In vitro regulation of corticotropin-releasing hormone

Hypothalamic and amygdalar cell lines differ markedly in mitochondrial rather than nuclear encoded gene expression

Background

Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) plays an important role in regulating the mammalian stress response. Two of the most extensively studied neuronal populations that express CRH are in the hypothalamus and amygdala. Both regions are involved in the stress response, but the amygdala is also involved in mediating response to fear and anxiety. Given that both hypothalamus and amygdala have overlapping functions, but their CRH-expressing neurons may respond differently to a given perturbation, we sought to identify differentially expressed genes between two neuronal cell types, amygdalar AR-5 and hypothalamic IVB cells. Thus, we performed a microarray analysis. Our hypothesis was that we would identify differentially expressed transcription factors, coregulators and chromatin-modifying enzymes.

Results

A total of 31,042 genes were analyzed, 10,572 of which were consistently expressed in both cell lines at a 95% confidence level. Of the 10,572 genes, 2,320 genes in AR-5 were expressed at ≥ 2-fold relative to IVBs, 1,104 genes were expressed at ≥2-fold in IVB relative to AR-5 and 7,148 genes were expressed at similar levels between the two cell lines. The greatest difference was in six mitochondrial DNA-encoded genes, which were highly abundant in AR-5 relative to IVB cells. The relative abundance of these genes ranged from 413 to 885-fold according to the microarray results. Differential expression of these genes was verified by RTqPCR. The differentially expressed mitochondrial genes were cytochrome b (MT-CYB), cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 and 2 (MT-CO1 and MT-CO2) and NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 1, 2, and 3 (MT-ND1, MT-ND2, MT-ND3).

Conclusion

As expected, the array revealed differential expression of transcription factors and coregulators; however the greatest difference between the two cell lines was in genes encoded by the mitochondrial genome. These genes were abundant in AR-5 relative to IVBs. At present, the reason for the marked difference is unclear. The cells may differ in mtDNA copy number, number of mitochondria, or regulation of the mitochondrial genome. The specific functions served by having such different levels of mitochondrial expression have not been determined. It is possible that the greater expression of the mitochondrial genes in the amygdalar cells reflects higher energy requirements than in the hypothalamic cell line.

Stressors, glucocorticoids and ovarian function in teleosts

The purpose of this overview is to re-examine the postulated direct and indirect actions of glucocorticoids on ovarian function in teleosts. The re-examination is undertaken in light of recent advances in the understanding of the stress response itself, the mode of action of the hypothalamus-pituitary gland-ovarian (HPO) axis, the mechanisms of control of oestrogen-dependent hepatic vitellogenin (VtG) secretion and the apparent roles of corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) and CRH-related factors in the regulation of feeding activity. Many of the results of different studies, particularly whole-animal studies, are conflicting, and little is known as to whether the hormone acts directly on various components of the HPO axis or indirectly by virtue of redirection of energy resources away from ovarian growth to provide a source of metabolic resources for other organ systems involved in the physiological stress response. In vitro studies provide some new insights into the direct actions of glucocorticoid on hepatic VtG synthesis and ovarian follicle steroidogenesis, but even here, in some studies the cellular sites of action of these hormones is not altogether clear. The overview emphasizes the complexity of the stress response, the complexity of the regulation of glucocorticoid-dependent gene expression and the extensive interactive nature of the HPO with other hypothalamus-pituitary gland-peripheral endocrine gland axes, such as the thyroid (HPT), 'somatic' (GH-IGF) and interrenal tissue (HPI) axes.

Effects of olanzapine and quetiapine on corticotropin-releasing hormone release in the rat brain

An altered regulation of the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) system in the CNS is consistently associated with anxiety and depression; several drugs used to treat CNS disorders modulate--usually in a negative manner--CRH turnover in the brain, and it can be postulated that their effectiveness may be at least in part related to their effects on CRH. This study was aimed to investigate the effects of two atypical antipsychotics also employed in the treatment of bipolar disorders, i.e. quetiapine (QTP) and olanzapine (OLZ), on CRH release from isolated rat brain regions. Acute rat hypothalamic and hippocampal explants were exposed for 1 h to plain medium or medium containing the test drugs, either under baseline conditions or after stimulation of CRH release by veratridine or 56 mM KCl. CRH immunoreactivity present in the incubation medium and in the tissues was assessed by radioimmunoassay. QTP 10 microM but not OLZ inhibited baseline CRH secretion from the hypothalamus; neither drug affected basal CRH release from the hippocampus. Both QTP and OLZ, 1 and 10 microM, inhibited veratridine- or K(+)-stimulated CRH release from the hypothalamus, whereas OLZ only, when given at 10 microM, was able to inhibit stimulated CRH release from the hippocampus. In conclusion, two widely used atypical antipsychotics, QTP and OLZ are able to acutely reduce the release of CRH from isolated rat hypothalami and hippocampi.

Involvement of regulatory elements on corticotropin-releasing factor gene promoter in hypothalamic 4B cells

INTRODUCTION

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) plays a central role in controlling the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis during stressful periods. CRF is synthesized and secreted in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) in response to stress, and stimulates ACTH in the pituitary corticotrophs. ACTH stimulates the release of glucocorticoids from the adrenal glands, and glucocorticoids sequentially inhibit hypothalamic PVN production of CRF and pituitary production of ACTH. The effects of glucocorticoids on CRF gene regulation, however, are possibly tissue-specific since glucocorticoids stimulate CRF gene expression in the placenta and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, while they inhibit it in the hypothalamus.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a hypothalamic cell line, 4B, we found that forskolin-stimulated CRF gene transcription was mediated by a functional cAMP-response element (CRE), which included -220 to -233 bp on the CRF 5'-promoter region. Protein kinase A, protein kinase C, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways contributed to forskolin-induced transcriptional activity of CRF in hypothalamic 4B cells. Glucocorticoid-dependent repression of cAMP-stimulated transcriptional activity of CRF was localized to promoter sequences between -278 and -233 bp, which included a glucocorticoid regulatory element and a serum response element.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, these findings indicate that the regulatory elements, including CRE, negative glucocorticoid regulatory element, and a serum response element on the promoter, contribute to the regulation of CRF gene transcription in hypothalamic 4B cells.

Effects of estradiol on regulation of corticotropin-releasing factor gene and interleukin-6 production via estrogen receptor type beta in hypothalamic 4B cells

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is produced in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) in response to stress and stimulates the release of adrenocorticotropic hormone in the corticotrophs. Estrogens acting centrally are able to modulate the stress responses. In fact, direct estrogenic regulation of CRF gene expression has been demonstrated in various tissues. However, the mechanisms responsible for the actions of estrogens on CRF regulation in the PVN remain undetermined. We investigated whether estradiol (E2) contributes to the regulation of CRF gene and promoter activity in hypothalamic 4B cells. Furthermore, the involvement of E2 in the regulation of interleukin (IL)-6 and its role in hypothalamic 4B cells was explored. We demonstrated the dominant expression of estrogen receptor type beta (ERbeta) and found that a physiologically relevant dose of E2 and an ERbeta agonist stimulated CRF gene transcription in hypothalamic 4B cells. E2 stimulated IL-6 transcriptional activity via ERbeta, and subsequently the levels of IL-6 mRNA and protein. We also found that treatment with IL-6 significantly reduced cell viability. Thus, these data suggest the important effects of E2 on the regulation of CRF gene and IL-6 production via ERbeta in hypothalamic 4B cells.

Structural and functional conservation of vertebrate corticotropin-releasing factor genes: evidence for a critical role for a conserved cyclic AMP response element

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) plays a central role in neuroendocrine, autonomic, immune, and behavioral responses to stressors. We analyzed the proximal promoters of two Xenopus laevis CRF genes and found them to be remarkably conserved with mammalian CRF genes. We found several conserved cis elements in the frog CRF genes including a cAMP response element (CRE), activator protein 1 binding sites, and glucocorticoid response elements. Exposure to a physical stressor caused a rapid elevation in phosphorylated CRE binding protein (CREB; 20 min) and CRF (1 h) in the anterior preoptic area of juvenile frogs. CREB bound to the putative frog CREs in vitro, which was disrupted by point mutations introduced into the CRE. The frog proximal CRF promoters supported basal transcription in transfection assays, and forskolin caused robust transcriptional activation. Mutagenesis of the CRE or overexpression of a dominant-negative CREB reduced forskolin-induced promoter activation. Using electroporation-mediated gene transfer in tadpole brain, we show that the proximal CRF promoters support cAMP or stressor-dependent transcription in vivo, which was abolished by mutation of the CRE. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, we found that CREB associated with the proximal frog CRF promoter in vivo in a stressor-dependent manner. These data provide strong support for the hypothesis that stressor-induced CRF gene activation in vivo depends on CREB binding to the CRE in the promoter. Our findings show that the basic regulatory elements of the CRF gene responsible for stressor-induced activation arose early in vertebrate evolution and have been maintained by strong positive selection.

Effect of ethanol on the regulation of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) gene expression

Ethanol stimulates hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity in vivo. To determine the cellular and molecular mechanisms through which ethanol regulates corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) gene expression, we compared the effect of ethanol and forskolin on CRF peptide secretion and messenger RNA levels in hypothalamic primary cell cultures, and on CRF promoter activity in the NG108-15 cell line. CRF secretion, mRNA levels, and gene transcription significantly increased in response to ethanol or forskolin. Mutation of the cAMP-response element (CRE) reduced luciferase activity under basal conditions as well as in response to forskolin or ethanol. On the other hand, plasmid with five CRE repeats yielded dramatically elevated basal luciferase activity and significantly increased upregulation by ethanol. Inclusion of adenosine deaminase reduced the promoter response to ethanol. Finally a PKA inhibitor and a cAMP antagonist both decreased ethanol-induced CRF peptide secretion, gene expression, and transcription. These results suggest that ethanol upregulates CRF expression through cAMP/PKA-dependent pathways.