Growth of human renal carcinoma in soft agar colony formation assays measured by computer-assisted volume analysis

The determination of growth rates of individual colonies in agarose using high-resolution automated image analysis

This paper describes the evaluation of a colony formation assay using automated image analysis, which permits the tracking of growth at the individual colony level, such that a growth rate can be estimated for each colony followed. In principle, this will permit quantitative characterization of cellular heterogeneity in growth rate and cellular heterogeneity in response to proliferation-modifying agents. In addition, we have demonstrated the possibility of using correlative microscopy to relate growth rate to other parameters, using metabolic viability as an example. This should be useful for determining cellular characteristics associated with proliferative behavior and response to proliferation-modifying agents.

Soft agarose colony formation assay for human renal cell carcinoma: comparison of optical colony counting versus tritiated thymidine incorporation

Use of the Hamburger-Salmon soft agar assay method for in vitro chemotherapy sensitivity testing of samples of renal cell carcinoma has been somewhat limited by a relatively low proliferation/evaluability rate for this tumor type (approximately 50%). The tritiated thymidine ([ 3H]-TdR) incorporation assay method of Tanigawa et al. (Cancer Res., 42: 2159, 1982) was compared to a standard optical colony counting assay technique. Fifty-seven different primary and five metastatic fresh samples of human renal cell carcinoma were studied. Evaluability rate by the [3H]-TdR assay was 90% (greater than or equal to 300 cpm control). In comparison, evaluability rate by optical colony counting was 43% for this group of tumors. [3H]-TdR incorporation increased with increasing tumor grade and increasing stage. Spindle cell tumors showed significantly higher cpm than other cell types. Twenty-three primary tumors were evaluable by both [3H]-TdR and colony counting methods. The correlation coefficient ("r") for regression lines for drug sensitivity data points (optical counting vs. [3H]-TdR) of these individual experiments ranged from 0.50 to 0.99 with a mean r +/- S.D. of 0.76 +/- 0.15. For all 260 paired drug response observations of 23 tumors exposed to different drugs, the correlation was very good with r = 0.71. Since the [3H]-TdR assay has an evaluability rate of approximately 90% for renal cell carcinoma, gives drug sensitivity information which correlates well with the colony counting endpoint and yields chemotherapy sensitivity information four days after sample accession, the [3H]-TdR assay may be a more useful method for study of human renal cell carcinoma in vitro chemotherapy sensitivity testing than standard colony counting techniques.