Synergistic antiallergic activity of combined histamine H1- and cysteinyl leukotriene1-receptor blockade in human bronchus

Monensin inhibits mast cell mediated airway contractions in human and guinea pig asthma models

Asthma is a common respiratory disease associated with airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), airway inflammation and mast cell (MC) accumulation in the lung. Monensin, an ionophoric antibiotic, has been shown to induce apoptosis of human MCs. The aim of this study was to define the effect of monensin on MC responses, e.g., antigen induced bronchoconstriction, and on asthmatic features in models of allergic asthma. Tracheal segments from house dust mite (HDM) extract sensitized guinea pigs were isolated and exposed to monensin, followed by histological staining to quantify MCs. Both guinea pig tracheal and human bronchi were used for pharmacological studies in tissue bath systems to investigate the monensin effect on tissue viability and antigen induced bronchoconstriction. Further, an HDM-induced guinea pig asthma model was utilized to investigate the effect of monensin on AHR and airway inflammation. Monensin decreased MC number, caused MC death, and blocked the HDM or anti-IgE induced bronchoconstriction in guinea pig and human airways. In the guinea pig asthma model, HDM-induced AHR, airway inflammation and MC hyperplasia could be inhibited by repeated administration of monensin. This study indicates that monensin is an effective tool to reduce MC number and MCs are crucial for the development of asthma-like features.

The role of antihistamines in asthma management

Histamine is an important mediator in airway inflammation. It is elevated in the airways of asthmatic patients and is responsible for many of the pathophysiological features in asthma. Antihistamines block the actions of histamine and also have effects on inflammation which is independent of histamine-H(1)-receptor antagonism. Antihistamines have been shown to have bronchodilatory effects, effects on allergen-, exercise-, and adenosine-monophosphate-challenge testing, and also to prevent allergen-induced nonspecific airways hyperresponsiveness. Clinical studies have shown mixed results, and some studies have reported beneficial effects of azelastine, cetirizine, desloratadine, and fexofenadine on asthma symptoms or physiological measures in patients with asthma. The combination of an antihistamine and a leukotriene receptor antagonist has been shown to have additive effects in certain studies. Antihistamines have also been shown to delay or prevent the development of asthma in a subgroup of atopic children. These data suggest that antihistamines may have beneficial effects in the management of asthma.

Human Lung Mast Cell Products Regulate Airway Smooth Muscle CXCL10 Levels

In asthma, the airway smooth muscle (ASM) produces CXCL10 which may attract CXCR3⁺ mast/T cells to it. Our aim was to investigate the effects of mast cell products on ASM cell CXCL10 production. ASM cells from people with and without asthma were stimulated with IL-1β, TNF-α, and/or IFNγ and treated with histamine (1–100 μM) ± chlorpheniramine (H1R antagonist; 1 μM) or ranitidine (H2R antagonist; 50 μM) or tryptase (1 nM) ± leupeptin (serine protease inhibitor; 50 μM), heat-inactivated tryptase, or vehicle for 4 h or 24 h. Human lung mast cells (MC) were isolated and activated with IgE/anti-IgE and supernatants were collected after 2 h or 24 h. The supernatants were added to ASM cells for 48 h and ASM cell CXCL10 production detected using ELISA (protein) and real-time PCR (mRNA). Histamine reduced IL-1β/TNF-α-induced CXCL10 protein, but not mRNA, levels independent of H1 and H2 receptor activation, whereas tryptase and MC 2 h supernatants reduced all cytokine-induced CXCL10. Tryptase also reduced CXCL10 levels in a cell-free system. Leupeptin inhibited the effects of tryptase and MC 2 h supernatants. MC 24 h supernatants contained TNF-α and amplified IFNγ-induced ASM cell CXCL10 production. This is the first evidence that MC can regulate ASM cell CXCL10 production and its degradation. Thus MC may regulate airway myositis in asthma.

Should antihistamines be re-considered as antiasthmatic drugs as adjuvants to anti-leukotrienes?

In spite of histamine mimicking the symptoms of allergic bronchoconstriction and severe anaphylaxis, histamine antagonists most probably represent no effective treatment for these conditions. Anti-leukotrienes proved effective for preventing attacks of allergic asthma. In vitro evidence supports a supra-additive effect of histamine H1 receptor antagonists and anti-leukotrienes in vitro, in asthma models utilizing human bronchi. The same seems to hold true for human allergen provocation tests in vivo. We conclude that combinations of second-generation antihistamines and anti-leukotrienes deserve a large-scale clinical trial for preventing and/or treating attacks of allergic asthma. If useful, these drugs could provide a cost-effective alternative to some recent antiasthmatics. Given that redundant mechanisms may be included in asthma pathophysiology, other combinations (including thromboxane or platelet activating factor antagonists) could also be considered.

Effect of combined montelukast and desloratadine on the early asthmatic response to inhaled allergen

BACKGROUND

The early asthmatic response (EAR) to inhaled allergen results from IgE-mediated release of multiple mast-cell mediators, including leukotrienes and histamine, both of which cause bronchoconstriction. Combination therapy directed at blocking the effects of both mediators might protect against the EAR better than either therapy alone.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the effect of desloratadine and montelukast, administered alone and in combination, on the EAR to inhaled allergen.

METHODS

Ten adults with mild-to-moderate atopic asthma participated in a randomized, 4-way crossover study design comparing placebo, 5 mg of desloratadine, 10 mg of montelukast, and the combination administered at 26 hours and 2 hours before each allergen challenge conducted at least 7 days apart. The primary end point was the concentration of allergen that resulted in a 20% decrease in FEV1 (PC20).

RESULTS

The geometric mean allergen PC20 (mean log +/- SEM) for combination therapy, montelukast, desloratadine, and placebo was 697 U/mL (2.8433 +/- 0.3253), 338 U/mL (2.5295 +/- 0.2979), 123 U/mL (2.0883 +/- 0.2102), and 104 U/mL (2.0166 +/- 0.2553), respectively (n = 9; P < .00001, ANOVA). Montelukast increased the allergen PC20 4.8-fold, and combination therapy increased the allergen PC20 8.9-fold. The effect of the combination was greater than that with montelukast alone (P < .02). Desloratadine treatment was no different than placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The early response to inhaled allergen was unchanged after desloratadine therapy and partially inhibited with montelukast therapy. The combination of desloratadine and montelukast provided superior efficacy to either blocker administered alone. Investigations into the possible mechanisms of the enhanced inhibition are necessary.

Evaluation of the efficacy of antihistamines using human monocyte-derived dendritic cells stimulated with histamine

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that histamine induces CD86 expression and chemokine production in human immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MoDCs), which can be blocked by both H(1)- and H(2)-receptor antagonists.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine whether the efficacy of H(1)-type antihistamines can be assessed by using MoDCs.

METHODS

We examined the suppressive effects of 1 H(2)-type antihistamine (cimetidine) and 5 different H(1)-type antihistamines (cetirizine, diphenhydramine, ketotifen, olopatadine, and emedastine) on the induction of CD86 and IL-8 production by MoDCs from 23 healthy individuals stimulated with histamine. We also examined the responses of MoDCs from 13 patients with chronic urticaria to these antihistamines, and compared the in vitro efficacy with the actual clinical response to antihistamines evaluated by patient and physician assessments.

RESULTS

All the antihistamines we examined suppressed the increase of CD86(+) cells after histamine stimulation in a dose-dependent fashion, and all H(1)-type antihistamines were more efficacious than cimetidine. IL-8 production stimulated with histamine was also suppressed by cetirizine, ketotifen, and olopatadine. Unexpectedly, the suppressive effect of these antihistamines on the CD86 augmentation was highly variable among different healthy control participants. Interestingly, in 10 of 13 cases of chronic urticaria, this in vitro analysis of antihistamines correlated with the clinical response to antihistamines.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the evaluation of antihistamines using MoDCs can be a useful method for the screening of effective antihistamines, for the comparison of the efficacy of antihistamines, and for predicting the efficacy of antihistamines on an individual basis.

Cysteinyl leukotriene-dependent [Ca2+]i responses to angiotensin II in cardiomyocytes

With the use of fura 2 measurements in multiple and single cells, we examined whether cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLT) mediate angiotensin II (ANG II)-evoked increases in cytosolic free Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. ANG II-evoked CysLT release peaked at 1 min. The angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) antagonist losartan, but not the AT(2) antagonist PD-123319, attenuated the elevations in [Ca(2+)](i) and CysLT levels evoked by ANG II. Vasopressin and endothelin-1 increased [Ca(2+)](i) but not CysLT levels. The 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) inhibitor AA-861 and the CysLT(1)-selective antagonist MK-571 reduced the maximal [Ca(2+)](i) responses to ANG II but not to vasopressin and endothelin-1. While MK-571 reduced the responses to leukotriene D(4) (LTD(4)), the dual CysLT antagonist BAY-u9773 completely blocked the [Ca(2+)](i) elevation to both LTD(4) and LTC(4). These data confirm that ANG II-evoked increases, but not vasopressin- and endothelin-1-evoked increases, in [Ca(2+)](i) involve generation of the 5-lipoxygenase metabolite CysLT. The inositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate [Ins(1,4,5)P(3)] antagonist 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate attenuated the [Ca(2+)](i) responses to ANG II and LTD(4). Thus AT(1) receptor activation by ANG II is linked to CysLT-mediated Ca(2+) release from Ins(1,4,5)P(3)-sensitive intracellular stores to augment direct ANG II-evoked Ca(2+) mobilization in rat cardiomyocytes.

Leukotriene modifiers

Leukotrienes (LTs) are 5-lipoxygenase products formed from arachidonic acid metabolism. There is compelling evidence that LTs play an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma. LTs affect vascular permeability, mucus production, and smooth muscle constriction, and may contribute to airway remodeling. In mild-to-moderate asthma, LT modifiers improve measures of airflow limitation and quality of life and reduce the frequency of asthma exacerbations and the need for short-acting bronchodilator therapy. In moderate-to-severe asthma, an LT modifier in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid results in improvements in lung function and asthma control over that achieved with an inhaled corticosteroid alone. LT modifiers are effective in the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and aspirin-induced asthma. There are few adverse effects of LT modifiers.

Are antihistamines useful in managing asthma?

There continues to be a great deal of interest in the anti-asthmatic role of antihistamines. Antihistamines have recently been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties that are more extensive than simply the blocking of histamine receptors. For example, new evidence suggests that the suppression of cell adhesion molecule expression occurs with these drugs. The anti-inflammatory and anti-asthmatic effects of antihistamines have been evaluated in patients with both allergic asthma and rhinitis, given the established association between allergic inflammation of the upper and lower airways, with evidence to suggest that antihistamines have clinically relevant anti-asthmatic properties. As well as conferring benefits in asthma symptom control and the measurement of lung function, studies assessing the effect of histamine receptor antagonists on bronchial hyperresponsiveness suggest that there is bronchoprotection during both methacholine and mannitol challenges. Recently, there has also been considerable interest in the effect of combining an antihistamine with a leukotriene receptor antagonist. This combination has an anti-asthmatic effect that is greater than that of either drug given alone and may be comparable to inhaled corticosteroid therapy.