly different between the groups in both datasets. Using the registry data the cost of TURP including re-interventions (TURP and bladder neck incisions) was estimated at [symbol: see text] 3159 over 2 years and [symbol: see text] 3185 over 3 years; the respective costs for PLFT were [symbol: see text] 2121 and at [symbol: see text] 2151.

CONCLUSIONS

In the 1-year clinical trial PLFT was as effective but less costly than TURP, but long-term data are still lacking. However, the preliminary analysis over 3 years indicates that the average cost of the procedure remains lower than the total cost of TURP for the same period.

Efficacy and safety of intraprostatic temperature-controlled microwave thermotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a prospective, open-label, single-center study with 1-year follow-up

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Different devices for transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) are currently available for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the Prostalund Feedback Treatment (PLFT), which continuously records the intraprostatic temperature, and its impact on sexual function of the patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 41 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to BPH were entered in this prospective open-label, single-center study of PLFT. The initial evaluation was performed according to a standard protocol. At 3, 6, and 12 months, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), bother score, sexual function, and peak flow rate (Qmax) were recorded. In addition, determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and measurement of residual urine volume were repeated at the 6- and 12-month visits. All adverse events were also recorded. Patients with IPSS of < or =7, > or =50% improvement in IPSS from baseline, a Qmax of > or =15 mL/sec, or > or =50% improvement in Qmax from baseline were judged responders to the treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-three of the patients completed the 12-month visit. The response rate was 88% (29 of 33 patients). There was a statistically significant decrease in IPSS at the 12-month visit, the mean IPSS being 7.1 v 21.9 at baseline (P<0.001). The mean IPSS was 10.3 and 7.6 at the 3- and 6-months' follow-up, respectively. The bother score presented a similar improvement, with a decrease from a mean of 4.2 at baseline to a mean of 1.4 after 12 months (P<0.001). The mean Qmax improved from 8.4 mL/sec at baseline to 15.9 mL/sec, 19.2 mL/sec, and 17.8 mL/sec at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively (P<0.001). The mean change in prostate volume, as determined by TRUS, was 16 mL at 6 months and 19 mL at 12 months (P<0.001). The procedure was well tolerated. The mean post-treatment catheterization time was 17.90 days. Bladder spasms and urinary tract infection were the most common adverse events. Coitus ability remained practically unchanged after treatment (from 71% to 74.3%), but the number of patients with ejaculation decreased (from 78% to 51.4%).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that PLFT is an effective and safe treatment for most patients with BPH.

TUMT 2.0: results three months and three years after treatment

OBJECTIVE

To examine the durability of the results following low-power transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

28 patients 55 to 83 years of age with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and marginal/moderate infravesical obstruction and 4 patients with LUTS, peak urinary flow (Qmax) less than than 15 ml/sec and prostate volume below 40 ml. We used a Prostatron version 2.0.

RESULTS

transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was done shortly after treatment in one patient with acute obstruction caused by necrotic tissue. Three months after treatment 15 patients reported that they were cured from LUTS and 10 experienced improvement of symptoms. A significant reduction of the symptom scores was seen among the 31 patients not operated while Qmax was unchanged. Three years after treatment two patients were still cured from LUTS, 9 hadsome reduction of symptoms, and TURP had been done in further three patients. Symptom scores among the 24 patients still in the study were significantly lower than the baseline values but also significantly higher than the symptom scores three months after treatment. Residual urine was reduced while no changes were seen in Qmax.

CONCLUSION

TUMT done by Prostatron version 2.0 causes mainly a reduction of symptoms. Most of the effect disappears after a few years.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In general, while this procedure is safe, patients require a spinal, epidural, or general anesthesia and often several days of hospital stay; the potential morbidity and mortality limits the use of TURP in high-risk patients. Pharmacotherapy has been recommended as a first-line therapy for all patients with mild to moderate symptoms. Patients are often times enthusiastic if they are offered a one-time method to treat lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH, provided that the method offers reduced risk and allows an efficacy equal to that of medical therapy. One such method is transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT). TUMT involves the insertion of a specially designed urinary catheter with a microwave antenna, which heats the prostate and destroys hyperplastic prostate tissue. TUMT allows the avoidance of general or regional anesthesia, and results in minimal blood loss and fluid absorption. In this review, the authors discussed the current indications and outcome of TUMT, including the history of the procedure, the mechanism of action, the indications for TUMT, the pre-operative considerations, the patient selection, the results in terms of efficacy, by comparing TUMT vs. Sham, TUMT vs. Alpha-blocker and TUMT vs. TURP. Finally, the complications are presented, as well as other uses and future directions of the procedure. The authors concluded that TUMT is a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative to treatment of symptomatic BPH.

Long-term effects of transurethral microwave thermotherapy

BACKGROUND

To identify the clinical valuables predicting a favorable outcome after transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) of the prostate with Prostatron.

METHODS

One hundred and two patients with lower urinary symptoms were treated with TUMT using a Prostatron device with the low-energy protocol (Prostasoft version 2.0 J). The pre-operative subjective score and objective voiding parameters were collected from the medical record. To test the differences in the risk of the necessity for additional treatments for several subgroups, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and log-rank tests were used.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that 67% of the patients received additional treatment within five years. The median period for receiving additional treatment was 37 months. The patients with a peak flow rate greater than 6.5 mL per second, with a urethral length less than 40 mm, or with an age over 64 years all demonstrated a significantly longer period before receiving additional treatment, when compared with their counterparts. These three factors were also significant in multivariate analysis to predict the long-term outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall durability of TUMT was limited. Aged patients with a relatively high peak flow rate or with a short prostatic urethral length resulted in lower risk of receiving additional treatments after TUMT.

Minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the new millennium: long-term data

Over the last decade, a number of minimally invasive therapies have been investigated for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Most of these therapies use thermal energy to ablate prostatic tissue. The major common problem with all these new minimally invasive therapies has been the lack of long-term data concerning efficacy, re-intervention rates and side-effects. We present here the available long-term data on these alternative minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia and their current place in the urologist's armamentarium.

Minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Currently, 3 categories of treatment are available for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): (1) medicine, such as alpha-blockers and finasteride; (2) minimally invasive treatment, such as transurethral microwave thermotherapy and interstitial ablation using either radiofrequency or laser; and (3) surgical therapy. The 1990s have seen an explosion of transurethral technology to treat symptoms caused by bladder outlet obstruction secondary to BPH. Unlike surgical debulking procedures, the minimally invasive therapies attempt to treat patients without general or regional anesthesia, and even ambulatory procedures are performed in the office. Because of the demographics of patients with BPH, it is hoped that these minimally invasive options will relieve symptoms without any surgical complications and the side effects and compliance issues associated with medical therapy. It is important that urologists have a clear understanding of the clinical usefulness of these devices, so that the overall role of such treatment may be determined by science rather than marketing. Clinically, the degree of symptom score, peak flow, and quality-of-life improvement seen with all the minimally invasive techniques are similar. The techniques may differ in their ability to reach the maximum number of responders and achieve an acceptable duration of response, and the need for analgesia/sedation associated with each technique. This study will define the minimally invasive therapies and present the differences in catheter design and technique. The pathologic basis for these therapeutic options and the advantages and disadvantages of each will be discussed. Urologists must decide which therapy can be used in their office practice. The maximum numbers of responders and enhanced durability of the treatment can be achieved based on realistic expectations, proper selection of patients, and complete information on the potential of these devices.

Changing therapeutic regimens in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clinical and economic considerations

About one-quarter of men aged 50 years and older experience voiding problems due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Until about 10 years ago, surgery (particularly transurethral resection of the prostate) was the only effective treatment for symptomatic BPH. Over the last decade, several new treatments have been introduced. These include different types of medication (alpha-blockers and finasteride), thermotherapy, laser prostatectomy, needle ablation and vaporisation methods. The diffusion of these less invasive treatment modalities has resulted not only in a decrease in the age-adjusted surgery rates, but also in an increase of the total number of men treated for BPH. A large number of studies on clinical benefits and risks reveal that the conventional types of surgery remain the most effective treatments, whereas new interventional therapies require a shorter hospital stay and result in fewer short term complications. The efficacy of medication is lower than that of interventional treatments. Adverse effects include dizziness and orthostatic hypotension (alpha-blockers) and decreased sexual function (finasteride), but are generally mild. There is some evidence that medication and minimally invasive treatments may preclude eventual surgical treatment, but the precise effect is difficult to estimate because of differences in the study populations and the relatively short study periods. As a result of the dynamic nature of BPH treatment and the lack of long term data, the cost effects of the introduction of the various new treatments are also difficult to assess. Given the aging of the population and the growing percentage of patients with BPH for whom any type of treatment can be considered, a considerable increase of total costs can be expected. Long term prospective studies are necessary to gain insight into the most cost-effective treatment for different patient groups.

Microwave thermotherapy: historical overview

The application of heat with curative aim is an old and very well-known principle in medicine. A review of the history of heat use in the treatment of prostatic disease is presented. The article is based on bibliographic research (MEDLINE Search and PubMed) and focuses on treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) since the first clinical documentation of transrectal hyperthermia for this condition. Then, in a chronological sequence, not only the evolution toward thermotherapy but also enhancements of the latest techniques are presented. The new advances in the field of patient selection, indications, and outcome predictors, as well as new trends in treatment are briefly considered.

Clinical results of microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy is a truly office procedure without the need for anesthesia for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia. Several devices have been developed. Continuous refinement of the procedure led to higher energy protocols and high-intensity dose protocols applying the heat-shock strategy. We report on the clinical results of these protocols. Symptom scores improve around 60%, whereas maximum urinary flow rate improve from an average 9 to 10 mL/sec at baseline to 14 to 15 mL/sec during follow-up. No significant differences have been shown between the outcomes with the different devices. Long-term data show satisfactory results after 4 years. Initial clinical results with the heat-shock strategy show results comparable to those of higher-energy protocols with decreased morbidity. Treatment morbidity of higher energy protocols is moderate and consists mainly of the need for catheterization and a higher percentage of retrograde ejaculation. To improve treatment efficacy, patient selection appears to be most important. Prostate size, bladder outlet obstruction, age, and prostate composition are of predictive value for treatment outcome. Further development of the treatment protocols and refinement of the urethral applicators might enhance outcome.

Durability of results obtained with transurethral microwave thermotherapy in the treatment of men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

To assess the durability of the results of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), we have reviewed publications describing trials with at least 3 years of follow-up. For men treated only by TUMT, improvement in symptoms and quality of life appears to be maintained for at least 4 to 5 years. Improvement in peak flow rates is modest but is generally maintained, particularly after higher-energy therapies. These results represent responders, and a crucial question is the need for additional treatments. With lower-energy treatment, this is common: between 50% and 60% within 3 to 5 years. With higher-energy TUMT, the retreatment rate appears to be less, approximating 20% within 3 to 4 years. When comparing these results with those of transurethral resection, it should be noted that there is a significant failure rate with surgery, and even if failure is more common with TUMT, men may be prepared to accept this risk rather than the greater morbidity of prostatectomy.

Transurethral hot-water balloon thermoablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: patient tolerance and pathologic findings

OBJECTIVES

To determine the patient tolerance and thermal ablation pattern in human prostatic tissue after treatment with a hot water, catheter-based system.

METHODS

Twenty-seven men scheduled for surgery for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia or adenocarcinoma of the prostate underwent water-induced thermotherapy. The patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Lidocaine gel was the sole means of pain control. The patients and an observer recorded patient discomfort during therapy. A Foley catheter was left in place until surgery (n = 13) or successful voiding (n = 14). Prostates were subsequently enucleated or removed, whole mounted, and examined.

RESULTS

Patients reported mild treatment discomfort, the level of which did not correlate with the extent of necrosis, balloon diameter, or water temperature (all P >0. 05). Distal penile burning was the most commonly reported discomfort. All 14 patients successfully voided within 12 days of treatment. Prostates were enucleated (n = 24) or removed (n = 3) at a mean of 27 days (range 4 to 120) after thermotherapy, except for a single adenectomy 17 months after therapy. Pathologic findings included periurethral hemorrhagic necrosis, with focal or extensive urothelial denudation and mild inflammation. The mean maximal depth of necrosis from the urethral lumen was 7, 9, 10.33, and 11 mm in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The extent of necrosis was similar in all groups (P = 0.11), regardless of the water temperature; conversely, the balloon diameter correlated with the depth of necrosis (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

This system of tissue ablation appears to be well tolerated, and it produced consistent pathologic results.

Clinical efficacy of a new 30-min algorithm for transurethral microwave thermotherapy: initial results

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of a new 30-min algorithm for high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT, Prostasoft 3.5) in the treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 108 men (mean age 66 years) with bothersome LUTS were treated with the new TUMT protocol. All patients were evaluated using a standard assessment at baseline, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after TUMT. The evaluation included the assessment of objective and subjective outcome measures, with a urodynamic evaluation using pressure-flow analysis, and the occurrence of adverse events.

RESULTS

The treatment was well tolerated. In general, the International Prostate Symptom Score improved from a mean of 20.0 at baseline to a mean of 9.3 at 6 months after treatment. The maximum urinary flow improved from 9.4 mL/s to 14.6 mL/s at 6 months. The mean duration of catheterization was 17.9 days. The urodynamic evaluation showed a change from the obstructed to the equivocal zone on the Abrams-Griffith nomogram. There were no serious complications. Urgency and frequency were the most frequent side-effects after treatment; these all resolved within 3 months.

CONCLUSION

High-energy TUMT using the new high-dose Prostasoft 3.5 protocol appears to be a safe and effective treatment. The faster procedure improves the tolerance of the treatment. The subjective and objective improvements were significant and the treatment-related morbidity low. A longer follow-up is needed to assess the durability of this new treatment protocol.

New technologies for the surgical management of symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement: tolerability and morbidity of high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy

High-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy is an attractive alternative outpatient single-session treatment for symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement, with good tolerability, low morbidity and few complications. This paper reviews recent published literature, with a focus on tolerability and morbidity.

Three-year follow-up after transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for benign prostatic hyperplasia using the PRIMUS U + R device

OBJECTIVE

We report long-term (3 years) follow-up data of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using a lower-power treatment protocol.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety-one patients were treated in a 1-h session with the PRIMUS U + R device.

RESULTS

Forty-five of the patients were still on TUMT monotherapy at 3-year follow-up, while 32 received additional therapy for their lower urinary tract symptoms. In patients with monotherapy there was a 45% decrease in international prostate symptom score (IPSS) when compared to pretreatment values. The moderate increase in peak uroflow seen early after TUMT could not be observed after 3 years. No serious side-effects were seen.

CONCLUSION

Three years after lower-power TUMT, 49% of patients treated were on TUMT monotherapy, while 35% received additional therapy for their voiding symptoms. Symptom score decreased 45% in patients with TUMT monotherapy concomitant with unchanged uroflow.

Sexual function following high energy microwave thermotherapy: results of a randomized controlled study comparing transurethral microwave thermotherapy to transurethral prostatic resection

PURPOSE

We evaluate changes in sexual function in patients treated with high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy compared to transurethral resection of the prostate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 147 patients randomized to undergo transurethral microwave thermotherapy or transurethral resection of the prostate were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire evaluating sexual function before, and 3 and 12 months after treatment. The questionnaire dealt with such items as social status, libido, quality of erection, ejaculation and overall satisfaction of sexual functioning.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant improvement of micturition in both groups. The improvement in the transurethral prostatic resection group was significantly better than in the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group. Antegrade ejaculation occurred at 3 months following treatment in 27% of the transurethral prostatic resection group compared to 74% of the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group and at 1 year in 37 and 67%, respectively. Significantly more patients undergoing transurethral prostatic resection (36%) had changes in sexual function compared to the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group (17%). The transurethral microwave thermotherapy group was more satisfied with the sex life. Of these patients 55% graded sex as very satisfying compared to 21% in the transurethral prostatic resection group. The severity of symptoms was not correlated with sexual function in this study. In general, older patients had sexual dysfunction more often, while younger patients had pain during sexual activities more frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinically less effective, high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy is a better therapeutic option than surgery for patients who want to preserve sexual function. In particular ejaculation is often preserved after transurethral microwave thermotherapy while there is significant deterioration following transurethral prostatic resection. In general, older patients have greater sexual dysfunction.

Long-term follow-up of transurethral microwave thermotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term results of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with up to 5 years of follow-up at our institution.

METHODS

From October 1991 to November 1993, 106 patients were treated for BPH with TUMT using the Prostatron 2.0. Of the 106 patients, 64 were available for evaluation of symptoms (Madsen-Iverson score), uroflow, residual urine, and retreatment rate at a mean follow-up of 50+/-5.4 months (mean+/-SD).

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 65.2+/-9.8 years. Thirty-two patients (50.0%) were treated with one session of TUMT. Additional treatments were required for 32 patients (50.0%). Three patients had two sessions of TUMT, 14 underwent transurethral resection of prostate, and 3 had laser prostatectomy. Twelve patients received medical therapy. The mean symptom score decreased significantly from 12.9+/-2.5 to 5.7+/-3.6 (P = 0.001). The mean peak flow rates and postvoid residual volume showed little difference before and after TUMT. On the basis of the criteria described by Poincelet and Cathaud the overall clinical efficacy rate was 39.1% (15.6% complete response and 23.5% partial response). No obvious clinical parameter was useful to predict favorable outcome after TUMT.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that the efficacy rate of TUMT with the Prostatron 2.0 at 50 months was 39.1 %. None of the preoperative clinical factors was predictive of a favorable outcome.

Office treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

The less invasive procedures described herein are suitable for use in the office setting. Improvement in symptoms and quality of life are similar to that achieved with TURP. With the exception of TUIP, flow rate improvement is less than with TURP. TURP, however, tends to produce a "super normal" flow rate, which may be unnecessary. Patients are concerned regarding symptoms and quality of life and the avoidance of complications. In regard to decreased complications, less invasive procedures have an advantage. The main concern with these new treatments, with the exception of TUIP, is durability. Treatment failure may lead to other treatments, thereby increasing overall management costs. In this regard, it must be remembered that there is a significant treatment failure rate with TURP. Although patients failing less invasive treatments are likely to be offered other treatments, this is less likely after an adequate TURP. Therefore, when results are compared, it may be more appropriate to evaluate failure rates based on symptoms and quality of life rather than on the use of additional treatments. More patient follow-up for a longer period of time will be required before a definite answer is available on durability. All of the procedures described herein can be performed to a variable extent using topical anesthesia. TUNA has been performed using topical lidocaine alone but frequently requires intravenous sedation/analgesia and, in some instances, a regional block. If the patient can tolerate rigid cystoscopy fairly well, topical anesthesia alone may suffice. Similar requirements for anesthesia apply to ILC with the Nd:YAG or indigo systems. Using the Targis (T3) microwave device, Peterson and co-workers reported that 60% of patients were treated with topical urethral lidocaine alone, whereas 40% also received oral Toradol. Djavan (personal communication) using the Targis (T3) device randomized patients to topical urethral anesthesia alone or combined with intravenous sedoanalgesia. Pain was evaluated using a 0 to 10 visual analog scale score. At the commencement of treatment, the mean score was 1.4 in the topical anesthesia alone group and 1.3 in the sedoanalgesia group. During therapy, the score increased to a peak at 30 minutes of 2.2 and 2.0 in the topical and sedoanalgesia groups, respectively. After this, the visual analog score declined, falling to 0.2 and 0.1, respectively, by 1 hour following treatment. This study shows that microwave treatment with the Targis (T3) system is well-tolerated using topical urethral anesthesia alone. No difference was observed between outcomes in the two groups. Capital and operating costs as well as reimbursement issues are important in the introduction of these treatments into the office; however, until more information is available on the durability of results, the cost-effectiveness of these newer treatments remains unclear.