Repeat cadaver kidney transplantation using cyclosporine A immunosuppression

Ten-year experience with cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression in recipients of renal allografts

Cyclosporine has been used as primary immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients in our unit for the past decade. The overall clinical experience and long-term effects of the agent are reviewed. There were 461 consecutive recipients of kidney grafts; 379 received grafts from cadaver donors (CAD) and 82 from living related donors (LRD). Four separate clinical protocols were used sequentially using progressively decreasing doses of CyA; azathioprine was added in group 4 recipients of LRD grafts, and in patients receiving secondary CAD grafts (group 5). The patient mortality rate was less than 5%, with sepsis being the prime contributor. The majority of kidney grafts were lost within the first 2 months after operation; those that never functioned were found almost invariably to have been irreversibly rejected. During the subsequent years of follow-up, attrition of CAD grafts was significantly greater than LRD grafts. In contrast, the attrition rate of primary and secondary CAD grafts was the same after the first 3 months, emphasizing the importance of early immunologic graft destruction. Primary nonfunction occurred in 49% of CAD kidneys and 17% of LRD grafts; however 71% of initially nonfunctioning LRD grafts never functioned at all compared to 34% of CAD grafts, the majority of such organs undergoing fulminate rejection. Individual graft loss after 1 year was almost inevitably due to chronic rejection; there were no differences in long-term allograft function among the treatment groups. Although CyA has improved overall results of kidney transplantation, chronic rejection remains a major unresolved problem.

The effect of cyclosporine on the use of hospital resources for kidney transplantation

Over the past decade the clinical results of kidney transplantation have improved substantially, with much of the benefit being attributed to the introduction in late 1983 of the immunosuppressive drug cyclosporine. To assess the effect of cyclosporine on the use of hospital services, we studied 702 patients who received kidney transplants at the University of California, San Francisco, between July 1982 and June 1986. All services were priced in constant 1985 dollars, and multiple regression analysis was used to adjust for changing patient and hospital characteristics. The introduction of cyclosporine for patients receiving kidneys from cadavers was associated with a significantly shorter adjusted mean postoperative stay (26.4 days as compared with 37.0 for patients not taking the drug; P less than 0.0001) and lower adjusted mean hospital charges ($28,649 as compared with $37,895; P less than 0.0001), although cyclosporine was not associated with changes in the use of services by patients who received transplants from living related donors. Cyclosporine was also associated with a reduction in the use of certain ancillary services, such as laboratory tests and radiographic procedures. In patients without diabetes who received cadaver kidneys, a sequential cyclosporine regimen (in which a combination of antilymphoblast globulin, prednisone, and azathioprine was given before cyclosporine) reduced the use of hospital services even more than did a cyclosporine regimen in which the combination was not given. The results suggest that new medications, such as cyclosporine, that reduce the frequency of complications and improve outcomes may also reduce the use of hospital resources.

Recent results of cadaver kidney retransplantation

The results of secondary cadaver renal transplantation in 42 patients treated from 1980 to 1986 have been reviewed. The initial graft was from a cadaver donor in all cases. All patients were managed with a maintenance immunosuppressive regimen, including either antilymphoblast globulin and/or cyclosporine. The over-all 1 and 2-year patient survival rates were 97 and 94 per cent, respectively. The over-all 1 and 2-year graft survival rates were 69 and 63 per cent, respectively. Graft success was not influenced by patient age greater than 50 years, diabetes, initial graft removal, interval between initial graft removal and retransplantation, duration of initial graft function, level of presensitization or HLA-Dr antigen matching. Currently, cadaver renal retransplantation can be performed safely and with an improved opportunity for graft success. Patients who return to dialysis after losing an allograft should be encouraged to consider another transplant for the same reasons that prompted initial transplantation.