Antibiotic prophylaxis of urinary tract infection after transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized study

Antibiotic prophylaxis for transurethral urological surgeries: Systematic review

The use of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent urinary tract infection and bacteremia (sepsis) following endoscopic urologic procedures is a controversial topic. Evidence in the literature revealed that urological instrumentation is associated with increased incidence of urinary tract infection and bacteremia. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing the risk of urinary tract infection in patients who had transurethral urological surgeries. We have selected all RCTs of adult population who underwent all different types of transurethral urological surgery, including cystoscopy, transurethral resection of prostate and transurethral resection of bladder tumor, and received prophylactic antibiotics or placebo/no treatment. At first, more than 3000 references were identified and reviewed; of which 42 studies with a total of 7496 patients were included in the final analysis. All those trials were analyzing antibiotic prophylaxis versus placebo/no treatment, and they were significantly favoring antibiotic use in reducing all outcomes, including bacteriuria (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.46, P < 0.0001) with moderate heterogeneity detected (I² 48%), symptomatic UTI (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.51, P < 0.0001) with no significant heterogeneity was detected (I²= 17%), bacteremia (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.82, P < 0.0001) with no noted heterogeneity (I² = 0%), and fever ≥38.5 Celsius (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.73, P = 0.003); also, there was no noted heterogeneity (I² = 0%). However, using antibiotic prophylaxis did not reduce the incidence of low grade temperature (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.11, P = 0.20) or in moderate grade temperature (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.48, P = 0.89). Antibiotic prophylaxis appears to be an effective intervention in preventing urinary tract infections and its sequels following transurethral urological surgeries in patients with preoperative sterile urine.

Protecting the ureter during radiofrequency ablation of renal cell cancer: a pilot study of retrograde pyeloperfusion with cooled dextrose 5% in water

PURPOSE

To describe early experience with cooled dextrose 5% in water (D5W) solution retrograde pyeloperfusion during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) within 1.5 cm of the ureter with respect to feasibility, safety, and incidence of residual/recurrent tumor in proximity to the cooled collecting system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2004 and April 2007, 17 patients underwent 19 RF ablation sessions of RCCs within 1.5 cm of the ureter during cooled D5W pyeloperfusion (nine men, eight women; mean tumor size, 3.5 cm; mean age, 73 y; mean distance to ureter, 7 mm). RF ablation was performed with pulsed impedance control current. The records and imaging studies of patients treated with this technique were reviewed for demographics, indication, technique, complications, and tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

All 19 RF ablation and ureteral catheter placement procedures were technically successful. No patient developed a ureteral stricture or hydronephrosis during a mean of 14 months of follow-up (range, 4-32 months). Three patients had residual tumor on the first follow-up imaging study, but all three tumors were completely ablated after a second RF ablation session. No complications or deaths occurred. No recurrent tumor was seen anywhere in the treated tumors, and there was complete ablation of the tumor margin in proximity to the collecting system.

CONCLUSIONS

RF ablation of RCC within 1.5 cm of the ureter is feasible with cooled D5W retrograde pyeloperfusion and is not associated with reduced efficacy, ureteral injury, or early recurrence.

Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urological field

For urologists, it is very important to master surgical indications and surgical techniques. On the other hand, the knowledge of the prevention of perioperative infections and the improvement of surgical techniques should always be considered. Although the prevention of perioperative infections in each surgical field is a very important issue, the evidence and the number of guidelines are limited. Among them, the preparation of guidelines has progressed, especially in gastrointestinal surgery. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) proposed guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections, which have been used worldwide. In urology, the original guidelines were different from those of general surgery, due to many endourological procedures and urine exposure in the surgical field. The Japanese Society of UTI Cooperative Study Group has thus framed these guidelines supported by The Japanese Urological Association. The guidelines consist of the following nine techniques: open surgeries, laparoscopic surgeries, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, ureterorenoscope and transurethral lithotripsy, transurethral resection of the prostate, prostate biopsy, cystourethroscope, pediatric surgeries in the urological field, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and febrile neutropenia. These are the first guidelines for the prevention of perioperative infections in the urological field in Japan. Although most of these guidelines were made using reliable evidence, there are parts without enough evidence. Therefore, if new reliable data is reported, it will be necessary for these guidelines to be revised in the future.

ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS FOR TRANSURETHRAL PROSTATIC RESECTION IN MEN WITH PREOPERATIVE URINE CONTAINING LESS THAN 100,000 BACTERIA PER ML: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

PURPOSE

We determined whether antibiotic prophylaxis can reduce the risk of postoperative infective complications in men undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) who have preoperative urine with less than 100,000 bacteria per ml.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE (Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo or active controls for men undergoing TURP with preoperative sterile urine. Two reviewers independently extracted patient characteristic and outcomes data based on a prospectively developed protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 28 trials, 10 placebo controlled and 18 no treatment controlled, involving 4,694 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the subjects was 69 years and the majority underwent TURP for prostatic hyperplasia (85%). Antibiotic prophylaxis was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing postoperative TURP complications. The risk differences for post-TURP bacteriuria, high degree fever, bacteremia and use of additional antibiotic treatment were -0.17 (95% CI 0.20, -0.15), -0.11 (-0.15, -0.06), -0.02 (-0.04, 0.00) and -0.20 (-0.28, -0.11), respectively. The results were observed consistently across all classes of antibiotics assessed. There was no difference in the duration of postoperative catheterization or hospitalization. Adverse events were rare, generally mild, and included allergic reactions, pyrexia and abdominal complaints.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic antibiotics decrease the incidence of post-TURP bacteriuria, high fever, bacteremia and additional antibiotic treatment. Additional research should evaluate the optimal antibiotic regimen, and whether the cost and possibility of the development of resistant strains of organisms justify the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics.

Current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for catheter procedures

The practice of giving prophylactic antibiotics to patients at the time of urinary catheter insertion, change or removal is variable since guidelines for their use have yet to be established. The use of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent urinary catheter-related infections and the possibility of bacteraemia and septicaemia, despite a lack of evidence for their efficacy, is a matter of concern in light of the reported overuse of, and increased resistance to, antibiotics. This article describes an audit of, and increased resistance to, antibiotics. This article describes an audit conducted in one trust to establish the current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary catheter procedures. The audit confirmed that in 60% of the recorded catheter procedures, patients were given antibiotics, usually gentamicin. Variations in gentamicin prophylaxis were revealed, including differences in the timing of administration relative to the catheter procedure. This audit revealed that intramuscular gentamicin was given simultaneously with the procedure or after the procedure in a number of cases, suggesting that on these occasions "prophylaxis" was suboptimal.

A randomized and prospective study on the value of antibiotic prophylaxis administration in transurethral resection of the prostate

CONTEXT

Antibiotic prophylaxis in transurethral resection of the prostate is a regular practice in urology. However, its prophylactic effect can be questioned when the antiseptic surgical technique is used. Nonetheless, urine culture-oriented antibiotic therapy is the gold standard for avoiding improper medication usage and bacterial resistance.

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy of antibiotic usage in patients with negative urine cultures, who were submitted to transurethral resection of the prostate.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective open labeled study.

SETTING

Tertiary care referral hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

124 consecutive patients, who were randomly divided into two groups to receive antibiotic prophylaxis or not.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Cultures from meatus, urine, irrigation and antiseptic fluid, and prostate tissue chips, were compared and analyzed for bacterial sensitivity to the antibiotic used, according to the surgeon's personal criteria. McLennan's test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference regarding clinical evolution was found between the groups that received or antibiotics or not. Statistical significance was found regarding the occurrence of positive urine cultures during the postoperative period for those not receiving antibiotics, but not in relation to fever, prostate chip culture or bacteremic episodes. Sixty-eight subjects (57.1%) presented positive prostatic tissue culture. There was no specific correlation between the recovered bacteria from the meatus, prostatic tissue chip and urine and the spectrum of the administered antibiotic. Six cases showed the same bacteria in the urine and prostatic tissue chip. Only fifteen cases (25%) in the antibiotic group showed the desired sensitivity directed to the collected bacteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients whose urine is sterile is debatable in patients who are candidates for transurethral resection of the prostate. Most of the time, the antibiotic agent used is not specific for any of the bacteria recovered from the various sources analyzed.

Population pharmacokinetics of netilmicin in short-term prophylactic treatment

AIMS

To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of netilmicin, an aminoglycoside antibiotic, in adult urology patients and to develop a covariate model for improved dose titration.

METHODS

Data from 62 adult patients (55 male, seven female), undergoing urological surgery and treated with netilmicin for short-term prophylaxis, were evaluated retrospectively. The group had (median, range) ages 68, 31-92 years, weights 72, 43-106 kg and heights 167, 148-182 cm. No patient showed renal impairment before netilmicin treatment (serum creatinine </=1.9 mg dl-1). Netilmicin (100 mg) was administered as a maximum of four successive intravenous infusions of 30 min, at 8-h intervals. A total of five blood samples were collected from each patient. Prior to analysis, the dataset was divided into 'index' (n = 44) and 'validation' (n = 18) groups at random. The time courses of netilmicin concentrations from all subjects were analysed using a mixed effects, population, nonlinear modelling package (WinNonMix). For covariate model development, a stepwise procedure was used with backward elimination followed by forward inclusion based on age, sex, weight, height, creatinine clearance and type of surgery. The final covariate model parameters from the index group were used to simulate concentrations in the validation group and the bias and precision were compared with the observations.

RESULTS

A bi-compartmental open model with a proportional residual error best described the data. The population parameters for central and peripheral volumes of distribution were (typical population value [interindividual CV%]) Vc = 14.5 l [56%] and Vp = 10.2 l [not estimated], and the systemic and intercompartmental clearances were CL = 3.9 l h-1[42%] and CLQ = 10.1 l h-1[not estimated], respectively. The final population covariate relationships were based on sex (SEX) and creatinine clearance (CrCL): (Vc, l) = 18.9 - 5.9 x SEX [29%] and (CL, l h-1) = 0.06 x CrCL [33%]. Compared with the observations in the validation group, this model showed a bias (95% confidence interval) of -0.028 (-0.28, 0.25) and precision of 1.22 (0.78, 1.34).

CONCLUSION

Bi-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters of netilmicin have been estimated from clinical data in urological surgery patients using a population approach. A given single dose results in large variability in plasma concentrations and thus the population covariate final model can be used for direct estimation of initial dosing in patients.

Comparison of local povidone-iodine antisepsis with parenteral antibacterial prophylaxis for prevention of infective complications of TURP: a prospective randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether antisepsis with povidone-iodine solution applied at the external urethral meatus confers protection against infective complications following transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and compare that with antibacterial prophylaxis.

METHODS

A total of 167 patients with sterile urine undergoing TURP for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were prospectively randomized into three groups. Group A, had gauze soaked in saline applied at the urethral meatus (control group). In group B, the gauze was soaked in povidone-iodine instead of saline and group C had a single 1 g i.v. injection of cephradine at induction of anaesthesia with no treatment for the meatus. Bacteraemia, post-operative bacteriuria and other infective complications were compared in the three groups. Associations of bacteriuria at catheter removal and intra-operative bacteraemia with infective complications and with long term bacteriuria were also studied.

RESULTS

Bacteriuria rate at catheter removal was not significantly different in the three groups. However, intraoperative bacteraemia and bacterial growth at the external urethral meatus was significantly lower in group C. Bacteriuria at catheter removal was significantly associated with bacterial growth at the meatus but not with long term bacteriuria at 3 months. Bacteriuria at catheter removal could not accurately predict infective complications.

CONCLUSION

Post-TURP bacteriuria appears to be preceded by bacterial growth at the external urethral meatus. Antisepsis with povidone-iodine solution application at the meatus does not confer adequate protection against meatal bacterial growth as that obtained by prophylactic antibacterials. Nonetheless, neither antibacterial prophylaxis nor local antisepsis could reduce bacteriuria rate in this study.

Day-case ureteroscopy: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome after day-case ureteroscopy (used in diagnosing and managing ureteric disease, primarily urolithiasis), as awareness of reduced resources has resulted in increasing pressure to undertake procedures in a day-surgery setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients presenting to the unit and requiring ureteroscopy between May 1995 and May 2000 were considered for a day-surgery procedure. The assessment of suitability comprised anaesthetic and social factors; no urological criteria precluded a day-surgery procedure. Outcomes after day-case ureteroscopy, including immediate or delayed admissions and subsequent inpatient management, were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Sixty-three day-case ureteroscopies were performed on 56 patients (mean age 47 years, range 19-78); eight procedures were diagnostic. Therapeutic ureteroscopies included one balloon dilatation of a ureteric stricture and 54 procedures for urolithiasis, with 98% stone clearance. Most patients were discharged with a JJ stent in situ. Of nine patients requiring immediate admission, seven were for pain control; eight were discharged on the following day. Seven patients required delayed admission 1-13 days after the procedure, three for stent-related symptoms and three for infection. No significant predictors of immediate or delayed admission were identified, although antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with a reduced admission rate.

CONCLUSION

Ureteroscopy can be used successfully as a planned day-case procedure in a dedicated day-surgery unit, with few patients requiring hospitalization. Implementation of analgesia protocols and routine antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce admission after day-case ureteroscopy.

Urothelial mucosal concentration of levofloxacin administered before transurethral resection: Is the mucosal concentration predictable?

BACKGROUND

Although it is an established surgical technique, transurethral resection (TUR) is associated with a certain incidence of postoperative bacteriuria. Assessment was made whether the urothelial mucosal concentration of an antibiotic administered before TUR was high enough to decrease the incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI). Also investigated were factors predicting the organ concentration.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients (45 men and four women aged 51-79 years with a median age of 70 years) who underwent TUR between August 1996 and September 1997 were enrolled in the study. Each patient received 200 mg of levofloxacin (LVFX) about two hours before surgery. Blood and bladder urine were collected and urothelial mucosa was harvested at the time of TUR. Then the LVFX concentration in these samples was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. The association between drug levels, or the ratio to the serum concentration, and factors likely to affect the vascular system that delivers the drug (age, bodyweight, blood pressure, pulse rate, total cholesterol and diabetes mellitus) were investigated.

RESULTS

The mean serum drug level was 2.4 microg/mL, and it was 206.4 microg/mL in the urine and 5.7 microg/mL in the urothelial mucosa. The mean ratio of the mucosal to serum concentrations was 2.6. The urinary drug concentration showed no association with any of the factors assessed, while the serum concentration decreased with increasing bodyweight (P = 0.03). As the diastolic blood pressure increased, both the mucosal drug concentration and the mucosa/serum ratio decreased (P < 0.01). When the relationship between the serum and mucosal concentrations was investigated, no correlation was found. However, the mucosa/serum ratio (indicating the transfer of LVFX from the blood) was positively correlated with the mucosal concentration.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative administration of LVFX was demonstrated to have potential value for the prophylaxis of UTI after TUR. Both the mucosal concentration and the mucosa/serum ratio were correlated with the diastolic blood pressure. As the diastolic blood pressure seems to be an indicator of the tissue concentration of LVFX, it may be possible to set the optimum dose based on the diastolic pressure.

Do antimicrobials have a role in preventing septicaemia following instrumentation of the urinary tract?

Urinary tract instrumentation is a significant cause of septicaemia. Review of the literature suggests that selective use of antimicrobials would reduce the risk of septicaemia as this varies between patients and with procedures. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is indicated for patients at high risk of endocarditis, or who are neutropenic. For patients without these risk factors, it is indicated for open, transurethral, or certain forms of laser prostatectomy or trans-rectal prostate biopsy. For cystoscopy, antimicrobials are indicated for patients with preoperative bacteriuria or a preoperative indwelling catheter. Single dose aminoglycosides or oral fluoroquinolones are the agents of choice with the exception of the prevention of endocarditis, where combinations active against streptococci are recommended. For other instrumentations, the risk of antimicrobial toxicity probably outweighs the benefits and a risk-reduction strategy is recommended. Further studies are required to provide definitive answers in many of these areas.

Double-blind randomized comparison of single-dose ciprofloxacin versus intravenous cefazolin in patients undergoing outpatient endourologic surgery

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of single-dose oral ciprofloxacin with intravenous cefazolin as a prophylactic agent in patients undergoing outpatient endourologic surgery.

METHODS

One hundred patients were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized study to receive either ciprofloxacin (500 mg) or cefazolin (1 g) before surgery. A postoperative clinical evaluation and urine cultures were performed 5 to 10 days after surgery. Patients undergoing ureteral stent insertion or exchange, ureteroscopy, bladder biopsy, retrograde pyelography, collagen injection, and internal urethrotomy were included.

RESULTS

Postoperative urinary tract infection occurred in 7 (9.1%) of 77 patients, including 3 (8.1%) of 37 and 4 (10.0%) of 40 of those who received ciprofloxacin and cefazolin, respectively (P = 0.77). There were no episodes of sepsis, and no patient with infection required hospitalization. The total cost associated with the administration of prophylactic antibiotics in the study population was $3657 less in those 50 patients who received ciprofloxacin than in the 50 patients who received cefazolin.

CONCLUSIONS

A single oral dose of ciprofloxacin in patients undergoing outpatient endourologic surgery was equally effective as cefazolin in preventing postoperative urinary tract infection, but was associated with markedly lower overall costs.

Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 139 patients were entered into a prospective randomized trial comparing single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis with no antibiotic before surgery. Twelve patients were excluded because they had significant bacteriuria before surgery (defined as > or = 10(5) bacteria/mL). Of the remaining 127 patients, 62 were allocated to the single-dose group (A) and 65 to the no-antibiotic group (B). All 62 patients in group A received 1 g of ceftriaxone intravenously 1-2 h before surgery with the anaesthetic premedication, the 65 in group B receiving none. Urine cultures were collected post-operatively as the catheter was removed and again 4 weeks after hospitalization.

RESULTS

The incidence of post-operative bacteriuria was statistically significantly different, occurring in five patients (9%) in group A and 16 patients (26%) in group B (Fisher's exact test, one-tail P = 0.009). There was no significant difference between the groups 4 weeks after hospitalization. The overall incidence of bacteriuria post-operatively and 4 weeks after hospitalization was 11 patients (18%) in group A and 22 patients (34%) in group B (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis with 1 g of ceftriaxone intravenously is effective in patients undergoing TURP and is recommended for such surgery.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevention of urinary tract infections (UTIs) after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a prospective randomized study using a quinolone antibiotic (fleroxacin) to compare the efficacy of: (1) a single oral dose, (2) a single intravenous (IV) dose, and (3) an extended regimen consisting of an initial IV dose followed by oral therapy until removal of the urinary catheter, but for less than 6 days.

METHODS

We excluded from study patients who received antimicrobial agents within 48 hours of surgery. Single-dose prophylaxis consisted of 400 mg of fleroxacin given either orally or intravenously. The extended regimen consisted of an initial 400 mg IV dose followed by 400 mg oral each day (patients older than 75 years, or with a creatinine clearance less than 40 mL/min, received 200 mg/day). UTI was defined as clinical evidence of infection plus the presence of more than 10 white blood cells (WBC)/mm3 in any urine specimen plus the presence of more than 10(4) cfu/mL in midstream urine specimens or more than 10(2) cfu/mL in catheter specimens.

RESULTS

Prior to TURP, 30% (25/84) of the patients had a urethral catheter in situ and 12% (3/25) of these patients had bacteriuria. Only 1 patient developed a UTI and that was 22 days after a TURP (intergroup comparisons, Fisher's exact test greater than 0.05). There were no instances of urosepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

A single oral dose of a fluoroquinolone agent provided optimum prophylaxis for patients undergoing TURP.

Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis with cefotaxime for prostatic resection: better in the operative period or at urethral catheter removal?

There are two critical moments for the development of severe infectious complications following transurethral prostatectomy (TURP): the operative and immediate postoperative periods, and the day that the postoperative drainage catheter is removed. To optimize the timing of antibiotic prophylaxis with cefotaxime, two prospective randomized studies were conducted in patients with preoperatively sterile urine. In Study 1, all patients (n = 50) received cefotaxime 1 g intramuscular (i.m.) 1 hour preoperatively and were then randomized to receive either a second identical dose of cefotaxime 1 hour before catheter removal 24 hours later, or no further antibiotic treatment. In Study 2, patients (n = 89) were randomized to receive either cefotaxime 1 g i.m. 1 hour preoperatively or no preoperative antibiotic, after which all received cefotaxime 1 g i.m. 1 hour before catheter removal. Results were compared using identical evaluation criteria for infection in both studies: incidence of fever (temperature > 38 degrees C), bacteriuria (10(5) organisms/mL) and positive blood cultures, and duration of hospital stay (days). In Study 1, infection was significantly reduced with respect to all parameters in the group receiving two doses of cefotaxime, and total drug treatment costs were halved. In Study 2, the groups did not differ with respect to any parameter. We conclude that a single dose of cefotaxime 1 g i.m. 1 hour preoperatively provides inadequate cover for urethral catheter removal 24 hours later, and that prophylaxis with a single dose of cefotaxime 1 g i.m. 1 hour before catheter removal is just as effective as two doses given 1 hour preoperatively and 1 hour before catheter removal. Prophylactic coverage is essential during the action of removing the catheter and the time immediately following the operation. Long-term antibiotic coverage (24 hours or more) is not necessary. Thus, following TURP in patients with preoperatively sterile urine undergoing continuous bladder irrigation for 24 hours postoperatively, the optimal dose schedule for antibiotic prophylaxis with cefotaxime is a single 1-g dose given i.m. 1 hour before catheter removal.

Urinary tract infection prophylaxis in transurethral surgery: oral lomefloxacin versus parenteral cefuroxime

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of single-dose oral lomefloxacin and single-dose parenteral cefuroxime for the prevention of urinary tract infection following transurethral surgery. A total of 63 patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized open-label study, which was conducted at two medical centers in France. Patients were randomized to receive either 400 mg of oral lomefloxacin 2-6 hours before surgery or 1.5 g parenteral cefuroxime 30-90 minutes before surgery. Postoperative clinical evaluation was performed daily, and bacteriologic evaluation included urine cultures performed 24 hours after surgery, just before and 1 day after removal of the indwelling catheter, and 3-5 days after surgery. Another urine culture was optionally performed 1-3 months after surgery. Infection was defined as a urinary bacteria count greater than or equal to 10(5) colony-forming units (CFU)/mL of urine. Of the 63 patients enrolled, 54 were evaluable for efficacy, 27 in each group. The success rate of prophylaxis was 88.9% in the lomefloxacin group and 88.5% in the cefuroxime group (p = nonsignificant). None of the 16 lomefloxacin-treated patients who were re-cultured at 1-3 months was found to be infected. Adverse events were minor in both groups. A single oral dose of lomefloxacin was as efficacious and as safe as a single intravenous dose of cefuroxime for prevention of postoperative urinary tract infection in patients undergoing transurethral surgery.

Altered tobramycin pharmacokinetics during chemoprophylaxis in bladder surgery

The effect of bladder surgery on the pharmacokinetics of tobramycin in hospitalized patients was studied. Fourteen patients with vesical neoplasia undergoing urinary tract surgery were given tobramycin in a dose of 2 mg/kg of body weight. Each patient received the dose at the induction of anesthesia, about 1 h before surgical incision. For seven patients, the drug was also administered 3 weeks later when nutritional conditions were normal. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by a two-compartment open model. Except for renal clearance, no significant difference appeared between pharmacokinetic parameters determined from serum data during peri- and postoperative periods. During this work, tobramycin excretion in urine was studied. Twenty-four hours after drug administration, the mean urine tobramycin levels were 25.5 +/- 9.06 and 41.6 +/- 21.5 micrograms/ml after peri- and postoperative administration, respectively; these values were higher than the MICs for most urinary tract pathogens. Seventy-two hours after perioperative administration, the mean value was still elevated (3.54 micrograms/ml), but 72 h after postoperative administration, the urinary tobramycin concentration was not detectable. The percentages of tobramycin recovered unchanged in urine were 54 and 79% after peri- and postoperative administration, respectively. When tobramycin was administered during surgery, a long terminal log-linear phase, with a mean half-life of 25.6 h, was detected. The ratio of renal clearance to total body clearance was 0.52 and 0.79 after peri- and postoperative administration, respectively.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in transurethral resection of the prostate. With special reference to preoperatively sterile urine

The literature on antimicrobial prophylaxis in connection with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is reviewed, and it is concluded that there is no proof of clinically significant beneficial effect of prophylaxis when the urine is sterile preoperatively. Prophylaxis is indicated when bacteriuria or an indwelling urethral catheter is present at the time of operation. Other possible risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus, neurogenic bladder dysfunction, immunosuppression, earlier coronary bypass operation and the presence of prosthetic devices, need further investigation.

Short-term antibiotic prophylaxis in open urologic surgery

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of a single dose of ceftriaxone with a triple dose of gentamicin as prophylactic agents in patients undergoing open urologic surgery. Fifty-two patients were allocated into two groups which were well matched with respect to sex, age and surgical procedure: --24 were given single-dose ceftriaxone (2 g i.v.) at the time of anesthesia (ceftriaxone group); --28 received gentamicin (80 mg i.v.) at the time of anesthesia and two additional doses of the same antibiotic were subsequently administrated every 8 hours (gentamicin group). The incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) was 3.5% in the gentamicin group and 0% in the ceftriaxone group (p = n.s.); postoperative fever (greater than 38 degrees C) occurred in 28.3% and 8.3% in the gentamicin and ceftriaxone groups respectively (p = n.s.). There was no clinical or hematological evidence of drug side effects in any patient. Results of the study show that short-term antibiotic regimens can improve UTI rates after open urologic surgery; moreover a single preoperative dose of ceftriaxone resulted to be as effective as three doses of gentamicin.